Search

The development of chemo-resistance remains a significant hurdle in effective cancer therapy. NRF1 and NRF2, key regulators of redox homeostasis, play crucial roles in the cellular response to oxidative stress, with implications for both tumor growth and resistance to chemotherapy. This study delves into the dualistic role of NRF2, exploring its protective functions in normal cells and its paradoxical support of tumor survival and drug resistance in cancerous cells. We investigate the interplay between the PERK/NRF signaling pathway, ER stress, autophagy, and the unfolded protein response, offering a mechanistic perspective on how these processes contribute to chemoresistance. Our findings suggest that targeting NRF signaling pathways may offer new avenues for overcoming resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, highlighting the importance of a nuanced approach to redox regulation in cancer treatment. This research provides a molecular basis for the development of NRF-targeted therapies, potentially enhancing the efficacy of existing cancer treatments and offering hope for more effective management of resistant tumors., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: CPUK02 (15-Oxosteviol benzyl ester) is a semi-synthetic derivative of stevioside known for its anticancer effects. It has been reported that the natural compound of stevioside and its associated derivatives enhances the sensitivity of cancer cells to conventional anti-cancer agents by inducing endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. In response to ER stress, autophagy and unfolded protein responses (UPR) are activated to restore cellular homeostasis. Consequently, the primary aim of this study is to investigate the impact of CPUK02 treatment on UPR and autophagy markers in two colorectal cancer cell lines., Methods: HCT116 and SW480 cell lines were treated with various concentrations of CPUK02 for 72 h. The expression levels of several proteins and enzymes were evaluated to investigate the influence of CPUK02 on autophagy and UPR pathways. These include glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), Inositol-requiring enzyme 1-α (IRE1-α), spliced X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1 s), protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK), C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), Beclin-1, P62 and Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 alpha (LC3βII). The evaluation was conducted using western blotting and quantitative real-time PCR techniques., Results: The results obtained indicate that the treatment with CPUK02 reduced the expression of UPR markers, including GRP78 and IRE1-α at protein levels and XBP-1 s, PERK, and CHOP at mRNA levels in both HCT116 and SW480 cell lines. Furthermore, CPUK02 also influenced autophagy by decreasing Beclin-1 and increasing P62 and LC3βII at mRNA levels in both HCT116 and SW480 treated cells., Conclusions: The study findings suggest CPUK02 may exert its cytotoxic effects by inhibiting UPR and autophagy flux in colorectal cancer cells., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

The COVID-19 pandemic is caused by the 2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2 virus. This severe acute respiratory syndrome is currently a global health emergency and needs much effort to generate an urgent practical treatment to reduce COVID-19 complications and mortality in humans. Viral infection activates various cellular responses in infected cells, including cellular stress responses such as unfolded protein response (UPR) and autophagy, following the inhibition of mTOR. Both UPR and autophagy mechanisms are involved in cellular and tissue homeostasis, apoptosis, innate immunity modulation, and clearance of pathogens such as viral particles. However, during an evolutionary arms race, viruses gain the ability to subvert autophagy and UPR for their benefit. SARS-CoV-2 can enter host cells through binding to cell surface receptors, including angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and neuropilin-1 (NRP1). ACE2 blockage increases autophagy through mTOR inhibition, leading to gastrointestinal complications during SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. NRP1 is also regulated by the mTOR pathway. An increased NRP1 can enhance the susceptibility of immune system dendritic cells (DCs) to SARS-CoV-2 and induce cytokine storm, which is related to high COVID-19 mortality. Therefore, signaling pathways such as mTOR, UPR, and autophagy may be potential therapeutic targets for COVID-19. Hence, extensive investigations are required to confirm these potentials. Since there is currently no specific treatment for COVID-19 infection, we sought to review and discuss the important roles of autophagy, UPR, and mTOR mechanisms in the regulation of cellular responses to coronavirus infection to help identify new antiviral modalities against SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Lung cells are constantly exposed to various internal and external stressors that disrupt protein homeostasis. To cope with these stimuli, cells evoke a highly conserved adaptive mechanism called the unfolded protein response (UPR). UPR stressors can impose greater protein secretory demands on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), resulting in the development, differentiation, and survival of these cell types to meet these increasing functional needs. Dysregulation of the UPR leads to the development of the disease. The UPR and ER stress are involved in several human conditions, such as chronic inflammation, neurodegeneration, metabolic syndrome, and cancer. Furthermore, potent and specific compounds that target the UPR pathway are under development as future therapies. The focus of this review is to thoroughly describe the effects of both internal and external stressors on the ER in asthma. Furthermore, we discuss how the UPR signaling pathway is activated in the lungs to overcome cellular damage. We also present an overview of the pathogenic mechanisms, with a brief focus on potential strategies for pharmacological interventions.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent malignant primary brain tumor with a very poor survival rate. Temozolomide (TMZ) is the common chemotherapeutic agent used for GBM treatment. We recently demonstrated that simvastatin (Simva) increases TMZ-induced apoptosis via the inhibition of autophagic flux in GBM cells. Considering the role of the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway in the regulation of autophagy, we investigated the involvement of UPR in Simva-TMZ-induced cell death by utilizing highly selective IRE1 RNase activity inhibitor MKC8866, PERK inhibitor GSK-2606414 (PERKi), and eIF2α inhibitor salubrinal. Simva-TMZ treatment decreased the viability of GBM cells and significantly increased apoptotic cell death when compared to TMZ or Simva alone. Simva-TMZ induced both UPR, as determined by an increase in GRP78, XBP splicing, eukaryote initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) phosphorylation, and inhibited autophagic flux (accumulation of LC3β-II and inhibition of p62 degradation). IRE1 RNase inhibition did not affect Simva-TMZ-induced cell death, but it significantly induced p62 degradation and increased the microtubule-associated proteins light chain 3 (LC3)β-II/LC3β-I ratio in U87 cells, while salubrinal did not affect the Simva-TMZ induced cytotoxicity of GBM cells. In contrast, protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) inhibition significantly increased Simva-TMZ-induced cell death in U87 cells. Interestingly, whereas PERK inhibition induced p62 accumulation in both GBM cell lines, it differentially affected the LC3β-II/LC3β-I ratio in U87 (decrease) and U251 (increase) cells. Simvastatin sensitizes GBM cells to TMZ-induced cell death via a mechanism that involves autophagy and UPR pathways. More specifically, our results imply that the IRE1 and PERK signaling arms of the UPR regulate Simva-TMZ-mediated autophagy flux inhibition in U251 and U87 GBM cells.

Colorectal cancer (CRC), despite numerous therapeutic and screening attempts, still remains a major life-threatening malignancy. CRC etiology entails both genetic and environmental factors. Macroautophagy/autophagy and the unfolded protein response (UPR) are fundamental mechanisms involved in the regulation of cellular responses to environmental and genetic stresses. Both pathways are interconnected and regulate cellular responses to apoptotic stimuli. In this review, we address the epidemiology and risk factors of CRC, including genetic mutations leading to the occurrence of the disease. Next, we discuss mutations of genes related to autophagy and the UPR in CRC. Then, we discuss how autophagy and the UPR are involved in the regulation of CRC and how they associate with obesity and inflammatory responses in CRC. Finally, we provide perspectives for the modulation of autophagy and the UPR as new therapeutic options for CRC treatment.