Search

The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial was a blinded, comparative-effectiveness study of fosphenytoin, levetiracetam, and valproic acid in benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus. The primary outcome was clinical seizure cessation and increased responsiveness without additional anticonvulsant medications. Weight-based dosing was capped at 75 kg. Hence, patients weighing >75 kg received a lower mg/kg dose. Logistic regression models were developed in 235 adults to determine the association of weight (≤ or >75 kg, ≤ or >90 kg), sex, treatment, and weight-normalized dose with the primary outcome and solely seizure cessation. The primary outcome was achieved in 45.1% and 42.5% of those ≤75 kg and >75 kg, respectively. Using univariate analyses, the likelihood of success for those >75 kg (odds ratio [OR] = 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54-1.51) or >90 kg (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.42-1.66) was not statistically different compared with those ≤75 kg or ≤90 kg, respectively. Similarly, other predictors were not significantly associated with primary outcome or clinical seizure cessation. Our findings suggest that doses, capped at 75 kg, likely resulted in concentrations greater than those needed for outcome. Studies that include drug concentrations and heavier individuals are needed to confirm these findings., (© 2020 International League Against Epilepsy.)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical safety of sodium valproate and total and unbound valproic acid plasma concentrations after rapid infusion in hospitalized, acutely ill children. Four children (5-15 years) completed the study. Sodium valproate doses (8.3-15.4 mg/kg) were administered in

The availability of an intravenous formulation now makes possible rapid administration of valproate (VPA) loading doses, but estimates of key VPA pharmacokinetic parameters in patients have limited the use of this approach. VPA disposition was characterized in 112 epilepsy patients, with or without enzyme inducing comedications, randomized to either 3.0 or 1.5mg/kg/min infusions of valproate sodium injection. Maximum dose was

Valproic acid (VPA) has a narrow therapeutic range (50-100mg/l) and exhibits nonlinear protein binding. Additionally, VPA pharmacokinetics are dependent on age, induction status, and formulation; so titration and dosing vary between individuals. The aim of these simulations was to determine optimal intravenous (i.v.) loading dose, and i.v. and oral VPA maintenance regimens. A 5-min 15mg/kg loading dose resulted in total and free plasma VPA concentrations of approximately 65 and 7.5mg/l in children, and approximately 80 and 11mg/l in adults, 1h after the infusion; induction status had little effect. For uninduced children and adults, 7.5 and 3.5mg/kg q6h i.v. valproate sodium, initiated 6h after loading dose maintains therapeutic plasma VPA concentrations. The rapid decline of plasma VPA concentrations following an i.v. loading dose in combination with the delayed initial absorption of drug from delayed-release divalproex sodium tablets warrant beginning q12h oral maintenance regimens of delayed-release divalproex sodium within 2h of a loading dose in the uninduced population. Plasma VPA concentrations can be sustained in the therapeutic range using once-daily maintenance regimens of extended-release divalproex sodium tablets if initiated concurrently with i.v. loading dose in the uninduced population. A two-fold higher i.v. and oral maintenance regimen dose may be required in induced patients.

Fosphenytoin (FOS) and its active form, phenytoin (PHT), levetiracetam (LEV), and valproic acid (VPA) are commonly used second-line treatments of status epilepticus. However, limited information is available regarding LEV and VPA concentrations following high intravenous doses, particularly in young children. The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial, a blinded, comparative effectiveness study of FOS, LEV, and VPA for benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus provided an opportunity to investigate early drug concentrations. Patients aged ≥2 years who continued to seizure despite receiving adequate doses of benzodiazepines were randomly assigned to FOS, LEV, or VPA infused over 10 minutes. A sparse blood-sampling approach was used, with up to 2 samples collected per patient within 2 hours following drug administration. The objective of this work was to report early drug exposure of PHT, LEV, and VPA and plasma protein binding of PHT and VPA. Twenty-seven children with median (interquartile range) age of 4 (2.5-6.5) years were enrolled. The total plasma concentrations ranged from 69 to 151.3 μg/mL for LEV, 11.3 to 26.7 μg/mL for PHT and 126 to 223 μg/mL for VPA. Free fraction ranged from 4% to 19% for PHT and 17% to 51% for VPA. This is the first report in young children of LEV concentrations with convulsive status epilepticus as well as VPA concentrations after a 40 mg/kg dose. Several challenges limited patient enrollment and blood sampling. Additional studies with a larger sample size are required to evaluate the exposure-response relationships in this emergent condition.

Convulsive status epilepticus (SE) is a relatively common emergency condition affecting individuals of all ages. The primary goal of treatment is prompt termination of seizures. Where first-line treatment with benzodiazepine has failed to achieve this, a condition known as established SE (ESE), there is uncertainty about which agent to use next. The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT) is a 3-arm (valproate (VPA), fosphenytoin (FOS), levetiracetam (LEV)), phase III, double-blind randomized comparative effectiveness study in patients aged 2 years and above with established convulsive SE. Enrollment was completed in January 2019, and the results are expected later this year. We discuss lessons learnt during the conduct of the study in relation to the following: ethical considerations; trial design and practical implementation in emergency settings, including pediatric and adult populations; quality assurance; and outcome determination where treating emergency clinicians may lack specialist expertise. We consider that the ESETT is already informing both clinical practice and future trial design. This article is part of the Special Issue "Proceedings of the 7th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures".

Estimating early exposure of drugs used for the treatment of emergent conditions is challenging because blood sampling to measure concentrations is difficult. The objective of this work was to evaluate predictive performance of two early concentrations and prior pharmacokinetic (PK) information for estimating early exposure. The performance of a modeling approach was compared with a noncompartmental analysis (NCA). A simulation study was performed using literature‐based models for phenytoin (PHT), levetiracetam (LEV), and valproic acid (VPA). These models were used to simulate rich concentration‐time profiles from 0 to 2 h. Profiles without residual unexplained variability (RUV) were used to obtain the true partial area under the curve (pAUC) until 2 h after the start of drug infusion. From the profiles with the RUV, two concentrations per patient were randomly selected. These concentrations were analyzed under a population model to obtain individual population PK (PopPK) pAUCs. The NCA pAUCs were calculated using a linear trapezoidal rule. Percent prediction errors (PPEs) for the PopPK pAUCs and NCA pAUCs were calculated. A PPE within ±20% of the true value was considered a success and the number of successes was obtained for 100 simulated datasets. For PHT, LEV, and VPA, respectively, the median value of the success statistics obtained using the PopPK approach of 81%, 92%, and 88% were significantly higher than the 72%, 80%, and 67% using the NCA approach (p < 0.05; Mann–Whitney U test). This study provides a means by which early exposure can be estimated with good precision from two concentrations and a PopPK approach. It can be applied to other settings in which early exposures are of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare the bioavailability of divalproex extended release (divalproex–ER) given once daily relative to the conventional divalproex formulation given once every 8 hours, using various divalproex–ER doses that are 8–20% greater than the corresponding divalproex total daily doses. Design and subjects: This multiple-dose, fasting, randomised, two-period, crossover design study in 76 subjects with epilepsy taking a concomitant enzyme inducing antiepileptic drug compared the bioavailability of divalproex once every-8-hours regimens with 8–20% higher daily dose divalproex–ER once-daily regimens. Results: The 8–20% higher divalproex–ER once-daily-dose regimens were equivalent, with respect to exposure (area under the concentration-time curve; 1551 vs 1539 mg · h/L), to the corresponding total daily divalproex dose regimens. The divalproex–ER maximum concentration central value was significantly lower (83.3 vs 92.6 mg/L), and the minimum concentration mean was not significantly different (45.8 vs 44.8 mg/L) from the corresponding values for the divalproex regimen. The peak-to-trough fluctuation in plasma concentrations was significantly lower for once-daily divalproex–ER (64%) compared with once-every-8-hours divalproex (79%). The size of the divalproex dose and the presence of a concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug did not have a statistically significant effect on divalproex–ER/divalproex relative bioavailability. No adverse event occurred in more than 5% of subjects on either treatment; all were mild or moderate in severity with none resulting in discontinuation. Both tested formulations were well tolerated by the subjects. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that patients with epilepsy taking divalproex may switch to 8–20% higher doses of divalproex–ER and have equivalent valproic acid exposure, lower fluctuation in valproic acid concentrations, and similar tolerability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]