Search

onography has traditionally been used to assess anatomic abnormalities. However, its value in evaluating physiologic characteristics has recently been recognized, particularly in the care of patients in shock. As the use of point-of-care sonography grows in critical care and emergency medicine, noninvasive assessment of intravascular volume status is increasingly being used to guide therapy of the critically ill. Although intravenous fluid is often the initial treatment in hypotensive patients, aggressive volume resuscitation may be detrimental in some patients and in certain types of shock. Accurate diagnosis of shock state can be challenging because physical findings of hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic, and obstructive shock often overlap. Pulmonary artery and central venous pressure catheters, which provide physiologic data such as cardiac output and right atrial pressure, are time-consuming, invasive, and carry considerable risks. Central venous pressure has long been used to guide fluid management; however, data suggest that in critically ill patients, central venous pressure may not correlate with the effective intravascular volume. 1 Furthermore, invasive hemodynamic monitoring has not been shown to benefit patients. 2 Given the importance of determining intravascular volume in shock, a rapid bedside sonographic examination can be instrumental in guiding medical management of critically ill patients. Multiple sonographic protocols now exist for the evaluation of shock, dyspnea, and cardiac arrest. 3,4 This article will describe the use of sonography of the inferior vena cava (IVC) in the evaluation of patients in shock.

Purpose: Bedside ultrasound (u/s) examinations by emergency physicians (EPs) have been integrated into clinical emergency medicine (EM) training programs and the efficacy and success of an introductory u/s training course, based on established guidelines, has been previously described. We used this same course to teach EM nurse practitioners (NPs) bedside u/s and then assessed the adequacy of NP ultrasonography 1 year following the course. Data sources: Five NPs were included in a standardized 16-h EM u/s training program. Subsequently, the NPs were asked to print consecutive u/s images representative of their clinical assessments. A single qualified EP reviewer assessed images for adequacy. Conclusions: Five NPs reported 229 u/s examinations, two of which were excluded as nondiagnostic over the 2-month study period. There were 32 inadequate images and 27 “positive” findings. All the positives were correct. Totals per provider were 104, 58, 49, 13, and 3 u/s assessments with 83%, 95%, 84%, 77%, and 100% adequacy of images, respectively. Of the 32 inadequate images, 18 of these were incomplete focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examinations with a reading of negative for free fluid. Implications for practice: NPs are able to perform focused u/s with a high degree of accuracy, and a 16-h guideline-based course serves as a good introductory foundation.

Promoting patient safety and increasing health care quality have dominated the health care landscape during the last 15 years. Health care regulators and payers are now tying patient safety outcomes and best practices to hospital reimbursement. Many health care leaders are searching for new technologies that not only make health care for patients safer but also reduce overall health care costs. New advances in ultrasonography have made this technology available to health care providers at the patient’s bedside. Point-of-care ultrasound assistance now aids providers with real-time diagnosis and with visualization for procedural guidance. This is especially true for common deep needle procedures such as central venous catheter insertion, thoracentesis, and paracentesis. There is now mounting evidence that clinician-performed point-of-care ultrasound improves patient safety, enhances health care quality, and reduces health care cost for deep needle procedures. Furthermore, the miniaturization, ease of use, and the evolving affordability of ultrasound have now made this technology widely available. The adoption of point-of-care ultrasonography has reached a tipping point and should be seriously considered the safety standard for all hospital-based deep needle procedures.

Study Objective: Timely diagnosis of a pericardial effusion is often critical in the emergency medicine setting, and echocardiography provides the only reliable method of diagnosis at the bedside. We attempt to determine the accuracy of bedside echocardiography as performed by emergency physicians to detect pericardial effusions in a variety of high-risk populations. Methods: Emergency patients presenting with high-risk criteria for the diagnosis of pericardial effusion underwent emergency bedside 2-dimensional echocardiography by emergency physicians who were trained in ultrasonography. The presence or absence of a pericardial effusion was determined, and all images were captured on video or as thermal images. All emergency echocardiograms were subsequently reviewed by the Department of Cardiology for the presence of a pericardial effusion. Results: During the study period, a total of 515 patients at high risk were enrolled. Of these, 103 patients were ultimately deemed to have a pericardial effusion according to the comparative standard. Emergency physicians detected pericardial effusion with a sensitivity of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.4% to 98.9%), specificity of 98% (95% CI 95.8% to 99.1%), and overall accuracy of 97.5% (95% CI 95.7% to 98.7%). Conclusion: Echocardiography performed by emergency physicians is reliable in evaluating for pericardial effusions; this bedside diagnostic tool may be used to examine specific patients at high risk. Emergency departments incorporating bedside ultrasonography should teach focused echocardiography to evaluate the pericardium. [Mandavia DP, Hoffner RJ, Mahaney K, Henderson SO. Bedside echocardiography by emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med. October 2001;38:377-382.]

