Search

Adhesive and locomotor performances of geckos are inherently linked by specialized morphological and biomechanical features. As such, we predict that conditions that lead to poor adhesive performance (i.e., low resistance to applied force while clinging) also lead to poor locomotor performance and behavior (i.e., slowed running speed, increased frequency and duration of stops, more failed or incomplete runs). In this study, we test the prediction that running speed changes as a function of adhesive performance in variable temperature (12 and 32°C), humidity (30, 55, 70, 80% relative humidity), and substrate wettability (hydrophilic glass, intermediately wetting plexiglass). We also expect other locomotor performance traits and behaviors, such as stopping and avoiding treatment conditions, to change as a function of adhesive performance. The results of this study do not fully support our prediction: gecko locomotor performance does not change as a function of humidity or substrate wettability, unlike adhesive performance. As an anticipated result of ectothermy, geckos run significantly slower and stop more frequently and longer at 12°C than 32°C. At high temperature, geckos required significantly more running attempts on hydrophilic glass than plexiglass to complete the experimental procedure, suggesting that this treatment condition is unfavorable. The results of this study highlight the robust locomotive response of geckos to variation in adhesive performance and environmental conditions, and have significant implications for predictions about habitat use and behavior in their natural environment. Research Highlights: Gecko running speed does not change with variable humidity or substrate, unlike adhesive performance. Geckos run slower and stop often and longer at 12 than 32°C. At 32°C, geckos avoid running on hydrophilic glass. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The gecko adhesive system has been under particular scrutiny forover a decade, as the field has recently attracted attention for its application to bio-inspired design. However, little is known about howthe adhesive system behaves in ecologically relevant conditions. Geckos inhabit a variety of environments, many of which are characterized by high temperature, humidity and rain. The van der Waals-based gecko adhesive system should be particularly challenged by wet substrates because water can disrupt the intimate contact necessary for adhesion. While a few previous studies have focused on the clinging ability of geckos on wet substrates, we tested a dynamic performance characteristic, sprint velocity. To better understand how substrate wettability and running orientation affect locomotor performance of multiple species on wet substrates, we measured average sprint velocity of five species of gecko on substrates that were either hydrophilic or intermediately wetting and oriented either vertically or horizontally. Surprisingly, we found no indication that wet substrates impact average sprint velocity over 1 m, and rather, in some species, sprint velocity was increased on wet substrates rather than reduced. When investigating physical characteristics and behavior that may be associated with running on wet substrates, such as total number of stops, slips andwet toes at thecompletion of a race, we found that there may be habitat-related differences between some species. Our results showthat in general, unlike clinging andwalking, geckos running along wet substrates suffer no significant loss in locomotor performance over short distances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although we now have thousands of studies focused on the nano-, micro-, and whole-animal mechanics of gecko adhesion on clean, dry substrates, we know relatively little about the effects of water on gecko adhesion. For many gecko species, however, rainfall frequently wets the natural surfaces they navigate. In an effort to begin closing this gap, we tested the adhesion of geckos on submerged substrates that vary in their wettability. When tested on a wet hydrophilic surface, geckos produced a significantly lower shear adhesive force (5.4 ± 1.33 N) compared with a dry hydrophilic surface (17.1 ± 3.93 N). In tests on an intermediate wetting surface and a hydrophobic surface, we found no difference in shear adhesion between dry and wet contact. Finally, in tests on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), we found that geckos clung significantly better to wet PTFE (8.0 ± 1.09 N) than dry PTFE (1.6 ± 0.66 N). To help explain our results, we developed models based on thermodynamic theory of adhesion for contacting surfaces in different media and found that we can predict the ratio of shear adhesion in water to that in air. Our findings provide insight into how geckos may function in wet environments and also have significant implications for the development of a synthetic gecko mimic that retains adhesion in water. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite profound interest in the mechanics and performance of the gecko adhesive system, relatively few studies have focused on performance under conditions that are ecologically relevant to the natural habitats of geckos. Because geckos are likely to encounter surfaces that are wet, we used shear force adhesion measurements to examine the effect of surface water and toe pad wetting on the whole-animal performance of a tropical-dwelling gecko (Gekko gecko). To test the effect of surface wetting, we measured the shear adhesive force of geckos on three substrate conditions: dry glass, glass misted with water droplets and glass fully submerged in water. We also investigated the effect of wetting on the adhesive toe pad by soaking the toe pads prior to testing. Finally, we tested for repeatability of the adhesive system in each wetting condition by measuring shear adhesion after each step a gecko made under treatment conditions. Wetted toe pads had significantly lower shear adhesive force in all treatments (0.86±0.09N) than the control (17.96±3.42N), as did full immersion in water (0.44±0.03N). Treatments with droplets of water distributed across the surface were more variable and did not differ from treatments where the surface was dry (4.72±1.59N misted glass; 9.76±2.81 N dry glass), except after the gecko took multiple steps. These findings suggest that surface water and the wetting of a gecko's adhesive toe pads may have significant consequences for the ecology and behavior of geckos living in tropical environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]