Search

The article discusses about the partnership of National Security Agency with AT&T to spy on vast quantities of Internet traffic. The article discusses a document, which lists the activities that AT&T has given access to NSA, through several methods under different legal rules from the period of 2003 to 2013 which includes surveillance technologies, emails and Internet metadata records, and customer's cellphone call records.

The article focuses on the reveal of a document which confirms the partnership of National Security Agency (NSA) with AT&T, for NSA's controversial method of tapping the Internet backbone on U.S. soil, which will filters the Internet traffic. The article discusses the claims of a digital civil liberties group, Electronic Frontier Foundation, shows a technical sketch of AT&T's spy agency to access to traffic and how they access to vast amounts of data from other telecoms.

The article discusses the special relationship between the National Security Agency (NSA) and American multinational telecommunications corporation AT&T. Topics include how the data collection was restored after the Japanese earthquake of 2011, jargon that was found in the NSA glossary that had a dictionary of terms, and the cable landing stations on the East and West coasts of the U.S owned by AT&T.

The article presents the details about the U.S. Government decision to expands its warrantless surveillance of the America's international internet traffic, which have been disclosed by the former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor, Edward J. Snowden. The article mentions about the orders given to spy agencies to look out for the evidence of computer hacking and adds that the Government has defended this monitoring by mentioning it as a security step.

Article lists U.S. National Security Agency programs of the year 2014 of bulk or targeted classified into foreign or domestic including NSA tested a technique using drones, NSA programs to spy on data sent through voice over IP calls and NSA program to geolocate people's SIM cards.

The article discusses U.S. National Security Agency which shows its British counterpart have been probing advertiser for mobile applications.

The article offers information on the globe spanning surveillance for terrorism suspects and its connection with the computer game application "Angry Birds". Reference is made to the National Security Agency (NSA) and Britain's Government Communication Headquarters surveillance techniques and its relation with smartphone using patterns. Data collection is done when one uses applications like Google Maps and sends posts through social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Linkedln etc.

The article looks into the review of U.S. encryption standards by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). It discusses the revelation of the National Security Agency's influence on computer security standards including those in Microsoft Windows that are used in tablets and smartphones. It also talks about the elliptic curve-based deterministic random bit generator which is a computer code in encryption technology.

The article offers information on Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland and the issue of resident professor Matthew Green's blog post in the university's Applied Physics Laboratory website which was alleged to contain links to classified material involving the National Security Agency (NSA) and its SIGNIT Enabling Project. The documents were marked Top Secret and was among the documents included in the cache taken by former NSA contractor Edward J. Snowden.

The article offers information on the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) and the documents released by former NSA contractor Edward J. Snowden that show that the NSA had a project that involved undermining the encryption of communications like emails, Internet chats, and phone calls by U.S. citizens and others around the world. The project is called "Bullrun," and it also involves developing countermeasures against encryption standards used by software developers.

A personal narrative is presented which explores the author's experience of receiving a response letter from the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) about the collection of metadata as part of its mass surveillance program.