1. New diagnostic criteria of colposcopy for uterine cervix neoplasia.
- Author
-
Kashimura M, Matsuura Y, Kawagoe T, Toki N, and Hachisuga T
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Colposcopy statistics & numerical data, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnosis
- Abstract
Aim: The purpose of this study is to present alternative diagnostic criteria of colposcopy using new parameters., Methods: Colposcopic photographs were reviewed in 1649 patients from the past 23 years, including 283 benign lesions, 327 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1), 549 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3), 78 microinvasive cancers, and 412 invasive cancers. Abnormal colposcopic findings were divided into: minor or major; single, or a combination of two or three findings; and under half or over half circumferential size. Histopathological backgrounds were investigated according to these new parameters of colposcopic findings., Results: Minor abnormal colposcopic findings were observed in 21% of LSIL, and major abnormal findings were seen in 52% of LSIL, 86% of HSIL, and 86% of microinvasions. A single major abnormal finding was observed in 64% of the cases with LSIL, while two abnormal findings were observed in 43% of HSIL, and three abnormal findings were observed in 44% of microinvasions. In qualifying major abnormal colposcopic findings, under half size was detected in 91% of LSIL and 74% of HSIL, and over half size was observed in 58% of microinvasions. From these results, the following diagnostic criteria were instituted: (i) LSIL - single, minor or major findings and under half size; (ii) HSIL - two or three major findings and under half size; (iii) microinvasion - three major findings and over half size; and (iv) invasive cancer - irregular surface with atypical vessels., Conclusion: Our new diagnostic criteria of colposcopy are fully acceptable, based on their similar level of accuracy to cytology., (© 2016 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF