Search

Introduction: The ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a medical device that enables repeated entrance into the ureter and collecting system during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Its impact on stone-free rates, ureteral injuries, operative time, and postoperative complications remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing RIRS with versus without UAS for urolithiasis management., Purpose: To compare outcomes from retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for stone extraction with or without ureteral access sheath (UAS); evaluating stone-free rate (SFR), ureteral injuries, operative time, and postoperative complications., Materials and Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety outcomes of UAS use in RIRS for urolithiasis treatment. Articles published between 2014 and 2024 were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively., Results: Five RCTs comprising 466 procedures were included. Of these, 246 (52.7%) utilized UAS. The follow-up ranged from 1 week to 1 month. UAS reduced the incidence of postoperative fever (RR 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.84; p=0.009), and postoperative infection (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.83; p=0.008). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of SFR (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99-1.11; p=0.10), ureteral injuries (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.95-1.75; p=0.11), operative time (MD 3.56 minutes; 95% CI -4.15 to 11.27 minutes; p=0.36), or length of stay (MD 0.32 days; 95% CI -0.42 to 1.07 days; p=0.40)., Conclusion: UAS leads to a lower rate of post-operative fever and infection. However, UAS did not significantly reduce or increase the SFR or the rate of ureteral injuries during RIRS for patients with urolithiasis. The use of UAS should be considered to decrease the risk of infectious complications, particularly in those who may be at higher risk for such complications., Competing Interests: None declared., (Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.)

Background and Objectives: Ureteral reconstruction is aimed at maintaining ureteral patency without the need for long-term catheters like ureteral stents or percutaneous nephrostomies. Different surgical strategies are adopted based on the etiology, the location of the injury, and the severity of the injury. We aimed to analyze the parameters that can predict which patients might not be free from further catheterization after reconstruction. Materials and Methods: This study included patients who underwent ureteral reconstruction from January 2007 to December 2021. The success of ureteral reconstruction was defined as being free from further catheterization after the operation. Results: A total of 184 patients underwent ureteral reconstruction. Malignant disease with ureteral invasion and iatrogenic injuries accounted for 79.9% of the cases. The majority (79.3%) did not have to undergo subsequent interventions. Predictors for a failed result of ureteral reconstruction included a history of radiotherapy (OR = 2.75, p = 0.01), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR = 3.42, p < 0.001), and an upper ureteric location of the injury (OR = 5.68, p = 0.042). Conclusions: A history of radiation therapy, an upper third ureteric location of the injury, and CKD were identified as predictors of a failed ureteral reconstruction. Malignant diseases, surgical methods, and repair techniques did not significantly affect the outcome of the operation.

Background: Ureteral injury occurs in 0.3-1.5% of colorectal cancer surgeries. Devices to visualize the ureteral course and avoid ureteral injury are required for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The NIRC™ fluorescent ureteral catheter (FUC) is a versatile ureteral visualization device currently available in Japan that can be used in combination with a variety of laparoscopic and robotic systems. In this study, we examined the outcomes of high-risk patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with FUC insertion., Methods: One hundred forty-one patients who underwent MIS for colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer recurrence at our institute between January 2021 and May 2024 underwent preoperative FUC insertion because of the high risk of ureteral injury and surgical difficulty. For these patients, patient background data and short-term outcomes were examined. The results are expressed as the median and interquartile range., Results: Age, 70 [60-78]; M:F(n), 84:57; BMI, 22.1 [19.7-24.7]; T4 (TNM classification), 52 cases (36.9%); preoperative intestinal obstruction, 45 cases (31.9%); abscess formation, 30 cases (21%); surgical history, 70 cases (50%); recurrent cancer, 14 cases (9.9%); preoperative chemo-radiotherapy, 28 cases (19.9%); time required for FUC insertion, 12 [9-19] minutes; operation time, 412 [309-552] minutes; blood loss, 10 [5-30] ml; open conversion, 0 cases; postoperative hospitalization, 12 [9-17.5]; circumferential resection margins < 1 mm (rectal surgery), 4/87 cases (4.6%); comorbidities, 0 ureteral injury, 1 urethral injury during FUC insertion (0.7%) and 16 CD Grade 3 or higher cases (11%)., Conclusions: FUC may improve the safety of MIS and reduce blood loss in addition to preventing ureteral injury and is expected to have oncological advantages for ensuring the margin of the tumor without fear of ureteral injury. However, the time required for and complications associated with FUC are challenging. New methods for less invasive and easier ureteral visualization may be needed., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Iatrogenic ureteral injury is a serious complication of abdominopelvic surgery. Identifying the ureters intraoperatively is essential to avoid iatrogenic ureteral injury. We developed a model that may minimize this complication., Impact of Innovation: We applied a deep learning-based semantic segmentation algorithm to the ureter recognition task and developed a deep learning model called UreterNet. This study aimed to verify whether the ureters could be identified in videos of laparoscopic colorectal surgery., Technology, Materials, and Methods: Semantic segmentation of the ureter area was performed using a convolutional neural network-based approach. Feature Pyramid Networks were used as the convolutional neural network architecture for semantic segmentation. Precision, recall, and the Dice coefficient were used as the evaluation metrics in this study., Preliminary Results: We created 14,069 annotated images from 304 videos, with 9537, 2266, and 2266 images in the training, validation, and test data sets, respectively. Concerning ureter recognition performance, the precision, recall, and Dice coefficient for the test data were 0.712, 0.722, and 0.716, respectively. Regarding the real-time performance on recorded videos, it took 71 milliseconds for UreterNet to infer all pixels corresponding to the ureter from a single still image and 143 milliseconds to output and display the inferred results as a segmentation mask on the laparoscopic monitor., Conclusions: UreterNet is a noninvasive method for identifying the ureter in videos of laparoscopic colorectal surgery and can potentially improve surgical safety., Future Directions: Although this deep learning model could lead to the development of an image-navigated surgical system, it is necessary to verify whether UreterNet reduces the occurrence of iatrogenic ureteral injury., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2024.)

Objective: Our objective was to propose a laparoscopic modified simple ureteroneocystostomy for repairing iatrogenic ureteral injuries. In laparoscopic modified simple ureteroneocystostomy, the highest point of the bladder was found by cystoscopy, then we implanted a "fish mouth" ureter end into the bladder, leaving at least 1 cm of ureter end in the bladder as an anti-reflux procedure., Case Report: We retrospectively reviewed a case series of lower third iatrogenic ureter injury during gynecology surgery of 11 patients who received laparoscopic modified simple ureteroneocystostomy at Da Lin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, from January 2011 to December 2020. One patient needs percutaneous nephrotomy due to infection and had the ureteroneocystostomy two months later. No obstruction, ureter stenosis/stricture, bladder leakage or other renal complications were noted after repair., Conclusion: Laparoscopic modified simple ureteroneocystostomy is technically feasible for repairing lower third ureter injuries, with no major complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Authors declare no actual or potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The use of ureteral access sheaths (UAS), which offer advantages in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURL), may lead to undesirable conditions such as ureteral injury, ischemia, and prolonged ureteral stenosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the distal ureteral lateralization angle on successful UAS placement., Methods: We analyzed the data of patients who underwent fURL for kidney and/or proximal ureteral stones retrospectively. Based on the preoperative computed tomographic examinations of the patients, the bladder outlet was considered the zero point. We calculated the angle values between the horizontal axis passing through this point and the most lateralized point of the distal ureter. The patients were divided into two groups: those to whom UAS was successfully placed and those to whom UAS placement failed., Results: No significant difference was detected between the groups with successful UAS placement (n=36) and those without UAS placement (n=12) in terms of sex, laterality, localization, number of stones, stone burden, and bladder volumes evaluated with preoperative computed tomography (p>0.05). However, a significant difference was found between the two groups regarding age and distal ureteral lateralization angle (p<0.001, p=0.013)., Conclusion: The distal ureteral lateralization angle is considered to be an effective factor in the placement of UAS in patients scheduled for fURS.

