Search

Host markers to monitor the response to tuberculosis (TB) therapy hold some promise. We evaluated the changes in concentration of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb)-induced soluble biomarkers during early treatment for predicting short- and long-term treatment outcomes. Whole blood samples from 30 cured and 12 relapsed TB patients from diagnosis, week 1, 2, and 4 of treatment were cultured in the presence of live M.tb for seven days and patients followed up for 24 weeks after the end of treatment. 57 markers were measured in unstimulated and antigen-stimulated culture supernatants using Luminex assays. Top performing multi-variable models at diagnosis using unstimulated values predicted outcome at 24 months after treatment completion with a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI, 42.8-94.5%) and specificity of 72.4% (95% CI, 52.8-87.3%) in leave-one-out cross validation. Month two treatment responder classification was correctly predicted with a sensitivity of 79.2% (95% CI, 57.8-92.9%) and specificity of 92.3% (95% CI, 64.0-99.8%). This study provides evidence of the early M.tb-specific treatment response in TB patients but shows that the observed unstimulated marker models are not outperformed by stimulated marker models. Performance of unstimulated predictive host marker signatures is promising and requires validation in larger studies., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death due to an infectious agent, but only a small fraction of those infected develop the disease. Cytokines are involved in the mediation and regulation of immunity, and their secretion patterns may reflect the infection status. To increase our understanding of immune response to M. tuberculosis infection, we conducted a cross-sectional study investigating M. tuberculosis infection status and comparing the release profiles of cytokines GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-12 (p70), IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, in community controls (CCs) and healthy healthcare workers (HCWs) highly exposed to TB. Among HCWs and CCs, the probability of latent M. tuberculosis (LTB + ) infection was respectively 5.4 (p = 0.002) and 3.4 (p = 0.006) times higher in men than women. The odds ratio of LTB infection was 4 times higher among HCWs in direct contact with active TB patients than other HCW (p = 0.01). Whole blood supernatant cytokine responses to M. tuberculosis antigens showed differential pro-inflammatory responses between HCWs and CCs. CCs LTB- had higher IL-1β responses than HCWs LTB- (p = 0.002). HCWs LTB+ had significantly higher IL-8 responses to M. tuberculosis antigens than HCWs LTB- (p = 0.003) and CCs LTB- (p = 0.015). HCWs LTB+/- showed weak but positive TNF-α responses to M. tuberculosis antigen stimulation compared to CCs LTB+/- (p ≤ 0.015). Looking at T-helper (1 and 2) responses, HCWs LTB+ and CCs LTB+ had significantly higher IFN-γ and IL-2 responses compared to HCWs LTB- and CCs LTB- (p < [0.0001-0.003]). Also, TB antigen induced IL-5 secretion was significantly higher in HCWs LTB+ and CCs LTB+ than in non-infected CCs LTB- (p < [0.005-0.04]). M. tuberculosis antigen specific responses in HCWs LTB+ varied based on active TB exposure gradient. HCWs LTB+ who were highly exposed to active TB (≥3 hours per day) had significantly higher IFN-γ and IL-8 responses (p ≤ 0.02) than HCWs LTB+ not in direct contact with active TB patients. HCWs LTB+ working with active TB patients for 5 to 31 years had a significantly enhanced secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12p70, TNF-α) compared to HCWs LTB- (p < [0.0001-0.01]). Secretion of anti-inflammatory/Th2 cytokines IL-5 and IL-10 was also higher in HCWs LTB+ than HCWs LTB- . In conclusion, LTBI individuals controlling the M. tuberculosis infection have an enhanced TB specific Th1-cytokines/proinflammatory response combined with selected Th2 type/anti-inflammatory cytokines induction.

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR) strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis pose major problems for global health. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay rapidly detects resistance to rifampin (RIF r ), but for detection of the additional resistance that defines MDR-TB (MDR tuberculosis) and XDR-TB, and for molecular epidemiology, specimen cultures and a biosafe infrastructure are generally required. We sought to determine whether the remnants of sputa prepared for the Xpert assay could be used directly to find mutations associated with drug resistance and to study molecular epidemiology, thus providing precise characterization of MDR-TB cases in countries lacking biosafety level 3 (BSL3) facilities for M. tuberculosis cultures. After sputa were processed and run on the Xpert instrument, the leftovers of the samples prepared for the Xpert assay were used for PCR amplification and sequencing or for a line probe assay to detect mutations associated with resistance to additional drugs, as well as for molecular epidemiology with spoligotyping and selective mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem-repeat (MIRU-VNTR) typing. Of 130 sputum samples from Gabon tested with the Xpert assay, 124 yielded interpretable results; 21 (17%) of these were determined to be RIF r Amplification and sequencing or a line probe assay of the Xpert remnants confirmed 18/21 samples as MDR, corresponding to 12/116 (9.5%) new and 6/8 (75%) previously treated TB patients. Spoligotyping and MIRU typing with hypervariable loci identified an MDR Beijing strain present in five samples. We conclude that the remnants of samples processed for the Xpert assay can be used in PCRs to find mutations associated with the resistance to the additional drugs that defines MDR and XDR-TB and to study molecular epidemiology without the need for culturing or a biosafe infrastructure., (Copyright © 2017 Alame-Emane et al.)

Currently the ultimate success of anti-TB therapy is measured by the relapse rate within the first 2 years after treatment. The long duration of clinical trials that rely on this outcome constitute a disincentive for the pharmaceutical industry to develop new TB drugs. Biomarkers for relapse measurable during early treatment may shorten clinical trials. Additionally pre-treatment markers could allow stratification of patients into groups with different treatment requirements for improved clinical management. Currently there is a lack of sufficiently validated biomarkers with good individual predictive value and an urgent need for candidate markers and their evaluation in prospective studies. This review provides an overview of novel biomarkers for TB treatment response and outcome focusing on immunological markers in serum. Additionally, the challenges and roadblocks biomarker research is currently faced with are highlighted.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are both life-threatening pathogens in their own right, but their synergic effects on the immune system during co-infection markedly enhance their effect on the host. This review focuses on the bidirectional interaction between HIV and Mtb and discusses the relevance of sputum smear examination, CD4+ counts, viral load at baseline and after initiation of anti-retroviral therapy, as well as additional existing and new potential immune correlates of disease progression and prognosis. These markers include beta2-microglobulin, neopterin, tumor necrosis factor receptor II (TNFRII), CD8+/CD38+, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and CXCL10 (or IP-10).