Search

Objective: We explored whether hemodynamic cardiac stress leads to a differential release of cardiomyocyte injury biomarkers, used in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Methods: In an observational international multicenter study, we enrolled 831 unselected patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AMI to the emergency department. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists. Hemodynamic cardiac stress was quantified by levels of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Spearman's rho correlation was used to analyze the correlations between BNP and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), Siemens cTnI-Ultra (cTnI-ultra), CK-MB and Myoglobin. Patients were categorized according to the extent of hemodynamic cardiac stress as quantified by BNP tertiles., Results: Among all patients, the positive pair-wise correlation with BNP was strongest with hs-cTnT and cTnI-ultra (r=0.58 and 0.50, respectively), moderate for Myoglobin (r=0.43), and weakest with CK-MB (r=0.25; p<0.001 for each). Similar pattern of correlations was also observed among AMI patients. Among patients diagnosed with non-cardiac cause of chest pain (n=385, 46%) and cardiac but non-coronary (n=109, 13%), BNP had significant positive correlations with hs-cTnT, cTnI-ultra and Myoglobin (p<0.05), but not with CK-MB (p=NS). A similar pattern of stronger correlation between BNP and hs-cTnT, cTnI-ultra and Myoglobin as compared to that with CK-MB was also observed within the higher BNP tertile range. There was no correlation between BNP and other biomarkers within the 1st BNP tertile group., Conclusion: Hemodynamic cardiac stress, as quantified by BNP, as a likely cause of cardiomyocyte injury, is more closely reflected by concentrations of hs-cTnT, cTnI-ultra and Myoglobin than CK-MB., (Copyright © 2015 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) may allow an earlier diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 1148 (derivation cohort) and 517 (external validation cohort) unselected patients presenting with suspected AMI to the emergency department. Final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. Hs-cTnT was measured at presentation and after 2 hours. A diagnostic algorithm incorporating hs-cTnT values at presentation and absolute changes within the first 2 hours was derived., Results: AMI was the final diagnosis in 16% of patients in the derivation and 9.1% in the validation cohort. The 2-hour algorithm developed in the derivation cohort classified 60% of patients as "rule-out," 16% as "rule-in," and 24% in the "observational-zone." Resulting sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were 99.5% and 99.9%, respectively, for rule-out, and specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 96% and 78%, respectively, for rule-in. Applying the 2-hour triage algorithm in the external validation cohort, 78% of patients could be classified as "rule-out," 8% as "rule-in," and 14% in the "observational-zone." Resulting sensitivity and NPV were 96% and 99.5%, respectively, for rule-out, and specificity and PPV were 99% and 85%, respectively, for rule-in. Cumulative 30-day survival rates were 100%, 98.9%, and 95.2% (P < .001), and 100%, 100%, and 95% (P < .001) in patients classified as "rule-out," "observational-zone," and "rule-in" in the 2 cohorts, respectively., Conclusions: A simple algorithm incorporating hs-cTnT baseline values and absolute changes over 2 hours allowed a triage toward safe rule-out, or accurate rule-in, of AMI in the vast majority of patients, with only 20% requiring more prolonged monitoring and serial blood sampling., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Diabetes is a major risk factor for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Assessment of diabetic patients is challenging due to an often atypical presentation of symptoms. We aimed to evaluate the two novel biomarkers copeptin and high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-TnT) for the improvement of early diagnosis and risk-stratification in patients with diabetes and suspected AMI., Methods: In this prospective international multicenter study we evaluated 379 patients with diabetes in a cohort of 1991 patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AMI. The measurement of biomarkers was performed at presentation., Results: Among the 379 diabetic patients, 32.7% had AMI, and in the 1621 patients without diabetes, 18.8% had AMI. The additional use of copeptin improved the diagnostic accuracy provided by conventional troponin alone (AUC 0.86 vs. 0.79, p=0.004). During a median follow-up of 814 days, 49 (13.1%) diabetic patients died. Cumulative 2-year survival rate for patients with copeptin levels below 9 pmol/l was 96.6% compared to 82.8% in patients above that level (p<0.001). The same was observed for hs-TnT with a cutoff level of 14 ng/l (97.7% vs. 82.0%, p<0.001) respective of cTnT with a cutoff level of 10 ng/l (93.5% vs. 75.6%, p<0.001). In multivariate Cox analysis, copeptin, hs-TnT and cTnT were strong and independent predictors of 24-month-mortality. Using the dual marker strategy (copeptin and troponin) identified two groups of high-risk patients where 22.5% of the group with hs-cTnT and copeptin above the cutoff and 28.6% with cTnT and copeptin above the cutoff died., Conclusion: In diabetic patients, copeptin only slightly improves the early diagnosis of AMI provided by hs-cTnT. However, both markers (copeptin and troponin) predict long-term mortality accurately and independently of each other., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: It is unknown whether cardiac troponin (cTn) I or cTnT is the preferred biomarker in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI)., Methods and Results: In a prospective multicentre study, we measured cTnI and cTnT using clinically available high-sensitivity assays (hs-cTnI Abbott and hs-cTnT Roche) and compared their diagnostic and prognostic accuracies in consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all information pertaining to the individual patient. The mean follow-up was 24 months. Among 2226 consecutive patients, 18% had an adjudicated final diagnosis of NSTEMI. Diagnostic accuracy at presentation as quantified by the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) for NSTEMI was very high and similar for hs-cTnI [AUC: 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-0.94] and hs-cTnT (0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.94) P = 0.62. In early presenters (<3 h since chest pain onset) hs-cTnI showed a higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94) when compared with hs-cTnT AUC (0.89, 95% CI: 0.86-0.91) (P = 0.019), while hs-cTnT was superior in late presenters [AUC hs-cTnT 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.96)  vs. hs-cTnI 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95); P = 0.007]. The prognostic accuracy for all-cause mortality, quantified by AUC, was significantly higher for hs-cTnT (AUC: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.78-0.82) when compared with hs-cTnI (AUC: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.73-0.77; P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Both hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT provided high diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. The direct comparison revealed small but potentially important differences that might help to further improve the clinical use of hs-cTn., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Several high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have recently been developed. It is unknown which hs-cTn provides the most accurate prognostic information and to what extent early changes in hs-cTn predict mortality., Methods and Results: In a prospective, international multicentre study, cTn was simultaneously measured with three novel [high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T (hs-cTnT), Roche Diagnostics; hs-cTnI, Beckman-Coulter; hs-cTnI, Siemens] and a conventional assay (cTnT, Roche Diagnostics) in a blinded fashion in 1117 unselected patients with acute chest pain. Patients were followed up 2 years regarding mortality. Eighty-two (7.3%) patients died during the follow-up. The 2-year prognostic accuracy of hs-cTn was most accurate for hs-cTnT [area under the receivers operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.83) and outperformed both hs-cTnI (Beckman-Coulter, 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65-0.77; P = 0.001 for comparison), hs-cTnI (Siemens) 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64-0.76; P < 0.001 for comparison)] and cTnT 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.74; P < 0.001 for comparison). Absolute changes of hs-cTnT were more accurate than relative changes in predicting mortality, but inferior to presentation values of hs-cTnT. Combining changes of hs-cTnT within the first 6 h with their presentation values did not further improve prognostic accuracy. Similar results were obtained for both hs-cTnI assays regarding the incremental value of changes. Hs-cTn concentrations remained predictors of death in clinically challenging subgroups such as patients with pre-existing coronary artery disease, impaired renal function, and patients older than 75 years., Conclusion: High-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T is more accurate than hs-cTnI in the prediction of long-term mortality. Changes of hs-cTn do not seem to further improve risk stratification beyond initial presentation values.

