1. Ablation produced using a toroidal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound device is independent of hepatic perfusion.
- Author
-
Melodelima, David, N'Djin, William A., Favre, Julia, Parmentier, Hubert, Rivoire, Michel, and Chapelon, Jean Yves
- Subjects
HIGH-intensity focused ultrasound ,ABLATION techniques ,ULTRASONIC imaging ,METASTASIS ,LIVER physiology - Abstract
In the liver, the efficacy of radiofrequency or HIFU ablation is impaired by blood perfusion. This can be overcome by hepatic inflow occlusion using a Pringle manoeuver. Here we report the in vivo evaluation of ablations performed in the liver using a surgical toroidal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) device used during an open procedure with and without hepatic inflow occlusion. The HIFU device was composed of 256 toroidal-shaped emitters working at 3 MHz and an integrated ultrasound imaging probe working at 7.5 MHz. Using an Intermittent Pringle Manoeuver (IPM), thermal ablations were created in three pigs with hepatic inflow occlusion (IPM Group) and in three pigs with normal perfusion (NoIPM Group). The ablations were studied on sonograms, macroscopically and microscopically fourteen days after the treatment. In the NoIPM group, the average coagulated volume obtained after a 40 s total exposure was 7.4 ± 3.8 cm3 (2.2 - 16.6). In the IPM group, the average ablated volume was 6.3 ± 2.9 cm3 (2.6 - 12.1). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of ablated volume (p=0.25), diameter (p=0.37), or depth (p=0.61). The data from the present study demonstrated that there is no significant influence of hepatic vascular flow on the size and shape of ablations created with the toroidal-shaped HIFU device that has been used. The HIFU approach presented in this study is characterized by the brevity of the treatment (40 seconds for one ablation of 7 cm3), which makes it possible to reduce treatment dependence on blood perfusion. Ablations obtained with or without a Pringle manoeuver were homogeneous in both groups and were not significantly different in terms of diameter, depth and volumes in the IPM group compared with the NoIPM group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF