Search

Introduction: Active sacroiliitis represents the hallmark of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and manifests as inflammatory low back pain associated with morning stiffness (MS). Sometimes, the combination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and biological disease modifying drugs (bDMARDs) proves unsatisfactory in achieving a remission. Materials and methods: We enrolled patients affected with active sacroiliitis confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and treated with a corticosteroid sacroiliac joint injection (SIJI) via ultrasound guidance. After SIJI, we evaluated visual–analogue scale (VAS) and MS pain changes. As controls, we selected axSpA patients starting bDMARDs. Results: We enrolled 26 patients (mean age 55 ± 14 years; 25 females and 1 male; > 95% treated with NSAIDs; 46% on bDMARDs; 75.82 ± 123 months) and examined a total of 47 treated joints. We detected a 48% reduction in VAS pain after 24 h. Moreover, we observed a significant reduction (p < 0.0001) of VAS pain between the baseline and every subsequent follow-up visit. Further, a significant difference in VAS pain compared to the baseline in the controls was observed starting from week 12. There was a significant reduction in MS after 1 week due to SIJIs, while in the controls the first significant change from the baseline in MS was detected after 12 weeks. The efficacy of infiltrative therapy lasted up to 6 months: persistent VAS as well as MS pain reduction was observed. Conclusions: US-guided SIJI represents an effective and safe technique for patients who have active sacroiliitis yet are ineligible for biologic treatment or who experience unsatisfactory disease control despite receiving therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ultrasound (US) is acoustic energy that interacts with human tissues, thus, producing bioeffects that may be hazardous, especially in sensitive organs (i.e., brain, eye, heart, lung, and digestive tract) and embryos/fetuses. Two basic mechanisms of US interaction with biological systems have been identified: thermal and non-thermal. As a result, thermal and mechanical indexes have been developed to provide a means of assessing the potential for biological effects from exposure to diagnostic US. The main aims of this paper were to describe the models and assumptions used to estimate the "safety" of acoustic outputs and indices and to summarize the current state of knowledge about US-induced effects on living systems deriving from in vitro models and in vivo experiments on animals. This review work has made it possible to highlight the limits associated with the use of the estimated safety values of thermal and mechanical indices relating above all to the use of new US technologies, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) shear wave elastography (SWE). US for diagnostic and research purposes has been officially declared safe, and no harmful biological effects in humans have yet been demonstrated with new imaging modalities; however, physicians should be adequately informed on the potential risks of biological effects. US exposure, according to the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, should be as low as reasonably possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]