Search

Background: Based on the Khorana score, guidelines recommend anticoagulation for primary prophylaxis (PP) in outpatients with cancer with an intermediate-to-high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). ONKOTEV score has been prospectively externally validated as novel risk assessment model (RAM) with good discriminatory performances but no direct comparisons with Khorana Score are available., Methods: Using the ONKOTEV validation dataset (n = 425), we applied generalized decision curve analysis (gDCA) which integrates the principles of evidence-based medicine with treatment effects, model accuracy and patient preferences (weighted as the relative value [RV] of avoiding VTE versus major bleeding [MB]). The aim is to select the most optimal treatment strategy among multiple options: "no treatment", "treat all patients with DOAC/LMVH", or "use ONKOTEV/KHORANA scores to guide PP with DOAC/LMWH"., Results: Results showed that ONKOTEV-guided PP (using DOAC or LMWH) remained the most optimal strategy for wide range assumption of treatment efficacy and patient's preference. For those patients, who value avoiding VTE more than MB, then offering DOAC to all patients represents the best strategy. When MBs are feared more than the morbidity of VTE, ONKOTEV-guided PP (DOAC) represents the best management strategy. In all cases, ONKOTEV outperformed Khorana for individualized VTE prevention., Conclusions: When the two predictive models are integrated within a decision analysis framework, ONKOTEV appears superior to Khorana Score in guiding individualized prevention of cancer-related VTE in outpatients with cancer. The findings herein reported provide cutting edge insights in cancer care and support the spread of ONKOTEV score in the ambulatory cancer setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: CAC reports personal fees from BMS and Leo Pharma; and a research grant from IPSEN (institutional). BD has no conflict of interest to declare. IH has no conflict of interest to declare. FL received fees for lectures, expert appraisal or consulting services from Amgen GmbH, Astellas Pharma GmbH, AstraZeneca GmbH, Bayer AG, BioNTech SE, Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH & Co. KGaA, Daiichi Sankyo Deutschland GmbH, Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Elsevier GmbH, Falk Foundation e.V., Incyte Inc, Merck KGaA, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Roche Deutschland Holding GbmH, Servier Deutschland GmbH, Springer Nature AG & Co. KGaA, StreamedUp! GmbH; research projects are supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH und Co. KGaA and Gilead Science GmbH. VB has no conflict of interest to declare. SF has no conflict of interest to declare. LG has no conflict of interest to declare. NF received personal fees from AAA, Hutchinson MediPharma, Merck, Novartis; has financial interest with 4SC, Astellas, Beigene, FIBROGEN, Incyte, IPSEN, MSD and NUCANA; and has received research grant form IPSEN (institutional)., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Importance: The assessment of the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among outpatients with cancer represents an unsolved topic. Current international guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis for patients at intermediate to high risk of VTE, indicated by a Khorana score of 2 or more. A previous prospective study developed the ONKOTEV score, a 4-variable risk assessment model (RAM) consisting of a Khorana score of more than 2, metastatic disease, vascular or lymphatic compression, and previous VTE event., Objective: To validate the ONKOTEV score as a novel RAM to assess the risk of VTE among outpatients with cancer., Design, Setting, and Participants: ONKOTEV-2 is a noninterventional prognostic study conducted in 3 European centers located in Italy, Germany, and the United Kingdom among a prospective cohort of 425 ambulatory patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of a solid tumor who were receiving active treatments. The total study duration was 52 months, with an accrual period of 28 months (from May 1, 2015, to September 30, 2017) and an overall follow up-period of 24 months (data were censored September 30, 2019). Statistical analysis was performed in October 2019., Exposures: The ONKOTEV score was calculated for each patient at baseline by collecting clinical, laboratory, and imaging data from tests performed for routine practice. Each patient was then observed to detect any thromboembolic event throughout the study period., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism., Results: A total of 425 patients (242 women [56.9%]; median age, 61 years [range, 20-92 years]) were included in the validation cohort of the study. The cumulative incidences for the risk of developing VTE at 6 months were 2.6% (95% CI, 0.7%-6.9%), 9.1% (95% CI, 5.8%-13.2%), 32.3% (95% CI, 21.0%-44.1%), and 19.3% (95% CI, 2.5%-48.0%), respectively, among 425 patients with an ONKOTEV score of 0, 1, 2, and greater than 2 (P < .001). The time-dependent area under the curve at 3, 6, and 12 months was 70.1% (95% CI, 62.1%-78.7%), 72.9% (95% CI, 65.6%-79.1%), and 72.2% (95% CI, 65.2%-77.3%), respectively., Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that, because the ONKOTEV score has been validated in this independent study population as a novel predictive RAM for cancer-associated thrombosis, it can be adopted into practice and into clinical interventional trials as a decision-making tool for primary prophylaxis.

Background: Cancer immunotherapy is associated with several immune-related adverse events, but the relationship between immunotherapy and venous thromboembolism has not been thoroughly studied., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,686 patients who received immunotherapy for a variety of malignancies to determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism and the impact of venous thromboembolism on survival. To examine the potential role of inflammation in venous thromboembolism, we also profiled immune cells and plasma cytokines in blood samples obtained prior to initiation of immunotherapy in a sub-cohort of patients treated on clinical trials who subsequently did (N = 15), or did not (N = 10) develop venous thromboembolism., Findings: Venous thromboembolism occurred while on immunotherapy in 404/1686 patients (24%) and was associated with decreased overall survival [HR=1.22 (95% CI 1.06-1.41), p<0.008]. Patients that developed venous thromboembolism had significantly higher pretreatment levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (5.382 ± 0.873 vs. 3.341 ± 0.3402, mean ± SEM; p=0.0045), interleukin 8 (221.2 ± 37.53 vs. 111.6 ± 25.36, mean ± SEM; p=0.016), and soluble vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (1210 ± 120.6 vs. 895.5 ± 53.34, mean ± SEM; p=0.0385)., Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that venous thromboembolism is an underappreciated and important immune-related adverse event associated with cancer immunotherapy, and may implicate an interleukin 8 and myeloid-derived suppressor cell-driven pathway in pathogenesis.

Introduction: Thromboembolism (TE) is common in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with worse outcomes. Recent advances in the understanding of NSCLC have led to the identification of molecular subtypes such as anaplastic lymphocyte kinase (ALK) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The association of these subtypes with risk of TE has not been fully explored., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive NSCLC patients seen at the Cleveland Clinic from July 2002 through July 2017 for whom molecular classification and follow-up were available. TE events included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), visceral vein thrombosis (VVT), and arterial events. TE-free survival and overall survival rates for each of the molecular subtypes (wild-type, ALK-mutant, and EGFR-mutant) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the endpoints TE and overall survival. TE was analyzed as a conditional, time-dependent covariate to assess its impact with respect to overall survival., Results: The study population consisted of 461 patients. Approximately half were females (n = 263, 57%) and 58% (n = 270) were older than 65 years. TE occurred in 98 of 461 patients (21.3%) during a median follow-up of 33.1 months. The highest cumulative rates of TE were observed in patients with ALK-mutant NSCLC (N = 20/46, 43.5%) followed by patients with EGFR-mutant cancers (N = 35/165, 21.2%) and wild-type cancers (N = 43/250, 17.2%) P < .05. Cumulative incidence of TE at 6 months of follow-up was 15.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.0%-26.4%) for ALK-mutant cancers, 8.8% (95% CI: 4.4%-13.2%) for EGFR-mutant cancers, and 9.2% (95% CI: 5.4%-12.9%) for wild-type cancers. Patients who experienced TE had worse overall survival (all patients: hazard ratio = 2.8 95% CI 2.1-3.6, P < .001)., Conclusions: Patients with ALK-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma have the highest rate of TE. TE is associated with worse survival across molecular subtypes. These findings should be taken into consideration in decision-making regarding thromboprophylaxis., (© 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) complicates several anticancer regimens including chemotherapy and antiangiogenic agents. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) are a new approach for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Reported VTE rates in randomized trials range from 0.6% to 5%, but these may underestimate actual rates observed in clinical practice., Objectives: Evaluate VTE rate and its association with outcomes in CDKIs patients., Patients/methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive mBC patients who received any of three Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved CDKIs (palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) from January 2015 through December 2017. Venous thromboembolism including deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and visceral vein thrombosis (VVT) were identified by electronic medical record review. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated and evaluated for association with VTE using Cox proportional hazard regression., Results: We included 424 patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 55 years. Palbociclib was the most commonly used CDKI (n = 390, 91.8%). Venous thromboembolism during CDKIs occurred in 38 patients, 6.3% at year 1, including DVT in 52.6%, PE in 18.5%, and VVT in 15.8%. Median time to VTE was 314 days. Venous thromboembolism was associated with a trend to worse PFS and OS in multivariate analysis [PFS hazard ratio (HR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-2.38, P = .21], OS (HR 1.70, 95% CI 0.95-2.98, P = .076)., Conclusions: Venous thromboembolism rates with CDKI treatment in mBC in clinical practice are 2-fold to 5-fold greater than reported in registration trials and may be associated with worse outcomes., (© 2019 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)