Search

Background: The 2020 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend using the 0/1-hour and 0/2-hour algorithms over the 0/3-hour algorithm as the first and second choices of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn)-based strategies for triage of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracies of the ESC 0/1-hour, 0/2-hour, and 0/3-hour algorithms., Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020. (PROSPERO: CRD42020216479)., Study Selection: Prospective studies that evaluated the ESC 0/1-hour, 0/2-hour, or 0/3-hour algorithms in adult patients presenting with suspected AMI., Data Extraction: The primary outcome was index AMI. Twenty unique cohorts were identified. Primary data were obtained from investigators of 16 cohorts and aggregate data were extracted from 4 cohorts. Two independent authors assessed each study for methodological quality., Data Synthesis: A total of 32 studies (20 cohorts) with 30 066 patients were analyzed. The 0/1-hour algorithm had a pooled sensitivity of 99.1% (95% CI, 98.5% to 99.5%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.8% (CI, 99.6% to 99.9%) for ruling out AMI. The 0/2-hour algorithm had a pooled sensitivity of 98.6% (CI, 97.2% to 99.3%) and NPV of 99.6% (CI, 99.4% to 99.8%). The 0/3-hour algorithm had a pooled sensitivity of 93.7% (CI, 87.4% to 97.0%) and NPV of 98.7% (CI, 97.7% to 99.3%). Sensitivity of the 0/3-hour algorithm was attenuated in studies that did not use clinical criteria (GRACE score <140 and pain-free) compared with studies that used clinical criteria (90.2% [CI, 82.9 to 94.6] vs. 98.4% [CI, 88.6 to 99.8]). All 3 algorithms had similar specificities and positive predictive values for ruling in AMI, but heterogeneity across studies was substantial. Diagnostic performance was similar across the hs-cTnT (Elecsys; Roche), hs-cTnI (Architect; Abbott), and hs-cTnI (Centaur/Atellica; Siemens) assays., Limitation: Diagnostic accuracy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and cardiac troponin sampling time varied among studies., Conclusion: The ESC 0/1-hour and 0/2-hour algorithms have higher sensitivities and NPVs than the 0/3-hour algorithm for index AMI., Primary Funding Source: National Taiwan University Hospital.

Background: Identifying older patients with non-ST- elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) within the very large proportion with elevated high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) is a diagnostic challenge because they often present without clear symptoms or electrocardiographic features of acute coronary syndrome to the emergency department (ED). We prospectively investigated the diagnostic and prognostic performance of copeptin ultra-sensitive (copeptin-us) and hs-cTnT compared to hs-cTnT alone for NSTEMI at prespecified cut-offs in unselected older patients. Methods: We consecutively enrolled 306 non-surgical patients ≥70 years presenting to the ED. In addition to clinical examination, copeptin-us and hs-cTnT were measured at admission. Two cardiologists independently adjudicated the final diagnosis of NSTEMI after reviewing all available data. All patients were followed up for cardiovascular-related death within the following 12 months. Results: NSTEMI was diagnosed in 38 (12%) patients (age 81±6 years). The combination of copeptin-us ≥14 pmol/L and hs-cTnT ≥0.014 µg/L compared to hs-cTnT ≥0.014 µg/L alone had a positive predictive value of 21% vs. 19% to rule in NSTEMI. The combination of copeptin-us <14 pmol/L and hs-cTnT <0.014 µg/L compared to hs-cTnT <0.014 µg/L alone had a negative predictive value of 100% vs. 99% to rule out NSTEMI. Hs-cTnT ≥0.014 µg/L alone was significantly associated with outcome. When copeptin-us ≥14 pmol/L was added, the net reclassification improvement for outcome was not significant (p=0.809). Conclusions: In unselected older patients presenting to the ED, the additional use of copeptin-us at predefined cut-offs may help to reliably rule out NSTEMI but may not help to increase predicted risk for outcome compared to hs-cTnT alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: To determine if an algorithm implementing a serial high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) measurement at presentation (0h) and at 3 hours after presentation (3h) is helpful for early diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in older patients. Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting: An emergency department (ED) of a city hospital covering a population of approximately 1 million in Germany. Participants: A total of 332 consecutive unselected patients were recruited, of whom 25 had one or more of the prespecified exclusion criteria and 1 had a missing hs-cTnT at 3h, resulting in a final population of 306 patients. Measurements: In addition to clinical examination, hs-cTnT was measured at 0h and 3h. The final diagnosis of NSTEMI was adjudicated by two independent consultants and an algorithm for rule-in and rule-out of NSTEMI was developed using classification and regression tree analysis. All patients were followed-up for cardiovascular outcome within 12 months. Results: Among 306 patients (mean age 81 ± 6 years), 38 (12%) patients had NSTEMI. Accuracy to diagnose NSTEMI was significantly higher for hs-cTnT measurements at 3h versus 0h (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.88 vs. 0.82, P = .0038) and for absolute versus relative hs-cTnT delta changes (AUC 0.89 versus 0.69, P < .001). A diagnostic algorithm using hs-cTnT values at presentation and absolute delta changes values ruled-in NSTEMI in 23% and ruled-out NSTEMI in 35% of patients. For patients neither fulfilling the rule-in nor the rule-out criteria, an observational zone was established. Cumulative 1-year survival was 79.4%, 88.5%, and 99.1% in patients classified as rule-in, observational zone, and rule-out, respectively. Conclusion: In older patients, serial hs-cTnT measurements and absolute delta-changes at 3h were valuable for early diagnosis of NSTEMI. An algorithm ruled-in NSTEMI in one quarter of patients with high risk and ruled-out NSTEMI in one-third with low risk. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]