Search

Application of artificial neural network (ANN) models has been reported to solve variety of water resources and environmental related problems including prediction, forecasting and classification, over the last two decades. Though numerous research studies have witnessed the improved estimate of ANN models, the practical applications are sometimes limited. The black box nature of ANN models and their parameters hardly convey the physical meaning of catchment characteristics, which result in lack of transparency. In addition, it is perceived that the point prediction provided by ANN models does not explain any information about the prediction uncertainty, which reduce the reliability. Thus, there is an increasing consensus among researchers for developing methods to quantify the uncertainty of ANN models, and a comprehensive evaluation of uncertainty methods applied in ANN models is an emerging field that calls for further improvements. In this paper, methods used for quantifying the prediction uncertainty of ANN based hydrologic models are reviewed based on the research articles published from the year 2002 to 2015, which focused on modeling streamflow forecast/prediction. While the flood forecasting along with uncertainty quantification has been frequently reported in applications other than ANN in the literature, the uncertainty quantification in ANN model is a recent progress in the field, emerged from the year 2002. Based on the review, it is found that methods for best way of incorporating various aspects of uncertainty in ANN modeling require further investigation. Though model inputs, parameters and structure uncertainty are mainly considered as the source of uncertainty, information of their mutual interaction is still lacking while estimating the total prediction uncertainty. The network topology including number of layers, nodes, activation function and training algorithm has often been optimized for the model accuracy, however not in terms of model uncertainty. Finally, the effective use of various uncertainty evaluation indices should be encouraged for the meaningful quantification of uncertainty. This review article also discusses the effectiveness and drawbacks of each method and suggests recommendations for further improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The meaningful quantification of uncertainty in hydrological model outputs is a challenging task since complete knowledge about the hydrologic system is still lacking. Owing to the nonlinearity and complexity associated with the hydrological processes, Artificial neural network (ANN) based models have gained lot of attention for its effectiveness in function approximation characteristics. However, only a few studies have been reported for assessment of uncertainty associated with ANN outputs. This study uses a simple method for quantifying predictive uncertainty of ANN model output through first order Taylor series expansion. The first order partial differential equations of non-linear function approximated by the ANN with respect to weights and biases of the ANN model are derived. A bootstrap technique is employed in estimating the values of the mean and the standard deviation of ANN parameters, and is used to quantify the predictive uncertainty. The method is demonstrated through the case study of Upper White watershed located in the United States. The quantitative assessment of uncertainty is carried out with two measures such as percentage of coverage and average width. In order to show the magnitude of uncertainty in different flow domains, the values are statistically categorized into low-, medium- and high-flow series. The results suggest that the uncertainty bounds of ANN outputs can be effectively quantified using the proposed method. It is observed that the level of uncertainty is directly proportional to the magnitude of the flow and hence varies along time. A comparison of the uncertainty assessment shows that the proposed method effectively quantifies the uncertainty than bootstrap method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]