Search

Background: Concern about disease exacerbations and fear of reactions after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations are common in chronic urticaria (CU) patients and may lead to vaccine hesitancy., Objective: We assessed the frequency and risk factors of CU exacerbation and adverse reactions in CU patients after COVID-19 vaccination., Methods: COVAC-CU is an international multicenter study of Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence (UCAREs) that retrospectively evaluated the effects of COVID-19 vaccination in CU patients aged ≥18 years and vaccinated with ≥1 dose of any COVID-19 vaccine. We evaluated CU exacerbations and severe allergic reactions as well as other adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccinations and their association with various CU parameters., Results: Across 2769 COVID-19-vaccinated CU patients, most (90%) received at least 2 COVID-19 vaccine doses, and most patients received CU treatment and had well-controlled disease. The rate of COVID-19 vaccination-induced CU exacerbation was 9%. Of 223 patients with CU exacerbation after the first dose, 53.4% experienced recurrence of CU exacerbation after the second dose. CU exacerbation most often started <48 hours after vaccination (59.2%), lasted for a few weeks or less (70%), and was treated mainly with antihistamines (70.3%). Factors that increased the risk for COVID-19 vaccination-induced CU exacerbation included female sex, disease duration shorter than 24 months, having chronic spontaneous versus inducible urticaria, receipt of adenovirus viral vector vaccine, having nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug/aspirin intolerance, and having concerns about getting vaccinated; receiving omalizumab treatment and Latino/Hispanic ethnicity lowered the risk. First-dose vaccine-related adverse effects, most commonly local reactions, fever, fatigue, and muscle pain, were reported by 43.5% of CU patients. Seven patients reported severe allergic reactions., Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination leads to disease exacerbation in only a small number of CU patients and is generally well tolerated., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and urticarial vasculitis (UV) share several clinical features including the occurrence of wheals. As of yet, the criteria for differentiating the 2 disorders are not clearly defined., Objective: Here, we aimed to identify differences, similarities, and the likelihood for specific clinical features in patients with UV versus those with CSU., Methods: Across 10 Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence, 106 patients with skin biopsy-confirmed UV and 126 patients with CSU were prospectively recruited to complete a questionnaire on the clinical features, course, and response to treatment of their disease., Results: As compared with CSU, patients with UV more often experienced postinflammatory skin hyperpigmentation, wheals of ≥24-hour duration, eye inflammation, and fever (6.9, 4.0, 3.6, and 2.4 times, respectively). Clinical features that increased the risk for UV diagnosis when present at the onset of disease included wheals of ≥24-hour duration (7.3-fold), pain of the skin (7.0-fold), postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (4.1-fold), and fatigue (3.1-fold). The diagnostic delay was markedly longer for normocomplementemic UV as compared with hypocomplementemic UV and CSU (21 vs 5 vs 6 months, respectively). Oral corticosteroids and omalizumab were the most effective treatments in patients with UV and CSU, respectively. Patients with UV showed a higher need for immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory therapies than patients with CSU., Conclusions: Long wheal duration, skin pain and hyperpigmentation, and systemic symptoms point to UV rather than CSU as the underlying disease and should prompt further diagnostic workup including a skin biopsy., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare and difficult-to-treat chronic skin disease defined by long-lasting urticarial lesions and the histopathologic finding of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. As of yet, little is known about UV patients' perspective on the disease., Objective: To assess UV patients' perspective on the clinical course, treatment response, greatest challenges, and quality-of-life (QOL) impairment., Methods: A web-based questionnaire was disseminated in a Facebook group of patients with UV. Patients with UV confirmed by skin biopsy were included., Results: Patients with UV had a mean age of 47.3 ± 12.3 years and were mostly female (94.3%; n = 82 of 87). The median delay in diagnosis was 8.1 months (interquartile range, 2.0-46.3). Normocomplementemia and hypocomplementemia were present in 54.0% (n = 27) and 46.0% (n = 23) of 50 patients, respectively. Most patients with UV (51.8%; n = 43 of 83) reported severely decreased QOL due to their disease. Low QOL was also the most frequently reported greatest challenge for patients with UV (40.7%), followed by the long-standing course of UV with frequent relapses (14.8%). Low QOL correlated with long disease duration (r = 0.298; P = .02) and high numbers of clinical symptoms (r = 0.294; P = .007). Patients with UV with allergies, lung diseases, and chronic infections reported lower QOL. Patients with UV with low QOL were treated with analgesics, dapsone, montelukast, omalizumab, and colchicine more often than patients with UV with higher QOL (P < .05 for all)., Conclusions: Our results show a considerable impairment in QOL in patients with UV associated with long disease duration, high symptom burden, and a high need for therapy. Improvement of the management of UV by further research is necessary., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Omalizumab is an effective treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). In routine clinical practice, physicians often face complex cases of CSU and need to decide whether patients are suitable for omalizumab treatment and how to manage this therapy. Here, we provide evidence and experience-based answers to the most common and important questions on omalizumab treatment of CSU. At 4 large urticaria centers, questions on the use of omalizumab in the treatment of patients with CSU were collected and then ranked by frequency and importance and grouped into top 5 domains using an interactive consensus approach. We suggest that omalizumab can be used to treat patients with CSU with any of the 3 CSU phenotypes (wheals only, angioedema only, wheals and angioedema), with comorbid chronic inducible urticaria, with cancer, who receive other biologics or cyclosporine, or who are pregnant or want to become pregnant, or are breast-feeding. Omalizumab treatment should be started with 300 mg every 4 weeks, monitored with validated patient-reported outcome measures, and maintained, in responders, until remission of CSU. Finally, partial responders or non responders can benefit from omalizumab updosing or adding or switching to cyclosporine. We believe our suggestions on the use of omalizumab in CSU will help to inform clinical decision making. Follow-up efforts should increase, systematically review, and profile the data available and provide evidence-based recommendations on how to best use omalizumab in CSU., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a difficult-to-treat condition characterized by long-lasting urticarial rashes and histopathologic findings of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Treatment is dictated by the severity of skin and systemic involvement and the underlying systemic disease. This is a comprehensive systematic review of the efficacy of current UV treatment options. We searched for relevant studies in 7 databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. In total, 261 eligible studies and 789 unique patients with UV were included in the systematic review. Most patients with UV are adult women with chronic (≥6 weeks) and systemic disease. UV is mostly idiopathic but can be associated with drugs, malignancy, autoimmunity, and infections. It usually resolves with their withdrawal or cure. Corticosteroids are effective for the treatment of skin symptoms in more than 80% of patients with UV. However, their long-term administration can lead to potentially serious adverse effects. The addition of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive agents often allows corticosteroid tapering and improves the efficacy of therapy. Biologicals, including omalizumab, as well as corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, dapsone, mycophenolate mofetil, plasmapheresis, colchicine, hydroxychloroquine, intravenous immunoglobulin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and cyclosporine, can be effective for both skin and systemic symptoms in patients with UV. H 1 -antihistamines, montelukast, danazol, H 2 -antihistamines, pentoxifylline, doxepin, and tranexamic acid are not effective in most patients with UV. As of yet, no drugs have been approved for UV, and management recommendations are based mostly on case reports and retrospective studies. Prospective studies investigating the effects of treatment on the signs and symptoms of UV are needed., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)