Search

Background: Few studies have prospectively reported outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treated with epoprostenol in the modern-day era of oral therapy and combination treatments. The Registry to Prospectively Describe Use of Epoprostenol for Injection (Veletri, prolonged room temperature stable-epoprostenol [RTS-Epo]) in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PROSPECT) was established to prospectively describe the course of PAH in patients prescribed RTS-Epo., Methods: PROSPECT is a multicenter, US-based drug registry of primarily group 1 patients with PAH treated with RTS-Epo who were parenteral-naive or parenteral-transitioned at enrollment. Patients were followed until discontinuation of RTS-Epo, withdrawal, loss to follow-up, death, or end of study (maximum 1 year). One-year freedom from hospitalization (FH) and survival estimates were summarized by prostacyclin history (parenteral-naive or parenteral-transitioned), sex, and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI)., Results: A total of 336 patients were included. The overall 1-year FH estimate was 51.0% ± 2.8% and was lower in parenteral-naive patients than parenteral-transitioned patients (42.8% ± 4.3% vs 57.1% ± 3.7%, respectively; P = .002). FH estimates were lower in male patients than female patients (38.3% ± 5.9% vs 54.6% ± 3.2%, respectively; P < .015) and in patients with CRI than patients without CRI (17.0% ± 8.4% vs 53.7% ± 2.9%, respectively; P < .001). The overall 1-year survival estimate was 84.0% ± 2.1%. Survival was poorer in parenteral-naive patients, male patients, and patients with CRI., Conclusions: Risk of hospitalization and mortality remain high in patients with PAH. In particular, patients who are parenteral-naive at initiation of RTS-Epo therapy, male patients, and patients with CRI require close monitoring and aggressive clinical management.

Background: The long-term safety and tolerability of sildenafil treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) were assessed., Methods: Two hundred fifty-nine of 277 randomized and treated patients completed a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (SUPER-1 [Sildenafil Use in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension]) of oral sildenafil in treatment-naive patients with PAH (96% functional class II/III) and entered an open-label uncontrolled extension study (SUPER-2) that continued until the last patient completed 3 years of sildenafil treatment. Patients titrated to sildenafil 80 mg tid; one dose reduction for tolerability was allowed during the titration phase., Results: The median duration of sildenafil treatment across SUPER-1 and SUPER-2 was 1,242 days (range, 1-1,523 days); 170 patients (61%) completed both studies, and 89 patients discontinued from SUPER-2. After 3 years, 87% of 183 patients on treatment were receiving sildenafil 80 mg tid. Of patients remaining under follow-up, 3%, 10%, and 18% were receiving a second approved PAH therapy at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. At 3 years post-SUPER-1 baseline, 127 patients had an increased 6-min walk distance (6MWD); 81 improved and 86 maintained functional class. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. At 3 years, 53 patients had died (censored, n = 37). Three-year estimated survival rate was 79%; if all censored patients were assumed to have died, 3-year survival rate was 68%. No deaths were considered to be treatment related., Conclusions: Long-term treatment of PAH initiated as sildenafil monotherapy was generally well tolerated. After 3 years, the majority of patients (60%) who entered the SUPER-1 trial improved or maintained their functional status, and 46% maintained or improved 6MWD.

In adults with sickle cell disease (SCD), an increased tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) by Doppler echocardiography is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although sildenafil has been shown to improve exercise capacity in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, it has not been evaluated in SCD. We therefore sought to determine whether sildenafil could improve exercise capacity in SCD patients with increased TRV and a low exercise capacity. A TRV ≥ 2.7 m/s and a 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) between 150 and 500 m were required for enrollment in this 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled sildenafil trial. After 74 of the screened subjects were randomized, the study was stopped early due to a higher percentage of subjects experiencing serious adverse events in the sildenafil arm (45% of sildenafil, 22% of placebo, P = .022). Subject hospitalization for pain was the predominant cause for this difference: 35% with sildenafil compared with 14% with placebo (P = .029). There was no evidence of a treatment effect on 6MWD (placebo-corrected effect -9 m; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -56-38; P = .703), TRV (P = .503), or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (P = .410). Sildenafil appeared to increase hospitalization rates for pain in patients with SCD. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00492531.

Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension can be associated with decreased functional capacity and poor prognosis in patients with parenchymal lung diseases (PLD). Yet, little attention has been given to current beliefs and practice patterns., Methods: An 18-question survey was submitted electronically to members of four Networks of the American College of Chest Physicians., Results: Analyzable responses were received from 453 physicians. Most (95%) respondents reported testing for PH in patients with PLD using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or right-heart catheterization (RHC) and believed that PH could occur in the absence of severe compromise in pulmonary function (70%) and hypoxemia (50%). Approximately 30% of physicians reported not performing RHC to confirm a diagnosis of PH before initiating therapy. Most respondents (92%) felt that medical therapy was effective and the medication of first choice was either bosentan or sildenafil. Most respondents believed that treating PH in these patients improves quality of life (63%) and dyspnea (67%), but were less sure about the impact on functional capacity and survival., Conclusions: Approximately 30% of physicians do not perform RHC to confirm this diagnosis prior to initiating therapy. Despite relatively little supportive evidence, most physicians treat with vasoactive medications and believe that medical therapy confers benefit.

