Search

Objective: To evaluate the association between a topical hemostatic agent used at the time of cesarean delivery and uterine scar disruption (rupture or dehiscence) at the subsequent trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC)., Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted (2005-2021). Parturients with a singleton pregnancy in whom a topical hemostatic agent was placed during the primary cesarean delivery were compared with patients in whom no such agent was placed. We assessed the uterine scar disruption rate after the subsequent TOLAC and the rate of adverse maternal outcomes. Univariate analyses were followed by multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]; 95% confidence interval [CI])., Results: During the study period, 7199 women underwent a trial of labor and were eligible for the study; 430 (6.0%) had prior use of a hemostatic agent, 6769 (94.0%) did not. In univariate analysis, a history of topical hemostatic agent use was not found to be significantly associated with uterine scar rupture, dehiscence, or failed trial of labor. This was also confirmed on multivariate analysis for uterine rupture (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 0.66-5.54; P = 0.23), dehiscence of uterine scar (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 0.56-4.68; P = 0.37), and TOLAC failure (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.48; P = 0.61)., Conclusion: A history of hemostatic agent use is not associated with an increased risk for uterine scar disruption after subsequent TOLAC. Further prospective studies in other settings are needed to strengthen these findings., (© 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Objective: Parity is a prognostic variable when considering trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC). This study aimed to determine whether grandmultiparous patients are at increased risk of poor TOLAC outcomes such as uterine rupture., Study Design: A retrospective cohort was conducted at a single university-affiliated medical center with approximately 10,000 deliveries per year. The study group included women post one cesarean section who attempted TOLAC carrying a singleton fetus in vertex presentation. We divided the cohort into three groups: group 1 - women who had a parity of 1; group 2 - parity of 2-4; group 3 - parity of 5 and above. The primary outcome was successful VBAC. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, uterine rupture, and combined maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, Chi-square test, ANOVA, and paired t -test., Results: Five thousand four hundred and forty-seven women comprised the study group: group 1 - 879 patients, group 2 - 2374 patients, and group 3 - 2194 patients. No significant between-group differences were found in gestational age at delivery. Rates of a successful VBAC were 80.6%, 95.4%, and 95.5%, respectively. Group 1 were more likely to have a failed TOLAC compared to group 2 (OR 5.02, 95% CI 3.9-6.5, p <.001) and group 3 (OR 5.17, 95% CI 4.0-6.7, p <.001). There was no increased risk of failed TOLAC when comparing groups 2 and 3 (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.8-1.4, p =.89). Operative delivery rate differed significantly between all three groups; 25.1%, 6.2%, and 3.6%, for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively ( p <.001). The rate of uterine rupture was significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (1.02% vs. 0.29% p =.02) and group 3 (1.02% vs. 0.2%, p =.01, respectively). There were no differences between group 2 and group 3 (0.29% vs. 0.2% p =.78)., Conclusions: Grandmultiparity is not associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture during TOLAC.

Objective: To evaluate success rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean in grand multiparous women., Study Design: A retrospective computerized data base study was conducted at a single tertiary center, between 2005 and 2019. The study compared the maternal and neonatal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in grand multiparous women (parity ≥ 6) as compared to multiparous women (parity: 3-5). Comparison analysis was performed by univariate analysis and followed by adjusted multiple logistic regression models., Results: During the study period we identified 2749 and 4294 cases of trial of labor after cesarean in grand multiparous and multiparas, respectively. VBAC was observed in 94.6% of the grand multiparous as compared to 96.5% in the multiparous group, p  < .01. The grand multiparous group had a higher rate of postpartum hemorrhage (3 vs. 2.2%, p  = .03) and prolonged postpartum hospitalization (1.4 vs. 0.7%, p  < .01). The rates of uterine rupture (0.3 vs. 0.2%, p =.50), peripartum hysterectomy (0.1 vs. 0%, p  = .33) and adverse neonatal outcomes were comparable between the groups., Conclusion: Trial of labor after cesarean in grand multiparous women is associated with favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. Consideration and awareness should be given for the increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage, not associated with uterine rupture.

Background: Uterine rupture is an obstetrical emergency with serious undesired complications for laboring mothers resulting in fatal maternal and neonatal outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of uterine rupture, its association with previous uterine surgery and vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), and the maternal and perinatal implications., Methods: This is a population-based retrospective study. All pregnant women treated for ruptured uterus in one center between 2013 and 2020 were included. Their information retrieved from the medical records department were reviewed retrospectively., Results: A total of 209,112 deliveries were included and 41 cases of uterine rupture were identified. The incidence of uterine rupture was 1.96/10000 births. Among the 41 cases, 16 (39.0%) had maternal and fetal complications. There were no maternal deaths secondary to uterine rupture, while perinatal fatality related to uterine rupture was 7.3%. Among all cases, 38 (92.7%) were scarred uterus and 3 (7.3%) were unscarred uterus. The most common cause of uterine rupture was previous cesarean section, while cases with a history of laparoscopic myomectomy were more likely to have serious adverse outcomes, such as fetal death. 24 (59.0%) of the ruptures occurred in anterior lower uterine segment. Changes in Fetal heart rate monitoring were the most reliable signs for rupture., Conclusions: Incidence of uterine rupture in the study area, Shanghai, China was consistent with developed countries. Further improvements in obstetric care and enhanced collaboration with referring health facilities were needed to ensure maternal and perinatal safety., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The appearance of urological complications is a major problem in obstetrics and gynecologic surgery; the bladder is the most common damaged organ. Due to a continuous increase in the rate of cesareans, the incidence of urologic complications will be potentially higher. We reviewed the most important risk factors for urinary tract injury and analyzed the strategies necessary to avoid these situations during vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). The risks and benefits of VBAC should be balanced before deciding the mode of delivery., (©2021 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE.)

