Search

This cohort study aimed to determine the association between false-positive 50-g GCT and incidence of LGA and to evaluate predictive roles of third-trimester ultrasonographic examination. A total of 200 women with false-positive 50-g GCT and 188 women without GDM risks were enrolled. Third-trimester ultrasonographic examinations were offered. Rate of LGA during third trimester and at birth were compared between groups. Factors associated with LGA and diagnostic properties of third-trimester ultrasonography were evaluated. Incidence of LGA by third-trimester ultrasound and at birth were significantly higher in women with false-positive GCT (19.0% vs. 10.6%, p  = .03 and 22% vs. 13.8%; p  = .04). Factors associated with LGA included multiparity (adjusted OR 2.32, p  = .01), excessive weight gain (adjusted OR 2.57, p  = .01) and LGA by ultrasound (adjusted OR 9.79, p  < .001). Third-trimester ultrasonography had 47.1% sensitivity, 92.1% specificity and LR + and LR- of 5.96 and 0.57 in identifying LGA infants.Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Women with abnormal GCT but normal OGTT (false positive GCT) might have some degree of glucose intolerance so that GDM-related outcomes could develop, including LGA, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, and caesarean delivery. Roles of ultrasonography in the prediction of LGA and macrosomia has been reported with mixed results. What do the results of this study add? The results showed that the incidence of LGA, by third-trimester ultrasound and at birth, were significantly increased in women with false-positive GCT. Multiparity, excessive weight gain and LGA by third-trimester ultrasound significantly increased the risk of LGA. Third-trimester ultrasonography had 47.1% sensitivity, 92.1% specificity and LR + and LR- of 5.96 and 0.57 in identifying LGA infants. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? More intensive behavioural and dietary interventions, together with weight gain control and monitoring, may be needed in women with false-positive GCT to minimise the risk of LGA. Third trimester ultrasonographic examination might be helpful to detect and predict LGA at birth and should be included into routine clinical practice. Further studies that are more widely generalisable are needed to elucidate the relationship between false-positive GCT and adverse pregnancy outcomes and to investigate the benefits of ultrasonographic examination in the prediction of LGA and macrosomia.

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of transperineal ultrasonography for uterine cervical assessment by determining the correlation of uterine cervical length measurement from transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasonography and comparing discomfort arising from each technique., Material and Method: Fifty pregnant women of 37 weeks' gestation or later who gave consent participated in this research. They had no exclusion criteria, which were listed as the following: preterm premature rupture of membranes, previous cervical surgery, undiagnosed vaginal bleeding, and true labor pain. They all underwent transabdominal (3.5-MHz curvilinear transducer), transperineal (3.5-MHz curvilinear transducer) and transvaginal ultrasonography (7.5-MHz curvilinear endovaginal transducer). The uterine cervical length was measured from the straight line between the external and internal os. If either of the external or internal os was not clearly demonstrated, the authors would justify the cervical length as non-measurable. Measurement in each technique was performed twice and the mean cervical length was used for data analysis. Discomfort arising from each technique was evaluated by visual analog scale., Results: Uterine cervical length was measurable in 23 (46%), 49 (98%) and in all cases by transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasonography respectively. In the transabdominal technique, no significant differences in woman's age, weight, body-mass index and parity were observed between measurable and non-measurable cases. Significant correlation was demonstrated between transperineal and transvaginal ultrasound (r = 0.73, p < 0.01). A significantly higher discomfort score was demonstrated in transvaginal ultrasonography, but no significant difference in discomfort score was found between transabdominal and transperineal ultrasonography., Conclusion: Transperineal ultrasonography is feasible for acceptable uterine cervical visualization with only slight discomfort to the patients.

A cross-sectional study was conducted in order to construct new reference charts for Thai fetal biometries that are commonly used in obstetric ultrasound practice. We discussed and illustrated a sound appropriate study design and statistical analysis which lead to more valid results. A total of 621 normal pregnant women between 12-41 weeks of gestation and their fetuses were recruited. Each fetus was measured once at a randomly assigned gestational age specifically for the purpose of this study only. Stepwise linear regression technique was used to model the mean and its standard deviation as functions of gestational age. Goodness of fit and normality of the data were checked before the final models were chosen. Reference centiles were derived, taking into account the increasing variation as pregnancy proceeds. We demonstrated the stated technique with humerus data from the same study. Reference charts for other fetal biometries have been derived and are presented in subsequent papers.