The teaching of ultrasonography is rapidly being incorporated into emergency medicine (EM) training programs and clinical practice. Most literature focuses on appropriate indications for the performance of emergency ultrasonography, and most EM-related courses and programs limit their teaching to standard focused indications. Generally this will suffice; however, occasionally, incidental findings, which are beyond the realm of what is taught in these programs, have influenced patient care. In this paper we discuss 7 cases in which incidental findings were discovered during an emergency sonographic examination. In each case the findings changed the patient’s disposition, diagnosis and, potentially, outcome. RESUME On integre de plus en plus l’enseignement de l’echographie aux programmes de formation en medecine d’urgence (MU) et en pratique clinique. La majeure partie de la litterature se concentre sur les indications appropriees pour le recours a l’echographie d’urgence et la plupart des cours et programmes relies a la MU limitent leur enseignement aux indications specifiques habituelles. En general, cette approche est suffisante; cependant, a l’occasion, des constatations fortuites depassant le cadre de ces programmes ont influence l’orientation des soins aux patients. Le present article expose sept cas ou l’on fit des constatations fortuites pendant un examen echographique d’urgence. Dans chacun des cas, les constatations modifierent le traitement du patient, son diagnostic et, potentiellement, le resultat final.

OBJECTIVES Bedside ultrasound examination by emergency physicians (EPs) is being integrated into clinical emergency practice, yet minimum training requirements have not been well defined or evaluated. This study evaluated the accuracy of EP ultrasonography following a 16-hour introductory ultrasound course. METHODS In phase I of the study, a condensed 16-hour emergency ultrasound curriculum based on Society for Academic Emergency Medicine guidelines was administered to emergency medicine houseofficers, attending staff, medical students, and physician assistants over two days. Lectures with syllabus material were used to cover the following ultrasound topics in eight hours: basic physics, pelvis, right upper quadrant, renal, aorta, trauma, and echo-cardiography. In addition, each student received eight hours of hands-on ultrasound instruction over the two-day period. All participants in this curriculum received a standardized pretest and posttest that included 24 emergency ultrasound images for interpretation. These images included positive, negative, and nondiagnostic scans in each of the above clinical categories. In phase II of the study, ultrasound examinations performed by postgraduate-year-2 (PGY2) houseofficers over a ten-month period were examined and the standardized test was readministered. RESULTS In phase I, a total of 80 health professionals underwent standardized training and testing. The mean +/- SD pretest score was 15.6 +/- 4.2, 95% CI = 14. 7 to 16.5 (65% of a maximum score of 24), and the mean +/- SD posttest score was 20.2 +/- 1.6, 95% CI = 19.8 to 20.6 (84%) (p < 0. 05). In phase II, a total of 1,138 examinations were performed by 18 PGY2 houseofficers. Sensitivity was 92.4% (95% CI = 89% to 95%), specificity was 96.1% (95% CI = 94% to 98%), and overall accuracy was 94.6% (95% CI = 93% to 96%). The follow-up ultrasound written test showed continued good performance (20.7 +/- 1.2, 95% CI = 20.0 to 21.4). CONCLUSIONS Emergency physicians can be taught focused ultrasonography with a high degree of accuracy, and a 16-hour course serves as a good introductory foundation.

Acute flank pain is a common emergency department presenting symptom, and bedside ultrasound is being used increasingly in its evaluation. Emergency renal ultrasonography concentrates on the focused presence or absence of hydronephrosis as is often seen in patients with acute flank pain secondary to renal colic. We present three cases in which other abnormal sonographic signs not commonly taught prompted further investigation, revealing renal cell carcinoma. Baseline knowledge of sonographic characteristics of tumors will benefit the occasional emergency patient who has unsuspected renal carcinoma.

