Search

Vasodilation due to impaired vascular tone is common in liver failure. Vasoconstrictor drugs are almost always required during the anhepatic phase of a liver transplant to maintain blood pressure unless venovenous bypass is employed. Arginine-vasopressin can be used as a vasoconstrictor instead of or in addition to norepinephrine for this purpose, but the effect of vasopressin on the portal vein pressure and flow in this setting is unknown. Portal vein pressure, portal vein blood flow, hemodynamic variables, and plasma vasopressin levels were measured in 16 patients during liver transplantation after ligation of the hepatic artery before and after a vasopressin infusion of 3.8 +/- 1.1 units/hour. Measurements were performed on the native liver prior to caval clamping. After vasopressin infusion, the portal vein pressure decreased significantly from 24.0 +/- 6.5 to 21.5 +/- 7.4 mm Hg [mean +/- standard deviation (SD), P = 0.006]. The portal vein blood flow also decreased (from 1.01 +/- 0.53 to 0.76 +/- 0.53 L/minute, mean +/- SD, P < 0.0001), as did the portal vein blood flow to cardiac output ratio (from 0.14 +/- 0.06 to 0.10 +/- 0.07, mean +/- SD, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, vasopressin significantly decreased portal vein pressure and flow of the native liver without decreasing cardiac output or intestinal perfusion in patients undergoing liver transplantations.

Inadequate secretion of vasopressin during fluid removal by hemodialysis may contribute to the cardiovascular instability that complicates this therapy and administration of exogenous hormone, by supporting arterial pressure, may facilitate volume removal. To test this, we measured plasma vasopressin in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) during hemodialysis and found that despite significant fluid removal, plasma vasopressin concentration did not increase. We further found that ESRD did not alter the endogenous removal rate of plasma vasopressin and that plasma hormone is not dialyzed. Finally, in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in 22 hypertensive patients, we examined the effect of a constant infusion of a non-pressor dose of vasopressin on the arterial pressure response during a hemodialysis in which the target fluid loss was increased by 0.5 kg over the baseline prescription. We found that arterial pressure was more stable in the patients receiving vasopressin and that while only one patient (9%) in the vasopressin group had a symptomatic hypotensive episode, 64% of the patients receiving placebo had such an episode (P=0.024). Moreover, increased fluid removal was achieved only in the vasopressin group (520+/-90 ml vs 64+/-130 ml, P=0.01). Thus, administration of non-pressor doses of vasopressin to hypertensive subjects improves cardiovascular stability during hemodialysis and allows increased removal of excess extracellular fluid. Inadequate vasopressin secretion during hemodialysis-induced fluid removal is a likely contributor to the intradialytic hypotension that limits fluid removal.

The use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as milrinone in the treatment of severe heart failure is frequently restricted because they cause vasodilation and hypotension. In patients with decompensated heart failure with hypotension after treatment with milrinone, low doses of vasopressin restored blood pressure without inhibiting the inotropic effect of milrinone.

Objective: To determine whether vasopressin could be effective in treating the hypotension associated with phosphodiesterase III inhibition. Phosphodiesterase III inhibitors are cardiotonic agents that increase myocardial contractility and decrease vascular smooth muscle tone. The vasodilatory effect can be profound, and the resulting hypotension frequently requires the administration of catecholamine pressors., Design: Retrospective analysis of existing data., Setting: The medical or surgical intensive care unit of Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center., Patients: Three consecutive patients receiving milrinone and requiring catecholamine pressors to maintain systolic arterial pressure of > or =90 mm Hg., Interventions: Vasopressin was administered to the three patients., Measurements and Main Results: Vasopressin (0.03-0.07 units/min) increased systolic arterial pressure from 90+/-4.7 to 130+/-2.3 mm Hg while reducing the administration of catecholamine pressors., Conclusions: Vasopressin at very low doses appears to be an effective vasopressor for milrinone-induced hypotension.

Background: Solid organ donors often develop hypotension due to vasodilation, and recently we observed that a variety of vasodilatory states are characterized by vasopressin deficiency and hypersensitivity. Thus, we investigated the prevalence of vasopressin deficiency in hypotensive solid organ donors without clinical evidence of diabetes insipidus; we also investigated the vasopressor effect of vasopressin replacement in hypotensive donors., Methods and Results: Fifty organ donors were evaluated for hemodynamic instability, (mean arterial pressure [MAP]

