Search

Analysis of urinary stones is an essential step in establishing the diagnosis and treatment of the stone patient. In fact, the need for an exhaustive study of the stones increases as the relationships between the type of stone and the etiological factors that predispose to this disease become evident. The enumeration (qualitative or quantitative) of the major components that make up the kidney stone (calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium oxalate dihydrate, uric acid, calcium phosphates, cystine), which is obtained by the most commonly used analytical method, infrared spectroscopy (IR), is no longer enough to guide the urologist on the etiology of the disease. Only a detailed structural analysis and macro and micro components can provide key information on the etiology of the stone, and therefore, on the possible causes that have led to its formation. This study should conclude with a report that is provided to the Urologist. Obtaining this report involves a detailed study, sample by sample, which involves the systematic handling of stereoscopic microscopy, IR spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive X-raymicroanalysis (EDAX).

Objective: Renal stone formation is a multifactorial process depending in part on urine composition. Other parameters relate to structural or pathological features of the kidney. To date, routine laboratory estimation of urolithiasis risk has been based on determination of urinary composition. This process requires collection of at least two 24 h urine samples, which is tedious for patients. The most important feature of urinary lithogenic risk is the balance between various urinary parameters, although unknown factors may be involved. The objective of this study was to compare data obtained using a commercial kit with those of a laboratory prototype, using a multicentre approach, to validate the utility of these methods in routine clinical practice., Material and Methods: A simple new commercial test (NefroPlus®; Sarstedt AG & Co., Nümbrecht, Germany) evaluating the capacity of urine to crystallize calcium salts, and thus permitting detection of patients at risk for stone development, was compared with a prototype test previously described by this group. Urine of 64 volunteers produced during the night was used in these comparisons. The commercial test was also used to evaluate urine samples of 83 subjects in one of three hospitals., Results: Both methods were essentially in complete agreement (98%) with respect to test results. The multicentre data were: sensitivity 94.7%; specificity 76.9%; positive predictive value (lithogenic urine) 90.0%; negative predictive value (non-lithogenic urine) 87.0%; test efficacy 89.2%., Conclusion: The new commercial NefroPlus test offers fast and cheap evaluation of the overall risk of development of urinary calcium-containing calculi.