Objective: To analyse whether levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) below their respective 99th percentile can be used as a single parameter to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at presentation., Design: Prospective, multicentre study., Main Outcome Measures: We measured hs-cTn using four different methods (hs-cTnT Roche, hs-cTnI Siemens, hs-cTnI Beckman Coulter and hs-cTnI Abbott) in consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain. Two independent cardiologists adjudicated the final diagnosis. Patients were followed for death or AMI during a mean period of 24 months., Results: Among 2072 consecutive patients with hs-cTnT measurements available, 21.4% had an adjudicated diagnosis of AMI (sensitivity 89.6%, 95% CI 86.4% to 92.3%, negative predictive value (NPV): 96.5%, 95% CI 95.4% to 97.4%). Among 1180 consecutive patients with hs-cTnI Siemens measurements available, 20.0% had AMI (sensitivity 94.1%, 95% CI 90.3% to 96.7%, NPV: 98.0%, 95% CI: 96.6% to 98.9%). Among 1151 consecutive patients with hs-cTnI Beckman Coulter measurements available, 19.7% had AMI (sensitivity 92.1%, 95% CI 87.8% to 95.2%, NPV: 97.5%, 95% CI 96.0% to 98.5%). Among 1567 consecutive patients with hs-cTnI Abbott measurements available, 20.0% had AMI (sensitivity 77.2%, 95% CI 72.1% to 81.7%, NPV: 94.3%, 95% CI 92.8% to 95.5%)., Conclusions: Normal hs-cTn levels at presentation should not be used as a single parameter to rule out AMI as 6%-23% of adjudicated AMI cases had normal levels of hs-cTn levels at presentation. Our data highlight the lack of standardisation among hs-cTnI assays resulting in substantial differences in sensitivity and NPV at the 99th percentile.

Background: The introduction of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays allows the assessment of clinical decision values below the 99th percentile., Methods: Final diagnosis and one-year mortality were adjudicated in a multicenter, prospective cohort of 1181 patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department. Hs-cTnT (Roche) and cTnI-ultra (Siemens) were measured in a blinded fashion., Results: At presentation hs-cTnT and cTnI-ultra were below the limit of blank (LOB) in 201 (17%) and 549 (47%) patients, below the 75th percentile in 379 (32%) and 623 (53%) patients, below the 95th percentile in 603 (51%) and 808 (68%), and below the 99th percentile in 748 (63%) and 913 (77%), respectively. Sensitivities for the diagnosis of AMI were 100.0% and 96.8% respectively for hs-cTnT and cTnI-ultra (LOB as cut-off value), 99.5% and 96.2% (75th percentile), 96.8% and 93.0% (95th percentile), and 94.1% and 88.1% (99th percentile). The proportion of patients correctly classified as having or not AMI increased from 32.9% (LOB as cut-off value) to 47.8% (75th percentile), 65.9% (95th percentile) and 77.3% (99th percentile) for hs-cTnT and from 61.2% to 67.3%, 81.9% and 89.3% respectively for cTnI-ultra. At 1 year, all-cause mortality was very low and similar for patients below all of these cut-off levels (between 0.7% and 1.5%, p=0.748 for all-groups comparison)., Conclusion: cTn should be considered as a continuous variable. Decision values below the 99th percentile (e.g. the 75th percentile) are associated with a very high NPV for the diagnosis of AMI, but have a lower accuracy than the 99th percentile., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We examined whether undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin (hs-cTn) can be used to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with a single blood draw at presentation to the emergency department (ED)., Methods and Results: In a prospective multicenter study we used 4 different hs-cTn assays (hs-cTnT Roche, and hs-cTnI Siemens, hs-cTnI Beckman Coulter and hs-cTnI Abbott) in consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain. The final diagnosis of AMI was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all available data including serial hs-cTnT levels. Mean follow up was 24 months. Among 2072 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnT levels, 21% had an adjudicated diagnosis of AMI. Among AMI patients, 98.2% had initially detectable levels of hs-cTnT (sensitivity 98.2%, 95%CI 96.3%-99.2%, negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%, 95%CI 97.0%-99.3%). Undetectable levels of hs-cTnT ruled out AMI in 26.5% of patients at presentation. The NPV was similar with the three hs-cTnI assays: among 1180 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Siemens), the NPV was 98.8%; among 1151 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Beckman Coulter), the NPV was 99.2%; among 1567 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Abbott), the NPV was 100.0%. The percentage of patients with undetectable levels of hs-cTnI was similar among the three hs-cTnI assays and ranged from 11.4% to 13.9%., Conclusions: Undetectable levels of hs-cTn at presentation have a very high NPV and seem to allow the simple and rapid rule out of AMI. This criteria applies to much more patients with hs-TnT as compared to the investigated hs-cTnI assays., (© 2013.)

