Search

Objectives: We sought to compare outcomes between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and laparotomy in patients with clinical stage I uterine serous carcinoma (USC)., Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for newly diagnosed USC between 11/1/1993 and 12/31/2017 were retrospectively identified and assigned to either the MIS cohort or the laparotomy cohort. Patients with conversion to laparotomy were analyzed with the MIS cohort. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival and compared using the log-rank test., Results: In total, 391 patients met inclusion criteria; 242 underwent MIS (35% non-robotic and 65% robotic-assisted laparoscopies) and 149 underwent laparotomy. Age, BMI, stage, and washings status did not differ between cohorts. Patients who underwent MIS were less likely to have lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI; 35.1% vs 48.3%), had fewer nodes removed (median, 9 vs 15), and lower rates of paraaortic nodal dissection (44.6% vs 65.1%). Rates of adjuvant therapy did not differ between cohorts. Median follow-up times were 63.0 months (MIS cohort) vs 71.0 months (laparotomy cohort; P = .04). Five-year PFS rates were 58.7% (MIS) vs 59.8% (laparotomy; P = .1). Five-year OS rates were 65.2% (MIS) compared to 63.5% (laparotomy; P = .2). On multivariable analysis, higher stage, deep myometrial invasion, and positive washings were associated with decreased PFS. Age ≥ 65 years, higher stage, LVSI, and positive washings were associated with shorter OS., Conclusions: MIS does not compromise outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed USC and should be offered to these patients to minimize surgical morbidity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest N.R. Abu-Rustum reports research funding paid to the institution from GRAIL. M.M. Leitao Jr. reports research funding paid to the institution from KCI/Acelity, ad-hoc speaker for Intuitive Surgical, Inc., and advisory board participation for JnJ/Ethicon and Takeda. V. Makker reports advisory board participation (unpaid) for Eisai, Merck, Clovis, Faeth, Duality, Morphyes, Karyopharm, Novartis, Lilly, and Immunocore. All other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GEA) is a rare form of cervical cancer not associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. We summarize our experience with GEA at a large cancer center., Methods: Clinical and demographic information on all patients diagnosed with GEA between June 1, 2002 and July 1, 2019 was obtained retrospectively from clinical charts. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to describe progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumors from a subset of patients underwent next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis., Results: A total of 70 women with GEA were identified, including 43 who received initial treatment at our institution: of these 4 (9%) underwent surgery alone, 15 (35%) underwent surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, 10 (23%) were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT), 7 (16%) with chemotherapy alone, and 3 (7%) with neoadjuvant CCRT and hysterectomy with or without chemotherapy. One-third (n = 14) of patients experienced disease progression, of whom 86% (n = 12) had prior CCRT. The median PFS and OS for patients with stage I GEA were 107 months (95% CI 14.8-199.2 months) and 111 months (95% CI 17-205.1 months) respectively, compared to 17 months (95% CI 5.6-28.4 months) and 33 months (95% CI 28.2-37.8 months) for patients with stages II-IV, respectively. On NGS, 4 patients (14%) had ERBB2 alterations, including 2 patients who received trastuzumab., Conclusions: GEA is an aggressive form of cervical cancer with poor PFS and OS when diagnosed at stage II or later. Further investigation is needed to identify the optimal management approach for this rare subtype., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Outside the submitted work, B. Weigelt reports ad hoc membership in the scientific advisory board of Repare Therapeutics, outside the scope of the study. C. Friedman reports participation in the scientific advisory boards for Merck (LYNK-002) and Genentech (MyPathway) without compensation, consulting for Seagen and Bristol Myers Squibb, and institutional research funds from Genentech/Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi. E. Jewell reports personal fee from Covidien/Medtronic. K. Cadoo reports grant funding from the Irish Cancer Society, MSD, and Immunogen; consulting fees from Nextcure, MJH Life Sciences, and GSK; payments/honoraria from GSK, AstraZeneca, and MSD; financial support to attend meetings from Roche, Pfizer, and MSD; advisory board participation at MSD, AstraZeneca, GSK, and Eisai; a voluntary advisory role at the National Cancer Control Programme Ireland; and a voluntary board member at ARC Cancer Support Centers. N. Abu-Rustum reports grant funding from GRAIL paid to the institution. S. issa Bhaloo reports stock or stock options in BioNTech, Moderna, Inc., Inovio, Relief Therapeutics Holding SA, Cansino Biologics, Inc., and Pfizer, Inc. M. Leitao reports personal fees from Medtronic, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., and JnJ/Ethicon. C. Aghajanian has received research grants from Abbvie, Clovis, Genentech, and Astra Zeneca and served on advisory boards for Abbvie, AstraZeneca/Merck, Eisai/Merck, Mersana Therapeutics, Repare Therapeutics, and Roche/Genentech. R. O'Cearbhaill reports honoraria from GSK, Bayer, Regeneron, SeaGen, Fresenius Kabi, Immunogen, MJH Life Sciences and Curio. C. Kyi reports grant funding from Conquer Cancer Foundation; grant funding paid to the institution from Merus, Gritstone, and BMS; and consulting fees from Scenic Immunology B.V. and OncLive. D. Zamarin is an inventor on a patent related to the use of oncolytic Newcastle Disease Virus for cancer therapy, and reports grant funding paid to the institution from AstraZeneca, Roche, Plexxikon, and Synthekine; consulting fees from Memgen, Celldex, Agenus, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Crown Biosciences, Roche, GSK, Hookpia, ImmunOS, Kalvir, Synlogic Therapeutics, Synthekine, Takeda, Targovax, Tessa Therapeutics, and Xencor; stock options in Accurius Therapeutics, Immunos Therapeutics and Calidi Biotherapeutics; and a Merck licensed patent (with personal payments and payments to the institution). All other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To perform a systematic review of gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the cervix and lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (a possible precursor lesion) in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and to analyze data from the literature, along with our institutional experience, to determine recommendations for screening and detection., Methods: A comprehensive literature searc and retrospective search of pathology records at our institutio were conducted. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Case reports/series on lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia/gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the cervix in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome were included. Demographic, clinical, and radiologic information was collected., Results: A total of 1564 publications were reviewed; 38 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-nine were included in the analysis (43 from the literature, 6 from our institution). Forty-three reported on gastric-type adenocarcinoma alone, 4 on lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia alone, and 2 on concurrent lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia/gastric-type adenocarcinoma. Median age at diagnosis was 17 (range, 4-52) for patients with lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia alone and 35 (range, 15-72) for those with gastric-type adenocarcinoma. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal/pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding/discharge. Imaging was reported for 27 patients; 24 (89%) had abnormal cervical features. Papanicolaou (Pap) smear prior to diagnosis was reported for 12 patients; 6 (50%) had normal cytology, 4 (33%) atypical glandular cells, and 2 (17%) atypical cells not otherwise specified. Patients with gastric-type adenocarcinoma (n=45) were treated with surgery alone (n=16), surgery/chemotherapy/radiation (n=11), surgery/chemotherapy (n=9), surgery/radiation (n=5), or radiation/chemotherapy (n=4). Twelve (27%) of 45 patients recurred; median progression-free survival was 10 months (range, 1-148). Twenty patients (44%) died; median overall survival was 26 months (range, 2-156). Thirteen patients (27%) were alive with no evidence of disease., Conclusions: Gastric-type adenocarcinoma in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is associated with poor outcomes and short progression-free and overall survival. Screening recommendations, including pathognomonic symptom review and physical examination, with a low threshold for imaging and biopsy, may detect precursor lesions and early-stage gastric-type adenocarcinoma, leading to better outcomes in this high-risk population., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42019118151., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)