Search

Aim: The present study explored the gender interaction on the risk of uric acid in the new development of hypertension., Study Design: A longitudinal retrospective cohort., Subjects & Methods: A total of 5,807 individuals with an average age of 38 ± 7 years old were recruited. Individuals whose blood pressure rose more than 140/90mmHg or those who newly commenced antihypertensive treatment were defined as a new onset of hypertension. Cox regression analysis was employed for the analysis., Results: During the 10-years follow-up, 42.8% of men and 22.2% of women had developed hypertension. Factors to predict the hypertension development were male gender, older age, higher BMI, higher uric acid, and higher mean blood pressure. An association between higher uric acid levels and higher incidence of hypertension remained statistically significant in women in a multivariate model adjusted for various clinical variables (Hazard ration (HR), 1.180; 95%CI, 1.018 to 1.369), whereas such association was not found in men (HR, 1.034; 95%CI, 0.994 to 1.075). The interaction between the two genders reached statistical significance (p for interaction = 0.007)., Conclusion: Higher uric acid is associated with the incident hypertension in the both genders. Women are more susceptible to the development of hypertension than men.

Background: Uric acid (UA) levels correlate positively with the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or hypertension. We tested the hypothesis that UA may also have a link to a new incidence of CKD and hypertension., Methods: Study design is a cohort study and the predictor is UA levels. Of the 15,470 screened cases, 8223 participants without CKD were eligible for the analysis of the incidence of CKD. Among these CKD candidates, 7569 participants were eligible for the analysis of the new development of hypertension. The observation period was 4 years., Results: Relationship of UA with new cases of CKD. Higher UA levels had a closer association with the new development of CKD; 1.1 % (UA < 5 mg/dL), 1.5 % (5.0-5.9 mg/dL), 1.7 % (6.0-6.9 mg/dL), and 3.4 % (≧7 mg/dL), respectively (p < 0.001 by the Chi-square test). Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that the estimates of the CKD development were eGFR [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.816, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 0.791-0.840] and male gender (HR 0.562, 95 % CI 0.322-0.982). UA levels and new development of hypertension. Higher UA levels had a closer association with the new development of hypertension; 5.0 % (UA < 5 mg/dL), 8.9 % (5.0-5.9 mg/dL), 10.6 % (6.0-6.9 mg/dL), and 11.8 % (≧7 mg/dL), respectively (p < 0.001 by the Chi-square test). Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that the estimates of the hypertension development were BMI (HR 1.190, 95 % CI 1.155-1.226), age (HR 1.021, 95 % CI 1.010-1.032), HDL-cholesterol (HR 1.013, 95 % CI 1.007-1.019), male gender (HR 1.791, 95 % CI 1.338-2.395), UA level (HR 1.112, 95 % CI 1.024-1.207), and eGFR (HR 1008, 95 % CI 1.002-1.013). Furthermore, the logistic analysis showed that the odds ratio (OR) to estimate hypertension in the high UA group (UA ≧ 7 mg/dL; OR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.01-1.80) was greater than that in the low UA group (UA < 5 mg/dL). Kaplan-Meier analysis also confirmed the finding that the higher the UA levels the greater the hypertension development (p < 0.001 by the Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard analysis)., Conclusion: High UA levels are associated with the new development of hypertension, but not with the incidence of CKD.

Aim: Serum uric acid (UA) concentration is regulated by its production in the liver and/or intestine and its rate of excretion from the kidneys. However, little is known about skeletal muscle involvement in determining the physiological UA level. The present trial explores whether muscle strength and/or muscle volume is associated with UA levels., Material & Methods: Muscle strength was evaluated in terms of grasping power calculated as an average of right and left hand measurements in relation to other parameters in 14,333 subjects (median age; 41.2 years), who were recruited to the study. Skeletal muscle volume was calculated based on the bioimpedance method by subtracting estimated fat volume plus estimated bone weight from the total body weight., Results: 1) Multiple regression analyses to explain the association with UA levels (dependent variable) revealed that BMI, BUN, triglyceride, muscle strength, AST, age and sex are independent variables. 2) Higher UA levels (assessed as 4 UA quartiles) are associated with higher muscle volume, muscle strength, BMI, DBP, and serum creatinine (Cr) concentration. 3) Greater DBP (assessed as 2 UA categories) was associated with higher BMI, muscle strength, muscle volume, UA levels and serum Cr concentration. 4) Regression coefficient "t" for muscle strength was the largest among the other parameters including serum Cr concentration in the UA level ranging from 5.5 to 6.5 mg/dL., Conclusion: There was an association between muscle strength/volume and UA levels in the near physiological UA range, suggesting that the circulating UA levels can be, at least in part, controlled by its production in the skeletal muscles.

Objective: The Jikei Optimal Antihypertensive Treatment (JOINT) study originally evaluated the effect of a fixed-dose formulation of losartan (LOS) (50 mg) plus 12.5 hydrochrolthiazide (HCTZ) for achieving better blood pressure (BP) control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This study is a sub-analysis of the JOINT study, focusing on the effect of LOS/HCTZ on the uric acid (UA) metabolism., Methods: Among 228 participants in the JOINT study, a total of 164 patients whose blood and urinary UA specimens were available were included in the present analyses., Results: Six months after switching from the prior antihypertensive agent(s) to a single tablet formulation of LOS/HCTZ, the overall serum UA concentration (sUA) increased from 6.0 ± 1.6 mg/dL to 6.2 ± 1.6 mg/dL (p=0.029). The urinary UA/creatinine (Cr) ratio increased from 0.45 +/- 0.21 to 0.50 +/- 0.25 (p=0.014), and the fractional excretion of UA (FEUA) also increased, from 7.1 +/- 3.6 to 7.0 +/- 4.3, p=0.04). Multivariate regression analyses of the basal parameters showed the change in sUA (ΔUA) to correlate with the basal sUA (β=-0.483, p<0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (β=-0.202, p=0.007) and systolic BP (β=0.147, p=0.038). In addition, the ΔUA also correlated with the changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (ΔeGFR) (β=-0.332, p<0.001). When the patients were classified into two groups depending on their basal sUA, those with a basal sUA ≥ 7 mg/dL exhibited a decrease in their sUA, whereas the rest of those with a sUA <7 mg/dL experienced an increase. Furthermore, patients who had previously been treated with LOS alone had a greater increase in the sUA than those treated with an angiotensin II blocker (ARB) other than LOS alone., Conclusion: Antihypertensive therapy with a single tablet formulation of LOS/HCTZ is considered to be a useful option for controlling both BP and sUA, especially in uncontrolled hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia.