Search

Background & Aims: Clinical guidelines do not recommend long-term anticoagulation in non-cirrhotic splanchnic vein thrombosis (NC-SVT) without underlying thrombophilia because it is assumed that there is a very low risk of recurrent thrombosis (RT). Our first aim was to describe the incidence of RT in people with NC-SVT without an indication for long-term anticoagulation. The second aim was to identify RT risk factors and afterwards verify them in a validation cohort., Methods: This is a multicentre, retrospective observational study evaluating risk factors for RT in 64 people with NC-SVT of idiopathic/local factor aetiology. In a subgroup of 48 individuals, the potential value of additional thrombophilic parameters to predict RT was analysed. Findings were validated in 70 individuals with idiopathic/local factor NC-SVT., Results: Of the 64 participants in the training cohort, 17 (26%) presented splanchnic and/or extrasplanchnic RT (overall-RT) during follow-up (cumulative incidence: 2, 10, 19, and 34% at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years, respectively). In addition, 53% of people with splanchnic RT were asymptomatic. No clinical or biochemical parameters predicted overall-RT. However, in the 48 people with an additional comprehensive thrombophilic study, factor VIII ≥150% was the only independent factor predicting overall-RT (hazard ratio 7.10, 95% CI 2.17-23.17, p <0.01). In the validation cohort, 19 individuals (27%) presented overall-RT, and it was also independently predicted by factor VIII >150% (hazard ratio 3.71, 95% CI 1.31-10.5, p <0.01). The predictive value of factor VIII was confirmed in both people with idiopathic/local factor aetiology associated NC-SVT., Conclusions: People with idiopathic/local factor NC-SVT are at risk of overall-RT. Splanchnic RT can be asymptomatic and requires screening for its detection. Values of factor VIII ≥150% may help identify individuals at high risk of overall-RT who could benefit from long-term anticoagulation., Impact and Implications: People with idiopathic/isolated local factor non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis were previously thought to be at minimal risk of re-thrombosis and therefore did not receive scheduled follow-up. The results of this study are of special interest for hepatologists treating people with non-cirrhotic splanchnic thrombosis, as they show a 25% incidence of re-thrombosis and support the close follow-up of people with factor VIII >150% to ensure the early identification of new thrombotic events., (Copyright © 2022 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occurs in approximately 2%-26% of the patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) and is no longer an absolute contraindication for LT. Nearly half of PVT cases are accidentally found during the LT procedure. The most important risk factor for PVT development in cirrhosis may be the severity of liver disease and reduced portal blood flow. Whether other inherited or acquired coagulation disorders also play a role is not yet clear. The development of PVT may have no effect on the liver disease progression, especially when it is nonocclusive. PVT may not increase the risk of wait-list mortality, but it is a risk factor for poor early post-LT mortality. Anticoagulation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are 2 major treatment strategies for patients with PVT on the waiting list. The complete recanalization rate after anticoagulation is approximately 40%. The role of TIPS to maintain PV patency for LT as the primary indication has been reported, but the safety and efficacy should be further evaluated. PVT extension and degree may determine the surgical technique to be used during LT. If a "conventional" end-to-end portal anastomotic technique is used, there is not a major impact on post-LT survival. Post-LT PVT can significantly reduce both graft and patient survival after LT and can preclude future options for re-LT., (© 2015 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: Myeloproliferative neoplasms are the most common aetiological cause of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). In these patients, the JAK2V617F mutation has facilitated the diagnosis of an underlying myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Recently, somatic mutations of the calreticulin (CALR) gene have been identified in MPN patients lacking the JAK2 mutation. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether CALR mutations could also play a role in the diagnosis of masked MPN in SVT., Methods: We included 209 patients with SVT (140 with PVT and 69 with Budd-Chiari syndrome) who had a complete aetiological diagnostic work-out. They were investigated for CALR mutations., Results: CALR mutations were found in 4 of the 209 patients (1.9%). They represented 5.4% of patients with an underlying MPN of whom all had already been diagnosed with a MPN using conventional criteria including bone marrow biopsy findings., Conclusions: In the screening of underlying MPNs in patients with SVT, given its high frequency in these disorders, the JAK2 mutation must be evaluated first and, if negative, CALR mutations should also be investigated. This approach would increase the diagnostic yield of masked MPNs by reducing the need for additional studies., (Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Noncirrhotic, nontumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the second most-frequent cause of portal hypertension in the world. General thrombophilic factors can be identified in approximately 60% of patients. PVT may manifest as an acute process. However, the acute episode more frequently is asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic and portal vein thrombosis is misdiagnosed until the development of complications secondary to portal hypertension, such as variceal bleeding or portal biliopathy. Although no randomized controlled trials have been performed, after the diagnosis of acute PVT early initiation of anticoagulation (within 30 days of the onset of symptoms) is recommended to achieve recanalization. In patients with portal cavernoma, anticoagulation is aimed to prevent the progression and recurrence of thrombosis. Because of the lack of data in this specific population, variceal bleeding is managed as in cirrhotic patients. Ursodeoxycholic acid has been proposed empirically for the treatment of patients with symptomatic portal biliopathy. Choledocholithiasis might be present, complicating a bile duct stenosis. Accordingly, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy, extraction with balloon catheter, and stent placement is indicated. Mortality among patients with PVT is low (5-year mortality rate of 5 to 10%) and is mainly related to associated diseases rather than to complications of portal hypertension.