Search

Aims: As necroptosis involving receptor‐interacting protein kinase 3 (RIP3) and dynamin‐related protein 1 (Drp1)‐mediated signalling is a crucial mechanism of cell loss in heart failure (HF), we aimed to determine the potential diagnostic use of these molecules. Methods and results: The serum samples of the healthy subjects (n = 8) and patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (n = 31), being subdivided according to the aetiology and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, were used to measure RIP3 and Drp1 levels by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Although the serum levels of Drp1 in the patients with HF were comparable with those seen in healthy individuals, we found a trend of increase in the levels of RIP3 (P = 0.0697) in the diseased group. These changes were unlikely dependent on the HF aetiology or NYHA class. The circulating RIP3 correlated with neither the main parameters assessing cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter, and N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide) nor the marker of inflammation (C‐reactive protein). Conclusions: In this pilot study, findings on serum RIP3 supported the importance of necroptosis in HF pathomechanisms. The potential diagnostic use of circulating RIP3, unlike Drp1, as an additional biomarker of HF has also been indicated; however, further large studies are needed to prove this concept. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients after the first manifestation of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has currently been observed more frequently than it was years ago. This appears to be due to the early initiation of comprehensive HF therapy. According to these observations, a new HF syndrome category, heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF), was introduced. In this short review, we present definitions of reverse remodelling, myocardial remission, and myocardial recovery. We provide an overview of clinical research aimed at evaluating reverse remodelling in different populations of patients with HFrEF. Clinical and imaging characteristics and biomarkers identified as predictors of reverse remodelling and improvement of the LVEF are discussed. We also briefly address the current views on the management of patients with HFimpEF. In-depth study and knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying the reverse remodelling process may lead to the identification of new individualized therapeutic approaches for HFrEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]