Background: Absolute changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) seem to have higher diagnostic accuracy in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction compared with relative changes. It is unknown whether the same applies to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays and whether the combination of absolute and relative change might further increase accuracy., Methods: In a prospective, international multicenter study, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) was measured with 3 novel assays (hs-cTnT, Roche Diagnostics Corp, Indianapolis, Ind; hs-cTnI, Beckman Coulter Inc, Brea, Calif; hs-cTnI, Siemens, Munich, Germany) in a blinded fashion at presentation and after 1 and 2 hours in a blinded fashion in 830 unselected patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists., Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction was significantly higher for 1- and 2-hour absolute versus relative hs-cTn changes for all 3 assays (P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the combination of 2-hour absolute and relative change (hs-cTnT 0.98 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.97-0.99]; hs-cTnI, Beckman Coulter Inc, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]; hs-cTnI, Siemens, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99]) were high and provided some benefit compared with the use of absolute change alone for hs-cTnT, but not for the hs-cTnI assays. Reclassification analysis confirmed the superiority of absolute changes versus relative changes., Conclusions: Absolute changes seem to be the preferred metrics for both hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The combination of absolute and relative changes provides a small added value for hs-cTnT, but not for hs-cTnI., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Concerns have been raised about possible gender disparities in cardiac investigations and/or outcome. This study sought to examine and compare the diagnostic and prognostic performance of selected cardiac biomarkers in women versus men., Methods: In a prospective, multicenter cohort of patients with acute chest pain cardiac troponin T (cTnT) (fourth-generation Roche assay), high-sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT), and copeptin were measured at presentation., Results: Of 1,247 patients, 420 were women and 827 were men. Although the rate of acute myocardial infarction was similar in women (14.5%) and men (16.6%, P = .351), women more frequently had cardiac but noncoronary causes of chest pain (17.4% vs 10.8%, P = .001) and less frequently had unstable angina (8.8% vs 16.6%, P = .002) than men. Diagnostic accuracy as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for acute myocardial infarction in women was 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.95) for cTnT, which was lower than the AUC for hs-cTnT alone (0.94, 95% CI [0.91-0.98]), the combination of cTnT with copeptin (0.96, 95% CI [0.94-0.98]) or the combination of hs-cTnT with copeptin (0.96, 95% CI [0.93-0.98]) (P = .008, P = .006, and P = .002, respectively). Prognostic accuracy as quantified by the AUCs for 1-year mortality was 0.69 (0.56-0.83), 0.86 (0.79-0.93), 0.87 (0.81-0.94), and 0.87 (0.80-0.94), respectively. No relevant gender differences in AUCs were observed., Conclusion: The diagnostic and prognostic performance of cTnT, hs-cTnT, and copeptin is as good in women as in men. High-sensitivity cTnT and the combination of cTnT and copeptin outperform cTnT alone, both in women and men., (Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The study objective was to compare the incidence and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction when using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays instead of a standard cardiac troponin assay for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction., Methods: In a prospective international multicenter study, we enrolled 1124 consecutive patients presenting with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Final diagnoses were adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists 2 times using all available clinical information: first using standard cardiac troponin levels and second using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels for adjudication. Patients were followed up for a mean of 19±9 months., Results: The use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T instead of standard cardiac troponin resulted in an increase in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction from 18% to 22% (242 vs 198 patients), a relative increase of 22%. Of the 44 additional acute myocardial infarctions, 35 were type 1 acute myocardial infarctions and 9 were type 2 acute myocardial infarctions. This was accompanied by a reciprocal decrease in the incidence of unstable angina (unstable angina, 11% vs 13%). The most pronounced increase was observed in patients adjudicated with cardiac symptoms of origin other than coronary artery disease with cardiomyocyte damage (83 vs 31 patients, relative increase of 268%). Cumulative 30-month mortality rates were 4.8% in patients without acute myocardial infarction, 16.4% in patients with a small acute myocardial infarction detected only by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T but not standard cardiac troponin, and 23.9% in patients with a moderate/large acute myocardial infarction according to standard cardiac troponin assays and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (P<.001)., Conclusions: The introduction of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays leads to only a modest increase in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction. The novel sensitive assays identify an additional high-risk group of patients with increased mortality, therefore appropriately classified with acute myocardial infarction (Advantageous Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation; NCT00470587)., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays seem to improve the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but it is unknown how to best use them in clinical practice. Our objective was to develop and validate an algorithm for rapid rule-out and rule-in of AMI., Methods: A prospective multicenter study enrolling 872 unselected patients with acute chest pain presenting to the emergency department. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) was measured in a blinded fashion at presentation and after 1 hour. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. An hs-cTnT algorithm incorporating baseline values as well as absolute changes within the first hour was derived from 436 randomly selected patients and validated in the remaining 436 patients. The primary prognostic end point was death during 30 days of follow-up., Results: Acute myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 17% of patients. After applying the hs-cTnT algorithm developed in the derivation cohort to the validation cohort, 259 patients (60%) could be classified as "rule-out," 76 patients (17%) as "rule-in," and 101 patients (23%) as in the "observational zone" within 1 hour. Overall, this resulted in a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% for rule-out, a specificity and positive predictive value of 97% and 84%, respectively, for rule-in, and a prevalence of AMI of 8% in the observational zone group. Cumulative 30-day survival was 99.8%, 98.6%, and 95.3% (P < .001) in patients classified as rule-out, observational zone, and rule-in, respectively., Conclusions: Using a simple algorithm incorporating hs-cTnT baseline values and absolute changes within the first hour allowed a safe rule-out as well as an accurate rule-in of AMI within 1 hour in 77% of unselected patients with acute chest pain. This novel strategy may obviate the need for prolonged monitoring and serial blood sampling in 3 of 4 patients.

Background: It is unknown to what extent noncardiac causes, including renal dysfunction, may contribute to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels., Methods: In an observational international multicenter study, we enrolled consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department. Of 1181 patients enrolled, 572 were adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists to have a noncardiac cause of chest pain. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine the important predictors of log-transformed high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess the prognostic significance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T>0.014 μg/L (99th percentile)., Results: A total of 88 patients (15%) had high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T>0.014 μg/L. Less than 50% of cardiac troponins could be explained by known cardiac or noncardiac diseases. In decreasing order of importance, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, and chronic kidney disease (adjusted r(2) 0.44) emerged as significant factors in linear regression analysis to predict high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T was best explained by a linear curve with age as ≤0.014 μg/L. Patients with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels>0.014 μg/L were at increased risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-10.6; P=.02) during follow-up., Conclusion: Among the known covariates, age and not renal dysfunction is the most important determinant of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Because known cardiac and noncardiac factors, including renal dysfunction, explain less than 50% of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels among patients with a noncardiac cause of chest pain, unknown or underestimated cardiac involvement during the acute presenting condition seems to be the major cause of elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be particularly challenging in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) due to pre-existing ECG changes and chronic increases in cardiac troponin (cTn) levels., Design: Of 1170 consecutive patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AMI, 433 (37%) with pre-existing CAD were analysed in a prospective multicentre study and the diagnostic and prognostic impact of copeptin in combination with either fourth generation cardiac troponin T (cTnT) or high-sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT) was evaluated., Results: AMI was the final diagnosis in 78 patients with pre-existing CAD (18%). Copeptin was significantly higher in patients with AMI than in those without (26 pmol/l (IQR 9-71) vs 7 pmol/l (IQR 4-16), p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy for AMI as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was significantly higher for the combination of copeptin and cTnT than for cTnT alone (0.94 vs 0.86, p<0.001). The combination of copeptin and hs-cTnT (0.94) was trending to superiority compared with hs-cTnT alone (0.92, p=0.11). The combination of copeptin and the cTn assays was able to improve the negative predictive value up to 99.5% to rule out AMI. Copeptin was a strong and independent predictor of 1-year mortality (HR 4.18-4.63). Irrespective of cTn levels, patients with low levels of copeptin had an excellent prognosis compared with patients with raised levels of both copeptin and cTn (360-day mortality 2.8-3.6% vs 23.1-33.8%, p<0.001)., Conclusion: In patients with pre-existing CAD, copeptin significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy if used in addition to cTnT, but only trended to superiority compared with hs-cTnT alone. Copeptin provides independent prognostic information, largely by overcoming the challenging interpretation of mild increases in hs-cTnT., Clinical Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials Gov number NCT00470587.