Background: There is a lack of robust evidence to recommend the use of perioperative ureteric catheterisation or stenting in complex gynaecological surgery., Objectives: To evaluate the evidence on the benefits and risks of perioperative ureteric catheterisation or stenting in complex gynaecological surgery., Search Strategy: A literature search was performed in CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Embase and MEDLINE, from 1946 to January 2024, using a combination of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terminology., Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included., Data Collection and Analysis: Meta-analysis of the RCTs and observational studies were performed separately. Cochrane RevMan 6.5.1 was used to undertake meta-analysis. Risk ratios with 95% CIs were calculated for the outcome measures., Main Results: Ten studies were included: three RCTs and seven observational studies, comprising 8661 patients. The three RCTs, comprising a total of 3277 patients, showed no difference in the risk of immediate complications in the form of ureteric injury between the ureteric stent and the control groups (RR 0.9, 95% CI 0.49-1.65). The observational studies included 5384 patients. Four studies that explored the ureteric injury as an outcome did not show any difference between the two groups (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.27-2.16). One case-control study with 862 participants found that the rate of ureteric injury was higher in the non-stented group, although this was observed in only three patients. The risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) was increased in the stent group, although not with statistical significance (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.47-7.17). There was no significant difference in the risk of ureteric fistulae (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.62-5.83), although the number of studies was limited., Conclusions: Prophylactic ureteric catheterisation or stenting for complex gynaecological surgery is not associated with a lower risk of ureteric injury., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: The use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) during ureteroscopy (URS) has been associated with the risk for ureteral injuries. Preoperative administration of α1-blockers presents a potential mitigator of such lesions by inducing ureteral relaxation, which may also contribute to improving other surgical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing preoperative α1-blockers administration vs its non-use in adult patients without pre-stenting undergoing URS. Binary outcomes were evaluated using risk ratios (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was measured with the Cochran's Q test, I 2 statistics, and prediction intervals (PIs). A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was utilized for all outcomes. Results: Eleven studies encompassing 1074 patients undergoing URS were included, of whom 522 (48.60%) received α1-blockers before the procedure. Preoperative α1-blockers were associated with a reduction in significant ureteral injuries (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.17-0.53; I 2 = 6%; PI 0.10-0.88) and an increase in mean successful UAS insertion (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.08-4.23; I 2 = 23%; PI 0.51-8.93). In patients undergoing exclusively ureteroscopy lithotripsy (URSL), the medications also reduced total complications (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46-0.84; I 2 = 0%) and complications graded Clavien-Dindo III or higher (RR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04-0.69; I 2 = 0%), but no significant difference between groups was found in the stone-free rate (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.86-1.40; I 2 = 91%; PI 0.47-2.59). Conclusion: Preoperative α1-blockers were linked to a decrease in significant ureteral injuries with UAS use and fewer complications during URSL procedures. However, their impact on the successful insertion of a UAS remains uncertain. Consideration of administering preoperative α1-blockers in non-stented adult patients undergoing URS with UAS is advisable.

Background: After colorectal surgery, acute kidney injury (AKI) results from a complex interplay of multiple independent causes and preventive measures that occur during the hospitalization. Prophylactic stenting for ureter identification has been identified as a potential cause, but the evidence is conflicting, possibly because of differing baseline characteristics and procedure-related approaches., Objective: This retrospective cohort study assesses the role of stents in the etiology of AKI after determining the independent predictors of AKI., Methods: From a population of 1224 consecutive colorectal patients (from 8/1/2016 through 12/31/2021), 382 (31.2%) received ureteral stents, and propensity score matching was used to create stented and control groups. Emergent cases and patients with sepsis were excluded from the analysis. Previously identified independent predictors of AKI, minimally invasive procedures, and a history of diabetes mellitus were used as criteria to create two balanced groups., Results: Baseline demographic characteristics and procedure-related factors baseline factors were similar between the groups. There was no difference in the rate of AKI between stented patients and controls (P = 0.82), nor was there any difference in postoperative complications, such as chronic renal insufficiency (CRI, P = 0.49), average postoperative creatinine (P = 0.67), urinary tract infections (UTI, P = 0.82), any postoperative infection (P = 0.48), in-hospital complications (P = 1.00), length of stay (LOS, P = 0.15), and 30-day readmissions (P = 0.79)., Conclusions: In a population of patients where stenting was frequently employed, ureter stents placed for identification did not appear to cause AKI or AKI-related complications., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Ureteric injury (UI) is an infrequent but serious complication of colorectal surgery. Prophylactic ureteric stenting is employed to avoid UI, yet its efficacy remains debated. Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) has been used to facilitate ureter detection. This study aimed to investigate the role of ICG-FI in identification of ureters during colorectal surgery and its impact on the incidence of UI., Methods: A retrospective cohort study involving 556 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal surgery between 2018 and 2023 assessed the utility of routine prophylactic ureteric stenting with adjunctive ICG-FI. Patients with ICG-FI were compared to those without ICG-FI. Demographic data, operative details, and postoperative morbidity were analyzed. Statistical analysis included univariable regression., Results: Ureteric ICG-FI was used in 312 (56.1%) patients, whereas 43.9% were controls. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographics except for a higher prevalence of prior abdominal surgeries in the ICG-FI group. Although intraoperative visualization was significantly higher in the ICG-FI group (95.3% vs 89.1%; p = 0.011), the incidence of UI was similar between groups (0.3% vs 0.8%; p = 0.585). Postoperative complications were similar between the two groups. Median stent insertion time was longer in the ICG-FI group (32 vs 25 min; p = 0.001)., Conclusion: Ureteric ICG-FI improved intraoperative visualization of the ureters but was not associated with a reduced UI rate. Median stent insertion time increased with use of ureteric ICG-FI, but total operative time did not. Despite its limitations, this study is the largest of its kind suggesting that ureteric ICG-FI may be a valuable adjunct to facilitate  ureteric visualization during colorectal surgery., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Surgical exploration in complete ureteropelvic-junction disruption (CUPJD) is still recommended by many authors. Conservative approach to pediatric renal trauma (RT) includes minimally invasive techniques such as nephrostomy, angioembolization or double-J stent placement., Case Report: A 14-year-old patient with CUPJD was treated conservatively. CT-scan revealed active bleeding of the renal artery and significant urine extravasation. Coil angioembolization and nephrostomy placement were performed. An attempt to place a double-J stent was unsuccessful and surgical reconstruction was scheduled. Before surgery, methylene-blue was injected through the nephrostomy observing blue urine output through urethra. Antegrade pyelogram revealed drainage from the urinoma to the ureter. A new attempt to place an internal-external double-J-stent was successful. After 5 weeks, it was removed with total restoration of the urinary tract., Conclusion: Complete urinary tract restoration in some cases of CUPJD following RT is possible through a nonoperative approach. It can be safe and effective, reducing the risk of complications associated with complex surgeries.

Endometriosis surgery involving the ureter poses significant challenges requiring meticulous surgical techniques and vigilant postoperative care. This chapter addresses key aspects of ureterolysis techniques, intraoperative management of ureteral injuries, and postoperative care in the context of endometriosis surgery. Ureterolysis methods aim to isolate and mobilize the ureter while preserving its vascularity. Cold instruments and careful dissection are recommended to prevent thermal injury during surgery. Intraoperative tools such as indocyanine green (ICG) show promise in assessing for vascular compromise. Over half of ureteral injuries are detected postoperatively, necessitating a high index of suspicion. Optimal postoperative care in the case of ureteral injury involves Foley catheterization for decompression, ureteral stenting, and meticulous follow-ups to monitor healing and renal function. While advances have been made in surgical techniques and diagnostic tools, gaps persist in preoperative imaging optimization and predictive models for identifying at-risk patients. This chapter aims to bridge existing knowledge gaps, optimize surgical practices, and enhance the overall care and outcomes of patients undergoing endometriosis surgery involving the ureter., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest L.R.C reports no conflict of interest., (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

This study aimed to register and analyse outcomes after iatrogenic ureteral injuries (IUI) with special emphasis on potential consequences of a delayed diagnosis, and further to analyse if the incidence of IUI has changed during the study period. 108 patients treated for an IUI during 2001-2021 were included. Injuries due to endourological procedures, planned tumour resection and traumatic injuries were excluded. All relevant information to answer the research questions were entered into a database. Chi-square and t-tests were used for categorical and continuous variables respectively. Regression analysis was used to evaluate potential change of incidence in IUIs over time. Our results showed that most IUIs (74, 69%) were caused by gynaecological surgery. 49 (45%) had a delayed diagnosis (not diagnosed intraoperatively). Younger age (mean 50 vs 62 years, p < 0.001) and benign indication for laparoscopic hysterectomy (OR 8.0, p < 0.001) predisposed for a delayed diagnosis. Patients with a delayed diagnosis had a higher number of secondary injury related procedures (mean 4.6 vs 1.7, p < 0.001), hospital admissions (mean 3.0 vs 0.8, p < 0.001) and longer hospital stays (mean 20.6 vs 3.9 days p < 0.001) compared to patients with an intraoperative diagnosis. There was complete recovery for 91% of the patients. We did not observe any changes in IUI incidence during the study period. In conclusion, our study underlines that IUI can cause major morbidity for the patient affected if not diagnosed intraoperatively. Benign indication and younger age are predictors for a delayed diagnosis. The prognosis is good, with 91% full recovery. No significant changes in incidence of IUIs were observed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The benefits of prophylactic ureteral stent placement during colorectal surgery remain controversial. This study aimed to determine the incidence of ureteral injury in colorectal operations, assess the complications associated with stent usage, and determine whether their use leads to earlier identification and treatment of injury., Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing colorectal abdominal operations between 2015 and 2021. Variables were examined for possible association with ureteral stent placement. The primary study endpoint was ureteral injury identified within 30 days postoperatively., Results: Of 6481 patients who underwent colorectal surgery, 970 (15%) underwent preoperative ureteral stent placement. The use of stents was significantly associated with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, wound classification, and longer duration of surgery. A ureteral injury was identified in 28 patients (0.4%). Of these patients, 13 had no stent, and 15 had preoperative stents placed. After propensity matching, stent use was associated with an increased risk of hematuria and urinary tract infection. Ureteral injury was identified intraoperatively in 14 of 28 patients (50.0%) and was not associated with ureteral stent use (P = .45)., Conclusion: Iatrogenic ureteral injury was uncommon, whereas preoperative stent placement was relatively frequent. Earlier recognition of iatrogenic ureteral injury is not an expected advantage of preoperative ureteral stent placement., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To define a peak force of insertion (PFOI) threshold for ureteral damage during ureteral access sheath (UAS) placement on an experimental ureteral orifice model., Methods: A specially designed water tank using 2 laparoscopic 5 mm ports and 2 different size (10 Fr and 8 Fr) sealing cap adaptors (SCA) as ureteral orifices was used to perform the test. A 10-12 Fr UAS was fixed to a load cell and the force of insertion (FOI) was continuously recorded with a digital force gauge.13 experts in the field of endourology who participated performed 3 UAS insertions. The FOI was recorded initially with 10 Fr followed by 8 Fr SCA. On the final insertion, the orifice was obstructed, leaving a 5 cm length to insert the UAS. The experts were asked to "Stop at the point they anticipate ureteral damage, and they would not proceed in real life"., Results: Using 10 Fr SCA the PFOI was 2.12 ± 0.58 Newton (N) (range:1.48-3.48) while 8 Fr SCA showed a PFOI 5.76 ± 0.96 N (range:4.05-7.35). Six of the experts, said they would stop proceeding when they reached above 5.1 N. Three experts had PFOI < 5.1 N and the other 4 stated they would go with PFOIs of 5.88, 6.16, 6.69 and 7.35 N when using SCA of 8 Fr.The highest load they would stop proceeding had a PFOI of 6.09 ± 1.87 N (range: 2.53-10.74)., Conclusion: The PFOI threshold for ureteral damage inserting UAS of the experts is variable. Although FOI is a subjective perception, experience suggests that ureteral injury may occur at an average of 6.05 N perceived by surgeons' tactile feedback. In-vivo measurement of UAS PFOI may confirm a threshold., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Ureteral injury during lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is uncommon. However, it is a serious complication that may require additional surgery should it occur. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether there was any change in the position of the left ureter between preoperative biphasic contrast-enhanced CT scanned in the supine position and intraoperative scanning in the right lateral decubitus position after stent placement, to assess the risk of ureteral injury in the actual surgical position., Methods: The position of the left ureter scanned with the O-arm navigation system with the patient in the right lateral decubitus position and its position on preoperative biphasic contrast-enhanced CT images scanned with the patient in the supine position were investigated comparing their positions at the L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 levels., Results: The ureter was located along the interbody cage insertion trajectory in 25 of 44 disc levels (56.8%) in the supine position, but in only 4 (9.5%) in the lateral decubitus position. The proportion of patients in whom the left ureter was located lateral to the vertebral body (along the LLIF cage insertion trajectory) at each level was 80% in the supine position and 15.4% in the lateral decubitus position at the L2/3 level, 53.3% in the supine position and 6.7% in the lateral decubitus position at the L3/4 level, and 33.3% in the supine position and 6.7% in the lateral decubitus position at the L4/5 level., Conclusion: The proportion of patients in whom the left ureter was located on the lateral surface of the vertebral body when the patient was in the actual surgical position (lateral decubitus position) was 15.4% at the L2/3 level, 6.7% at the L3/4 level, and 6.7% at the L4/5 level, suggesting that caution is required during LLIF surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) during colorectal surgery is a rare complication but related to a serious burden of morbidity. This comprehensive and systematic review aims to provide a critical overview of the most recent literature about IUI prevention techniques in colorectal surgery. We performed a comprehensive and systematic review of studies published from 2000 to 2022 and assessed the use of techniques for ureteral injury prevention and intraoperative localization. 26 publications were included, divided into stent-based (prophylactic/lighted ureteral stent and near-infrared fluorescent ureteral catheter [PUS/LUS/NIRFUC]) and fluorescent dye (FD) groups. Costs, the percentage and number of IUIs detected, reported limitations, complication rates and other outcome points were compared. The IUI incidence rate ranged from 0 to 1.9% (mean 0.5%) and 0 to 1.2% (mean 0.3%) in the PUS/LUS/NIRFUC and FD groups, respectively. The acute kidney injury (AKI) and urinary tact infection (UTI) incidence rate ranged from 0.4 to 32.6% and 0 to 17.3%, respectively, in the PUS/LUS/NIRFUC group and 0-15% and 0-6.3%, respectively, in the FD group. Many other complications were also compared and descriptively analyzed (length-of-stay, mortality, etc.). These techniques appear to be feasible and safe in select patients with a high risk of IUI, but the delineation of reliable guidelines for preventing IUI will require more randomized controlled trials., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)

Purpose: To assess whether preoperative administration of silodosin can facilitate the placement of ureteral access sheath (UAS) prior to flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) and reduce the occurrence of ureteric injury in challenging cases., Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out on 147 patients diagnosed with upper ureteric stone or stone kidney, non-stented. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A (silodosin group) included patients in whom F-URS was done with daily preoperative intake of 8 mg silodosin for 1 week and group B (placebo/control group) included patients in whom F-URS was done with daily preoperative intake of placebo tablets., Results: In group A, a total of 23 (33.3%) experienced ureteral wall injury following UAS insertion, while in group B, this occurred in 40 patients (59.7%). There was a statistically significant difference in the grade of ureteral wall injury between the two groups (P < 0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, age, operative time and silodosin were found to be significant risk factors for ureteral wall injury (P = 0.007, 0.041 and < 0.001, respectively)., Conclusions: The administration of silodosin prior to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) effectively prevented significant ureteral wall damage and reduced initial postoperative discomfort., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction and Objectives: Ureteral stents have long been utilized during colorectal resections to assist in the identification of ureters intraoperatively and mitigate risk of ureteral injury. As these procedures have shifted toward robot-assisted laparoscopic methods, lighted stents have increasingly been used. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) following bilateral ureteral stent placement has been reported to be as high as 41.9%. We sought to identify our single-institution risk and determine the extent to which age, sex, and stent type affected incidence of AKI., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed at a single community hospital of all open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgeries from October 2012 to April 2022. If requested, ureteral stents were placed bilaterally by a urologist and later removed by the surgeon. Non-lighted stents used were 5 Fr whistle-tip (BARD); lighted stents were 6 Fr with a fiberoptic core (STRYKER). Kidney failure was described as a rise of creatinine to ≥ 1.5 times the preoperative value, per KDIGO guidelines., Results: 633 consecutive colorectal surgeries were evaluated, with no stents placed in 237 cases, non-lighted stents placed in 137 cases, and lighted stents placed in 259 cases. No ureteral injuries were observed. Overall incidence of AKI for non-stented surgeries was 0.8% vs 5.8% for non-lighted stents and 5.8% for lighted stents. Patient age was the most significant factor in AKI incidence: for patients under 60, there was no statistical difference in AKI incidence for stented vs non-stented procedures (2.2% vs 1.1%). For patients over 60, the risk of AKI was 10.5% for stented vs 0.7% for non-stented. Female patients had statistically significant risk differences, with AKI incidence of 7.1% stented vs 0.0% non-stented. AKI completely resolved in all cases, regardless of cohort., Conclusions: In patients under age 60, the use of stents was not associated with an increased risk of AKI. For women and those over 60, stents pose a higher risk of transient AKI. Overall incidence of AKI in our larger and single-institution community hospital population was significantly lower than reported in other studies. No statistical difference was observed, overall, in AKI incidence between lighted and non-lighted stents., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Several strategies have been implemented to better identify the course of the ureters intra-operatively due of the morbidity associated with ureteric injuries especially during gynaecological surgery. We described our experience with pre-operative ureteric catherisation in women who underwent major endoscopic gynaecological surgery., Methods: A case-controlled study of 862 women who underwent major endoscopic gynaecological surgery sourced from two health institutions were conducted. Two groups were compared: those who had pre-operative prophylactic ureteric catherisation (study group) and those who had routine cystoscopy performed immediately post surgery (control group)., Results: There were no intra-operative ureteric injuries or associated complications noted in the study group. When compared to the control group, length of hospital stay (2 days vs 5 days; p < 0.05) and overall mean time for cystoscopy (11 min vs 35 min; p < 0.05) was significantly shorter in the study group. There was no long-term morbidity recorded in the study group., Conclusion: Our experiences with prophylactic pre-operative bilateral ureteric catheterisation for major endoscopic gynaecological surgeries were favourable and are associated with low complication rates. Routine or adjunct use before major gynaecological and pelvic surgery combined with meticulous surgical technique can help reduce iatrogenic and unintentional ureteric injuries., (© 2023. Crown.)

Background: Intraoperative ureteral injury, a serious complication of abdominopelvic surgeries, can be avoided through ureter visualization. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging offers real-time anatomical visualization of ureters during surgery. Pudexacianinium (ASP5354) chloride is an indocyanine green derivative under investigation for intraoperative ureter visualization during colorectal or gynecologic surgery in adult and pediatric patients., Methods: In this phase 2 study (NCT04238481), adults undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were randomized to receive one intravenous dose of pudexacianinium 0.3 mg, 1.0 mg, or 3.0 mg. The primary endpoint was successful intraoperative ureter visualization, defined as observation of ureter fluorescence 30 min after pudexacianinium administration and at end of surgery. Safety and pharmacokinetics were also assessed., Results: Participants received pudexacianinium 0.3 mg (n = 3), 1.0 mg (n = 6), or 3.0 mg (n = 3). Most participants were female (n = 10; 83.3%); median age was 54 years (range 24-69) and median BMI was 29.3 kg/m 2 (range 18.7-38.1). Successful intraoperative ureter visualization occurred in 2/3, 5/6, and 3/3 participants who received pudexacianinium 0.3 mg, 1.0 mg, or 3.0 mg, respectively. Median intensity values per surgeon assessment were 1 (mild) with the 0.3-mg dose, 2 (moderate) with the 1.0-mg dose, and 3 (strong) with the 3.0-mg dose. A correlation was observed between qualitative (surgeon's recognition/identification of the ureter during surgery) and quantitative (video recordings of the surgeries after study completion) assessment of fluorescence intensity. Two participants experienced serious adverse events, none of which were drug-related toxicities. One adverse event (grade 1 proteinuria) was related to pudexacianinium. Plasma pudexacianinium concentrations were dose-dependent and the mean (± SD) percent excreted into urine during surgery was 22.3% ± 8.0% (0.3-mg dose), 15.6% ± 10.0% (1.0-mg dose), and 39.5% ± 12.4% (3.0-mg dose)., Conclusions: In this study, 1.0 and 3.0 mg pudexacianinium provided ureteral visualization for the duration of minimally invasive, laparoscopic colorectal procedures and was safe and well tolerated., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of bladder emptying status on the ureteral access sheath (UAS) insertion resistance and following ureteral injury., Methods: Eighty patients were enrolled and randomly divided into bladder emptying group and control group before UAS placement. A digital force gauge (Imada Z2-50N) was used to measure the resistance during the UAS insertion. The ureteral injury was evaluated and graded with Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) system at the end of procedure. The mean resistance, maximum resistance in different ureteral segments, and ureteral injury were compared between the two groups., Results: The mean resistance (3.12 ± 0.49 vs. 4.28 ± 0.52 N, P < 0.001), maximum resistance in the whole procedure (5.17 ± 0.72 vs. 6.39 ± 0.96 N, P < 0.001) and distal ureter (3.07 ± 0.75 vs. 6.18 ± 1.17 N, P < 0.001) in the bladder emptying group were significantly lower when compared to the control group. In subgroup analysis, the similar result was also noted in patients with BMI ≥ 25 when compared to patients with BMI < 25, while there was no significant difference between men and women, age ≥ 50 years versus age < 50 years. The incidence of PULS 1-2 ureteral injury in the bladder emptying group was lower than the control group (35% vs. 55%, P = 0.045). The ureteral injury in distal ureteral was less frequently noted in bladder emptying group than the control group (22.5% vs. 55%, P = 0.006); however, there was no significant difference in middle and upper ureter (P > 0.05)., Conclusion: Emptying the bladder before UAS insertion can effectively reduce the UAS insertion resistance and the risk of distal ureteral injury in RIRS., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Preoperative ureteral catheterization/stenting (stenting) and intraoperative diagnostic cystoscopy (cystoscopy) may help prevent or identify intraoperative ureteral injuries (IUIs) during abdominopelvic surgery. In order to provide a comprehensive, single source of data for health care decision makers, this study aimed to catalog the incidence of IUI and rates of stenting and cystoscopy across a wide spectrum of abdominopelvic surgeries., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of United States (US) hospital data (October 2015-December 2019). IUI rates and stenting/cystoscopy use were investigated for gastrointestinal, gynecological, and other abdominopelvic surgeries. IUI risk factors were identified using multivariable logistic regression., Results: Among approximately 2.5 million included surgeries, IUIs occurred in 0.88% of gastrointestinal, 0.29% of gynecological, and 1.17% of other abdominopelvic surgeries. Aggregate rates varied by setting and for some surgery types were higher than previously reported, especially in certain higher-risk colorectal procedures. Prophylactic measures were generally employed at a relatively low frequency, with cystoscopy used in 1.8% of gynecological procedures and stenting used in 5.3% of gastrointestinal and 2.3% of other abdominopelvic surgeries. In multivariate analyses, stenting and cystoscopy use, but not surgical approach, were associated with a higher risk of IUI. Risk factors associated with stenting or cystoscopy, as well as those for IUI, largely mirrored the variables reported in the literature, including patient demographics (older age, non-White race, male sex, higher comorbidity), practice settings, and established IUI risk factors (diverticulitis, endometriosis)., Conclusion: Use of stenting and cystoscopy largely varied by surgery type, as did rates of IUI. The relatively low use of prophylactic measures suggests there may be an unmet need for a safe, convenient method of injury prophylaxis in abdominopelvic surgeries. Development of new tools, technology, and/or techniques is needed to help surgeons identify the ureter and avoid IUI and the resulting complications., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Objectives: Most thermal energy-induced distal ureter injuries are missed intraoperatively as they are caused by delayed ischemia-induced necrosis of the affected part leading to fistula, and a delayed presentation. The injuries of the distal ureter are commonly managed by ureteroneocystostomy, which has long-term complications related to vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR). We present our experience of management of distal ureter injury due to thermal energy by laparoscopy ureteroureterostomy and the role of various methodologies for its diagnosis., Methods: It is a retrospective, single-center study that was conducted from January 1, 2020 - December, 31 2022., Results: A total of 8 cases were enrolled in the study. All cases had an uterovaginal fistula (UVF) post-laparoscopic gynecology surgery. The bilateral ureteric injury was observed in 2 cases. The median post-surgery time to diagnose UVF in the study was 10 days. All cases were managed by laparoscopy ureteroureterostomy (LUUS). Six cases underwent immediate surgery after the diagnosis; whereas 2 cases had initial double-J stent placement as treatment, which subsequently failed following which the LUUS was performed. There were not any immediate or long-term complications such as leakage, stenosis, fistula, or any requirement for revision surgery., Conclusion: The management of thermal energy-induced ureteric injury is exceptional as compared to other types of ureteric injury. Our approach should be toward immediate surgical management rather than a conservative one to avoid long-term complications and sequelae. Iatrogenic lower ureteral injury can be managed successfully by LUUS, maintaining the normal anatomy and physiology of VUR., Competing Interests: Conflict of interests: none., (© 2023 by SLS, Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons.)

