Search

Background: Educational interventions may be a strategy to increase human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among female university students, but studies to date have shown mixed results. This study evaluated the effect of MeFirst, an individually tailored, online educational intervention, on HPV vaccine-related knowledge, vaccination intention, and uptake among previously unvaccinated female university students., Methods: All female students aged 18-26 years who reported being unvaccinated against HPV at a midwestern university were invited via email to enroll. Participants completed an online survey that assessed baseline HPV vaccine-related knowledge, attitudes and vaccination intention. Participants (n = 661) were then randomized to receive either an educational website automatically tailored to their baseline survey responses (MeFirst intervention) or a standard CDC information factsheet on HPV vaccine (control). Vaccine uptake and repeat knowledge and attitude measures were assessed with online surveys 3 months following the intervention and analyzed using logistic regression models., Results: HPV vaccine uptake was similar in both the MeFirst and control groups at 3 months following the intervention (p = 0.98). Three months after the intervention, the proportion of participants with high knowledge regarding HPV vaccination increased from baseline (32% to 50%; p < 0.0001) but the proportion with favorable intention was unchanged., Conclusions: We found that an individually tailored, online educational tool had similar effects as a nontailored factsheet on HPV-related knowledge, intention to HPV undergo vaccination, and HPV vaccine uptake among previously unvaccinated female university students.

Objective: To characterize population-level surgical treatment patterns for cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS) reported to the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program (MCSP), and to inform data collection strategies., Methods: All cases of cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS) (including cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ [AIS]) reported to the MCSP during 1998-2003 were identified. First course of treatment (ablative procedure, cone biopsy, loop electrosurgical excisional procedure [LEEP], hysterectomy, unspecified surgical treatment, no surgical treatment, unknown if surgically treated) was described by histology, race, and age at diagnosis., Results: Of 17,022 cases of cervical CIS, 82.8 percent were squamous CIS, 3 percent AIS/adenosquamous CIS, and 14.2 percent unspecified/other CIS. Over half (54.7 percent) of cases were diagnosed in women under age 30. Excisional treatments (LEEP, 32.3 percent and cone biopsy, 17.3 percent) were most common, though substantial proportions had no reported treatment (17.8 percent) or unknown treatment (21.1 percent). Less common were hysterectomy (7.2 percent) and ablative procedures (2.6 percent). LEEP was the most common treatment for squamous cases, while hysterectomy was the most treatment for AIS/adenosquamous CIS cases. Across histologic types, a sizeable proportion of women diagnosed ≤30 years of age underwent excision, either LEEP (20 percent-38.7 percent) or cone biopsy (13.7 percent-44 percent)., Conclusion: Despite evidence suggesting it may be safer and equally effective as excision, ablation was rarely used for treating cervical squamous CIS. These population-based data indicate some notable differences in treatment by histology and age at diagnosis, with observed patterns appearing consistent with consensus guidelines in place at the time of study, but favoring more aggressive procedures. Future data collection strategies may need to validate treatment information, including the large proportion of no or unknown treatment.

Aberrant promoter methylation of biologically relevant genes in cervical cancer and uneven CpG distribution within the human papillomavirus 16 (HPV 16) enhancer region have been reported. Cervical samples and questionnaires from 151 women screened for cervical cancer in Appalachian Ohio were analyzed. Methylation was measured by bisulfite sequencing in candidate gene sites in ESR1, DCC, p16, and LINE1 elements. Among 89 HPV 16-positive women, CpG sites in the E6 promoter and enhancer regions and the L1 region of the HPV 16 genome were measured. Methylation levels were compared by cervical cytology and HPV 16 status. HPV methylation was low regardless of cytology status, however E6 methylation was significantly higher in women with normal cytology. ESR1 and DCC methylation were significantly higher in HPV 16-positive women. Increased methylation at sites in the E6 promoter region was associated with lower odds of abnormal cytology. Increased methylation in candidate genes was associated with higher odds of abnormal cytology, particularly DCC region 2.4, DCC region 2.6, ESR1 region 3.2, and LINE1 site 1.2. HPV 16 genome CpG methylation was low except for the L1 region. In general, lower HPV 16 methylation and higher candidate gene methylation levels were associated with higher odds of abnormal cytology., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Breast or cervical cancer screening visits may present an opportunity to motivate mothers to have their daughters vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV). In preparation for a future intervention study, we sought to establish the feasibility of using these visits to identify women with at least one daughter in the appropriate age range for adolescent HPV vaccination., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional mailed survey of women who had received breast or cervical cancer screening within the 6-18 months before the survey. The study was conducted at two diverse institutions: one serving a mostly black (54.1%) urban inner-city population and another serving a mostly white (87.5%) suburban population., Results: Our overall response rate was 28% (n = 556) in the urban site and 38% (n = 381) in the suburban site. In the urban site, the proportions of mothers completing mammography or Pap smear visits with HPV vaccine-eligible daughters were 23% and 24%, respectively. In the suburban site, the proportions of mothers completing mammography or Pap smear with at least one vaccine-eligible daughter were 41% and 26%, respectively., Conclusions: Women who undergo breast or cervical cancer screening in the two different demographic groups evaluated have at least one adolescent daughter at the appropriate age for HPV vaccination. An important implication of this finding in adolescent daughters of urban mothers is the potential use of maternal breast or cervical cancer screening encounters to target a potentially undervaccinated group.

Objective: For some cancers, married individuals present with less advanced stage of disease, receive more aggressive treatment, and live longer after diagnosis compared with unmarried individuals. We examined survival differences by marital status among women with cervical cancer using a population-based sample of patients in the United States while considering patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics., Methods: We identified 7,997 women (1,835 single, 3,849 married, 1,193 separated/divorced, and 1,120 widowed) diagnosed with primary invasive cervical cancer from 1992 to 1996 (with follow-up through December 31, 2004) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Associations of marital status, race, age at diagnosis, tumor grade, tumor stage, cancer-directed radiotherapy, and cancer-directed surgery with survival were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression models., Results: Five-year survival was highest for married women and lowest for widowed women (p <.0001). Compared with married women, risks of death for single, separated/divorced, and widowed women were 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.25), 1.41 (95% CI = 1.28-1.57), and 2.51 (95% CI = 2.29-2.76), respectively. After adjustment, marital status was not independently associated with risk of death (p =.21), although it interacted with tumor stage and cancer-directed radiation therapy. Married women with early stage disease who did not receive radiation therapy had improved survival compared with single, separated/divorced, or widowed women., Conclusions: Marital status interacted with tumor stage and cancer-directed radiation therapy to influence survival among women with cervical cancer. Additional study of the pathways through which partner status influences survival after cancer diagnosis could inform the development of social support interventions.

Cervical cancer represents a global women's health issue. The emergence of vaccines against the most common types of human papillomaviruses causing cervical cancer represents a significant advance in cervical cancer prevention. Adolescent girls are the primary target population for vaccination-a population that traditionally has been difficult to reach. Obstetricians and gynecologists may hold the key to improving adolescent human papillomavirus vaccinations through the novel use of their existing relationships with adolescents' mothers during the routine cervical cancer screening visit. We propose using maternal cancer screenings, specifically breast and cervical cancer screening episodes, as "teachable moments," naturally occurring life or health events thought to motivate a person to adopt risk-reducing health behaviors spontaneously, to improve human papillomavirus vaccination rates among adolescents.

Background: African-American (AA) women have lower survival rates from cervical cancer compared with white women. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) and other variables on racial disparities in overall survival among women with invasive cervical cancer., Methods: One thousand thirty-six women (705 white women and 331 AA women) who were diagnosed with primary invasive cancer of the cervix between 1988 and 1992 were identified through the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System (MDCSS), a registry in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Pathology, treatment, and survival data were obtained through SEER. SES was categorized by using occupation, poverty, and educational status at the census tract level. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare overall survival between AA women and white women adjusting for sociodemographics, clinical presentation, and treatment., Results: AA women were more likely to present at an older age (P<.001), with later stage disease (P<.001), and with squamous histology (P=.01), and they were more likely to reside in a census tract categorized as Working Poor (WP) (P<.001). After multivariate adjustment, race no longer had a significant impact on survival. Women who resided in a WP census tract had a higher risk of death than women from a Professional census tract (P=.05). There was a significant interaction between disease stage and time with the effect of stage on survival attenuated after 6 years., Conclusions: In this study, factors that affected access to medical care appeared to have a more important influence than race on the long-term survival of women with invasive cervical cancer., (Copyright (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.)

Objective: The incidence of cervical cancer is higher in Hispanic than in non-Hispanic or African American women in the United States, but few studies have examined differences in survival between these groups. The objective of this study was to examine racial/ethnic differences in survival after diagnosis with invasive cervical cancer in a population-based sample of patients while adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics and treatment types., Methods: We identified 7267 women (4431 non-Hispanic Caucasians, 1830 Hispanic Caucasians, and 1006 non-Hispanic African Americans) diagnosed with primary invasive cervical cancer from 1992 to 1996 (with follow-up through 2000) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards survival methods were used to assess differences in survival by race/ethnicity., Results: After adjusting for age at diagnosis, histology, stage, first course of cancer-directed treatment (surgery and radiation therapy), and SEER registry, Hispanic Caucasian women were at 26% decreased risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.83) and non-Hispanic African American women were at 19% increased risk of death (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.33) compared to non-Hispanic Caucasian women over the follow-up period., Conclusion: Analysis of population-based SEER data indicates significant survival differences by race/ethnicity for women with invasive cervical cancer. Hispanic Caucasian women in SEER had improved survival compared to non-Hispanic Caucasian or non-Hispanic African American women.