6 results on '"Shields, Adrian M"'
Search Results
2. Saliva antiviral antibody levels are detectable but correlate poorly with serum antibody levels following SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or vaccination.
- Author
-
Faustini, Siân E., Cook, Alex, Hill, Harriet, Al-Taei, Saly, Heaney, Jennifer, Efstathiou, Elena, Tanner, Chloe, Townsend, Neal, Ahmed, Zahra, Dinally, Mohammad, Hoque, Madeeha, Goodall, Margaret, Stamataki, Zania, Plant, Timothy, Chapple, Iain, Cunningham, Adam F., Drayson, Mark T., Shields, Adrian M., and Richter, Alex G.
- Abstract
The importance of salivary SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, following infection and vaccination, has not been fully established. 875 healthcare workers were sampled during the first wave in 2020 and 66 longitudinally in response to Pfizer BioNTech 162b2 vaccination. We measured SARS-CoV-2 total IgGAM and individual IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies. IgGAM seroprevalence was 39.9%; however, only 34.1% of seropositive individuals also had salivary antibodies. Infection generated serum IgG antibodies in 51.4% and IgA antibodies in 34.1% of individuals. In contrast, the salivary antibody responses were dominated by IgA (30.9% and 12% generating IgA and IgG antibodies, respectively). Post 2nd vaccination dose, in serum, 100% of infection naïve individuals had IgG and 82.8% had IgA responses; in saliva, 65.5% exhibited IgG and 55.2% IgA antibodies. Prior infection enhanced the vaccine antibody response in serum but no such difference was observed in saliva. Strong neutralisation responses were seen for serum 6 months post 2nd-vaccination dose (median 87.1%) compared to low neutralisation responses in saliva (median 1%). Intramuscular vaccination induces significant serum antibodies and to a lesser extent, salivary antibodies; however, salivary antibodies are typically non-neutralising. This study provides further evidence for the need of mucosal vaccines to elicit nasopharyngeal/oral protection. Although saliva is an attractive non-invasive sero-surveillance tool, due to distinct differences between systemic and oral antibody responses, it cannot be used as a proxy for serum antibody measurement. • Largest investigation of SARS-CoV-2 serum and salivary antibodies in 875 healthcare workers. • In-depth profiling of combined anti-Spike IgGAM and individual immunoglobulin classes. • Saliva is not equivalent to serum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Correlation Between Postvaccination Anti-Spike Antibody Titers and Protection Against Breakthrough Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study.
- Author
-
Vivaldi, Giulia, Jolliffe, David A, Faustini, Sian, Shields, Adrian M, Holt, Hayley, Perdek, Natalia, Talaei, Mohammad, Tydeman, Florence, Chambers, Emma S, Cai, Weigang, Li, Wenhao, Gibbons, Joseph M, Pade, Corinna, McKnight, Áine, Shaheen, Seif O, Richter, Alex G, and Martineau, Adrian R
- Subjects
COVID-19 ,SARS-CoV-2 ,ANTIBODY titer ,BREAKTHROUGH infections - Abstract
In this population-based cohort of 7538 adults, combined immunoglobulin (Ig) G, IgA, and IgM (IgG/A/M) anti-spike titers measured after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination were predictive of protection against breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection. Discrimination was significantly improved by adjustment for factors influencing risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, including household overcrowding, public transport use, and visits to indoor public places. Anti-spike IgG/A/M titers showed positive correlation with neutralizing antibody titers (rs = 0.80 [95% confidence interval, .72-.86]; P < .001) and S peptide-stimulated interferon-γ concentrations (rs = 0.31 [.13-.47]; P < .001). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Impact of vaccination on hospitalization and mortality from COVID-19 in patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiency: The United Kingdom experience.
- Author
-
Shields, Adrian M., Tadros, Susan, Al-Hakim, Adam, Nell, Jeremy M., Me Me Nay Lin, Chan, Michele, Goddard, Sarah, Dempster, John, Dziadzio, Magdalena, Patel, Smita Y., Elkalifa, Shuayb, Huissoon, Aarnoud, Duncan, Christopher J. A., Herwadkar, Archana, Khan, Sujoy, Bethune, Claire, Elcombe, Suzanne, Thaventhiran, James, Klenerman, Paul, and Lowe, David M.
- Subjects
COVID-19 ,PRIMARY immunodeficiency diseases ,PELVIC inflammatory disease ,VACCINATION ,COVID-19 vaccines ,SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant - Abstract
Background: Individuals with primary and secondary immunodeficiency (PID/SID) were showntobeat riskofpooroutcomesduringtheearly stagesoftheSARS-CoV-2pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines demonstrate reduced immunogenicity in these patients. Objectives: To understand whether the risk of severe COVID-19 in individuals with PID or SID has changed following the deployment of vaccination and therapeutics in the context of the emergence of novel viral variants of concern. Methods: The outcomes of two cohorts of patients with PID and SID were compared: the first, infected between March and July 2020, prior to vaccination and treatments, the second after these intervention became available between January 2021 and April 2022. Results: 22.7% of immunodeficient patients have been infected at least once with SARS-CoV-2 since the start of the pandemic, compared to over 70% of the general population. Immunodeficient patients were typically infected later in the pandemic when the B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant was dominant. This delay was associated with receipt of more vaccine doses and higher pre-infection seroprevalence. Compared to March-July 2020, hospitalization rates (53.3% vs 17.9%, p<0.0001) and mortality (Infection fatality rate 20.0% vs 3.4%, p=0.0003) have significantly reduced for patients with PID but remain elevated compared to the general population. The presence of a serological response to vaccination was associated with a reduced duration of viral detection by PCR in the nasopharynx. Early outpatient treatment with antivirals or monoclonal antibodies reduced hospitalization during the Omicron wave. Conclusions: Most individuals with immunodeficiency in the United Kingdom remain SARS-CoV-2 infection naïve. Vaccination, widespread availability of outpatient treatments and, possibly, the emergence of the B.1.1.529 variant have led to significant improvements in morbidity and mortality followings SARS-CoV-2 infection since the start of the pandemic. However, individuals with PID and SID remain at significantly increased risk of poor outcomes compared to the general population; mitigation, vaccination and treatment strategies must be optimized to minimize the ongoing burden of the pandemic in these vulnerable cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Increased Seroprevalence and Improved Antibody Responses Following Third Primary SARS-CoV-2 Immunisation: An Update From the COV-AD Study.
