Search

Purpose: In elderly patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), there is little scientific understanding of the long-term changes of quality of life (QoL) and health status (HS) after treatment. The primary goal of this study was to provide long-term QoL and HS results for elderly CLTI patients after therapy. Treatments consisted of endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization, or conservative treatment. Furthermore, the aim of this study was to identify the distinctive trajectories of QoL and HS., Patients and Methods: CLTI patients aged ≥70 years were included in a prospective observational cohort study with a two-year follow-up. The WHOQOL-BREF was used to asses QoL. The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey was used to measure HS. The QoL and HS scores were compared to the scores in the general elderly Dutch population. Latent class trajectory analysis was used., Results: A total of 195 patients were included in this study. After two years, in all treatment groups patients showed significantly higher physical QoL score compared to baseline and there was no significant difference with the corresponding values in the elderly Dutch population. In the latent class trajectory analysis, there were no overlapping risk factors for poorer QoL or HS., Conclusion: This study shows that QoL levels in surviving elderly CLTI patients in the long-term do not differ from the corresponding values for elderly in the general population. There were no disparities in sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics associated with poorer QoL and HS. This study was carried out to encourage further analysis of the influence of biopsychosocial characteristics on QoL and HS in elderly CLTI patients., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2020 Peters et al.)

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown period on the number and type of vascular procedures performed in the operating theater., Methods: A total of 38 patients who underwent 46 vascular procedures during the lockdown period of March 16th until April 30th, 2020, were included. The control groups consisted of 29 patients in 2019 and 54 patients in 2018 who underwent 36 and 66 vascular procedures, respectively, in the same time period. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics., Results: Our study shows that the lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant increase in the number of major amputations (42% in 2020 vs. 18% and 15% in 2019 and 2020, respectively; P-value 0.019). Furthermore, we observed a statistically significant difference in the degree of tissue loss as categorized by the Rutherford classification (P-value 0.007). During the lockdown period, patients presented with more extensive ischemic damage when than previous years. We observed no difference in vascular surgical care for patients with an aortic aneurysm., Conclusions: Measurements taken during the lockdown period have a significant effect on non-COVID-19 vascular patient care, which leads to an increased severe morbidity. In the future, policy makers should be aware of the impact of their measurements on vulnerable patient groups such as those with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. For these patients, medical care should be easily accessible and adequate., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To aid physicians in the process of shared decision-making, many predictive models for critical limb ischemia (CLI) have been constructed. However, none of these models is in widespread use. Predicting survival outcomes for a specific individual may be used to guide treatment selection. The aim of this study was to construct a 6-month survival-predicting model representative of elderly patients with CLI undergoing surgical or endovascular treatment., Methods: An observational cohort study including all patients with CLI aged ≥65 years who underwent surgical or endovascular treatment of CLI between January 2013 and June 2018 was conducted. The model to predict survival at 6 months was based on a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model and a penalized likelihood method. The performance of the model was judged by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve., Results: In total, 449 patients were included in the study population. The median age was 76 years (range, 65-97 years), and 52.8% of the population was male. Surgical treatment was performed in 303 patients (67.5%), and 146 underwent endovascular treatment (32.5%). The estimated 30-day survival was 92.7% (standard error [SE], 1.2%); 6-month survival, 80% (SE, 1.9%); and 12-month survival, 71% (SE, 2.1%). Variables with the strongest association with 6-month mortality were age, living in a nursing home, physical impairment, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the 6-month mortality model was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.85; P < .001)., Conclusions: A prediction model constructed for 6-month mortality of elderly patients undergoing surgical or endovascular treatment of CLI showed that age, living in a nursing home, physical impairment, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class have the highest association with an increase in mortality. These factors may be used to identify patients at risk for mortality in shared decision-making., (Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Revascularization is the cornerstone in the treatment of patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, the 2-year mortality rate is up to 50% in these patients. Therefore, the clinical benefit of revascularization needs to be considered carefully. The question emerges if there are changes in quality of life (QoL) and health status (HS) in the end-of-life phase of CLTI in older patients., Methods: Patients with CLTI and of an age of 70 years or older were included in a prospective observational cohort study. Treatment consisted of endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization, or