Background: Oral sildenafil and intravenous epoprostenol have independently been shown to be effective in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension., Objective: To investigate the effect of adding oral sildenafil to long-term intravenous epoprostenol in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension., Design: A 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study., Setting: Multinational study at 41 centers in 11 countries from 3 July 2003 to 27 January 2006., Patients: 267 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (idiopathic, associated anorexigen use or connective tissue disease, or corrected congenital heart disease) who were receiving long-term intravenous epoprostenol therapy., Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or sildenafil, 20 mg three times daily, titrated to 40 mg and 80 mg three times daily, as tolerated, at 4-week intervals. Of 265 patients who received treatment, 256 (97%) patients (123 in the placebo group and 133 in the sildenafil group) completed the study., Measurements: Change from baseline in exercise capacity measured by 6-minute walk distance (primary end point) and hemodynamic measurements, time to clinical worsening, and Borg dyspnea score (secondary end points)., Results: A placebo-adjusted increase of 28.8 meters (95% CI, 13.9 to 43.8 meters) in the 6-minute walk distance occurred in patients in the sildenafil group; these improvements were most prominent among patients with baseline distances of 325 meters or more. Relative to epoprostenol monotherapy, addition of sildenafil resulted in a greater change in mean pulmonary arterial pressure by -3.8 mm Hg (CI, -5.6 to -2.1 mm Hg); cardiac output by 0.9 L/min (CI, 0.5 to 1.2 L/min); and longer time to clinical worsening, with a smaller proportion of patients experiencing a worsening event in the sildenafil group (0.062) than in the placebo group (0.195) by week 16 (P = 0.002). Health-related quality of life also improved in patients who received combined therapy compared with those who received epoprostenol monotherapy. There was no effect on the Borg dyspnea score. Of the side effects generally associated with sildenafil treatment, the most commonly reported in the placebo and sildenafil groups, respectively, were headache (34% and 57%; difference, 23 percentage points [CI, 12 to 35 percentage points]), dyspepsia (2% and 16%; difference, 13 percentage points [CI, 7 to 20 percentage points]), pain in extremity (18% and 25%; difference, 8 percentage points [CI, -2 to 18 percentage points]), and nausea (18% and 25%; difference, 8 percentage points [CI, -2 to 18 percentage points])., Limitations: The study excluded patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with other causes. There was an imbalance in missing data between groups, with 8 placebo recipients having no postbaseline walk assessment compared with 1 sildenafil recipient. These patients were excluded from the analysis., Conclusion: In some patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, the addition of sildenafil to long-term intravenous epoprostenol therapy improves exercise capacity, hemodynamic measurements, time to clinical worsening, and quality of life, but not Borg dyspnea score. Increased rates of headache and dyspepsia occurred with the addition of sildenafil.

Objective: Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease (PAH-CTD) is difficult to manage, and has a poor prognosis. The phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil citrate enhances vasodilatation, has antiproliferative effects, and is effective in the treatment of PAH. We examined the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in patients with PAH-CTD., Methods: In a 12-week, double-blind study (SUPER-1), 278 patients with PAH were randomized to oral placebo, sildenafil 20 mg, sildenafil 40 mg, or sildenafil 80 mg 3 times daily (tid). In a post-hoc subgroup analysis of 84 patients with PAH-CTD, exercise capacity, hemodynamic measures, World Health Organization functional class, and tolerability were assessed., Results: Forty-five percent of the patients had scleroderma, 23% had systemic lupus erythematosus, and the rest (32%) were categorized as other. Patients were predominantly functional class II (38%) or III (61%) at baseline. Sildenafil-treated patients exhibited mean increases in 6-minute walk distance at Week 12 of 42 m (95% CI 20, 64) for 20 mg, 36 m (95% CI 14, 58) for 40 mg, and 15 m (95% CI -24, 54) for 80 mg, while placebo-treated patients exhibited a mean decrease of 13 m (95% CI -36, 10). Improvement of at least 1 functional class occurred in 29%-42% of sildenafil-treated patients, compared to 5% for placebo. Significant improvements in mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were observed with sildenafil 20 mg, and sildenafil was generally well tolerated., Conclusion: In patients with PAH-CTD, sildenafil improves exercise capacity, hemodynamic measures (at the 20 mg dose), and functional class after 12 weeks of treatment.

Rationale: Small, open-label studies suggest that combinations of existing therapies may be effective for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)., Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding inhaled iloprost, a prostacyclin analog, to the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan in patients with PAH., Methods: In a randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial, inhaled iloprost (5 mug) or placebo was added to stable monotherapy with bosentan for 12 wk. Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in 6-min-walk distance (6-MWD), modified New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, hemodynamic parameters, and time to clinical worsening., Measurements and Main Results: A total of 67 patients with PAH (55% idiopathic PAH, 45% associated PAH, 94% NYHA class III, and mean baseline 6-MWD of 335 m) were randomized. At Week 12, patients receiving iloprost had a mean increase in 6-MWD of 30 m (p = 0.001); placebo patients had a mean 6-MWD increase of 4 m (p = 0.69), with a placebo-adjusted difference of +26 m (p = 0.051). NYHA status improved by one class in 34% of iloprost versus 6% of placebo patients (p = 0.002). Iloprost delayed the time to clinical worsening (p = 0.0219). Improvements were noted in postinhalation placebo-adjusted change in mean pulmonary artery pressure (-8 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (-254 dyn x s x cm(-5); p < 0.001). Combination therapy was well tolerated., Conclusions: Within the limitations of a relatively small sample size, results of this study demonstrate that the addition of inhaled iloprost in patients with PAH with reduced exercise capacity on bosentan monotherapy is safe and efficacious.