Search

Background: Peripheral vasodilatation in response to muscarinic agonists has been shown to be subnormal during heart failure. However, a more recent study suggested that the abnormal muscarinic-induced vasodilatation was not due to abnormal nitric oxide synthase activity. This study was designed to show that nitric oxide synthase contributes to desmopressin-induced forearm vasodilatation and to determine whether vasodilatation mediated by nitric oxide synthase is abnormal during heart failure., Methods: Desmopressin (10, 50, and 100 ng/min) was infused into the brachial artery of 10 healthy subjects and eight patients with heart failure, and forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethsymography. Desmopressin responses were then recorded during inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with L-monomethylarginine or after aspirin., Results: In healthy subjects, desmopressin caused a significant (p < 0.001) dose-dependent increase in forearm blood flow of 0.9 +/- 0.6, 4.0 +/- 2.6, and 7.9 +/- 2.6 ml/min/dl, respectively. Desmopressin responses in heart failure of 0.8 +/- 0.6, 1.7 +/- 1.4, and 3.1 +/- 1.0 ml/min/dl were significantly less (p < 0.001) than normal. L-Monomethylarginine reduced desmopressin responses in normal subjects (p < 0.01), and this inhibitory effect was significantly (p < 0.01) greater than in patients with heart failure. Aspirin did not affect desmopressin-induced vasodilatation., Conclusion: Nitric oxide synthase contributes to desmopressin-induced forearm vasodilatation. In response to desmopressin, patients with heart failure have subnormal vasodilatation mediated through nitric oxide synthase.

Endothelium-dependent vasodilation of peripheral resistance vessels is abnormal in patients with heart failure, but there are little in vivo data on endothelium-dependent vasodilation of peripheral conduit vessels. This study assessed endothelium-dependent vasodilation of forearm conduit and resistance vessels in normal subjects and patients with heart failure. The effects of intraarterial endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilators on both forearm conduit (brachial artery) and resistance vessels were assessed in 9 patients with New York Heart Association class II-III heart failure and 11 normal subjects of similar age. Brachial artery diameter was measured by two-dimensional, moderate-frequency (8 MHz) ultrasound, and forearm blood flow was measured by strain gauge plethysmography. The endothelium-dependent vasodilator, methacholine (0.3 and 1.5 micrograms/min), increased brachial artery diameter by 7.6 +/- 1.3% and 12.2 +/- 1.5% in normal subjects as compared to 6.9 +/- 2.1% and 10.4 +/- 2.4% in patients with heart failure (P = NS, normal vs heart failure). The endothelium-independent vasodilator, nitroglycerin (0.15 microgram), also produced similar increases in brachial artery diameter in the two groups (8.2 +/- 1.3% in normal subjects vs 11.1 +/- 1.4% in patients with heart failure, P = NS). In contrast, forearm blood flow responses to methacholine were significantly (P < .05) greater in normal subjects (4.1 +/- 0.5 and 9.2 +/- 1.4 mL/min/100 mL forearm volume) than in patients with heart failure (2.0 +/- 0.8 and 5.1 +/- 1.3 mL/min/100 mL forearm volume). Forearm blood flow responses to the endothelium-independent vasodilator, sodium nitroprusside, were similar between the two groups. This study suggests that endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation of the brachial artery is not impaired in patients with class II-III heart failure. This finding contrasts with abnormal endothelium-dependent vasodilation of forearm resistance vessels. These data suggest that there are regional differences in endothelial function in patients with heart failure.

Background: Endothelium-dependent dilatation of forearm resistance vessels is attenuated in patients with heart failure. Activation of the sympathetic nervous system could cause this abnormality by way of vasoconstriction and chemical inactivation of nitric oxide., Methods and Results: The effects of concurrent intra-arterial norepinephrine infusions (25, 50 and 100 ng/min) on forearm blood flow responses to equipotent doses of an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, methacholine (0.3 and 1.5 micrograms/min), and an endothelium-independent vasodilator, nitroprusside (1 and 5 micrograms/min), were studied in 12 normal subjects. Norepinephrine infusions increased the mean plasma norepinephrine from 255 pg/ml at baseline to 460, 629, and 1089 pg/ml, respectively. Basal forearm blood flow was reduced from 2.9 to 1.6 ml/min/100 ml of forearm volume at the highest dose (p < 0.01). The average response to the lowest dose of methacholine (4.5 ml/min/100 ml) was not significantly reduced by concurrent infusion of norepinephrine (4.4, 4.2, and 4.3 ml/min/100 ml, respectively), whereas the response to the higher dose of methacholine (8.9 ml/min/100 ml) tended to be lower (7.2, 6.7, and 7.4 ml/min/100 ml, respectively) but did not attain statistical significance. Methacholine induced vasodilation was not more sensitive to norepinephrine than nitroprusside responses. Lower body negative pressure (-20 mm Hg) also significantly reduced baseline forearm flow and increased plasma norepinephrine but did not effect either methacholine or nitroprusside induced vasodilation., Conclusion: Sympathetic stimulation induced by infusion of norepinephrine or lower body negative pressure is not a potent antagonist to endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the forearm vasculature. These data suggest that sympathetic activation does not completely explain the abnormal endothelium-dependent vasodilation seen in patients with heart failure.

Patients with congestive heart failure demonstrate attenuated endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the peripheral vasculature, but there are no data regarding the effect of therapies on this abnormality or whether this abnormality is reversible. This study was performed to address the hypothesis that abnormalities in endothelium-dependent vasodilation in heart failure are improved by heart transplantation. Forearm blood flow responses to the intraarterial administration of a dose range of methacholine, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, and nitroprusside, an endothelium-independent vasodilator, were examined in 2 separate protocols. In protocol 1, forearm blood flow responses to methacholine in 14 heart transplant recipients were 5.02 +/- 3.11, 11.55 +/- 7.20 and 11.61 +/- 10.24 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume. These responses were significantly greater than those in 10 patients with heart failure (2.23 +/- 1.22, 4.60 +/- 3.43 and 6.70 +/- 4.91 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume; p < 0.05). In contrast, the responses to nitroprusside were nearly identical in the 2 groups. In protocol 2, six patients were studied before and 4 months (range 1 to 11) after transplantation. Methacholine responses before transplantation were 2.5 +/- 1.3, 5.2 +/- 1.5 and 7.3 +/- 1.5 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume and were significantly improved after transplantation to 5.7 +/- 1.2, 12.1 +/- 3.0 and 14.2 +/- 2.2 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume (p < 0.05). Peak reactive hyperemia responses increased significantly from 19.0 +/- 3.7 to 44.8 +/- 6.4 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume (p < 0.01) after transplantation. These data demonstrate that heart transplantation was associated with a significant improvement in the forearm blood flow responses to methacholine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) have impaired peripheral vasodilation during exercise. Hyperosmolality is one local stimulus that produces vasodilation during exercise in normal subjects. This study addressed the hypothesis that vasodilation to hyperosmolal stimuli is impaired in patients with CHF. Forearm blood flow responses to intrabrachial artery infusions of isoosmolar (280 mosm/kg) and hyperosmolal (480 and 660 mosm/kg) solutions of saline and glucose were compared in 9 patients with CHF and 13 normal subjects. Forearm blood flow was measured by strain gauge plethysmography. In the normal subjects, hyperosmolal infusions of 480 and 660 mosm/kg increased forearm blood flow by 3.12 +/- 0.40 and 6.80 +/- 0.67 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume, respectively (both p < 0.001 compared with isoosmolal infusions). In contrast, in the patients with CHF, these infusions increased forearm blood flow by 2.19 +/- 0.44 and 4.06 +/- 0.92 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume (p < 0.05 normal vs CHF). The impaired forearm blood flow responses in heart failure occurred despite significantly greater (p < 0.05, normal vs CHF) increases in venous osmolality (17.3 +/- 6.5 vs 9.6 +/- 1.3 mosm/kg for the 660 mosm/kg infusion). There were no differences between groups in forearm venous hematocrit, calcium, and sodium or potassium changes during hyperosmolal infusions. It is concluded that peripheral vasodilation to hyperosmolal stimuli is impaired in patients with CHF.

Background: Endothelial cells produce a number of substances, collectively termed endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF), that promote local relaxation of vascular smooth muscle. Although studies have demonstrated defects in endothelium-dependent vasodilation in animal models of hypertension, atherosclerosis, and heart failure, there are only limited data from human subjects because of the difficulty in obtaining fresh vascular segments., Methods and Results: To address the hypothesis that endothelium-dependent vasodilation is attenuated in patients with heart failure, we measured forearm blood flow responses to the intra-arterial administration of methacholine, a known stimulus of EDRF release through muscarinic receptors. In 14 normal subjects, a dosage range of methacholine increased forearm blood flow by 5.26 +/- 0.63, 10.50 +/- 0.63, and 13.22 +/- 0.86 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume (FAV); these responses were 1.98 +/- 0.46, 5.48 +/- 0.79, and 8.50 +/- 1.53 ml/min/100 ml FAV in 14 patients with heart failure. When pooled over all doses, the responses were strikingly less in the patients with heart failure (5.32 +/- 0.31 versus 9.52 +/- 0.60 ml/min/100 ml FAV; p = 0.0003). In a second study, the average difference in forearm blood flow responses between patients with heart failure and normal subjects with methacholine was significantly greater than the average difference between the groups with nitroprusside (4.04 +/- 1.10 versus 2.20 +/- 0.71 ml/min/100 ml FAV; p = 0.04). The decreased methacholine responses in the patients with heart failure were not related to age (r = 0.39; p = NS) or etiology because there was no difference in the responses between patients with ischemic heart disease and those with idiopathic cardiomyopathy., Conclusions: These data suggest that endothelium-dependent vasodilation is attenuated in patients with heart failure. Although the mechanisms of the decreased endothelium-dependent responses in heart failure are not known, this impaired local vasodilation may contribute to abnormalities in vasoconstriction that are characteristic of heart failure.

To determine whether converting enzyme inhibitors could produce peripheral vasodilation through a local mechanism, we infused enalaprilat, 2 micrograms/min/dl forearm volume (FAV), into the brachial artery of normal subjects and measured changes in forearm blood flow (FBF) with strain-gauge plethysmography. Enalaprilat produced a peak increase in FBF of 2.82 +/- 0.54 ml/min/dl FAV (78% increase) at 1 minute (p less than 0.01 versus vehicle) and an increase of 1.11 +/- 0.28 ml/min/dl FAV at 4 minutes (p less than 0.05 versus vehicle). Blood pressure and plasma renin activity measured at the completion of infusion did not change. Intravenous enalaprilat infusion at the same dose in seven additional normal subjects did not increase FBF. Pretreatment of seven subjects with 75 mg oral indomethacin attenuated the peak response to enalaprilat (4.13 +/- 1.52 versus 0.58 +/- 0.32 ml/min/dl; p less than 0.05). We conclude that intra-arterial enalaprilat produces an increase in FBF in normal subjects. This peripheral vasodilation is caused by a local effect independent of circulating renin-angiotensin system inhibition. This response is attenuated by indomethacin, suggesting that prostaglandins contribute to the vasodilator response.