Search

Introduction: The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been demonstrated to modulate cell proliferation, desmoplasia, angiogenesis and immunosuppression. We examined the association of RAS inhibitors (RASi)-namely angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB)-with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) preceding radical cystectomy (RC)., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively investigated concurrent RASi use with NAC prior to RC in 302 patients with MIBC from 3 academic institutions. Outcomes included pathologic complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS). Pathologic features, performance status (PS), clinical stage, type/number of cycles of NAC, and toxicities were collected., Results: Overall pCR rate was 26.2% and 5-year OS was 62%. Concurrent ACEi intake with NAC approached significance for association with pCR (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71; 95% CI, 0.94-3.11; P = .077). Patients with cT3/4N0-N1 disease receiving ACEi had higher pCR rates (30.8% vs. 17.7%, P = .056) than those not on ACEi. Female sex had a statistically significant favorable interaction for pCR with ACEi intake (P = .044). ACEi intake was not associated with OS, while pCR, PS and lower clinical stage were significantly associated with improved OS., Conclusion: ACEi intake is potentially associated with increased pCR in patients with MIBC receiving NAC prior to RC, and this association is more pronounced in patients with higher clinical stage of disease at the initiation of therapy and female sex. Our data suggest the potential relevance of the RAS as a therapeutic target in aggressive MIBC., Competing Interests: Disclosure Parvaneh Fallah Scientific advisor/consultant: BMS, Seagen, Pfizer, Astrazeneca, EMD Sereno Canada Honoraria: Astrazeneca, EMD Sereno Canada, Gilead, Merck, Janssen Rohit K Jain Receiving honoraria from FLASCO, Curio Science, DAVA Oncology, NCCN/Pfizer, and OncLive/MJH Life Sciences Consulting for AVEO, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, EMD Serono, Gilead Sciences, IDEOlogy Pfizer, and Seattle Genetics/Astellas In the speakers’ bureau of Gilead Sciences, Seagen, and Seattle Genetics/Astellas Receiving research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and NCI. Praful Ravi Research funding to institution: Lilly, Bayer, Telix Speaker's fees: OncLive Charlene Mantia Consulting/advisory role: Aadi Bioscience, Synthekine, Nextech Institutional research funding: Bristol Myers Squibb Bradley Alexander McGregor Received funds for consulting: Arcus, BMS, Eisai, Exelixis, Gliead, Pfizer, SeaGen Funding to institution - BMS, Exelixis, Gilead, Pfizer, SeaGen Roger Li Research support: Predicine; Veracyte; CG Oncology; Valar labs; Merck. Clinical trial protocol committee: CG Oncology; Merck; Janssen. Scientific advisor/consultant: BMS, Merck, Fergene, Arquer Diagnostics, Urogen Pharma, Lucence, CG Oncology, Janssen, Thericon. Honoraria: SAI MedPartners, Solstice Health Communications, Putnam Associates, UroToday. Wassim Kassouf Consultant or advisory roles: Sesen Bio, Ferring, Roche, BMS, Merck, Janssen, Bayer, Astellas, Seagen, Pfizer/EMD Serono, Photocure Clinical trials: BMS, Roche, Janssen, Theralase, Pfizer, CG Oncology Gregory Russell Pond Received honorariums from Astra-Zeneca and Takeda Received consulting fees from Merck and Profound Medical. Close family member who is employed by Roche Canada, and who owns stock in Roche Ltd. Raskesh K. Jain Received consultant fees from Cur, DynamiCure, Elpis, Merck, SPARC, SynDevRx Owns equity in Accurius, Enlight, SynDevRx Served on the Boards of Trustees of Tekla Healthcare Investors, Tekla Life Sciences Investors, Tekla Healthcare Opportunities Fund, Tekla World Healthcare Fund Received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi. Research is supported by NIH R01CA259253, R01CA269672, R01-NS118929, U01CA261842, and grants from the National Foundation for Cancer Research, Jane's Trust Foundation, Niles Albright Research Foundation, and Harvard Ludwig Cancer Center. Guru Sonpavde Advisory Board: EMD Serono, BMS, Merck, Seattle Genetics/Astellas, Janssen, Bicycle Therapeutics, Pfizer, Gilead, Scholar Rock, Eli Lilly/Loxo Oncology, Vial, PrecisCa, Atkis, Kura Oncology, Daiichi-Sankyo Consultant/Scientific Advisory Board (SAB): Syapse, Merck, Servier, Syncorp Research Support to institution: EMD Serono, Jazz Therapeutics, BMS Speaker: Seagen, Gilead, Natera, Exelixis, Janssen, Astellas, Bayer, Aveo, Merck, Pfizer Data safety monitoring committee (honorarium): Mereo Employment: Spouse employed by Myriad Travel: BMS, Astellas, (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) plays a central role in the cellular response to DNA damage and ATM alterations are common in several tumor types including bladder cancer. However, the specific impact of ATM alterations on therapy response in bladder cancer is uncertain. Here, we combine preclinical modeling and clinical analyses to comprehensively define the impact of ATM alterations on bladder cancer. We show that ATM loss is sufficient to increase sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents including cisplatin and radiation. Furthermore, ATM loss drives sensitivity to DNA repair-targeted agents including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) inhibitors. ATM loss alters the immune microenvironment and improves anti-PD1 response in preclinical bladder models but is not associated with improved anti-PD1/PD-L1 response in clinical cohorts. Last, we show that ATM expression by immunohistochemistry is strongly correlated with response to chemoradiotherapy. Together, these data define a potential role for ATM as a predictive biomarker in bladder cancer.