conservative therapy. The follow-up period was 2 years. Within this follow-up period, patients completed the following questionnaires at six specified time intervals: the WHOQOL-BREF and the SF-12. Patients who died within 2 years after inclusion were analyzed. Final scores were defined as the last measurement at end of follow-up or death., Results: Eighty two patients (42.1%) died during the 24-month follow-up. QoL and HS before death did not decrease with treatment (option: endovascular intervention, surgical revascularization, or conservative therapy)., Conclusions: Older patients with CLTI and a life expectancy less than 2 years had no differences in QoL and HS before death compared to their previous measurement. Except for the mental HS domain, no differences in the percentage of patients showing significant individual change in QoL and HS were found between the treatments. For clinicians, it is important to use patient-reported outcome measure when discussing treatment for older frail patients with CLTI in a shared decision-making process., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI), with the intention to prevent limb loss, is often an intensive and expensive therapy. The aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of endovascular and conservative treatment of elderly CLI patients unsuitable for surgery., Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, data were gathered in two Dutch peripheral hospitals. CLI patients aged 70 years or older were included in the outpatient clinic. Exclusion criteria were malignant disease, lack of language skills, and cognitive impairment; 195 patients were included and 192 patients were excluded. After a multidisciplinary vascular conference, patients were divided into three treatment groups (endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization, or conservative therapy). Subanalyses based on age were made (70-79 years and ≥80 years). The follow-up period was 2 years. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular and conservative treatment was quantified using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in euros per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)., Results: At baseline, patients allocated to surgical revascularization had better health states, but the health states of endovascular revascularization and conservative therapy patients were comparable. With an ICER of €38,247.41/QALY (∼$50,869/QALY), endovascular revascularization was cost-effective compared with conservative therapy. This is favorable compared with the Dutch applicable threshold of €80,000/QALY (∼$106,400/QALY). The subanalyses also established that endovascular revascularization is a cost-effective alternative for conservative treatment both in patients aged 70 to 79 years (ICER €29,898.36/QALY; ∼$39,765/QALY) and in octogenarians (ICER €56,810.14/QALY; ∼$75,557/QALY)., Conclusions: Our study has shown that endovascular revascularization is cost-effective compared with conservative treatment of CLI patients older than 70 years and also in octogenarians. Given the small absolute differences in costs and effects, physicians should also consider individual circumstances that can alter the outcome of the intervention. Cost-effectiveness remains one of the aspects to take into consideration in making a clinical decision., (Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients are often of advanced age with reduced health status (HS) and quality of life (QoL) at baseline. Physical health is considered as the most affected domain due to reduced mobility and ischemic pain. QoL and HS are often used interchangeably in the current literature. HS refers to objectively perceived physical, psychological, and social functioning and in assessing QoL, change is measured subjectively and can only be determined by the individual since it concerns patients' evaluation of their functioning. It is important to distinguish between QoL and HS, especially in the concept of shared decision-making when the opinion of the patient is key. Goal of this study was to examine and compare QoL and HS in elderly CLI patients in relation to the used therapy, with a special interest in conservatively treated patients., Methods: Patients suffering from CLI and ≥70 years old were included in a prospective study with a follow-up period of 1 year. Patients were divided into three groups; endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization, and conservative therapy. The WHOQoL-Bref was used to determine QoL, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey was used to evaluate HS at baseline, 5-7 days, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year., Results: Physical QoL of endovascularly and surgically treated patients showed immediate significant improvement during follow-up in contrast to delayed increased physical HS at 6 weeks and 6 months ( P <0.001). Conservatively treated patients showed significantly improved physical QoL at 6 and 12 months ( P =0.02) in contrast to no significant improvement in physical HS., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that QoL and HS are indeed not identical concepts and that differentiating between these two concepts could influence the choice of treatment in elderly CLI patients. Discriminating between QoL and HS is, therefore, of major importance for clinical practice, especially to achieve shared decision-making., Competing Interests: Dr Stijn L Steunenberg reports grants from Nuts Ohra, during the conduct of the study. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Introduction: Despite guideline recommendations advocating conservative management before invasive treatment in intermittent claudication, early revascularisation remains widespread in patients with favourable anatomy. The aim of the Effect of Disease Level on Outcomes of Supervised Exercise in Intermittent Claudication Registry is to determine the effect of the location of stenosis on the outcomes of supervised exercise in patients with intermittent claudication due to peripheral arterial disease., Methods and Analysis: This multicentre prospective cohort study aims to enrol 320 patients in 10 vascular centres across the Netherlands. All patients diagnosed with intermittent claudication (peripheral arterial disease: Fontaine II/Rutherford 1-3), who are considered candidates for supervised exercise therapy by their own physicians are appropriate to participate. Participants will receive standard care, meaning supervised exercise therapy first, with endovascular or open revascularisation in case of insufficient effect (at the discretion of patient and vascular surgeon). For the primary objectives, patients are grouped according to anatomical characteristics of disease (aortoiliac, femoropopliteal or multilevel disease) as apparent on the preferred imaging modality in the participating centre (either duplex, CT angiography or magnetic resonance angiography). Changes in walking performance (treadmill tests, 6 min walk test) and quality of life (QoL; Vascular QoL Questionnaire-6, WHO QoL Questionnaire-Bref) will be compared between groups, after multivariate adjustment for possible confounders. Freedom from revascularisation and major adverse cardiovascular disease events, and attainment of the treatment goal between anatomical groups will be compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves., Ethics and Dissemination: This study has been exempted from formal medical ethical approval by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United 'MEC-U' (W17.071). Results are intended for publication in peer-reviewed journals and for presentation to stakeholders nationally and internationally., Trial Registration Number: NTR7332; Pre-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Revascularization to relieve ischemic pain and prevent limb loss is the cornerstone of critical limb ischemia (CLI) treatment; however, not all elderly patients are deemed fit for revascularization. Patient-related outcome measurements are important in these patients. Quality of life (QoL) results regarding the effect of endovascular, surgical, and conservative treatment on the QoL in the elderly are scarce in the current literature. The goal of this study was to explore the outcomes of the different treatment modalities in elderly patients suffering from CLI, with a specific focus on QoL., Methods: A total of 195 CLI patients ≥70 years were prospectively included between January 2012 and February 2016 and divided into 6 groups (endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization, and conservative treatment). Two age groups (70-79 and >80 years) were analyzed. Follow-up was performed at 5-7 days, 6 weeks, and 6 months. World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF questionnaire was used to determine QoL. The Vascular-Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity score was noted. QoL was used as the primary end point, with mortality and limb salvage as the secondary end points., Results: Six-month mortality was significantly lower in surgically treated patients aged 70-79 years (4%) as compared with endovascular (24%, P = 0.001) or conservative treatment (25%, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in 6-month mortality in patients >80 years among endovascularly (38%), surgically (15%), and conservatively treated patients (27%). QoL significantly increased at all follow-up moments in surgically treated patients between 70 and 79 years and at 6 months in endovascularly treated patients. Conservatively treated patients did not improve their QoL in this age group. All patients aged >80 years, including conservatively treated patients, showed significantly improved QoL results at 6 months., Conclusions: Elderly patients judged fit for surgery may benefit the most from surgical revascularization, reporting low mortality rates, low adverse events and significantly gained QoL in multiple domains. However, all 3 treatment modalities have significantly increased physical health at 6 months. Conservative therapy seems to be an acceptable treatment option in patients unfit for revascularization with gained physical health at 6 months., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) cause considerable morbidity and deaths among patients undergoing vascular surgery. Pre-operative screening and subsequent treatment of nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriers with mupirocin and chlorhexidine reduces the risk of SSIs in cardiothoracic and orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of this screen-and-treat strategy on the development of SSI in patients undergoing aortoiliac surgery., Methods: A prospective study was performed that enrolled an intervention cohort comprising all patients undergoing aortoiliac surgery from February 2013 to December 2016. Before surgery, patients were screened for S. aureus nasal carriage and, if positive, were treated with mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine body washes. The presence of SSI was recorded on the basis of the criteria of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A historic control group was used, consisting of aortoiliac surgery patients in 2010 who tested positive for S. aureus but received no treatment., Results: A total of 374 patients in the study cohort were screened of whom 75 (20.1%) tested positive for S. aureus. Of these patients, 68 were given eradication therapy. In the 2010 cohort, 22 patients (15.7%) were positive. The incidence of S. aureus infection was 0 of 75 in the treatment group versus 3 of 22 (13.6%) in the control group (p = 0.021). Both the 30-day mortality rate (1.3% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.035) and the rate of re-interventions (12.0% vs. 31.8%) were significantly lower in the treated group., Conclusion: We conclude that S. aureus nasal screening and eradication with mupirocin and chlorhexidine reduces S. aureus SSI and its complications after aortoiliac surgery.

Background: Postoperative delirium is a common and serious adverse event in the elderly patient and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is of great importance to identify patients at risk for delirium, in order to focus preventive strategies. The aim of this article is to systematically review current available literature on pre-operative risk factors for delirium after vascular surgery., Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE, using the MeSH terms and key words "delirium", "surgery" and "risk factor". Studies were retained for review after meeting strict inclusion criteria that included only prospective studies evaluating risk factors for delirium in patients who had elective vascular surgery. Diagnosis of delirium needed to be confirmed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or ICD-10., Results: Fifteen articles were selected for inclusion, incidence of delirium across the studies ranged from 5% to 39%. Many factors have been associated with increased risk of delirium, including age, cognitive impairment, comorbidity, depression, smoking, alcohol, visual and hearing impairment, ASA-score, biochemical abnormalities, operative strategies and blood loss., Conclusions: Delirium is a common complication after elective vascular surgery in elderly. The highest delirium incidence was observed after open aortic surgery as well as after surgery for critical limb ischemia. A picture starts to form of which predisposing factors lead to increased risk of delirium. The leading risk factors consistently identified in this systematic review were advanced age and cognitive impairment. Multi-disciplinary specialist-led interventions in the preoperative phase could decrease incidence and severity of delirium and should be focused on identified high-risk patients., (Copyright © 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Various treatment options exist for patients suffering from critical limb ischemia (CLI). These options consist of endovascular procedures, surgical revascularization, primary amputation, or conservative therapy. The effect of the treatment is traditionally focused on outcomes, such as primary patency and limb salvage, though quality of life (QoL) is considered an important additional primary end point in a more patient-oriented healthcare system. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the best clinical decision making possible, to increase QoL in CLI patients., Methods: This review is based on a systematic electronic literature search using the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Articles evaluating QoL in patients with CLI were selected for further analysis. Only prospective studies, written in English, describing QoL and health status (HS) after endovascular or surgical revascularization, amputation or conservative therapy were considered for inclusion. Treatment results were divided into short-term (≤3-month follow-up) and long-term results (≥1-year follow-up) to achieve a clear view of the QoL in patients suffering for CLI patients., Results: Twenty-five articles describing HS in patients suffering from CLI were included. It was found that while most of these articles reported HS of patients, rarely did they report on QoL. As a result, it is difficult to determine the best treatment to increase HS as studies that focus on the comparison of treatment modalities are lacking. All 4 treatment modalities can raise HS in the short and the long terms; however, endovascular and surgical revascularization seem to positively effect HS the most. QoL results are lacking in both the short and long terms., Conclusions: All treatment methods included in the study resulted in an increase in patients' HS in both short and long terms. More comparative studies with inclusion of all different treatments of CLI are needed to assist in clinical decision making and perform tailored interventions for the individual patient. QoL and HS are confusingly used in current international literature with abundant HS research. To take patients individual opinions more into account, focus on QoL research is needed to designate the superior treatment in patients suffering from CLI., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

An automated ankle-brachial index device could lead to potential time savings and more accuracy in ankle-brachial index-determination after vascular surgery. This prospective cross-sectional study compared postprocedural ankle-brachial indices measured by a manual method with ankle-brachial indices of an automated plethysmographic method. Forty-two patients were included. No significant difference in time performing a measurement was observed (1.1 min, 95% CI: -0.2 to +2.4; P = 0.095). Mean ankle-brachial index with the automated method was 0.105 higher (95% CI: 0.017 to 0.193; P = 0.020) than with the manual method, with limits of agreement of -0.376 and +0.587. Total variance amounted to 0.0759 and the correlation between both methods was 0.60. Reliability expressed as maximum absolute difference (95% level) between duplicate ankle-brachial index-measurements under identical conditions was 0.350 (manual) and 0.152 (automated), although not significant (p = 0.053). Finally, the automated method had 34% points higher failure rate than the manual method. In conclusion based on this study, the automated ankle-brachial index-method seems not to be clinically applicable for measuring ankle-brachial index postoperatively in patients with vascular disease., (© The Author(s) 2016.)

Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSI) are a serious complication in vascular surgery which may lead to severe morbidity and mortality. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage is associated with increased risk for development of SSIs in central vascular surgery. The risk for SSI can be reduced by perioperative eradication of S. aureus carriage in cardiothoracic and orthopedic surgery. This study analyzes the relation between S. aureus eradication therapy and SSI in a vascular surgery population., Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed, including all patients undergoing vascular surgery between February 2013 and April 2015. Patients were screened for S. aureus nasal carriage and, when tested positive, were subsequently treated with eradication therapy. The presence of SSI was recorded based on criteria of the CDC. The control group consisted of a cohort of vascular surgery patients in 2010, who were screened, but received no treatment., Results: A total of 444 patients were screened. 104 nasal swabs were positive for S. aureus, these patients were included in the intervention group. 204 patients were screened in the 2010 cohort. 51 tested positive and were included in the control group. The incidence of S. aureus infection was 5 out of 51 (9.8%) in the control group versus 3 out of 104 in the eradication group (2.2%; 95% confidence interval 0.02-1.39; P = 0.13). A subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of S. aureus infection was 3 out of 23 (13.0%) in the control group in central reconstructive surgery versus 0 out of 44 in the intervention group (P = 0.074). The reduction of infection pressure by S. aureus was stronger than the reduction of infection pressure by other pathogens (exact maximum likelihood estimation; OR = 0.0724; 95% CI: 0.001-0.98; p = 0.0475)., Conclusion: S. aureus eradication therapy reduces the infection pressure of S. aureus, resulting in a reduction of SSIs caused by S. aureus.

Purpose: Vascular intervention studies generally consider patency and limb salvage as primary outcomes. However, quality of life is increasingly considered an important patient-oriented outcome measurement of vascular interventions. Existing literature was analyzed to determine the effect of different treatments on quality of life for patients suffering from either claudication or critical limb ischemia., Basic Methods: A review of the literature was undertaken in the Medline library. A search was performed on quality of life in peripheral arterial disease. Results were stratified according to treatment groups., Principal Findings: Twenty-one articles described quality of life in approximately 4600 patients suffering from peripheral arterial disease. Invasive treatment generally results in better quality of life scores (at a maximum of 2 years of follow-up), compared with non-invasive treatment. In patients with critical limb ischemia, successful revascularization improves quality of life scores. Only one study reported long-term results., Conclusions: Increase in quality of life scores can be found for any intervention performed for peripheral arterial disease. However, there is scarce information on long-term quality of life after vascular intervention., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Importance: Supervised exercise is recommended as a first-line treatment for intermittent claudication. Combination therapy of endovascular revascularization plus supervised exercise may be more promising but few data comparing the 2 therapies are available., Objective: To assess the effectiveness of endovascular revascularization plus supervised exercise for intermittent claudication compared with supervised exercise only., Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial of 212 patients allocated to either endovascular revascularization plus supervised exercise or supervised exercise only. Data were collected between May 17, 2010, and February 16, 2013, in the Netherlands at 10 sites. Patients were followed up for 12 months and the data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle., Interventions: A combination of endovascular revascularization (selective stenting) plus supervised exercise (n = 106) or supervised exercise only (n = 106)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the difference in maximum treadmill walking distance at 12 months between the groups. Secondary end points included treadmill pain-free walking distance, vascular quality of life (VascuQol) score (1 [worst outcome] to 7 [best outcome]), and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) domain scores for physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, and general health perceptions (0 [severe limitation] to 100 [no limitation])., Results: Endovascular revascularization plus supervised exercise (combination therapy) was associated with significantly greater improvement in maximum walking distance (from 264 m to 1501 m for an improvement of 1237 m) compared with the supervised exercise only group (from 285 m to 1240 m for improvement of 955 m) (mean difference between groups, 282 m; 99% CI, 60-505 m) and in pain-free walking distance (from 117 m to 1237 m for an improvement of 1120 m vs from 135 m to 847 m for improvement of 712 m, respectively) (mean difference, 408 m; 99% CI, 195-622 m). Similarly, the combination therapy group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in the disease-specific VascuQol score (1.34 [99% CI, 1.04-1.64] in the combination therapy group vs 0.73 [99% CI, 0.43-1.03] in the exercise group; mean difference, 0.62 [99% CI, 0.20-1.03]) and in the score for the SF-36 physical functioning (22.4 [99% CI, 16.3-28.5] vs 12.6 [99% CI, 6.3-18.9], respectively; mean difference, 9.8 [99% CI, 1.4-18.2]). No significant differences were found for the SF-36 domains of physical role functioning, bodily pain, and general health perceptions., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with intermittent claudication after 1 year of follow-up, a combination therapy of endovascular revascularization followed by supervised exercise resulted in significantly greater improvement in walking distances and health-related quality-of-life scores compared with supervised exercise only., Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Registry Identifier: NTR2249.

Background: Vascular surgery patients are frequently deemed to be in a frail clinical condition and at risk for delirium. Therefore, we evaluated the incidence and independent perioperative risk factors for delirium. In addition, we describe factors on frailty in the various vascular disease groups in current practice., Methods: This observational longitudinal study included 206 selected patients who were referred to a vascular surgery ward of a large-sized teaching hospital (Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands) for critical limb ischemia (n = 80), diabetic foot ulcers (n = 27), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (n = 62), and carotid surgery (n = 37) between April 2013 and December 2013. Data on factors that characterize frailty were collected. Delirium was scored using the Delirium Observation Screening Scale. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to find independent risk factors for delirium., Results: Delirium was present in 24% of the critical limb ischemia patients, in 19% of the patients with a diabetic foot ulcer, in 7% of the patients with an AAA, and in 8% of the patients undergoing carotid surgery (P > 0.05). Of the patients with critical limb ischemia and a delirium, 53% were octogenarians. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that history of delirium and nurse help at patient's home were independently associated with delirium. Patients with critical limb ischemia scored worse on factors related to frailty compared with the other disease groups in our current clinical practice on vascular surgery., Conclusions: Delirium is a frequent complication in vascular surgery clinical practice, especially in the elderly. Nurse visits at patients' homes and the Amphia Risk Score for delirium were independent risk factors for delirium in our study population. In this study, we identified patients with critical limb ischemia as the most frail and vulnerable., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The management of surgical site infections (SSI's) in vascular surgery has been challenging over the years. To assess the outcomes associated with the various strategies, we performed a review of all SSI's after elective vascular procedures in patients with moderate to severe peripheral arterial disease in a single centre hospital., Methods: All patients with a SSI after peripheral vascular surgery were retrieved from a database on Surgical site infections (SSI)-surveillance after vascular surgery between March 2009 and January 2012. At admission, all patients were approached by microbiological wound sampling and empirical start of antibiotics. Further wound management was based on personal experience and preference of the attending vascular surgeon. Endpoints were treatment success (complete wound healing while staying alive and without major amputation), survival and major amputation during one year follow up., Results: A total of 40 patients with a SSI were identified (60% superficial SSI and 40% deep SSI). In 92% of the patients with a superficial SSI's were successfully treated with adjusted antibiotics and incisional drainages. In the contrast, 25% of the patients with deep-SSI's were successfully treated. No particular treatment was more successful than the others., Conclusion: Adjusted antibiotic use and adequate wound drainage are sufficient strategies for superficial SSI management. The management of deep-SSI's is a challenging undertaking and future research on indications and timing of these wide arrays of treatment options is suggested., (Copyright © 2015 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at risk for revision surgery in the groin and therefore at potential risk for surgical site infections (SSIs). In an observational study, a cohort of patients with peripheral arterial disease was followed to examine the effect of different incision intervals on SSI-free survival., Methods: Patients, needing peripheral vascular surgery because of PAD, were retrieved from a prospectively collected database on SSIs after vascular surgery between March 2009 and January 2012, the group consisting of 720 patients. Of these, 255 patients were selected (age 71.9±10.4 y). Cox proportional hazards models were used for event-history analyses. The effect of incision interval was estimated with adjustment for a number of potential confounders. Effects were quantified by means of hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: No significant effect on the incision interval on SSI-free survival was observed. After separating incisional SSIs into superficial- and deep-seated, a significant linear trend effect of the groin incision interval on deep-incisional SSI development was observed: the shorter the interval, the higher the event rate (HR 1.5 per category, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, p=0.22). Besides the incision interval, the Rutherford classification was a significant risk factor for SSI development (HR 3.0; 95% CI 2.1-4.2; p<0.0005)., Conclusion: Revision surgery in the groin puts patients at risk for deep-incisional SSI. No effect on superficial incisional SSI development was observed. Besides the incision interval, the Rutherford classification was a significant risk factor for both superficial- and deep-incisional SSI. Quality improvement and better risk stratification schemes are suggested.

Background: An increasing number of vascular surgery units expand their team with nurse practitioners (NPs) to optimize patient care. There are no previously performed studies which assessed the influence of NPs on patients' quality of life (QoL), anxiety, and depressive symptom levels. The transition in care from surgeon to NP in the vascular surgery unit of our hospital facilitated the comparison of both groups., Methods: A prospective study was undertaken to analyze the effect of NPs on QoL, anxiety, and depressive symptom scores. Two groups were analyzed: a group of patients treated by a vascular surgeon alone (surgeon group) and a group of patients treated by a NP supervised by a vascular surgeon (NP group). Patients completed the short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) questionnaires both before and after intervention., Results: Two hundred fourteen patients were included in our study. Within groups, there was a significant increase in physical QoL, with 5.2 points in the surgeon group and 4.4 points in the NP group. There was a significant decrease in anxiety scores (-3.8 points in the surgeon group and -5.4 points in the NP group). No differences were found for depressive symptoms. Between groups, no differences were found., Conclusions: The same improvements were found for QoL and anxiety scores in both groups. Vascular NPs are therefore competent to explain procedures and guide patients through vascular interventions., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI's) are associated with severe morbidity, mortality and increased health care costs in vascular surgery., Objective: To implement a bundle of care in vascular surgery and measure the effects on the overall and deep-SSI's rates., Design: Prospective, quasi-experimental, cohort study., Methods: A prospective surveillance for SSI's after vascular surgery was performed in the Amphia hospital in Breda, from 2009 through 2011. A bundle developed by the Dutch hospital patient safety program (DHPSP) was introduced in 2009. The elements of the bundle were (1) perioperative normothermia, (2) hair removal before surgery, (3) the use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and (4) discipline in the operating room. Bundle compliance was measured every 3 months in a random sample of surgical procedures and this was used for feedback., Results: Bundle compliance improved significantly from an average of 10% in 2009 to 60% in 2011. In total, 720 vascular procedures were performed during the study period and 75 (10.4%) SSI were observed. Deep SSI occurred in 25 (3.5%) patients. Patients with SSI's (28,5±29.3 vs 10.8±11.3, p<0.001) and deep-SSI's (48.3±39.4 vs 11.4±11.8, p<0.001) had a significantly longer length of hospital stay after surgery than patients without an infection. A significantly higher mortality was observed in patients who developed a deep SSI (Adjusted OR: 2.96, 95% confidence interval 1.32-6.63). Multivariate analysis showed a significant and independent decrease of the SSI-rate over time that paralleled the introduction of the bundle. The SSI-rate was 51% lower in 2011 compared to 2009., Conclusion: The implementation of the bundle was associated with improved compliance over time and a 51% reduction of the SSI-rate in vascular procedures. The bundle did not require expensive or potentially harmful interventions and is therefore an important tool to improve patient safety and reduce SSI's in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

Background: Registration of complications of treatment is an important instrument for measuring the quality of health care. Reliable registration depends on definitions, the case-finding method that is used, and the registration method itself. We conducted a comparative study of two different methods of registration for the surveillance of surgical site infections (SSIs) in a single hospital., Methods: The study included all patients in both the surgical database and the microbiology and infection-prevention database of the hospital who underwent surgery on the abdominal aorta or peripheral vascular procedures from March 1, 2009 to March 1, 2010. The surgical database included positive scores for SSI in cases of positive wound swabs, the need for incision drainage, or the need for antibiotic treatment. The microbiology and infection-prevention database used criteria from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and based positive scores on redness, heat, swelling, or pain in the area of a surgical incision within 30 d after a procedure, and on a positive swab, drainage from an incision, or the presence of pus following a diagnostic puncture., Results: The surgical complication database included 218 patients, of whom 20 (9.2%) had a SSI. The microbiology and infection-prevention database included 236 patients, of whom 33 (14%) had a SSI. The databases were merged and all infections were ascertained by an expert team. The surgical database had a sensitivity of 57% for SSIs, whereas the microbiology and infection-prevention database had a sensitivity of 93% (p<0.05)., Conclusion: Physicians provided less reliable scores for SSI than did trained infection-control practitioners. This raises questions about the comparability of rates of SSI in different institutions as a means for judging the quality of hospital care.

Background: The pathophysiological mechanisms that induce postrevascularization edema after femoropopliteal bypass surgery are not completely understood. Reperfusion-associated injury to revascularized tissue and damage to lymphatic structures are both likely to play a role. Aim of this study was to study edema formation after peripheral bypass surgery with magnetic resonance imaging., Materials and Methods: Nine patients suffering from severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging scans before and 1 week after autologous femoropopliteal or femorocrural bypass surgery., Results: A 12% increase in volume of the upper legs and an 11% increase in volume of the lower legs were measured in patients postoperatively. The increase of volume was largely due to expansion of the subcutaneous compartments: a 35% increase in the upper legs and a 41% increase in the lower legs. Edema in the upper legs was predominantly located medially at the site of the surgical wound. In contrast, edema in the lower legs was homogenously distributed around the entire leg circumference. The muscle compartment showed no significant change of volume. However, in the majority of patients, edema-like changes were seen in selected muscles as well after a peripheral bypass reconstruction., Conclusion: Swelling of the subcutaneous compartments is mainly responsible for the volume increases in upper and lower legs similar to lymphatic edema. In addition, in a majority of patients, edema-like changes in selected muscles were seen especially in the upper legs. Reperfusion-associated injury as a cause of these changes cannot be ruled out., (Copyright © 2012 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus is the most important pathogen in the development of surgical site infections (SSI). Patients who carry S. aureus in the nose are at increased risk for the development of SSI in cardiothoracic and orthopedic surgery. In these populations it has been shown that the risk for SSI can be substantially reduced by eradicating S. aureus carriage. For vascular surgery the relation between nasal carriage and surgical site infections has not been clearly investigated. For this reason we performed this study to analyze the relation between S. aureus nasal carriage and SSI in our vascular surgery population., Methods: A prospective cohort study was undertaken, including all patients undergoing vascular surgery between January first 2010 and December 31th 2010. Before surgery patients were screened for S. aureus nasal carriage using a PCR technique. The presence of SSI was recorded based on criteria of the CDC., Results: Screening was performed in 224. Of those, 55 (24.5%) were positive, 159 (71.0%) were negative and 10 (4.5%) were inconclusive. In the screened vascular population 4 S. aureus SSI occurred in the 55 carriers compared with 6 in 159 non-carriers (p=0.24). A stratified analysis revealed a 10-fold increased risk in nasal carriers undergoing central reconstruction surgery (3 S. aureus SSI in 20 procedures versus 1 in 65 procedures in non-carriers, p=0.039)., Discussion: In patients undergoing central reconstruction surgery nasals carriers are at increased risk for the development of S. aureus SSI. These patients will probably benefit from perioperative treatment to eradicate nasal carriage.

Anne L Meulenbroek,1 Miriam C Faes,2 Stefanie R van Mil,1 MG Buimer,1 Hans GW de Groot,1 Eelco J Veen,1 Gwan H Ho,1 Leandra JM Boonman-de Winter,3,4 Jolanda de Vries,5,6 Rebecca van Gorkom,1 Fleur Toonders,1 Rene van Alphen,7 Karolien van Overveld,8 Nathalie Verbogt,1 Ewout W Steyerberg,9 Lijckle van der Laan1,10 1Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands; 2Department of Geriatrics, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands; 3Department of Scientific Research, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands; 4Admiraal de Ruyter Ziekenhuis, Goes, the Netherlands; 5Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands; 6Board, Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Goes, the Netherlands; 7Department of Physical Therapy, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands; 8Department of Dieticians, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands; 9Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; 10Department of Cardiovascular Science, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumCorrespondence: Anne L Meulenbroek, Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, Breda, 4818 CK, the Netherlands, Tel +31 76 595 3157, Fax +31 76 595 3818, Email AMeulenbroek1@amphia.nlObjective: Chronic limb threatening ischemia is the final stage of peripheral arterial disease. Current treatment is based on revascularization to preserve the leg. In the older, hospitalized chronic limb threatening ischemia patient, delirium is a frequent and severe complication after revascularization. Delirium leads to an increased length of hospital stay, a higher mortality rate and a decrease in quality of life. Currently, no specific guidelines to prevent delirium in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients exist. We aim to evaluate the effect of a multicomponent, multidisciplinary prehabilitation program on the incidence of delirium in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients ≥ 65 years.Design: A prospective observational cohort study to investigate the effects of the program on the incidence of delirium will be performed in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands. This manuscript describes the design of the study and the content of this specific prehabilitation program.Methods: Chronic limb threatening ischemia patients ≥ 65 years that require revascularization will participate in the program. This program focuses on optimizing the patient’s overall health and includes delirium risk assessment, nutritional optimization, home-based physical therapy, iron infusion in case of anaemia and a comprehensive geriatric assessment in case of frailty. The primary outcome is the incidence of delirium. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, amputation-free survival, length of hospital stay and mortality. Exclusion criteria are the requirement of acute treatment or patients who are mentally incompetent to understand the procedures of the study or to complete questionnaires. A historical cohort from the same hospital is used as a control group.Discussion: This study will clarify the effect of a prehabilitation program on delirium incidence in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients. New insights will be obtained on optimizing a patient’s preoperative mental and physical condition to prevent postoperative complications, including delirium.Trial: This protocol is registered at the Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR) number: NL9380.Keywords: chronic limb threatening ischemia, vascular surgical procedures, delirium, delirium/prevention and control, prehabilitation