This study aimed to investigate the regeneration of epithelial cells in the long-term observation of ureter reconstruction by excising the demucosalized ileum. First, 8 Beagle dogs were anesthetized and the abdominal cavity was inspected for abnormalities via an abdominal incision. The right kidney and ureter were subsequently separated, and the ureter was severed from its connection to the renal pelvis and bladder and ligated distally. The 10-15 cm of ileum was used to reconstruct the ureter. The biopsies of the proximal, middle, and distal reconstructed ureter (neo-ureter) were collected at the first, third, fifth, and sixth month postoperatively. The regeneration of ileal mucosa at the first, third, fifth, and sixth month was observed by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and immunofluorescence staining cytokeratin 18 (CK18). HE staining results showed irregular cytoarchitecture, severe nuclear consolidation, and inflammatory infiltration in the proximal, middle, and distal neo-ureters of dogs at the first month after ureteral reconstruction. With longer follow-up, the injuries of the proximal, middle, and distal neo-ureters were alleviated at the third, fifth, and sixth month after surgery. The expression of CK18 was higher in the middle neo-ureters than that in the proximal and distal neo-ureters at different time points after ureteral reconstruction and decreased with time. In summary, the present study demonstrated that demucosalized ileum was feasible for ureteral reconstructive surgery with satisfying prognostic effects., (© 2023 The Authors. The FASEB Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.)

Aim: The long-term urological sequelae after iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) during colorectal surgery are not clearly known. The aims of this work were to report the incidence of IUI and to analyse the long-term consequences of urological late complications and their impact on oncological results of IUI occurring during colorectal surgery through a French multicentric experience (GRECCAR group)., Method: All the patients who presented with IUI during colorectal surgery between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively included. Patients with ureteral involvement needing en bloc resection, delayed ureteral stricture or noncolorectal surgery were not considered., Results: A total of 202 patients (93 men, mean age 63 ± 14 years) were identified in 29 centres, corresponding to 0.32% of colorectal surgeries (n = 63 562). Index colorectal surgery was mainly oncological (n = 130, 64%). IUI was diagnosed postoperatively in 112 patients (55%) after a mean delay of 11 ± 9 days. Intraoperative diagnosis of IUI was significantly associated with shorter length of stay (21 ± 22 days vs. 34 ± 22 days, p < 0.0001), lower rates of postoperative hydronephrosis (2% vs. 10%, p = 0.04), anastomotic complication (7% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.002) and thromboembolic event (0% vs. 6%, p = 0.02) than postoperative diagnosis of IUI. Delayed chemotherapy because of IUI was reported in 27% of patients. At the end of the follow-up [3 ± 2.6 years (1 month-13 years)], 72 patients presented with urological sequalae (36%). Six patients (3%) required a nephrectomy., Conclusion: IUI during colorectal surgery has few consequences for the patients if recognized early. Long-term urological sequelae can occur in a third of patients. IUI may affect oncological outcomes in colorectal surgery by delaying adjuvant chemotherapy, especially when the ureteral injury is not diagnosed peroperatively., (© 2023 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Background: Intraoperative ureteral injury (IUI) during colorectal surgery can have devastating consequences. This study aimed to assess the clinical and economic impact of pre-operative ureteral stenting in colorectal surgeries., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using United States hospital data (October 2015 - December 2019). IUI incidence was examined across selected inpatient surgery types (elective colectomy, enterectomy, proctectomy, enterostomy, other colorectal procedures; emergency colectomy). Stenting effectiveness was evaluated as the difference in IUI and intraoperative detection rates between propensity score-matched groups. The additional hospital cost for stenting was also estimated considering the savings from IUIs that were potentially avoidable or detected by stenting., Results: In total, 283,549 colorectal surgeries were analyzed. Across surgery types, stent use and IUI incidence ranged from 1.47% - 8.86% and from 0.91% - 2.90%, respectively. Stents were used in 6.75% of elective colectomy cases, where they were associated with an absolute reduction of 1.14 percentage points (95% CI: -1.85 to -1.03) in IUI rate and a 21.6 percentage point reduction in the intraoperative detection rate. Additional hospital costs for stenting ranged from $1,464 - $4,436 across surgery types. Additional results varied by case but were consistent with the colectomy example., Conclusions: While effective in limited settings, the IUI reduction attributed to stenting and ability to shift IUI detection to the intraoperative setting could not offset the hospital cost of stent placement during colectomy (and colorectal surgery, in general). There thus remains an ongoing need in colorectal surgery for a universal, cost-effective solution to prevent IUI., Competing Interests: Conflict of interests: TK, QF, WH, JS, and ES are employees of Astellas Pharma, Inc. AFA was an employee of Astellas Pharma, Inc. at the time of the study. SW reports consulting fees from ARC, Astellas, Baxter, ICON, Stryker, Intuitive, Olympus, Medtronic; royalties for Intellectual Property licenses from Intuitive, Medtronic, and Karl Storz., (© 2023 by SLS, Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons.)

Objective: We aimed to evaluate and compare the functional characteristics, safety profile and effectiveness of two commonly used ureteral access sheaths (UAS) during flexible ureteroscopy., Methods: After institutional review board approval, patients with proximal ureteral or kidney stones requiring flexible ureteroscopy and UAS were prospectively randomized to group I or group II according to the type of access sheath used. Primary outcome was incidence of intraoperative complications., Results: Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the study, 44 patients in each group. Sheath size 12/14 FR was used in both cohorts. Median (IQR) stone size was 10 mm (7-13.5) and 10.5 mm (7.37-14) in group I and II respectively (p = 0.915). Nineteen and twenty patients, in group I and II respectively, were pre-stented. Subjective resistance with insertion of the UAS was observed in 9 and 11 patients in group I and II respectively (p = 0.61) while failed insertion was encountered in one patient in group I. Traxer grade 1 ureteral injury was noted in 5 and 6 patients in group I and II respectively while grade 3 injury was seen in 1 patient for both cohorts (p = 0.338). There was less resistance for UAS placement in pre-stented patients (p = 0.0202) but without significant difference in ureteric injury incidence (p = 0.175). Emergency department visits were encountered in 7 (group I) and 5 patients (group II) (p = 0.534)., Conclusions: The studied UASs were comparable regarding safety and efficacy in the current study. Pre-stented and dilated ureters had less resistance to insertion although this was not reflected on incidence of ureteric injury.

Objective: To evaluate ureteral injuries caused by insertion of a 13-Fr ureteral access sheath and identify factors (other than pre-stenting) that are predictive of ureteral injury., Methods: We enrolled 201 patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL). We excluded 80 patients who underwent ureteral stent insertion before URSL, 10 patients who did not use a ureteral access sheath, and 2 patients in whom a ureteral access sheath could not be inserted. In total, 109 patients were analyzed; all underwent insertion of a 13-Fr ureteral access sheath. We investigated ureteral injuries using the Traxer ureteral injury scale., Results: There were 21 (19.3%) cases of ureteral access sheath-related ureteral injury, including 11 (10.1%) grade 2 cases and 10 (9.2%) grade 3 cases. The ureteral injury location was the proximal ureter in 20 cases (18.3%), middle ureter in one case (0.9%), and distal ureter in zero cases. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that male sex and smaller stone diameter were significant predictive factors for ureteral injury (p = 0.037, odds ratio [OR]: 5.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-24.3 and p = 0.02, OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71-0.97, respectively). Postoperative ureteral stricture did not occur in any cases., Conclusions: The rate of ureteral injury caused by a 13-Fr ureteral access sheath was considerable, and most ureteral injuries occurred in the proximal ureter. Male sex and smaller stone diameter were significant predictive factors for ureteral injury. The proximal ureter should be confirmed when using a 13-Fr ureteral access sheath, particularly in male patients and patients with small stones., (© 2023 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Objective: To assess the incidence of ureteric injuries, clinical value of prophylactic ureteric stenting and impact of intra- or postoperative detection of ureteric injuries in patients treated with gynaecological or colorectal surgery., Methods: Multiple databases were searched for articles published before September 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated the differences in the rate of ureteric injuries between laparoscopic and open surgery, prophylactic ureteric stenting or not, and those of final treatment success between intra- and postoperative detection in patients who underwent gynaecological or colorectal surgery., Results: Overall, 46 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher incidence of ureteric injuries (pooled odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-2.62), but there was no statistically significant difference in colectomy (pooled OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03). Prophylactic ureteric stenting was associated with a lower incidence of ureteric injuries during gynaecological surgery (pooled OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). The number needed to perform ureteric stenting to prevent one ureteric injury was 224 in gynaecological surgery. On the other hand, prophylactic ureteric stenting did not reduce the risk of ureteric injuries during colorectal surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury was associated with a lower rate of complication management failure compared to postoperative detection (pooled OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.41)., Conclusions: Laparoscopic hysterectomy seems to be associated with a higher rate of ureteric injuries compared to an open approach. Prophylactic ureteric stenting seems to reduce this risk during gynaecological surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury during abdominal/pelvic surgery improves outcomes, suggesting the need for awareness and proactive problem identification. Further well-designed studies assessing the candidates who are more likely to benefit from prophylactic ureteric stenting including cost analysis are needed., (© 2022 BJU International.)

Case History: Medical records were reviewed for cats that underwent surgical treatment of traumatic ureteral rupture (TUR) using urinary diversion procedures between 2012 and 2019., Clinical Findings and Treatment: Five cats had presented with injuries associated with road traffic accidents. These included three cats with abdominal hernias that required surgical management. At a median of 15 days after the accident, cats represented with lethargy, the presence of an abdominal mass or with lower urinary tract symptoms and in all cats contrast diagnostic imaging showed proximal unilateral TUR with associated para-ureteral urinoma. Four cats received subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) device placement and one had ureteral anastomosis over a stent. Unilateral cyst-like retroperitoneal fluid consistent with para-ureteral urinoma was observed in all cats and a diffuse retroperitoneal haematoma was noticed in four cats. No immediate major complications occurred, and all cats had post-operative serum creatinine concentration within the reference interval. The cat that had received a ureteral stent subsequently required placement of a SUB following stent encrustation 15 months after surgery. Median follow-up time was 34 (min 28, max 58) months and renal function was normal in all cats at the last follow-up., Clinical Relevance: Urinary diversion procedures provided long-term stable renal function following proximal TUR in these five cats. Delayed, subtle non-specific clinical signs subsequent to high-energy blunt trauma causing abdominal hernia and associated diffuse retroperitoneal haematoma, should raise suspicion of TUR., Abbreviations: AFAST: Abdominal focused assessment with sonography for trauma; SUB: Subcutaneous ureteral bypass; TUR: Traumatic ureteral rupture.

Background: Lower urinary tract injury (LUTI) is a serious complication of major gynaecologic surgery. Although intra-operative cystoscopy can facilitate timely diagnosis and treatment of LUTI, the optimal approach to cystoscopy at the time of benign hysterectomy remains debatable., Aims: To assess whether implementation of a policy of universal cystoscopy at the time of benign hysterectomy was associated with a difference in intra-operative detection and rates of LUTI., Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort study at a large regional teaching hospital where a policy of universal cystoscopy at the time of benign hysterectomy was implemented on 30 September 2019. Hysterectomies performed from 1 November 2016 to 31 March 2021 were included and categorised into the 'pre-policy' and 'post-policy' groups. Primary outcomes included the intra-operative detection and overall rates of LUTI. Secondary outcome was the policy adherence rate. Multivariate analysis was used to examine the effect of this policy on the outcomes., Results: There were 584 hysterectomies identified, including 325 in the pre-policy group and 259 in the post-policy group. Cystoscopy was performed in 55.1% in the pre-policy group and 97.7% in the post-policy group (P < 0.01). Adjusted for age, indication and route of hysterectomy, there were no significant differences in the intra-operative cystoscopic detection of LUTI (42.9% vs 25.0%, P = 0.55) or the rate of LUTI (2.2% vs 1.5%, P = 0.25) after implementation of the policy., Conclusions: The practice of universal cystoscopy at the time of benign hysterectomy has not been associated with a significant change in the intra-operative detection and rates of LUTI at our institution., (© 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Purpose: Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) can complicate minimally invasive and open abdominopelvic surgery. The incidence of IUI is low and dependent on the type of surgery (< 10 %), but it is associated with high morbidity. Therefore, intraoperative visualization of the ureter is critical to reduce the incidence of IUI, and some methodologies for ureter visualization have been developed. Amongst these, near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) visualization is thought to bring an advantage with real-time retroperitoneal visualization through the retroperitoneum. We investigated an indocyanine green (ICG) derivative, ASP5354, which emits NIRF at 820 nm when exposed to near-infrared light at a wavelength of 780 nm, in a rodent and porcine model., Procedures: Wistar rats and Göttingen minipigs under anesthesia were laparotomized and then administered ASP5354 chloride intravenously at dose of 0.03 and 0.3 mg/kg for rats and 0.001 and 0.01 mg/kg for minipigs, respectively. Videos of the abdominal cavity in minipigs were taken using a near-infrared fluorescent camera (pde-neo) and assessed visually by three independent clinicians. Toxicological evaluation was demonstrated with cynomolgus monkeys., Results: The proportion of animals whose ureters were visible up to 3 h after administration of ASP5354 chloride were 33 % at 0.001 mg/kg and 100 % at 0.01 mg/kg, respectively. In a toxicological study in cynomolgus monkeys, ASP5354 chloride demonstrated no significant toxicity, suggesting that 0.01 mg/kg provides an optimal dose when used clinically and could allow for ureter visualization during routine surgical procedures., Conclusions: The dose of 0.01 mg/kg provided an optimal dose for ureter visualization up to 3 h after administration. ASP5354 shows promise for ureter visualization during abdominopelvic surgery, which may potentially lower the risk of IUI., (© 2021. World Molecular Imaging Society.)

