Search

The article reports that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has advised the administration of President Barack Obama to reconsider the impact of the Keystone XL pipeline project on climate change.

The article offers information on the delivery of first regulations on the storage and disposal of coal ash sent by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the White House for final review.

The article reports on the claim of fifteen Republican governors that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule breaks the law.

The article reports on the new climate regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that the Chamber of Commerce and the National Mining Association along with other industry groups consider ineffective in the U.S.

The article reports on the response from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy against the accusations that the agency has depended on secret science in support of its regulations.

The article reports on the announcement of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the implementation of stricter emission standards for trucks and cars through limiting the amount of sulfur that can be used in gasoline.

The article focuses on the proposed rules from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Interior Department regarding the methane emissions.

The article reports that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has entered the homestretch on the landmark climate regulation of President Barack Obama which aimed at curbing carbon pollution from the country's existing power plants.

The article offers information on the proposal of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to improve the carbon pollution rule for power plants in the country in June 2015.

The article reports on the opposition of the golf industry and a Waters Advocacy Coalition of 35 other organizations to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's proposed rule that deals with the government's jurisdiction over bodies of water.

The article reports the claim by Republican Congressman Paul Ryan at a "Christian Science Monitor" breakfast meeting in July 2014 that the rules issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reduce pollution from power facilities are illegal.

The article reports on the hearings to be held by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2014 which will focus on its climate change and carbon emissions regulations.

The article focuses on an investigation by the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) inspector general (IG) after Republicans accused the EPA of being biased against conservative groups while it reviewed fee waivers for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, and IG found no biasness.

The article focuses on the proposal of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that seeks to reduce 30% of carbon dioxide emissions from 2005 levels from existing power plants by 2030.which will be examined by the House Energy and Commerce panel on June 19, 2014.

The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a cross-state rule that allows the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate air pollution from coal-fired power plants crossing state lines in April 2014.

The article reports on the move of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency to assert their authority over the streams and wetlands of the nation under the Clean Water Act in 2014.

The article focuses on the skepticism of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy regarding the permits issued by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for power plants, factories, and other sources of greenhouse gasses.

The article reports on U.S. hearings on February 2014 regarding greenhouse gas regulations including the hearing of the Supreme Court on February 24 on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) program to regulate emissions including coal, chemical, and oil, the hearing of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on natural resources adaptation and ecosystems and economies protection on February 25, and the consideration for electronics recycling by a Senate Commerce subpanel.

The article reports that the cross-state air pollution regulation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will be brought to the U.S. Supreme Court for review after having been struck down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in 2012.