- Author
-
Shields, Adrian M., Faustini, Sian E., Hill, Harriet J., Al-Taei, Saly, Tanner, Chloe, Ashford, Fiona, Workman, Sarita, Moreira, Fernando, Verma, Nisha, Wagg, Hollie, Heritage, Gail, Campton, Naomi, Stamataki, Zania, Drayson, Mark T., Klenerman, Paul, Thaventhiran, James E. D., Elkhalifa, Shuayb, Goddard, Sarah, Johnston, Sarah, and Huissoon, Aarnoud
- Subjects
ANTIBODY formation ,PRIMARY immunodeficiency diseases ,SARS-CoV-2 ,COVID-19 vaccines ,IMMUNIZATION - Abstract
Background: Patients with primary and secondary antibody deficiency are vulnerable to COVID-19 and demonstrate diminished responses following two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine schedules. Third primary vaccinations have been deployed to enhance their humoral and cellular immunity. Objectives: To determine the immunogenicity of the third primary SARS-CoV-2 immunisation in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with antibody deficiency. Methods: Participants enrolled in the COV-AD study were sampled before and after their third vaccine dose. Serological and cellular responses were determined using ELISA, livevirus neutralisation and ELISPOT assays. Results: Following a two-dose schedule, 100% of healthy controls mounted a serological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, however, 38.6% of individuals with antibody deficiency remained seronegative. A third primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccine significantly increased anti-spike glycoprotein antibody seroprevalence from 61.4% to 76.0%, the magnitude of the antibody response, its neutralising capacity and induced seroconversion in individuals who were seronegative after two vaccine doses. Vaccine-induced serological responses were broadly cross-reactive against the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 variant of concern, however, seroprevalence and antibody levels remained significantly lower than healthy controls. No differences in serological responses were observed between individuals who received AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Pfizer BioNTech 162b2 during their initial two-dose vaccine schedule. SARS-CoV-2 infectionnaive participants who had received a heterologous vaccine as a third dose were significantly more likely to have a detectable T cell response following their third vaccine dose (61.5% vs 11.1%). Conclusion: These data support the widespread use of third primary immunisations to enhance humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in individuals with antibody deficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses following CD20-depletion treatment in patients with haematological and rheumatological disease: a West Midlands Research Consortium study.
- Author
-
Shields, Adrian M, Venkatachalam, Srinivasan, Shafeek, Salim, Paneesha, Shankara, Ford, Mark, Sheeran, Tom, Kelly, Melanie, Qureshi, Iman, Salhan, Beena, Karim, Farheen, De Silva, Neelakshi, Stones, Jacqueline, Lee, Sophie, Khawaja, Jahanzeb, Kaudlay, Praveen Kumar, Whitmill, Richard, Kakepoto, Ghulam Nabi, Parry, Helen M, Moss, Paul, and Faustini, Sian E
- Subjects
- *
VACCINE effectiveness , *COVID-19 vaccines , *BOOSTER vaccines , *CONSORTIA , *B cells , *IMMUNE reconstitution inflammatory syndrome , *AUTOIMMUNE diseases - Abstract
B-cell-depleting agents are among the most commonly used drugs to treat haemato-oncological and autoimmune diseases. They rapidly induce a state of peripheral B-cell aplasia with the potential to interfere with nascent vaccine responses, particularly to novel antigens. We have examined the relationship between B-cell reconstitution and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses in two cohorts of patients previously exposed to B-cell-depleting agents: a cohort of patients treated for haematological B-cell malignancy and another treated for rheumatological disease. B-cell depletion severely impairs vaccine responsiveness in the first 6 months after administration: SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence was 42.2% and 33.3% in the haemato-oncological patients and rheumatology patients, respectively and 22.7% in patients vaccinated while actively receiving anti-lymphoma chemotherapy. After the first 6 months, vaccine responsiveness significantly improved during early B-cell reconstitution; however, the kinetics of reconstitution was significantly faster in haemato-oncology patients. The AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and the Pfizer BioNTech 162b vaccine induced equivalent vaccine responses; however, shorter intervals between vaccine doses (<1 m) improved the magnitude of the antibody response in haeamto-oncology patients. In a subgroup of haemato-oncology patients, with historic exposure to B-cell-depleting agents (>36 m previously), vaccine non-responsiveness was independent of peripheral B-cell reconstitution. The findings have important implications for primary vaccination and booster vaccination strategies in individuals clinically vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2. B cell depleting drugs including rituximab are commonly used to treat haematological malignancy and autoimmune diseases but may impair the immunological response to vaccination. This study investigates SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses in individuals with haematological and rheumatological disease with previously exposure to B cell depleting agents. Vaccination within the first 6 months of B cell depletion is associated with significant impairment of vaccine responsiveness; however, rheumatology and haemato-oncological patients display different kinetics of B cell reconstitution corresponding to differential vaccine responsiveness over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.