Introduction: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the diameter of the ureteral access sheath (UAS) used during RIRS on kidney injury based on acute kidney injury (AKI) biomarkers., Methods: This prospectively randomized controlled study included a total of 125 patients divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 52) in which a 12/14 Fr UAS was used, group 2 (n = 52) in which a 9.5/11.5 Fr UAS was used, and group 3 (n = 21) that was designed as the control group with no urogenital disease history. Urine samples were collected preoperatively and at the postoperative second and 24th hours after surgery and analyzed for AKI using the urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (uKIM-1), N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocain biomarkers., Results: In group 1, there was no statistical change in any of the three AKI biomarkers at the postoperative second or 24th hour compared to the preoperative period. In group 2, the values of all three AKI biomarkers were statistically significantly increased at the postoperative second and 24th hours compared to the preoperative period while no statistical difference was observed between the two postoperative evaluation times. At the postoperative second hour, the uKIM-1 value was statistically significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (p = 0.043)., Conclusions: The results of our study showed that AKI was not observed in RIRS performed with a 12/14 Fr UAS while the use of a 9.5/11.5 Fr UAS resulted in AKI according to the assessment of the related biomarkers., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Study Objective: To identify the relationship between patient position during surgery and time to confirmation of ureteral patency on cystoscopy., Design: Randomized controlled trial., Setting: Academic tertiary care medical center., Patients or Participants: A total of 91 adult women undergoing laparoscopic (either conventional or robotic) hysterectomy between February 2021 and February 2022 were randomized to intervention (n = 45) or control (n = 46). Exclusion criteria included known kidney disease or urinary tract anomaly, current ureteral stent, pregnancy, malignancy, and recognized intraoperative urinary tract injury., Interventions: Subjects in the control group were placed in a 0° supine position during cystoscopy. Subjects in the intervention group were placed in a 20° angle in reverse Trendelenburg (RT) position during cystoscopy., Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome, time to confirmation of bilateral ureteral patency, was measured at the time the second ureteral jet was viewed during intraoperative cystoscopy. There was no significant difference in mean time to confirmation (66.5 seconds in supine vs 67 seconds in RT, p = .2) nor in total cystoscopy time (111 seconds in supine vs 104.5 seconds in RT, p = .39). There were no significant differences in need for alternative modalities to aid in ureteral efflux visualization, delayed diagnosis of ureteric injury, and operative time. RT position seemed to have reduced the time to confirmation for the small group of patients with longer confirmation time (>120 seconds)., Conclusion: RT position does not change time to confirmation of bilateral ureteral patency compared with supine position. However, there may be a benefit in position change if time to confirmation is >120 seconds., (Copyright © 2022 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Hypothesis: Describe the surgical technique of laparoscopic ureterovesical reimplantation applying the modified psoas hitch with Lich-Gregoire onlay technique to manage a distal ureteral fistula after a hysterectomy for a gynecologic malignancy., Materials and Methods: This video illustrates the surgical technique of laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation applying the modified psoas hitch with Lich-Gregoire onlay technique in a ten-step surgical video., Results: Step 1: closure of the caudal ureter.Step 2: Ureter mobilization. Step 3: Ureter spatulation. Step 4: Bladder mobilization. Step 5: Detrusor muscle incision. Step 6: Bladder suspension. Step 7: Mucosal incision. Step 8: Ureterovesical anastomosis. Step 9: JJ stent insertion. Step 10: Detrusor muscle closure., Conclusion: Intraoperative identification of ureteral injury and prompt repair are recommended. Ureteral repair technique depends on the ureteral injury site. Distal ureteral injuries (UIs) might require either uretero-ureterostomy or ureteral reimplant with or without a psoas hitch. The Lich-Gregoir is one of the two most frequently used anti-vesicoureteral reflux techniques and has acceptable complication rates., (© 2021. The International Urogynecological Association.)

Objective: To investigate the effect of the diameter of ureteral access sheath (UAS) used during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) on operative parameters, perioperative ureteral injury, and ureteral stricture development. Materials and Methods: The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial and included 320 patients who underwent RIRS. The patients were divided into two groups according to the diameter of UAS (9.5F/11.5F [Group 1] and 12F/14F [Group 2]) placed during the operation. At the end of the operation, ureteral injury was checked visually using semirigid ureterorenoscopy and classified according to the ureter injury scale. In the postoperative first year, the control CT urography images were used to observe newly developing ureteral dilatation. Results: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of patient and stone characteristics, operative time, postoperative stone-free rate, and postoperative infection development parameters. In Group 1, 30 (18.8%) of the patients had low-grade and 8 (5%) of the patients had high-grade ureteral injury, while in Group 2, 44 (27.5%) had low-grade and 19 (11.9%) had high-grade ureteral injury ( p  = 0.013). In the postoperative period, ureteral stricture was found in 5 (1.6%) patients, of whom 4 (2.5%) were in Group 2 and 1 (0.6%) ( p  = 0.371). Conclusion: The results of our study showed that the use of a 12F/14F UAS in patients who are not previously stented increases the risk of high-grade ureteral injuries; however, despite this increase there is no difference in ureteral stricture formation.

Background: This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with a Boari flap for long-segment ureteric avulsion or ureteric strictures of the middle and lower ureters. By observing its curative effect and prognosis, we can provide a safer and reliable treatment option for patients with middle and lower ureteral injury., Methods: In this study, of the eight cases under study, five were diagnosed with long-segment ureteric strictures, one had long-segment ureteric avulsion, one was diagnosed with ureteral rupture caused by surgical injury of appendicitis, and the remaining one underwent ureterostomy after ureteral injury. The location of ureteral injury was in the middle lower segment. All eight patients underwent laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with a Boari flap from January 2018 to October 2021. In this study, two patients were treated with a Boari bladder flap with psoas hitching. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon with over 20 years of experience in urological surgery., Results: The mean length of ureteric avulsion or ureteric strictures was 7.94 cm (range, 4-15 cm). Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with a Boari flap was performed successfully between 120 and 240 min. The mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was 6 days, and no major complications related to the procedure in the perioperative period occurred. Postoperative follow-up showed no obvious hydronephrosis on computed tomography urography or urinary ultrasound in all eight patients. Postoperative reexamination did not reveal any significant hydronephrosis, urinary tract infection, or ureteral reflux, and none of the postoperative renal functions were abnormal., Conclusions: Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with a Boari flap is safe and feasible for experienced physicians. In our case, the length/width ratio of bladder flap is more than 4:1, with good blood supply and no obvious complications, it provides a longer alternative length., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Objectives: Larger ureteral access sheaths (UASs) have the potential to improve ureteroscopic stone removal outcomes but are often avoided by surgeons because of concerns of ureteral injury. Using our novel UAS force sensor and previously defined force thresholds for ureteral injury, we sought to evaluate the impact of 1 week of stenting on the maximum safe dilation of ureteral luminal circumference. Methods: Twelve juvenile female Yorkshire pigs (24 ureters) were evaluated. The inner (i.e., luminal) circumference of each ureter was determined using Cook urethral dilators ranging from 8F to 24F in 2F increments, 37 cm in length. Each dilator was sequentially passed while applying the UAS force sensor to measure insertion force before and after 1 week of stent placement. Each ureter was randomized to receive either a 4.7F or 7.0F stent (20 cm). Maximum ureteral luminal circumference was defined as effective passage of the dilator to the ureteropelvic junction with ≤6 newtons (N) of force (the force threshold previously defined by porcine and clinical studies to avoid ureteral damage). After passage of the largest dilator at 6 N, flexible ureteroscopy was performed and a post-ureteroscopic lesion scale (PULS) was recorded. Results: After 1 week of stent placement, the median ureteral luminal circumference increased to 15F representing a mean increase of 3.8F ± 2.8F ( p  < 0.001). Twenty-one (88%) of the pre-stented ureters had an increase in luminal circumference, with 12 ureters (50%) dilated to ≥16F ( p  = 0.032), 6 ureters (25%) dilated to ≥18F, and in 2 cases a maximum size of 24F was recorded. The PULS grade was ≤2 in all cases, indicating no high-grade ureteral injuries. Laterality and stent size did not impact ureteral luminal circumference after pre-stenting ( p  = 0.232 and p  = 0.337, respectively). Conclusions: One week of ureteral stenting resulted in nearly a 4F increase in the luminal circumference of porcine ureters.

