Search

Abstract: To deal with the increasing gap between organ demand and supply for kidney transplantation, many centers have started to use non–heart-beating (NHB) donors. When we initiated our program to utilize kidneys from such donors in 1998, we had no protocol for the maximal agonal period. This however was audited in retrospect. Our current wait time is now a maximum of 5 hours. Concern has been expressed in the past about possible deterioration in the quality of the organs with a protracted agonal time. We aimed in this study to examine the effect of prolonging agonal period on the quality of kidneys retrieved from Maastricht category III donors: A total of 40 kidneys were transplanted from 29 category III donors between 1998 and 2004. Eleven kidneys had donor agonal times of >5 hours; the remainder, agonal times <5 hours. Both groups were matched for donor and recipient factors. The mean glomerular filtration rates at 12 months for <5 hours versus >5 hours agonal time were 43.8 ± 4.4 versus 49.8 ± 5.8, respectively (P = .24) and at 24 months, 46.83 ± 8.99 versus 37.67 ± 3.85, respectively (P = .24). In conclusion, intermediate graft function is comparable to ones with shorter agonal time, although we await long-term results. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Non-heart-beating donor kidneys (NHBD) are being used to increase the donor pool due to the scarcity of cadaveric heart beating donors (HBD). We evaluated the long-term outcomes of renal transplantation using NHBD kidneys, comparing the first 100 NHBD kidneys transplanted at our facility to the next consecutive cadaveric HBD kidneys for graft survival, recipient survival, and quality of graft function. Recipient survival (P = .22) and graft survival (P = .19) at 6 years did not differ between recipients of NHBD (83%, 80%) and HBD (89%, 87%) kidneys. Quality of graft function using the mean glomular filtration rates were significantly lower in the NHBD group up to 3 months following discharge (41 ± 2 vs 47 ± 2, P = .007) but were then comparable up to 6 years following transplantation (43 ± 5 vs 46 ± 4, P = .55). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Kidneys transplanted from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) are generally regarded as marginal or extended criteria grafts due to the associated period of warm ischemia. The most prolonged periods occurring in the category II (uncontrolled) donor. This potential for injury can adversely affect the glomular filtration rate (GFR), which in severe cases results in primary nonfunction. Viability testing can identify a group of kidneys that, although unsuitable for solitary transplantation, may be considered for dual transplant. This retrospective study examined a series of 11 dual renal transplants, comparing 3- and 12-month GFR outcome data with 81 single NHBD transplants. The mean GFR at 3 months in the dual group was 47.6 and at 12 months was 48.6. In the single group the GFR at 3 months was 40.6 and at 12 months was 41.9. Thus using viability testing to identify NHBD kidneys suitable for dual transplant appears reliable and predictable. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Kidneys transplanted from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) have been exposed to varying degrees of ischemic damage after death. Category III donors have invariably been managed, treated, and investigated in a hospital setting prior to arrest and death. Some therefore exhibit evidence of renal dysfunction and even acute renal failure (ARF) before death. Many surgeons would regard a NHBD with pre-arrest evidence of ARF as too marginal for renal transplantation. This retrospective study examines five Maastricht category III NHBD donors with evidence of pre-arrest ARF. We compare 3- and 12-month GFR outcome data from the nine resulting transplants with 40 category III NHBD transplants with normal pre-arrest renal function. The mean GFR at 3 months was 45.4 and 43.8 for the ARF and normal group, respectively. At 12 months the GFR was 42.2 and 44.7 in the ARF and normal groups, respectively. Thus evidence of ARF pre-arrest does not preclude successful category III NHBD renal transplantation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The shortage of donor kidneys for renal transplantation is becoming more severe as the gap between the number of patients waiting for renal transplantation and the number of cadaveric organs available continues to widen. Therefore, many centres have started using non-heart-beating (NHB) donors. There was no clear plan for maximal duration of agonal period in Maastricht category NHB donors after withdrawal of treatment in Newcastle. This withdrawal has been audited in retrospect. Our current wait time is now a maximum of 5 hours; however, previously there have been some considerably longer periods. Concern has always been expressed about poor quality with protracted periods. Nonuse in this review of 58 kidneys can be expressed against time: 0 to 2 hours 13%, 2 to 5 hours 33%, and >5 hours 45%. Therefore, though the nonuse rate was significantly different between 0 to 2 hours and >5 hours (P < .05, chi-square), there were 16 transplants performed with kidneys >2 hours and 12 transplanted >5 hours. In conclusion, although good usable kidneys can still be used with protracted withdrawal, there are considerable logistical difficulties with our 5-hour cut-off, which means that one third of potential kidneys will not be utilized. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Uncontrolled non–heart-beating donors offer the opportunity to significantly expand the potential pool of kidney donors but are associated with a variable duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), where cardiac output is only 30% to 40% of normal. We were concerned that prolonged CPR would adversely affect the function of transplanted kidneys. In our series of 46 uncontrolled donors the mean duration of CPR was 60 minutes, which also represents a realistic cutoff point for CPR duration. Taking a cutoff point of 60 minutes, we found no differences in kidney discard rates following viability assessment, primary nonfunction rate, or duration of delayed graft function. We therefore conclude that if formal viability assessment is performed, kidneys may be retrieved from uncontrolled non–heart-beating donors irrespective of duration of CPR. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Renal transplantation is established as the best form of renal replacement therapy, but demand for kidneys exceeds supply from cadaveric donations. It is therefore important to make the best use of the pool of potential cadaveric organ donors. Donation rates are to a large extent dependent on public opinions, which may be influenced by external events. In northeast England from 1986 to 2003, there was a potential pool of 1170 brain stem–dead donors, of whom 190 (16%) could not be retrieved due to relatives’ objections. From 1998 to 2003 we were referred 90 potential non–heart-beating donors, of whom relatives refused donation in 10 (11%). A major reason for not retrieving organs from a potential donor has been lack of consent from the relatives. Refusals appear to vary year by year and are consistently lower for non–heart-beating donors. This therefore raises the possibility that negative or positive media publicity plays a role in this variation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]