The objective of this study is to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of parturients attempting trial of labor (TOL) after two previous CD versus those who had an elective third repeat CD. A retrospective computerized database cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary center between 2005 and 2019. Various maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between parturients attempting TOL after two CD versus parturients opting for elective third repeat CD. TOL after two CD was allowed only for those who met all the criteria of our departments' protocol. Parturients with identified contraindication to vaginal delivery were excluded from the analysis. A univariate analysis was conducted and was followed by a multivariate analysis. A total of 2719 eligible births following two CD were identified, of which 485 (17.8%) had attempted TOL. Successful vaginal delivery rate following two CDs was 86.2%. Uterine rupture rates were higher among those attempting TOL (0.6% vs 0.1% p = 0.04). However, rates of hysterectomy, re-laparotomy, blood product infusion, and intensive care unit admission did not differ significantly between the groups. Neonatal outcomes following elective repeat CD were less favorable (specifically, neonatal intensive care unit admission and composite adverse neonatal outcome). Nonetheless, when controlling for potential confounders, an independent association between composite adverse neonatal outcome and an elective repeat CD was not demonstrated. In a subgroup analysis, diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were found independently associated with failed TOLAC. When following a strict protocol, TOL after two CD is a reasonable alternative and associated with favorable outcomes.

Objective: Prior vaginal delivery (VD), including vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), is one of the greatest predictors of successful trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) and uterine rupture. We aimed to evaluate VBAC and uterine rupture rates associated with TOLAC in women with VD prior to cesarean delivery (CD) or with prior VBAC, and the cumulative effect of the number of prior VD's., Study Design: This retrospective study included women having TOLAC between 2005-2019. The study compared the caesarean and uterine rupture rates of TOLAC in women with only prior VD as compared to women with only prior VBAC. Comparison analysis was performed by univariate analysis and followed by adjusted multiple logistic regression models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision tree analyses (chi-square automatic interaction detection algorithm) was conducted to evaluate the influence of the number of prior VD's on the likelihood of successful TOLAC., Results: Overall, 9,038 women met the inclusion criteria. Women with prior VBAC and prior VD showed significantly higher rates of successful VBAC compared to those with no prior VD or prior VBAC (96 % and 86 % vs 76 %; p < 0.01). However, women with prior VBAC but not women with prior VD showed significantly lower rates of uterine rupture compare to women with no prior VD or VBAC (0.1 % vs 0.6 % and 0.6 %; p < 0.01). The prevented fraction of TOLAC success was significantly higher in women with prior VBAC than that of women with VD prior to CD (83 % vs. 42 %, p < 0.01). ROC curve showed that the number of prior VBACs was a better predictor of TOLAC success and uterine rupture than the number of prior VD's. However, each single variable was found to have low positive predictive value (PPV) and requires other variables to improve the prediction. Finally, decision tree analysis demonstrated significant association between TOLAC success rate and prior VBAC, prior VD, and CD indications, without any association with the number of prior deliveries., Conclusion: Prior VBAC has some prediction value for TOLAC success and uterine rupture. However, it has low PPV as a single variable and requires other variables to improve the prediction. The number of prior VDs is not improving prediction., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Over the past few decades, the rate of repeat cesarean deliveries (CD) have taken on pandemic proportions. As part of the global effort to reduce the rate of CD, trail of labor (TOL) following one and even two previous CDs is encouraged. We aimed to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes of parturients attempting a TOL after two previous CDs, in which a strict departmental protocol was adopted., Study Design: A retrospective cohort study of TOL following CD (TOLAC) at a single tertiary center, between 2005 and 2019. Various maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed, in which parturients attempting TOL after two CD were compared to those after one previous CD. TOL after two CDs was permitted only to those parturients who fulfilled all the criteria of our department's protocol. A univariate analysis was initially conducted and was then followed by a multivariate analysis., Results: A total of 11,620 TOLAC were identified, of which 515 (4.4 %) were after two previous CDs. Overall, vaginal delivery rates were high, however, following two CDs the rate was lower than following one CD (83.1 % vs. 88.5 %, p < 0.01). Rates of uterine rupture, peripartum hysterectomy, and postpartum hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the groups. Neonatal results following two CDs were less favorable (specifically, one minute APGAR, neonatal care unit admissions and mechanical ventilation rates), yet, when controlling for potential confounders, an independent association between neonatal composite outcome and TOL following two CDs was not demonstrated., Conclusion: For parturients with a history of two CDs, when a strict protocol for selecting appropriate candidates is followed, TOL is a reasonable alternative to repeat CD and is associated with favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose and that they have no financial or non-financial conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The increasing rate of elective and indicated caesarean sections worldwide has led to new pathologies and management challenges. The number of patients undergoing trial of labor after caesarean section (TOLAC) is also increasing. Three professional societies provide detailed guidelines based on scientific evidence for the management of patients attempting vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). However, they do not provide any recommendations for the actual surgical steps to be followed to minimize the risks of uterine rupture (UR) during TOLAC. Uterine scar condition, intrapartum management and maternal health status correlate to uterine scar rupture risk and provide guidance for parturient TOLAC eligibility. TOLAC and vaginal delivery success rate as reported by the largest studies is between 60% and 77%. Uterine rupture is more prevalent in VBAC-2 patients (1.59%) in contrast to VBAC-1 (0.72%). Additionally, VBAC-2 patients have higher incidence of caesarean hysterectomy 0.56% vs. 0.19% for VBAC-1. The chances of successful VBAC increase when the interpregnancy/interdelivery interval is less than 6.3 years and less than 24 months, respectively. No difference was detected between the techniques of uterine incision closure of the previous CS and TOLAC results, although closure of the CS uterine incision in 2 layers seems to be practiced more widely. Niche or isthmocele presents another complication of CS. Secondary infertility due to niche, will eventually direct to hysteroscopic or laparoscopic repair, depending on the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) as measured by US scan. When RMT is below 3 mm or 2.5 mm surgery can be performed, to prevent any spontaneous UR in case of pregnancy. Monitoring by US scanning of hysterotomy scar after myomectomy can detect hematoma. In patients with severe postoperative pain but hemodynamically stable follow up by US scan examination can direct the management decision. In those patients with active bleeding and deterioration of hysterotomy scar edema will be an indication to surgery. There is no firm evidence regarding which type of thread, knotting or sequence of suturing is more favorable to reduce the risk of UR after VBAC or hysterotomy after myomectomy., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate whether cesarean delivery (CD) indication, labor status, and other primary CD characteristics affect the risk for uterine rupture in subsequent deliveries., Methods: A case-control study of women attempting trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) in a single, tertiary, university-affiliated medical center (2007-2016). Deliveries complicated by uterine rupture were matched to successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in a 1:3 ratio. Indication, labor status and post-partum complications (postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum infection) at primary CD were compared between study and control group., Results: During study period, there were 75,682 deliveries, of them, 3937 (5.2%) were TOLAC. Study group included 53 cases of uterine rupture at TOLAC and 159 women with successful VBAC. Women in study group had significantly lower rates of previous VBAC (15.1 vs. 28.9%, p = 0.047). Rate of postpartum complications at primary CD was significantly higher in women with TOLAC complicated by uterine rupture (7.5 vs. 1.9%, respectively, p = 0.042). Utilizing the multivariate logistic regression analysis, postpartum complications remained an independent risk factor for uterine rupture in the following TOLAC (aOR 4.07, 95% CI 1.14-14.58, p = 0.031)., Conclusion: Postpartum hemorrhage and infection, in primary CD, seem to be associated with increased risk for uterine rupture during subsequent TOLAC.

Objective: To estimate the effect of prior successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) on the rate of uterine rupture and delivery outcome in women undergoing labor after cesarean., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all women attempting labor after cesarean delivery in a university-affiliated tertiary-hospital (2007-2014) was conducted. Study group included women attempting vaginal delivery with a history of cesarean delivery and at least one prior VBAC. Control group included women attempting first vaginal delivery following cesarean delivery. Primary outcome was defined as the rate of uterine rupture. Secondary outcomes were delivery and maternal outcomes., Results: Of 62,463 deliveries during the study period, 3256 met inclusion criteria. One thousand two hundred and eleven women had VBAC prior to the index labor and 2045 underwent their first labor after cesarean. Women in the study group had a significantly lower rate of uterine rupture 9 (0.7%) in respect to control 33 (1.6%), p = .036, and had a higher rate of successful vaginal birth (96 vs. 84.9%, p < .001). In multivariate analysis, previous VBAC was associated with decreased risk of uterine rupture (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-0.97, p = .04)., Conclusions: In women attempting labor after cesarean, prior VBAC appears to be associated with lower rate of uterine rupture and higher rate of successful vaginal birth.

The cesarean delivery rate in the United States has risen steadily over the past 5 decades such that approximately one in three women now undergo cesarean section. The rise in repeat operations and accompanying decline in trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) have been major contributors to this phenomenon. The appropriate use of TOLAC continues to be a topic of interest with the recognition that most women with a history of prior cesarean are candidates for trial of labor. The NICHD MFMU Network Cesarean Registry conducted from 1999 to 2002 provided contemporary data concerning the risks and benefits of TOLAC, which in turn have helped inform practitioners and women considering their options for childbirth following cesarean delivery., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Risk of uterine rupture with trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) is less than one percent. Discovery of uterine rupture often occurs during labor. In our case, the uterine scar is discovered to be ruptured during the postpartum period. The exact cause and time of uterine rupture is difficult to ascertain in this case, yet manual palpation of the uterine scar did not aid in the eventual diagnosis.

Objective Following the release of A Randomized Trial of Induction versus Expectant Management (ARRIVE) trial, the induction of labor at 39 weeks has increased in the United States. The risk of uterine rupture and optimal timing of elective induction in those patients with a prior cesarean delivery is not well-described, and they were not included in the original trial. We aimed to determine the risk of uterine rupture in those patients undergoing elective induction of labor with prior cesarean delivery. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort of participants with prior cesarean delivery from 1996 to 2000. Participants were included if they had two or more prior cesareans. Participants were excluded if they had a history of an unknown prior incision, a classical incision, gestational age <39 weeks, any diabetes, chronic hypertension, twin gestation, collagen or vascular disease, or HIV. Those undergoing expectant management were compared with those undergoing elective induction with no medical or obstetrical indications for delivery. Analysis was performed at three gestational age groups: 39 weeks, 40 weeks, and 41 weeks. The primary outcomes were uterine rupture, rates of successful vaginal delivery, and a composite major morbidity risk. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. Results At 39 weeks, 618 (10.3%) elective inductions were compared with 5,365 (89.7%) undergoing expectant management; uterine rupture occurred more frequently (13 patients [2.1%] vs. 49 patients [0.9%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3–4.6) with fewer successful vaginal birth after cesarean [VBAC; 66.8 vs. 75%; aOR, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5–0.7]. The risk of uterine rupture was similar between groups at 40 weeks (5 patients [0.8%] vs. 21 patients [1.2%]; p = 0.387) and 41 weeks (7 patients [1.4%] vs. 2 patients (0.8%); p = 0.448). Conclusion Patients undergoing elective induction of labor with a prior cesarean scar had an increased risk of uterine rupture when compared with expectant management at 39 weeks, with fewer successful VBAC. Key Points TOLAC elective induction at 39 weeks has an increased risk of uterine rupture. TOLAC elective induction at 39 weeks has a less successful chance of vaginal delivery. Awaiting spontaneous labor in this cohort does not increase the risk of uterine rupture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The rising global Cesarean section (CS) rate has increased interest in vaginal birth after Cesarean (VBAC) due to its benefits over elective repeated CS. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the use of trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAUS) in assessing lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness in females with previous CS, highlighting its predictive value and potential clinical decision-making role. Methods: We conducted a thorough search on Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, & Cochrane Library. The investigation utilized both textual terms and medical subject titles, such as TAUS, CS, LUS and trial of labour (TOL) across Medline, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library. In addition, we conducted a thorough search on ClinicalTrials.gov and examined the references cited in selected publications and reviews to discover more relevant observational research. Results: Regarding elective repeat CS, TAUS measurements correlated with delivery outcomes and LUS thickness, with cut-off values varying from 1.5 to 4.05 millimeters. The pooled analysis exhibited a relative risk (RR) of 0.7 (95% confidence interval: 0.4, 0.9), with high heterogeneity (Chi-p <0.001, I² = 100%). Concerning uterine dehiscence & rupture, an association was found between thin LUS and uterine dehiscence (7 studies) and uterine rupture (1 study). An RR of 0.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.04, 0.15) for dehiscence and 0.003 (95% confidence interval: -0.001, 0.006) for rupture. Major heterogeneity for dehiscence (Chi-p <0.001, I² = 100%) and homogeneity for rupture (Chi-p <0.9, I² = 0%). Conclusion: TAUS is a valuable non-invasive tool for assessing LUS thickness in females with previous CS, thereby influencing clinical decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Temesgen Tantu Arusi,1,2 Dereje Zewdu Assefa,3 Muluken Gunta Gutulo,4 Teshome Gensa Geta5 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wolkite University College of Health Science, Wolkite, Ethiopia; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hawassa University, Hawassa City, Ethiopia; 3Department of Anesthesia, Wolkite University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite, Ethiopia; 4Wolaita Zone Health Department, Wolaita Zone Health Bureau, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia; 5Department of Public Health, Wolkite University College of Health Science, Wolkite, EthiopiaCorrespondence: Temesgen Tantu Arusi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite City, Southern Nations State, 2783, Ethiopia, Tel +251913323961, Email tematantu405@gmail.comBackground: Uterine rupture is a rare occurrence but has catastrophic complications during pregnancy. The incidence is relatively higher in scarred uteri because there is a promotion of labor after cesarean section. There is a scarcity of evidence from low-income countries regarding the predictors of uterine rupture after trial labor.Objective: To assess factors determining uterine rupture during labor after the previous cesarean section among mothers delivered at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from September 2017 to September 2022.Methods: A facility-based unmatched case–control study was done by reviewing 105 patients, which included 35 cases and 70 controls in a 1:2 case-to-control ratio. The association between dependent and independent variables was sought with running binary and multivariate analyses by using the cut point of a p value < 0.05 and 95% CI.Results: The prevalence of uterine rupture is 1.6%. The factors significantly associated with uterine rupture after trial of labor are fetal weight > 3.8 kg (AOR: 5.21), antenatal care 4 (AOR: 3.6), labor duration > 15 hours (AOR: 10.7), and previous successful vaginal delivery (AOR: 3.4). Poor fetal-maternal outcomes like 91.4% fetal death, 29 hysterectomies, 22 blood transfusions, and 1 death.Conclusion: The prevalence is relatively higher than in developed countries. The number of antenatal care, labor duration, and lower fetal weight are not common findings associated with uterine rupture after trial of labor across the literature, so large-scale studies are needed to develop guidelines for the Ethiopian setup. Improving the quality of obstetrics care given in each level of health system.Keywords: TOL, uterine rupture, scar dehiscence, VBAC, Ethiopia

Background and Objectives: Women with a history of cesarean section are a high-risk group because they are likely to develop uterine rupture during their next pregnancy. Current evidence suggests that a vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is associated with lower maternal mortality and morbidity than elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD). Additionally, research suggests that uterine rupture can occur in 0.47% of cases of trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC). Case Description: A healthy 32-year-old woman at 41 weeks of gestation, in her fourth pregnancy, was admitted to the hospital due to a dubious CTG record. Following this, the patient gave birth vaginally, underwent a cesarean section, and successfully underwent a VBAC. Due to her advanced gestational age and favorable cervix, the patient qualified for a trial of vaginal labor (TOL). During labor induction, she displayed a pathological CTG pattern and presented symptoms such as abdominal pain and heavy vaginal bleeding. Suspecting a violent uterine rupture, an emergency cesarean section was performed. The presumed diagnosis was confirmed during the procedure—a full-thickness rupture of the pregnant uterus was found. The fetus was delivered without signs of life and successfully resuscitated after 3 min. The newborn girl of weight 3150 g had an Apgar score of 0/6/8/8 at 1, 3, 5, and 10 min. The uterine wall rupture was closed with two layers of sutures. The patient was discharged 4 days after the cesarean section without significant complications, with a healthy newborn girl. Conclusions: Uterine rupture is a rare but severe obstetric emergency and can be associated with maternal and neonatal fatal outcomes. The risk of uterine rupture during a TOLAC attempt should always be considered, even if it is a subsequent TOLAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is worldwide accepted and encouraged. Currently, in Romania due to increased cesarean section rate especially for maternal request, a high number of patients with scarred uterus is seeking for VBAC at subsequent pregnancies. Because of specific complications of trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC), risks and benefits need to be individualized for each specific candidate. This study is about VBAC in Filantropia Clinical Hospital from Bucharest and how we are selecting the ideal candidate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Women are offered the choice of vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean section as although the absolute risks of major morbidity or mortality are lower with elective repeat caesarean in the short term, the risks of multiple caesareans such as invasive placental disorders and intra-abdominal adhesion formation, increase with the number of caesareans performed. Guiding patients in the clinic through this decision making process can be challenging but the use of a checklist can be of help. The most pertinent risk of vaginal birth after caesarean section is uterine rupture as it can give little warning to the clinician and can be catastrophic to mother and baby. Therefore, appropriate selection of patients and managing women labouring with a uterine scar is of utmost importance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the success of the double-balloon catheter (DBC) versus prostaglandin gel (PGE2) for induction of labour in women with one previous caesarean section.Design: Retrospective cohort study using routinely collected maternity data in a Tertiary NHS hospital, North West England, UK. Women with a live singleton cephalic pregnancy induced using DBC or PGE2 after one previous birth by caesarean section from 1st April 2017 to 1st July 2019 were included. The core outcomes assessed were the inability to perform artificial rupture of membranes, requirement of oxytocin, vaginal birth and uterine rupture.Results: 208 women met the inclusion criteria, 127 were induced using the DBC and 81 using PGE2. The two groups were well matched for demographics and characteristics. Women induced for prolonged ruptured membranes with PGE2 were excluded from the study leaving 127 managed with DBC and 69 with PGE2. There were no significant differences observed between the two groups. Vaginal birth rates were 52.7% for the DBC and 66.6% for the PGE2 (relative risk 0.79 (confidence interval 0.63-1.00); P = 0.05). A single uterine rupture was reported following DBC usage.Conclusions: The DBC and PGE2 appear to be equally effective for induction of labour in women with one previous caesarean section. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate success rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean in grand multiparous women.Study Design: A retrospective computerized data base study was conducted at a single tertiary center, between 2005 and 2019. The study compared the maternal and neonatal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in grand multiparous women (parity ≥ 6) as compared to multiparous women (parity: 3-5). Comparison analysis was performed by univariate analysis and followed by adjusted multiple logistic regression models.Results: During the study period we identified 2749 and 4294 cases of trial of labor after cesarean in grand multiparous and multiparas, respectively. VBAC was observed in 94.6% of the grand multiparous as compared to 96.5% in the multiparous group, p < .01. The grand multiparous group had a higher rate of postpartum hemorrhage (3 vs. 2.2%, p = .03) and prolonged postpartum hospitalization (1.4 vs. 0.7%, p < .01). The rates of uterine rupture (0.3 vs. 0.2%, p=.50), peripartum hysterectomy (0.1 vs. 0%, p = .33) and adverse neonatal outcomes were comparable between the groups.Conclusion: Trial of labor after cesarean in grand multiparous women is associated with favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. Consideration and awareness should be given for the increased risk for postpartum hemorrhage, not associated with uterine rupture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In 2010, the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG) published a new clinical practice guideline on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) that was considered less restrictive. It allowed for offering TOLAC to women with two prior cesarean deliveries, even without a prior vaginal delivery, and for labor induction. As a result, our hospital, a public tertiary care academic center, updated our TOLAC practice guideline to reflect ACOG's new recommendations. We thus aim to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes for women undergoing TOLAC with 1 versus 2 prior cesareans, with and without a prior vaginal delivery, following these clinical practice changes at our hospital.Study design: This was a secondary analysis of a 2-year retrospective cohort following implementation of a hospital guideline in women undergoing TOLAC with a live, cephalic, singleton without lethal anomaly ≥24 0/7 weeks and 1 or 2 prior cesarean deliveries. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with one prior cesarean were compared to women with two prior cesareans. The primary outcome was composite maternal morbidity (uterine rupture, uterine dehiscence, hysterectomy, transfusion, postpartum venous thromboembolism, delivery/surgical injury, chorioamnionitis or endometritis, shoulder dystocia, death). Secondary outcomes included neonatal morbidity. The analysis was performed in SAS; p < .05 was considered significant.Results: Seven hundred women with one prior cesarean and 73 women with two prior cesareans underwent TOLAC after the 2011 guideline implementation. Post guideline maternal demographics, labor length, comorbid conditions, simplified Bishop score, and induced labor were similar between groups. Composite maternal morbidity was similar between groups (18.3 versus 23.3%, p = .30 for women with 1 versus 2 prior cesarean deliveries, respectively). The same was true when comparing women with 1 versus 2 prior cesareans who had never had a prior vaginal delivery (25.5 versus 33.3%, p = .28 for 1 versus 2 prior cesarean deliveries, respectively). There were no differences in neonatal outcomes. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) success rates were similar between groups (78.9% in women with 1 prior cesarean versus 74.0% in women with 2 prior cesareans, p=.33), even when only analyzing women without a prior vaginal delivery (69.4% in women with 1 prior cesarean versus 71.4% in women with 2 prior cesareans, p = .78).Conclusion: Adoption of ACOG's TOLAC practice changes, specifically offering TOLAC to women with two prior cesareans even without a prior vaginal delivery, and offering induction of labor regardless of cervical favorability, may increase VBAC rates without increasing maternal or neonatal morbidity from TOLAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) and complications in Japan.Methods: We conducted a descriptive study of pregnant women with one prior cesarean section registered between January 2013 and December 2015 in the perinatal database of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. This database is a nationwide institution-based registry in Japan. This study included women who had undergone one prior cesarean delivery and who delivered a singleton by cephalic presentation between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation. We collected data on delivery method, particularly with regard to the involvement of TOLAC or elective repeated cesarean deliveries (ERCD). Rates of TOLAC were investigated by facility type, and we calculated the rates of maternal and perinatal complications including uterine rupture in TOLAC.Results: During the study period, 647,098 births were registered. Among the 34,460 women who met the inclusion criteria, 1730 (5.0%) and 32,730 (95.0%) underwent TOLAC and ERCD, respectively. In total, 76.4% of hospitals did not perform TOLAC at all. Generally in perinatal medical centers, which are better equipped with facilities, 58.7% women did not perform TOLAC. With regard to complications, we identified eight cases (0.46%) of uterine rupture with TOLAC. TOLAC births did not include maternal death and perinatal death. Among women attempting TOLAC, 1532 (88.6%) had successful vaginal births.Conclusion: The TOLAC rate in Japan was considerably lower than that reported in other countries, despite comparable complication rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Rates of cesarean delivery are continuously increasing in industrialized countries, with repeated cesarean accounting for about a third of all cesareans. Women who have undergone a first cesarean are facing a difficult choice for their next pregnancy, i.e.: (1) to plan for a second cesarean delivery, associated with higher risk of maternal complications than vaginal delivery; or (b) to have a trial of labor (TOL) with the aim to achieve a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and to accept a significant, but rare, risk of uterine rupture and its related maternal and neonatal complications. The objective of this trial is to assess whether a multifaceted intervention would reduce the rate of major perinatal morbidity among women with one prior cesarean. Methods/design The study is a stratified, non-blinded, cluster-randomized, parallel-group trial of a multifaceted intervention. Hospitals in Quebec are the units of randomization and women are the units of analysis. As depicted in Figure 1, the study includes a 1-year pre-intervention period (baseline), a 5-month implementation period, and a 2-year intervention period. At the end of the baseline period, 20 hospitals will be allocated to the intervention group and 20 to the control group, using a randomization stratified by level of care. Medical records will be used to collect data before and during the intervention period. Primary outcome is the rate of a composite of major perinatal morbidities measured during the intervention period. Secondary outcomes include major and minor maternal morbidity; minor perinatal morbidity; and TOL and VBAC rate. The effect of the intervention will be assessed using the multivariable generalized-estimating-equations extension of logistic regression. The evaluation will include subgroup analyses for preterm and term birth, and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Discussion The intervention is designed to facilitate: (1) women’s decision-making process, using a decision analysis tool (DAT), (2) an estimate of uterine rupture risk during TOL using ultrasound evaluation of low-uterine segment thickness, (3) an estimate of chance of TOL success, using a validated prediction tool, and (4) the implementation of best practices for intrapartum management. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials, ID: ISRCTN15346559 . Registered on 20 August 2015.