Background: Although colorectal surgery (CRS) has currently almost entirely standardized surgical procedures, it can still show pitfalls such as the intraoperative ureteral injury. Intraoperative ureteral identification (IUI) could reduce the ureteral injuries rate but evidence is still lacking. We aimed to analyze the utility and the effectiveness of real-time IUI in minimally invasive CRS. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed examining available data on randomized and nonrandomized studies evaluating the utility of intraureteral fluorescence dye (IFD) and lighted ureteral stent (LUS) for intraoperative identification of ureters in CRS, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Primary endpoint was ureteral injuries rate. Secondary endpoints included acute kidney injury, hematuria, urinary tract infections (UTI), and fluorescence assessment. Results: After literature search, 158 studies have been recorded, 36 studies underwent full-text reviews and 12 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, out of a total of 822 patients who successfully received IUI, 3 (0.33%) patients experienced ureteral injury. Hematuria was reported in 689 (97.6%) of patients following LUS-guided surgery and in 1 (2%) patient following IFD-guided surgery, although transient in all cases. UTI was reported in 15 (3.3%) LUS-guided resections and in 1 (2%) IFD-guided resections. Acute kidney injury occurred in 23 (2.5%) LUS-guided surgery and 1 (1%) IFD-guided surgery. Conclusions: Real-time ureteral identification techniques could represent a valid solution in complex minimally invasive CRS, safely, with no time consuming and always reproducible by surgeons. Prospective studies will be needed to confirm these findings.

Background: Ureteral trauma recognized in the operating theater is managed, for the most part, at the same surgical procedure oftentimes with urologic consultation. A delayed urine leak presents unique problems in that direct access to the site of the leak is not possible except by a reoperative procedure., Methods: In patients who develop delayed urine leakage following cancer surgery, the leakage may be controlled by the collaborative efforts of a urologist and interventional radiologist. Success depends on placement of a nephroureteral stent by the rendezvous procedure., Results: The sequence of procedures to reestablish ureteral continuity following a delayed leak are important in the successful placement of a nephroureteral stent. In the first methodology, through a percutaneous nephrostomy, a guidewire is placed in the ureter and down to the ureteral defect. The guidewire is then recovered and advanced into the bladder using a ureteroscope and grasping forceps. A nephroureteral stent is placed over the guidewire to bridge the gap and stent the ureteral defect. In the second methodology, the urologist passed a guidewire into the distal ureter, out of the ureteral defect, and into the free peritoneal space. Under fluoroscopic control, the wire loop must snare the ureteral guidewire and pull it out at the percutaneous nephrostomy. The nephroureteral stent is passed over the ureteral wire into the bladder., Conclusions: Two different methodologies were described to complete the rendezvous procedure. It can be successful a large percentage of the time with a delayed ureteral leakage. Success requires a combined interventional radiology and urologic procedure., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Ureteral injury during pelvic surgery is a serious complication that requires special attention. The fluorescent ureteral catheter near-infrared ray catheter sets are 6.0F catheters containing fluorescent substances along their length that can be recognized by a laparoscopic indocyanine green camera. We present our experience using a near-infrared ray catheter in 6 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for recurrent pelvic tumors., Technique: The near-infrared ray catheters were inserted into the bilateral ureters in all patients, with the exception of patient 5 (left unilateral), by urologists using a cystoscope with the same technique as that commonly used in placing ureteral stents under general anesthesia. A laparoscopic indocyanine green camera was adapted to identify the ureters. From February 2020 to July 2020, 6 consecutive patients with recurrent pelvic tumors underwent surgery using a near-infrared ray catheter. In 3 patients, recurrent tumors were detected in the pelvic cavity after surgery for colon cancer (1 patient each of peritoneal recurrence behind the seminal vesicles, lymph node metastasis on the residual superior rectal artery, and peritoneal recurrence at the peritoneal reflection). Two patients had postoperative local recurrences of rectal cancer. The last patient had a recurrence of cervical carcinoma invading the rectum., Results: All patients underwent surgery under ureteral image navigation using near-infrared ray catheter not only for ureter preservation during the operation (4 patients) but also for the combined resection of the ureter with recurrent tumors (2 patients). One patient experienced postoperative ureteral stenosis on postoperative day 21 that required a ureteral double J-stent placement in the left ureter., Conclusion: Near-infrared ray catheter has the potential to reduce inadvertent periureteral dissection because the ureter can be identified before approaching it., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2021.)

Introduction: Ureteric injury is a rare but serious, iatrogenic complication of hysterectomy. The risk depends on indication for surgery, predisposing risk factors, and peroperative conditions. Our aims were to evaluate and learn from compensation claims to The Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE) for ureteric injury occurring during hysterectomies to predict risk factors, time of identification, symptoms, and consequences, and to relate these cases to injuries registered in The Norwegian Patient Registry., Material and Methods: A retrospective study of ureteric injuries occurring during hysterectomies, reported to NPE and the Norwegian Patient Registry from 2009 through 2019., Results: During the study period, 53 096 hysterectomies were registered in The Norwegian Patient Registry, of which ureteric injury was documented in 643 (1.2%). More ureteric injuries were registered in large hospital trusts than in small trusts (1.3% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.05). NPE received 69 claims due to ureteric injury occurring during hysterectomy, comprising 11% of all injuries in the study period. Compensation was approved for 15%. Women who claimed compensation were younger (48.1 ± 8.9 years vs. 55.1 ± 13.6 years, p < 0.01), more likely to have had a benign diagnosis (89.9% vs. 52.1%, p < 0.01), and more likely to have had the ureteric injury recognized after discharge (58.0% vs. 33.0%, p < 0.001) compared with non-complainants. Identification of the ureters during the hysterectomy was documented in 30% of the NPE patient files. Additional information for the NPE cases included the following. The most common symptoms of unidentified injury were pain (77%), fever (12%), urinary leakage (13%), and anuria (8%). Re-operation was necessary in 77% of the cases, and 10% of the women lost one kidney. Long-term consequences after repair, such as loss of a kidney or persistent pain, were seen in 17%. No women died because of the injury., Conclusions: The incidence of ureteric injury occurring during hysterectomy in Norway was 1.2%; 11% involved a claim for compensation, and 15% of these had their case approved. Most ureteric injuries were not recognized during the hysterectomy. Documentation of peroperative identification of the ureters during hysterectomy was often missing. Vigilance to pain as a postoperative symptom of peroperative unrecognized ureteric injury may result in earlier diagnosis and treatment., (© 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).)

Background: Prophylactic ureteral catheters placement (PUCP) was advocated as an effective strategy for decreasing ureteral morbidities in colorectal surgeries. However, whether it should be routinely used prior to primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma (PRLS) surgeries remains unknown. Methods: It was a retrospective study, conducted at a tertiary sarcoma center. Medical records of patients with PRLS undergoing surgeries from January 2015 through December 2018 were reviewed. Primary endpoint was the rate of ureteral morbidities during and after retroperitoneal liposarcoma resection procedures. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined risk factors associated with ureteral injury (UI) in patients undergoing surgeries. Results: A total of 55 patients of PRLS were included. Fourteen (25.5%) patients underwent PUCP, with 1 UI (7.1%) identified. In 41 patients with no PUCP, 15 (36.6%) exhibited UIs during and post surgeries. There were significant improvements of UIs in group PUCP, compared with patients without PUCP ( P  < .05). Resection surgeries combined with colectomy and tumor-ureter relationship were 2 risk factors significantly associated to UIs ( P  < .01). Conclusions: PUCP might be an effective way of preventing UIs in patients with PRLS. It could be suggested especially in patients with ureter encased by tumor or anticipated colectomy during the surgical process.

Objective: There are many causesof ureteral injury being the main one iatrogenic.The reconstruction depends on the injury´s locationand length. In some complex cases, we must do ureteralreconstructions using bowel segments. Thesetechniques are a challenge for the surgeon and arenot exempt of short and long-term complications.Our purpose is to present three complex ureteralinjury cases, and to analyze the main technical variants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present threeclinical cases with long length ureteral injuries treatedin our hospital. RESULTS: None of the cases presented had complicationsin the immediate postoperative period. Inlong term, all of them had mechanical complications, needing urinary diversion and reintervention in twocases. However, no metabolic disturbances or kidneyfunction deterioration have been reported. At presentthe three patients have a good clinical condition. CONCLUSION: The repairment of complex ureteralinjuries is a safe and effective procedure, but itneeds a great knowledge of the anatomy, the differenttechniques described and the patient´s characteristics.It is recommended to be performed in experiencedcenters.