Background: The familial aggregation of bladder cancers has been observed, but the incidence and association of familial bladder cancer with germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants is unknown., Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with bladder cancer treated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute to identify those with a first-degree relative with bladder cancer. A second cohort of patients referred to DFCI for suspicion of a cancer predisposition syndrome was analyzed for candidate P/LP germline variants. Descriptive statistics were generated., Results: Among 885 patients with bladder cancer, 38 patients (4.3%) had a family history of bladder cancer in a first-degree relative. No significant association of age of diagnosis was observed between patients with and without a first-degree family history of bladder cancer (P = .3). In the second cohort, 27 of 80 (34%) patients with bladder cancer evaluated for cancer predisposition syndromes harbored a P/LP germline variant. P/LP variants were identified most commonly in the following genes: BRCA1 (n = 5), MSH2 (n = 5), MLH1 (n = 4), ATM (n = 3), and CHEK2 (n = 2). Of the 27 patients with identified germline P/LP variants, 20 (74%) had a family history of a tumor component syndrome in a first- or second-degree relative and 3 were subsequently diagnosed with another genetically-linked associated cancer., Conclusion: Familial bladder cancer defined as bladder cancer in the proband and a first-degree relative, was present in 4.3% of patients with bladder cancer and was not associated with age of diagnosis. Additionally, among patients suspected to have a familial cancer syndrome, one-third harbored a germline P/LP variant. Further study of germline variants in patients with familial bladder cancer including somatic testing for loss of heterozygosity may provide insights regarding disease pathogenesis and inform therapy., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Serial evaluation of circulating tumor DNA may allow noninvasive assessment of drivers of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC). We used a novel, amplicon-based next-generation sequencing assay to identify genomic alterations (GAs) pre- and post-therapy in 39 patients with aUC receiving ICI and 6 receiving platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). One or more GA was seen in 95% and 100% of pre- and post-ICI samples, respectively, commonly in TP53 (54% and 54%), TERT (49% and 59%), and BRCA1/BRCA2 (33% and 33%). Clearance of ≥1 GA was seen in 7 of 9 patients responding to ICI, commonly in TP53 (n = 4), PIK3CA (n = 2), and BRCA1/BRCA2 (n = 2). A new GA was seen in 17 of 20 patients progressing on ICI, frequently in BRCA1/BRCA2 (n = 6), PIK3CA (n = 3), and TP53 (n = 3), which seldom emerged in patients receiving PBC. These findings highlight the potential for longitudinal circulating tumor DNA evaluation in tracking response and resistance to therapy., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a rare but serious event following definitive radiation for prostate cancer. Radiation-associated MIBC (RA-MIBC) can be difficult to manage given the challenges of delivering definitive therapy to a previously irradiated pelvis. The genomic landscape of RA-MIBC and whether it is distinct from non-RA-MIBC are unknown., Objective: To define mutational features of RA-MIBC and compare the genomic landscape of RA-MIBC with that of non-RA-MIBC., Design, Setting, and Participants: We identified patients from our institution who received radiotherapy for prostate cancer and subsequently developed MIBC., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: We performed whole exome sequencing of bladder tumors from RA-MIBC patients. Tumor genetic alterations including mutations, copy number alterations, and mutational signatures were identified and were compared with genetic features of non-RA-MIBC. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate recurrence-free (RFS) and overall (OS) survival., Results and Limitations: We identified 19 RA-MIBC patients with available tumor tissue (n = 22 tumors) and clinical data. The median age was 76 yr, and the median time from prostate cancer radiation to RA-MIBC was 12 yr. The median RFS was 14.5 mo and the median OS was 22.0 mo. Compared with a cohort of non-RA-MIBC analyzed in parallel, there was no difference in tumor mutational burden, but RA-MIBCs had a significantly increased number of short insertions and deletions (indels) consistent with previous radiation exposure. We identified mutation signatures characteristic of APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis, aging, and homologous recombination deficiency. The frequency of mutations in many known bladder cancer genes, including TP53, KDM6A, and RB1, as well as copy number alterations such as CDKN2A loss was similar in RA-MIBC and non-RA-MIBC., Conclusions: We identified unique mutational properties that likely contribute to the distinct biological and clinical features of RA-MIBC., Patient Summary: Bladder cancer is a rare but serious diagnosis following radiation for prostate cancer. We characterized genetic features of bladder tumors arising after prostate radiotherapy, and identify similarities with and differences from bladder tumors from patients without previous radiation., (Copyright © 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate approved for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) refractory to prior therapy. In the Urothelial Cancer Network to Investigate Therapeutic Experiences (UNITE) study, the authors looked at the experience with EV in patient subsets of interest for which activity had not been well defined in clinical trials., Methods: UNITE was a retrospective study of patients with aUC treated with recently approved agents. This initial analysis focused on patients treated with EV. Patient data were abstracted from chart reviews by investigators at each site. The observed response rate (ORR) was investigator-assessed for patients with at least 1 post-baseline scan or clear evidence of clinical progression. ORRs were compared across subsets of interest for patients treated with EV monotherapy., Results: The initial UNITE analysis included 304 patients from 16 institutions; 260 of these patients were treated with EV monotherapy and included in the analyses. In the monotherapy cohort, the ORR was 52%, and it was >40% in all reported subsets of interest, including patients with comorbidities previously excluded from clinical trials (baseline renal impairment, diabetes, and neuropathy) and patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.8 and 14.4 months, respectively. Patients with a pure urothelial histology had a higher ORR than patients with a variant histology component (58% vs 42%; P = .06)., Conclusions: In a large retrospective cohort, responses to EV monotherapy were consistent with data previously reported in clinical trials and were also observed in various patient subsets, including patients with variant histology, patients with FGFR3 alterations, and patients previously excluded from clinical trials with an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min and significant comorbidities., Lay Summary: Enfortumab vedotin, approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2019, is an important new drug for the treatment of patients with advanced bladder cancer. This study looks at the effectiveness of enfortumab vedotin as it has been used at multiple centers since approval, and focuses on important patient populations previously excluded from clinical trials. These populations include patients with decreased kidney function, diabetes, and important mutations. Enfortumab vedotin is effective for treating these patients. Previously reported clinical trial data have been replicated in this real-world setting, and support the use of this drug in broader patient populations., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Background: The renin-angiotensin system is involved in the regulation of angiogenesis and cell proliferation. Angiotensin inhibition may improve drug delivery by enhancing tumor perfusion partly by downregulating transforming growth factor (TGF)-β. Because TGF-β is associated with resistance in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) receiving programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD1/L1) inhibitors, we hypothesized that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may enhance the outcomes of patients with mUC who receive PD1/L1 inhibitors., Patients and Methods: Data from patients with mUC who received PD1/L1 inhibitors as monotherapy were obtained; patients from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute constituted the discovery dataset, and data from Moffitt Cancer Center served as the validation dataset. A logistic regression investigated the impact of concurrent ACEI/ARB primarily on any regression of tumor (ART) after controlling for prognostic factors., Results: Data were available for 178 patients from the discovery dataset, of whom 153 (86%) had received prior platinum and 33 (18.5%) concurrent ACEIs/ARBs. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that ACEIs/ARBs were associated with greater probability of ART (odds ratio [OR] = 2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-6.30; P = .022). In the validation dataset, 101 patients were available, of whom 59 (58.4%) had received prior platinum and 22 (21.8%) concurrent ACEIs/ARBs. ACEI/ARB demonstrated a trend for association with ART (OR = 3.28; 95% CI, 0.98-10.99; P = .054) on multivariable analysis of the validation dataset., Conclusions: Concurrent angiotensin blockade was associated with a higher rate of tumor regression in patients with mUC receiving PD1/L1 inhibitors. Validation is warranted in a prospective trial, especially given the cost efficacy of ACEIs/ARBs., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)