Bedside ultrasound (u/s) examinations by emergency physicians (EPs) have been integrated into clinical emergency medicine (EM) training programs and the efficacy and success of an introductory u/s training course, based on established guidelines, has been previously described. We used this same course to teach EM nurse practitioners (NPs) bedside u/s and then assessed the adequacy of NP ultrasonography 1 year following the course.Five NPs were included in a standardized 16-h EM u/s training program. Subsequently, the NPs were asked to print consecutive u/s images representative of their clinical assessments. A single qualified EP reviewer assessed images for adequacy.Five NPs reported 229 u/s examinations, two of which were excluded as nondiagnostic over the 2-month study period. There were 32 inadequate images and 27 "positive" findings. All the positives were correct. Totals per provider were 104, 58, 49, 13, and 3 u/s assessments with 83%, 95%, 84%, 77%, and 100% adequacy of images, respectively. Of the 32 inadequate images, 18 of these were incomplete focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examinations with a reading of negative for free fluid.NPs are able to perform focused u/s with a high degree of accuracy, and a 16-h guideline-based course serves as a good introductory foundation.

The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the accuracy of ultrasonography in detecting radiolucent foreign bodies and to compare the performance of three newly trained emergency physicians with two experienced ultrasound technologists and one radiologist. One hundred-four chicken thighs were penetrated with a needle-driver, half of them embedded with a 1.5 cm toothpick. An 8.0 MHZ linear array ultrasound probe was used to detect the presence or absence of the foreign body. The overall accuracy (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 82% (79, 85); sensitivity 79% (74, 83), specificity 86% (82, 90), positive predicative value (PPV) 85% (81, 89), and negative predicative value (NPV) 80% (76, 84). The accuracy (95% CI) of the radiologist was 83% (75, 90); of the ultrasound technologists was 85% (80, 90); and of the emergency physicians was 0% (76, 85). The difference in accuracy among the three types of personnel was not statistically significant. Ultrasonography is an accurate modality in detecting radiolucent foreign bodies. Emergency physicians can be trained to provide a degree of accuracy comparable with more experienced ultrasonographers.

This case report describes a potential novel indication for the use of bedside ultrasound in the Emergency Department. The patient in this case had some of the signs and symptoms of diverticulitis. The "pseudo-kidney" sign, which was thought to represent acute diverticulitis, was appreciated on a rapid, bedside ultrasound and confirmed by computed tomography. Knowledge of the sonographic appearance of diverticulitis may aid emergency physicians in making this diagnosis promptly, and facilitate the appropriate disposition.

Although bedside ultrasound is listed in the Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine as an integral diagnostic procedure, the manner in which the didactic, hands-on, and experiential components of emergency ultrasound are taught is not specifically prescribed by the Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine (RRC-EM) or any single sponsoring group. Seven professional organizations [the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM), the American College of Emergency Medicine (ACEP), the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD), the Emergency Medicine Residents Association (EMRA), the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP), the RRC-EM, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM)] developed the Scope of Training Task Force, with the goal of identifying emerging areas of clinical importance to the specialty of emergency medicine, including emergency department (ED) ultrasound. The Task Force then identified a group of recognized authorities to thoughtfully address the issue of ED ultrasound training. This report represents a consensus of these identified experts on how emergency ultrasound training should be incorporated into emergency medicine residency programs.

Ultrasound is gaining wide acceptance in Emergency Medicine as an inexpensive and accurate examination modality. One of the leading uses of this technology is in the initial assessment of the trauma patient, where the ultrasound examination is often used to determine the need for immediate laparotomy or further diagnostic study. We present a series of four patients, all of whom sustained blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma. In each case, the initial screening abdominal ultrasound was negative for free intraperitoneal (i.p.) fluid but, when repeated by the same practitioner, became positive. These cases demonstrate the need for serial ultrasounds in evaluating the patient with abdominal trauma. Future studies of trauma ultrasound should investigate the utility of serial sonographic examinations.