Objective  We sought to assess the safety of transcervical Foley catheter (TCF) placement for cervical ripening in women undergoing induction of labor (IOL) after prior cesarean by evaluating the risk of uterine rupture. Study Design  We performed a secondary analysis of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit's Cesarean Section Registry, a prospective observational cohort study. We included women with a history of ≤2 low-transverse cesarean deliveries who underwent IOL at ≥24 weeks of gestational age with a live singleton fetus without major anomalies. We excluded those who received prostaglandins or laminaria. We performed multinomial logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for uterine rupture and dehiscence. Relevant confounders included prior vaginal delivery, pregnancy-induced hypertension, chorioamnionitis, and cervical effacement and dilation on admission. Results  A total of 2,564 women were eligible. Unadjusted analysis demonstrated no increased risk of uterine rupture with TCF (1.9 vs. 0.9%; p  = 0.10) but an increased risk of uterine dehiscence (1.9 vs. 0.6%; p  = 0.02). After adjustment, TCF was not associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture (aOR: 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71–5.78) or uterine scar dehiscence (aOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.37–4.72). Conclusion  Foley catheter is a safe tool for mechanical dilation in women undergoing IOL after prior cesarean. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the outcome of pregnancy in women with previous one cesarean section as successful trial of scar and vaginal delivery, and repeated caesarian section. Methodology: This is a retrospective cohort hospital-based study was conducted in Maternity and Children Hospital Al- HASA. Included booked women and non-booked pregnant women and had previous one cesarean section. Data were collected from delivery room log book and medical files when more details were required. Those who were eligible for the study were 299 women who underwent comprehensive analysis. Main results: The successful vaginal delivery was (73.9%). No reported cases of maternal mortality or morbidity. However, there were tender scar with no dehiscence or rupture uterus (4 %). No neonatal mortality, however, 6% of the CS were indicated by fetal distress. There was statistically significant association between gestational age and fetal weight (P < 0.01) and between the gestational age and Apgar score (P < 0.01). Significant results was found between outcome and previous successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) (P < 0.001) and with spontaneous vaginal deliveries (P Value 0.004) and between previous cause of C-Section and the outcome was highly significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: In this study the maternal and fetal outcome of VBAC were quite satisfactory. Policy maker can use the findings of this study to develop strategy to decrease the cesarean section rate. Safe practice that enhances VBAC success rate without increasing mortality and morbidity should be evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: External cephalic version is commonly not performed in women with a previous cesarean section. Fear of uterine rupture and cesarean section in labor are prominent. The risks, however, of these are unclear. This study aims to document the safety and efficacy of external cephalic version in women with a prior cesarean section in a series of 100 consecutive attempts, and to perform a literature of the existing literature.Study Design: This is a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data of external cephalic version attempts in women at term with a previous cesarean section, and a literature review of previously published series. External cephalic version was performed by one of 3 experienced operators, with salbutamol tocolysis if appropriate, using ultrasound to visualize the fetal heart and place of fetal parts.Results: 100 women with a prior cesarean section underwent external cephalic version over a 16-year period in one institution. 68% had no previous vaginal delivery. The external cephalic version success rate was 50%, and 30 (63.8%) of these subsequently delivered vaginally. There were no cases of uterine rupture or other complications. A literature review of series containing a total of 549 cases revealed no cases of uterine rupture or perinatal death.Conclusions: External cephalic version in women with a prior cesarean section is safe but enables a vaginal birth in only about a third of women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The objective of this study was to compare spontaneous labor outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) and nulliparas to better counsel women. Study Design A 4-year retrospective cohort.We included women at term in spontaneous labor with vertex singletons and no more than one prior cesarean delivery. In planned secondary analysis, we focused on a subset of women with a prior cesarean and a predicted likelihood of a successful vaginal delivery of 70% or more based on the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units-vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculator. Results Our cohort included 606 TOLACS and 606 nulliparas. Women undergoing TOLAC were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery (25.7 vs. 14.7%; p < 0.001). Severe maternal hemorrhage (1.5 vs. 0.2%; p = 0.02) and uterine rupture (1.9 vs. 0.0%; p < 0.01) were more likely in the TOLAC group. For the subset of women with a predicted likelihood of VBAC of 70% or more, there were no differences in cesarean delivery (16.7 vs. 14.7%; p = 0.51), maternal, or immediate neonatal complications. Conclusion Women undergoing TOLAC were more likely to have a cesarean delivery, hemorrhage, or uterine rupture. Those with more than 70% predicted likelihood of VBAC were no more likely to experience these outcomes. These findings help contextualize the risks of TOLAC for women considering this option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Epidural analgesia has been considered a risk factor for labor dystocia at trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) and uterine rupture. We evaluated the association between exposure to epidural during TOLAC and mode of delivery and maternal-neonatal outcomes. Materials and methods: A single center retrospective study of women that consented to TOLAC within a strict protocol between 2006 and 2013. Epidural “users” were compared to “non-users”. Primary outcome was the mode of delivery: repeat in-labor cesarean or vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Secondary outcomes were maternal/neonatal morbidities. Univariate/multivariate analyses for associations between epidural and mode of delivery were adjusted for significant covariates/mediators. Results: Of a total of 105,471 births registered, 9464 (9.0%) were eligible for TOLAC; 7149 (75.5%) women consented to TOLAC, among which 4081 (57.1%) had epidural analgesia. The in labor cesarean rate was significantly lower for the epidural “users” 8.7% vs. “non-users” 11.8%, P<0.0001, with a parallel increased rate of instrumental delivery. Uterine rupture rates were comparable: 0.4% and 0.29%, respectively (P=0.31). The adjusted multivariate model showed that epidural “users” were more likely to experience a VBAC, odds ratio (OR) 4.58 [3.67; 5.70]; P<0.0001 with a similar rate of adverse maternal-neonatal outcomes. Conclusion: Epidural analgesia at TOLAC may emerge as a safe and significant adjunct for VBAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This was a prospective observational study to determine the predictive factors for a successful vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) and to develop a relevant antenatal scoring system. Patients with one previous caesarean section were included in this study. All data including maternal demographics, obstetric history, pregnancy progress and outcomes were collected and analysed. A total of 142 out of the 186 women (76.3%) had successful VBAC. History of previous vaginal delivery and non-recurrent indications for previous caesarean section were the significant predictive factors for a successful VBAC. Five variables for our scoring tool were selected. By using a proposed mean score of 4 out of 7, the scoring system had a sensitivity of 81.0%, specificity of 52.3% and a positive predictive value of 84.6%. VBAC antenatal scoring system was potentially a useful predictive tool in antenatal counselling. Impact statement What is already known on this subject: Planned vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is an important strategy to limit the overall caesarean section rate, which is related to maternal morbidities. However, trial of vaginal delivery does involve potential complications including scar dehiscence, postpartum haemorrhage and emergency hysterectomy. What the results of this study add: Clinical predictors of a successful VBAC include non-recurrent indications for the previous caesarean section, previous vaginal delivery, spontaneous onset of labour and birthweight less than 4kg. There were multiple screening tools developed to predict the likelihood of successful VBAC. These scoring systems involved various variables such as age, ethnicity, Bishop's score and previous caesarean indication. We had prospectively developed an antenatal scoring system based on five variables. Our result showed that patient with a score of four and above will have around 85% chance of successful VBAC. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: We have also found that, estimated foetal weight based on ultrasound scan is a potential predictor for successful VBAC. This simple scoring method will be useful in-patient counselling regarding mode of delivery after one previous caesarean section. A multicentre study involving large cohort of patients is ideal to validate our scoring system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rates of cesarean delivery are continuously increasing in industrialized countries, with repeated cesarean accounting for about a third of all cesareans. Women who have undergone a first cesarean are facing a difficult choice for their next pregnancy, i.e.: (1) to plan for a second cesarean delivery, associated with higher risk of maternal complications than vaginal delivery; or (b) to have a trial of labor (TOL) with the aim to achieve a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and to accept a significant, but rare, risk of uterine rupture and its related maternal and neonatal complications. The objective of this trial is to assess whether a multifaceted intervention would reduce the rate of major perinatal morbidity among women with one prior cesarean.Methods/design: The study is a stratified, non-blinded, cluster-randomized, parallel-group trial of a multifaceted intervention. Hospitals in Quebec are the units of randomization and women are the units of analysis. As depicted in Figure 1, the study includes a 1-year pre-intervention period (baseline), a 5-month implementation period, and a 2-year intervention period. At the end of the baseline period, 20 hospitals will be allocated to the intervention group and 20 to the control group, using a randomization stratified by level of care. Medical records will be used to collect data before and during the intervention period. Primary outcome is the rate of a composite of major perinatal morbidities measured during the intervention period. Secondary outcomes include major and minor maternal morbidity; minor perinatal morbidity; and TOL and VBAC rate. The effect of the intervention will be assessed using the multivariable generalized-estimating-equations extension of logistic regression. The evaluation will include subgroup analyses for preterm and term birth, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.Discussion: The intervention is designed to facilitate: (1) women's decision-making process, using a decision analysis tool (DAT), (2) an estimate of uterine rupture risk during TOL using ultrasound evaluation of low-uterine segment thickness, (3) an estimate of chance of TOL success, using a validated prediction tool, and (4) the implementation of best practices for intrapartum management.Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials, ID: ISRCTN15346559 . Registered on 20 August 2015. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report two cases of women with a previous cesarean performed before active labor at 29 weeks of gestation who underwent sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment (LUS) at 36 weeks' gestation in their subsequent pregnancy. In both cases, uterine scar defect was detected on the upper part of the LUS, at ~9 to 11 cm from the cervical os, and was only visualized by the transabdominal approach. We suggest that early gestational age and the absence of labor at previous cesarean can lead to a higher uterine scar location on the LUS and, therefore, increase the risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancy. The heterogeneity of uterine scar location could explain discrepancies observed in studies using the transabdominal versus the transvaginal approach or both regarding the predictive value of LUS measurements for uterine rupture.

Caesarean section (CS) has evolved from a procedure with considerable morbidity and mortality risks into one that is safe enough to be considered as a matter of maternal choice in high resource countries. Improvements in operative techniques, anaesthesia, intensive care, blood transfusion services and availability of antibiotics have all contributed to improved safety of the procedure for pregnant women. Rates of CS are rising all over the world and so are the rates of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC). Attempting a VBAC is a safe and appropriate choice that must be offered to most women who have had a prior caesarean delivery. Approximately 70–75% of women who attempt VBAC will have a successful vaginal delivery. However VBAC is associated with risks for both mother and the baby. The possibility of uterine rupture in labour ranges from 3 to 7 per 1000 pregnancies while the risk of perinatal death or severe morbidity should uterine rupture occur is higher with trial of vaginal delivery than with repeat caesarean delivery. These risks and the associated medico-legal sequelae have resulted in revised national and international guidelines with focus on antenatal counselling, individualised risk assessment as well as stringent facility and personnel requirements to conduct VBAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the complications caused by uterine rupture associated with vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Some of the different factors that can increase the risk of uterine rupture during VBAC include the type and location of the prior uterine incision, the number of prior cesarean deliveries (CDs), induction of labor, increasing maternal age, advancing gestational age, birth weight exceeding 4000 grams and single-layer uterine closure.

Purpose: To determine the risk of uterine rupture for women undergoing trial of labour (TOL) with both a prior caesarean section (CS) and a vaginal delivery.Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using keywords for CS and uterine rupture. The results were critically appraised and the data from relevant and valid articles were extracted. Odds ratios were calculated and a pooled estimate was determined using the Mantel-Haenszel method.Results: Five studies were used for final analysis. Three studies showed a significant risk reduction for women with both a previous CS and a prior vaginal delivery (PVD) compared to women with a previous CS only, and two studies showed a trend towards risk reduction. The absolute risk of uterine rupture with a prior vaginal delivery varied from 0.17 to 0.46%. The overall odds ratio for PVD was 0.39 (95% CI 0.29-0.52, P < 0.00001).Conclusion: Women with a history of both a CS and vaginal delivery are at decreased risk of uterine rupture when undergoing TOL compared with women who have only had a CS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We assessed the rate of uterine rupture in patients undergoing labor induction for attempted vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). A retrospective study was performed of data from a computerized database. Deliveries from January 1, 1998, to June 30, 2001, in the Southern California Kaiser Permanente system were reviewed and various perinatal characteristics analyzed. A total of 16,218 patients had a prior low transverse cesarean section. Of these, 6832 (42.1%) had a trial of labor. Successful VBAC occurred in 86% of patients with spontaneous onset of labor and 66% of patients with labor induction (p <0.001). The uterine rupture rate was not different between patients with spontaneous or induced labor (1.0% versus 1.2%, p=0.51). Similarly, there was no significant difference between oxytocin or prostaglandin E2 induction (1.4% versus 1.0%, p=0.59). In our study, labor induction did not appear to increase the risk of uterine rupture in women attempting VBAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a case report of a patient who achieved a successful vaginal birth for five times attended by a traditional birth attendant twice after two cesarean sections and thrice after three cesarean sections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. To evaluate obstetricians' practice patterns, opinions and factors influencing decision-making about mode of delivery in women with two previous c-sections. Methods. A questionnaire was mailed to the 160 obstetricians from the Rhone-Alpes perinatal network. Questionnaires included demographic, organisational information and questions about physicians' opinion, practice patterns and patient counseling concerning vaginal birth after c-section (VBAC) after one and two caesarean sections. Results. Response rate was 65.6%, 100% and 23.8% would offer VBAC to women with respectively one and two previous c-sections. Uterine rupture rate was largely overestimated in both women with one (2.8%) and two prior c-sections (14.2%). Factors positively influencing obstetricians were cerebral palsy estimated rate less than 20%, a minimal decision to birth delay less than 20 min when emergency c-section would be required. Neonatal severe outcomes consecutive to trial of labour as well as placenta praevia or accreta risk and morbidity associated with multiple c-sections would be insufficiently discussed. Conclusion. Obstetricians largely prefer a third planned c-section in women with two previous c-sections. This decision is partly based on a large overestimation of immediate maternal and neonatal serious outcomes consecutive to trial of labour as well documented serious long term outcomes of multiple c-sections are insufficiently considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Uterine rupture is the most serious complication for women undergoing trial of labor (TOL) after prior cesarean delivery. While rates of uterine rupture vary significantly according to a variety of clinically associated risk factors, the absolute risk for this complication ranges between 0.5 and 4 percent. Previous vaginal delivery and prior successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery confer the lowest risk of rupture on women attempting TOL. In contrast, multiple prior cesareans, short interpregnancy interval, single layer uterine closure, prior preterm cesarean, labor induction and augmentation have all been suggested in some studies as factors which may increase the rate of uterine rupture. While considering these risk factors is important in counseling women regarding childbirth following cesarean delivery, the infrequency of uterine rupture coupled with relatively weak associations for most risk factors has prevented the development of an accurate prediction tool for uterine rupture. Preliminary studies suggest that sonographic evaluation of the uterine scar may hold some promise for identifying women at risk. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective. To show the results of vaginal birth after primary caesarean (VBAC) without using prostaglandin for induction and/or syntocinon augmentation are comparable when induction is done with these agents but without the added risks of uterine rupture. Method. A review of the obstetric records of 16,498 parturient from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2006 was carried out. The 229 cases of women who wanted VBAC were subjected to further analysis to determine the number of successful vaginal delivery after spontaneous onset of labour or membrane sweep. The instrumental vaginal delivery rate, analgesia commonly used and the complication rate were analysed. Results. The result showed that 34.49% had spontaneous onset of labour, 27.07% laboured after membrane sweep and 38.42% had repeat urgent caesarean section as they failed to go into spontaneous labour. Of those who went into labour spontaneously or after membrane sweep, 67% had vaginal delivery, a further 13.97% had instrumental vaginal delivery and 16% had emergency caesarean section. There was no case of uterine rupture. Conclusion. VBAC can end successfully in a high proportion of cases without the use of prostaglandin or syntocinon for induction of labour and or syntocinon for augmentation in these women because of their associated increased relative risk of uterine rupture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To assess incidence of uterine rupture in scarred and unscarred uteri and its maternal and fetal complications in a nationwide design. Design Population-based cohort study. Setting All 98 maternity units in the Netherlands. Population All women delivering in the Netherlands between August 2004 and August 2006 ( n = 371 021). Methods Women with uterine rupture were prospectively collected using a web-based notification system. Data from all pregnant women in the Netherlands during the study period were obtained from Dutch population-based registers. Results were stratified by uterine scar. Main outcome measures Population-based incidences, severe maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, relative and absolute risk estimates. Results There were 210 cases of uterine rupture (5.9 per 10 000 pregnancies). Of these women, 183 (87.1%) had a uterine scar, incidences being 5.1 and 0.8 per 10 000 in women with and without uterine scar. No maternal deaths and 18 cases of perinatal death (8.7%) occurred. The overall absolute risk of uterine rupture was 1 in 1709. In univariate analysis, women with a prior caesarean, epidural anaesthesia, induction of labour (irrespective of agents used), pre- or post-term pregnancy, overweight, non-Western ethnic background and advanced age had an elevated risk of uterine rupture. The overall relative risk of induction of labour was 3.6 (95% confidence interval 2.7–4.8). Conclusion The population-based incidence of uterine rupture in the Netherlands is comparable with other Western countries. Although much attention is paid to scar rupture associated with uterotonic agents, 13% of ruptures occurred in unscarred uteri and 72% occurred during spontaneous labour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rate of vaginal birth after a cesarean (VBAC) delivery in the multiparous population has decreased largely in recent years because of maternal and neonatal complications. The clinical management of grand multiparous (GMP) women (>5 births) with a prior cesarean delivery is even less clear. The purpose of the present study was to assess the risks of maternal and neonatal complications associated with VBAC compared to that of repeated elective cesarean section (CS) in the GMP population. A retrospective study of 1,102 GMP women with a singleton gestation and a prior single CS was conducted. Data were retrieved from the database of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women who underwent a successful VBAC attempt, women who had failed in a trial of labor and women who had an elective repeated CS. Six hundred and nineteen women (56%) underwent a successful VBAC, 155 (14%) underwent a trail of labor and 328 (30%) had an elective repeated CS. Women who had a successful VBAC required less blood transfusion, and had less puerperal fever diseases ( P < 0.001). Induction or augmentation of labor was associated with failure of VBAC ( P < 0.001). No significant differences in neonatal complications were observed between the groups. No significant difference in uterine dehiscence, uterine rupture, amnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, hysterectomy, puerperal fever and thromboembolic diseases was observed between the groups. A successful VBAC in the GMP population was not associated with a higher risk of maternal complications in comparison with a repeated elective CS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The safety of women undergoing childbirth with prior caesarean delivery is a major public health concern. Most of the earlier studies focused on the success rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section; later focus shifted to maternal and neonatal safety, and presently, each factor that would influence the outcome of trial of labour is being considered on both the success and the safety of vaginal birth following caesarean delivery. The contribution of induction of labour to uterine rupture is not entirely clear. Although large multi-center randomised trials comparing planned elective repeat caesarean delivery vs vaginal delivery following prior caesarean delivery are required for conclusive evidence; current evidence suggests that, in properly selected women, vaginal birth can be safely achieved if adequate facilities to monitor the foetus and immediate caesarean can be performed. Unbiased evidence-based information should be given to patients in making decisions about mode of delivery based on individual characteristics. The purpose of this review is to understand each factor that would influence the success and safety of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]