Background: Despite appropriate therapy, refractory hypotension often occurs in septic shock. A double-blinded placebo controlled clinical trial was performed to assess the role of low-dose vasopressin (VP) as a pressor agent in septic shock., Methods: Patients admitted to a trauma intensive care unit with vasodilatory septic shock were randomized to receive either VP at 0.04 U/min (n = 5) or placebo (n = 5). Vasodilatory septic shock was defined as a need for catecholamine agents to maintain a mean arterial pressure more than or equal to 70 mm Hg, despite a cardiac index more than 2.5 L/min and a minimal pulmonary artery wedge pressure more than 12 mm Hg. After 1 hour of initiation of the study drug, attempts to discontinue norepinephrine, phenylephrine, and/or dopamine, in respective order, were undertaken provided that the mean arterial pressure remained more than or equal to 70 mm Hg., Results: A vasopressin infusion increased systolic arterial pressure (98 +/- 5 to 125 +/- 8 mm Hg, p < 0.008) because of peripheral vasoconstriction (systemic vascular resistance increased from 878 +/- 218 to 1,190 +/- 213 dynes/s per cm(-5) p < 0.05). Arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance were statistically unaffected in the placebo group. Before study termination, measured at 24 hours after drug initiation, two patients in the placebo group died of refractory hypotension. However, all patients receiving VP survived the 24-hour study period and had all other catecholamine pressors withdrawn and blood pressure maintained solely with a low-dose VP infusion., Conclusion: A VP infusion improved arterial pressure and permitted the withdrawal of catecholamine vasopressors. VP is a useful agent in the treatment of refractory septic shock.

Background: Hypovolemic shock of marked severity and duration may progress to cardiovascular collapse unresponsive to volume replacement and drug intervention. On the basis of clinical observations, we investigated the action of vasopressin in an animal model of this condition., Methods and Results: In 7 dogs, prolonged hemorrhagic shock (mean arterial pressure [MAP] of approximately 40 mm Hg) was induced by exsanguination into a reservoir. After approximately 30 minutes, progressive reinfusion was needed to maintain MAP at approximately 40 mm Hg, and by approximately 1 hour, despite complete restoration of blood volume, the administration of norepinephrine approximately 3 micrograms . kg(-1). min(-1) was required to maintain this pressure. At this moment, administration of vasopressin 1 to 4 mU. kg(-1). min(-1) increased MAP from 39+/-6 to 128+/-9 mm Hg (P<0.001), primarily because of peripheral vasoconstriction. In 3 dogs subjected to similar prolonged hemorrhagic shock, angiotensin II 180 ng. kg(-1). min(-1) had only a marginal effect on MAP (45+/-12 to 49+/-15 mm Hg). Plasma vasopressin was markedly elevated during acute hemorrhage but fell from 319+/-66 to 29+/-9 pg/mL before administration of vasopressin (P<0.01)., Conclusions: Vasopressin is a uniquely effective pressor in the irreversible phase of hemorrhagic shock unresponsive to volume replacement and catecholamine vasopressors. Vasopressin deficiency may contribute to the pathogenesis of this condition.

Background: The hypotension of septic shock is due to systemic vasodilation. On the basis of a clinical observation, we investigated the possibility that a deficiency in vasopressin contributes to the vasodilation of septic shock., Methods and Results: In 19 patients with vasodilatory septic shock (systolic arterial pressure [SAP] of 92 +/- 2 mm Hg [mean +/- SE], cardiac output [CO] of 6.8 +/- 0.7 L/min) who were receiving catecholamines, plasma vasopressin averaged 3.1 +/- 1.0 pg/mL. In 12 patients with cardiogenic shock (SAP, 99 +/- 7 mm Hg; CO, 3.5 +/- 0.9 L/min) who were also receiving catecholamines, it averaged 22.7 +/- 2.2 pg/mL (P < .001). A constant infusion of exogenous vasopressin to 2 patients with septic shock resulted in the expected plasma concentration, indicating that catabolism of vasopressin is not increased in this condition. Although vasopressin is a weak pressor in normal subjects, its administration at 0.04 U/min to 10 patients with septic shock who were receiving catecholamines increased arterial pressure (systolic/diastolic) from 92/52 to 146/66 mm Hg (P < .001/P < .05) due to peripheral vasoconstriction (systemic vascular resistance increased from 644 to 1187 dyne.s/cm5; P < .001). Furthermore, in 6 patients with septic shock who were receiving vasopressin as the sole pressor, vasopressin withdrawal resulted in hypotension (SAP, 83 +/- 3 mm Hg), and vasopressin administration at 0.01 U/min, which resulted in a plasma concentration (approximately 30 pg/mL) expected for the level of hypotension, increased SAP from 83 to 115 mm Hg (P < .01)., Conclusions: Vasopressin plasma levels are inappropriately low in vasodilatory shock, most likely because of impaired baroreflex-mediated secretion. The deficiency in vasopressin contributes to the hypotension of vasodilatory septic shock.