1. Validated methods for identifying tuberculosis patients in health administrative databases: systematic review.
- Author
-
Ronald LA, Ling DI, FitzGerald JM, Schwartzman K, Bartlett-Esquilant G, Boivin JF, Benedetti A, and Menzies D
- Subjects
- Humans, International Classification of Diseases, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tuberculosis diagnosis, Algorithms, Databases, Factual statistics & numerical data, Tuberculosis epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: An increasing number of studies are using health administrative databases for tuberculosis (TB) research. However, there are limitations to using such databases for identifying patients with TB., Objective: To summarise validated methods for identifying TB in health administrative databases., Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search in two databases (Ovid Medline and Embase, January 1980-January 2016). We limited the search to diagnostic accuracy studies assessing algorithms derived from drug prescription, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic code and/or laboratory data for identifying patients with TB in health administrative databases., Results: The search identified 2413 unique citations. Of the 40 full-text articles reviewed, we included 14 in our review. Algorithms and diagnostic accuracy outcomes to identify TB varied widely across studies, with positive predictive value ranging from 1.3% to 100% and sensitivity ranging from 20% to 100%., Conclusions: Diagnostic accuracy measures of algorithms using out-patient, in-patient and/or laboratory data to identify patients with TB in health administrative databases vary widely across studies. Use solely of ICD diagnostic codes to identify TB, particularly when using out-patient records, is likely to lead to incorrect estimates of case numbers, given the current limitations of ICD systems in coding TB.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF