Search

Introduction: Maternal preeclampsia is associated with altered placental development in the first trimester of pregnancy. Confined placental trisomy 16 mosaicism (CPM16) is a genetic abnormality of the placenta that is highly predisposing to preeclampsia. We previously demonstrated widespread alterations in DNA methylation in 3rd trimester placentae associated with chromosomally normal early-onset preeclampsia (EOPET) and questioned whether similar changes would be associated with CPM16, making this condition a potential model for studying EOPET-associated changes early in pregnancy., Methods: Using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, 3rd trimester CPM16 placental samples (N = 10) were compared to gestational age matched controls, and to 1st trimester trisomy 16 placentae (N = 5)., Results: DNA methylation differences associated with CPM16 were identified at 2254 CpGs using stringent criteria (FDR < 0.01, Δβ > 0.15). A subset of these differences (11%; p < 0.0001) overlapped those observed in chromosomally normal EOPET using similarly stringent criteria (FDR < 0.01; Δβ > 0.125). Importantly, the majority of EOPET-associated CpGs were significantly altered (p < 0.05) in CPM16 with a similar Δβ distribution. This was true for CPM16 with (N = 5) and without (N = 5) EOPET, although EOPET cases showed a tendency towards larger changes. Of the shared CPM16/EOPET associated changes, three CpGs near two genes (ARGHEF37 and JUNB) were also altered in 1st trimester trisomy 16 placentae., Discussion: Despite the limited sample size, widespread DNA methylation changes are observed in Trisomy 16 that overlap those seen previously in chromosomally normal EOPET. Hence, Trisomy 16 may provide a model to study the progression of placental changes that occurs in EOPET across different gestational ages., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Trisomy 20 is one of the more common mosaic trisomies detected on amniocentesis and presents with a normal outcome in over 90% of reported cases. Trisomic cells are almost never confirmed in newborn blood and are only rarely found in other fetal or placental samples. Nonetheless, some abnormal outcomes have been reported, including unexplained fetal demise, intrauterine growth restriction, and multiple congenital anomalies. Because of the lack of molecular studies on such cases, it is unknown whether the origin of trisomy or presence of uniparental disomy (UPD) could have some influence on outcome., Methods: We present data on six cases of trisomy mosaicism, two detected by chorionic villous sampling (CVS) and four by amniocentesis (AF), submitted to our laboratory for molecular studies., Results and Conclusions: A meiotic origin of the trisomy could be confirmed in only one of these cases. In addition, uniparental disomy was excluded in all four cases for which parents were available for testing. The four cases with low levels of trisomy in amniotic fluid (0%, 10%, 11%, and 12%) were associated with a normal outcome. The remaining two cases of trisomy 20 had high levels of trisomy in amniotic fluid (96% and 58%) and had abnormal outcomes (developmental delay in one and stillbirth with IUGR and severe oligohydramnios in the other). Including previously published cases, there is a clear association with the level of trisomy and outcome, with only 4% abnormal outcomes when <40% trisomic cells were detected. Higher levels of trisomy were also observed in male fetuses as compared to female fetuses (p = 0.01); however, there were no sex differences in frequency of abnormal outcomes., (Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Introduction: Analysis of data from cases of trisomy mosaicism can provide insight for genetic counselling after prenatal diagnosis and for the elucidation of the pathogenesis of trisomy during pregnancy., Methods: Statistical analysis was carried out on data from 162 cases of pregnancies with prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 16 mosaicism., Results: The majority of cases resulted in live birth (66%) with an average gestational age of 35.7 weeks and average birth weight of -1.93 standard deviations from the population mean. Among the live births 45% had at least one malformation, the most common being VSD, ASD, and hypospadias. The level of trisomy on direct CVS (cytotrophoblast) was associated with more severe intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and higher risk of malformation, while the level of trisomy on cultured CVS (chorionic villous stroma) was associated only with more severe IUGR. Similarly, the presence of trisomy on amniocentesis (amniotic fluid) was associated with both IUGR and malformation, while the presence of trisomy in the amniotic mesenchyme was associated only with IUGR. Surprisingly, the degree of trisomy in placental tissues appeared to be independent of the degree of trisomy in amniotic fluid and amniotic mesenchyme. The sex of the fetus was not associated with any outcome variables, although there was an excess of females (sex ratio = 0.45) that may be explained by selection against male mosaic trisomy 16 embryos before the time of CVS (approximately 9-12 weeks)., Conclusion: The levels of trisomy in different fetal-placental tissues are significant predictors of some measures of outcome in mosaic trisomy 16 pregnancies.

An increase in extremely skewed X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) (> or = 90%) among women who experienced recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) has been previously reported. To further delineate the etiology of this association, we have evaluated XCI status in 207 women who experience RSA. A significant excess of trisomic losses was observed among the women who had RSA with skewed XCI versus those without skewed XCI (P=.02). There was also a significant excess of boys among live births in this group (P=.04), which is contrary to expectations if the cause of skewed XCI was only that these women carried X-linked lethal mutations. To confirm the association between skewed XCI and the risk of trisomy, an independent group of 53 women, ascertained on the basis of a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy mosaicism, were investigated. Only cases for which the trisomy was shown to be of maternal meiotic origin were included. The results show a significantly higher level of extreme skewing (> or = 90%) in women whose pregnancies involved placental trisomy mosaicism (17%) than in either of two separate control populations (n=102 and 99) (P=.02 compared with total control subjects). An additional 11 cases were ascertained on the basis of one or more trisomic-pregnancy losses. When all women in the present study with a trisomic pregnancy (n=103) were considered together, skewed XCI was identified in 18%, as compared with 7% in all controls (n=201) (P=.005). This difference was more pronounced when a cutoff of extreme skewing of 95% was used (10% vs. 1.5% skewed; P=.002). Maternal age was not associated with skewing in either the patient or control populations and therefore cannot account for the association with trisomy. Previous studies have shown that a reduced ovarian reserve is associated with increased risk of trisomic pregnancies. We hypothesize that the association between skewed XCI and trisomic pregnancies is produced by a common mechanism that underlies both and that involves a reduction of the size of the follicular pool.

Although a number of infants with maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 16 (upd(16)mat) have been reported, the evidence for imprinting on chromosome 16 is not yet conclusive. To test the hypothesis that upd(16)mat has a distinct phenotype, which would support the existence of imprinted gene(s) on chromosome 16, statistical analysis was performed on a large series (n = 83) of mosaic trisomy 16 cases with molecular determination of uniparental disomy status. The incidence of upd(16)mat was 40%, which is consistent with the expected one third from random chromosome loss during trisomy rescue (P = 0.262). In pairwise comparisons, upd(16)mat was found to be associated with fetal growth restriction (P = 0.029) and with increased risk of major malformation (RR = 1.43; P = 0.053). Regression modeling showed that the effect of upd(16)mat on fetal/neonatal weight and malformation is independent of the degree of trisomy detected in the fetus. Regression modeling to control for the degree of trisomy detected in the placenta was not possible due to limited sample size. We conclude that upd(16)mat is associated with more severe growth restriction, and possibly, with higher risk of malformation. Our hypothesis is that imprinted gene(s) exist on chromosome 16 and that abnormal expression of these gene(s) in upd(16)mat cells during development results in decreased cell proliferation. Although we do not advocate prenatal testing for upd(16), studies on the long-term outcome of upd(16)mat neonates is necessary for counseling purposes., (Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Two cases of trisomy 4 mosaicism are reported including one with molecularly confirmed uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 4. Cytogenetic analysis of a chorionic villus sample (CVS) in Case 1 showed complete trisomy 4 in trophoblast and diploidy in chorionic stroma. Amniotic fluid analysis demonstrated a 46,XX complement. After intrauterine fetal death at 30 weeks, molecular analysis confirmed the presence of trisomy 4 of maternal meiotic origin, while fetal tissues showed maternal UPD for chromosome 4. Cultured CVS in Case 2 revealed trisomy 4 in 2/30 cells analyzed. This pregnancy resulted in a healthy livebirth with biparental inheritance of chromosome 4. Molecularly confirmed UPD4 has not been previously reported, and therefore, although the adverse outcome in Case 1 is likely due to the trisomy 4 in the placenta, an imprinting effect associated with UPD4 cannot be excluded., (Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Skewed X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is frequently found in the diploid fetal tissues of individuals with mosaic trisomy that originated from a 'trisomic zygote rescue' event. This may result from a high number of trisomic cells in the embryonic cell pool at the time of XCI, which are subsequently eliminated by selection. We hypothesize that extremely skewed XCI in these mosaic cases will be associated with a poor fetal outcome due to failure to completely eliminate the trisomy from all fetal tissues. To test this hypothesis, XCI status was evaluated in 17 cases of prenatally detected trisomy 16 mosaicism. Ten of the 15 informative cases showed extreme XCI skewing ( > or = 90% inactivation of one allele) in blood or other diploid fetal tissues compared to six of the 111 controls (p < 0.001). Among these 10 'skewed' cases, 6 showed an abnormal outcome, defined as developmental abnormalities and/or intrauterine or neonatal death. In contrast, of the 5 cases without extreme skewing, none showed abnormal outcome, although outcome information was incomplete in 1 case. An additional 6 cases analyzed, involving trisomy mosaicism for other chromosomes, showed similar results. Further studies are warranted to determine if XCI status adds useful information to the prediction of pregnancy outcome in prenatally detected mosaic trisomy.

Although maternal meiotic errors predominate in most studies of nonmosaic trisomy, studies of trisomy ascertained through confined placental mosaicism (CPM) have shown a high rate of somatic errors. However, origin of trisomy of many of the chromosomes involved in CPM has not been evaluated previously in cases ascertained through spontaneous abortions (SAs). Therefore, it was impossible to determine if the relative lack of meiotic errors in trisomy-CPM cases was a characteristic of the specific chromosome involved or due simply to ascertainment through a mosaic state. In the present study, parental and meiotic/somatic stages of origin of trisomy were determined in 89 SAs involving trisomy of chromosomes 2, 4 to 10, 12, 15, 17, and 20. Comparisons were then made to origin of trisomy in cases of confined and generalized trisomy mosaicism. Although somatic errors are generally more common in mosaic cases, this depends on the specific chromosome involved. The results suggest that there are chromosome-specific differences in the relative frequency of somatic chromosome gain or loss and/or the ability of an early somatic loss of one chromosome from a trisomic conceptus to "rescue" the pregnancy. As mean maternal age was less in the somatic than meiotic origin cases (P < 0.01), the age distribution of the study population should also influence the probability of detecting a somatic error. No phenotypic differences were apparent when cases were subdivided based on either parent or stage of origin of the trisomy.

The inactivation of one X chromosome in females is normally random with regard to which X is inactivated. However, exclusive or almost-exclusive inactivation of one X may be observed in association with some X-autosomal rearrangements, mutations of the XIST gene, certain X-linked diseases, and MZ twinning. In the present study, a methylation difference near a polymorphism in the X-linked androgen-receptor gene was used to investigate the possibility that nonrandom X inactivation is increases in fetuses and newborns that are associated with confined placental mosaicism (CPM) involving an autosomal trisomy. Extreme skewing was observed in 7 (58%) of 12 cases with a meiotic origin of the trisomy, but in none of 10 cases examined with a somatic origin of the trisomy, and in only 1 (4%) of 27 control adult females. In addition, an extremely skewed X-inactivation pattern was observed in 3 of 10 informative cases of female uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 15. This may reflect the fact that a proportion of UPD cases arise by "rescue" of a chromosomally abnormal conceptus and are therefore associated with CPM. A skewed pattern of X inactivation in CPM cases is hypothesized to result from a reduction in the size of the early-embryonic cell pool, because of either poor early growth or subsequent selection against the trisomic cells. Since approximately 2% of pregnancies detected by chorionic villus sampling are associated with CPM, this is likely a significant contributor to both skewed X inactivation observed in the newborn population and the expression of recessive X-linked diseases in females.

We present a case of maternal uniparental heterodisomy for chromosome 2 (UPD 2) detected after trisomy 2 mosaicism was found on placental biopsy. This case presented prenatally with severe intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and oligohydramnios. The diploid newborn had hypospadias and features consistent with oligohydramnios sequence. He died shortly after birth of severe pulmonary hypoplasia. The term placenta had high levels of trisomy 2 in both the trophoblast and the stroma. A comparison of this case with others reported in the literature suggests that the IUGR and oligohydramnios are likely related to placental insufficiency due to the high levels of trisomy 2 present in the trophoblast of the term placenta and the presence of UPD 2 in the diploid placental line.

Molecular studies were performed on 101 cases of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) involving autosomal trisomy. The origin of the trisomic cell line was determined in 54 cases (from 51 pregnancies), 47 of which were also analyzed for the presence of uniparental disomy (UPD) in the disomic cell line. An additional 47 cases were analyzed for parental origin in the disomic cell line only. A somatic (postmeiotic) origin of the trisomy was observed in 22 cases and included the majority of cases with CPM for trisomy 2, 7, 8, 10, and 12. Most cases of CPM involving trisomy 9, 16, and 22 were determined to be meiotic. Fetal maternal UPD was found in 17 of 94 informative CPM cases, involving trisomy 2 (1 case), 7 (1 case), 16 (13 cases), and 22 (2 cases). The placental trisomy was of meiotic origin in all 17 cases associated with fetal UPD (P = .00005). A meiotic origin also correlated with the levels of trisomy in cultured chorionic villi samples (CVS) (P = .0002) and trophoblast (P = .00005). Abnormal pregnancy outcome (usually IUGR) correlated with meiotic origin (P = .0003), the presence of fetal UPD (P = 4 x 10(-7)), and the level of trisomy in trophoblast (P = 3 x 10(-7)) but not with the level of trisomy in CVS or term chorion. The good fit of somatic errors with the expected results could have been observed only if few true meiotic errors were misclassified by these methods as a somatic error. These data indicate that molecular determination of origin is a useful predictor of pregnancy outcome, whereas the level of trisomy observed in cultured CVS is not. In addition, UPD for some chromosomes may affect prenatal, but not postnatal, development, possibly indicating that imprinting effects for these chromosomes are confined to placental tissues.

Prenatal diagnosis by chorionic villus sampling (CVS) documents placental chromosomal mosaicism in approximately 2% of viable pregnancies at 9-12 weeks of gestation and can involve various chromosomes and placental cell lineages. Confined placental mosaicism (CPM) is the result of postzygotic mitotic errors occurring in either diploid or trisomic zygotes. With trisomic zygote rescue, depending on the parental origin of the chromosome which is lost, uniparental disomy (UPD) or biparental disomy (BPD) may arise [Kalousek et al., Am J Hum Genet 52: 8-16, 1993]. In this paper, we present 14 pregnancies which were diagnosed by CVS as mosaic trisomy 7. All follow-up amniocenteses showed a normal diploid karyotype. Using both classical cytogenetics and interphase analysis, studies of term placentae showed variable levels of trisomy 7. DNA analysis was performed in nine cases to determine whether the diploid fetus had BPD 7 or UPD 7. Fetal UPD 7 was present only in one case; in eight other cases biparental inheritance was demonstrated. DNA analysis to establish the origin of trisomy 7 in the placenta was fully informative in six cases. One trisomy resulted from a meiotic error and was associated with fetal UPD 7, while the rest were somatic in origin. It is difficult to compare the effect of CPM for trisomy 7 to other trisomies confined to the placenta, as for most chromosomes there are few available cases. It appears that intrauterine fetal growth is not greatly affected by the presence of a trisomy 7 cell line in the placenta. This finding is in contrast to the serious effect of high levels of trisomy 16 within the placenta on fetal intrauterine growth in a series of well-documented cases of CPM 16 [Kalousek et al. 1993].

Karyotypically normal fetuses with completely trisomic or mosaic placentae may be at increased risk for intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Molecular and cytogenetic analyses on nine pregnancies with confined placental mosaicism (CPM) for trisomy 2 were performed at two collaborating centres. Seven cases were identified through prenatal testing of chorionic villi (CVS). Two of these seven cases demonstrated complete trisomy 2 while the remaining five cases showed various levels of trisomy 2 (33 per cent-75 per cent cells). Two cases identified after IUGR was observed in newborn infants demonstrated 65 per cent and 100 per cent trisomy 2 in cultured villi from term placentae. In all nine cases, blood chromosome analysis (n = 4), chromosome analysis of amniotic fluid cultures (n = 4), and cultured amnion (n = 5) were normal, failing to demonstrate any trisomic cells in tissues of fetal origin. Molecular studies on the fetal or newborn tissues using dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms on chromosome 2 revealed normal biparental inheritance of chromosome 2 in all nine cases. The parental origin studies of the extra chromosome 2 in the placenta showed that three cases were maternal in origin, at least two of which were consistent with a maternal meiotic non-disjunction giving rise to the trisomy 2, while in one case a paternal origin of the extra chromosome 2 was established.

Twenty-four cases of trisomy 13 and one case with disomy 13, but a de novo dic(13,13) (p12p12) chromosome, were examined with molecular markers to determine the origin of the extra (or rearranged) chromosome. Twenty-one of 23 informative patients were consistent with a maternal origin of the extra chromosome. Lack of a third allele at any locus in both paternal origin cases indicate a somatic duplication of the paternal chromosome occurred. Five cases had translocation trisomy: one de novo rob(13q14q), one paternally derived rob(13q14q), two de novo t(13q13q), and one mosaic de novo t(13q13q)/r(13). The patient with a paternal rob(13q14q) had a maternal meiotic origin of the trisomy; thus, the paternal inheritance of the translocation chromosome was purely coincidental. Since there is not a significantly increased risk for unbalanced offspring of a t(13q14q) carrier and most trisomies are maternal in origin, this result should not be surprising; however, it illustrates that one cannot infer the origin of translocation trisomy based on parental origin of the translocation. Lack of a third allele at any locus in one of the three t(13q13q) cases indicates that it was most likely an isochromosome of postmeiotic origin, whereas the other two cases showed evidence of recombination. One balanced (nontrisomic) case with a nonmosaic 45, -13, -13, +t(13;13) karyotype was also investigated and was determined to be a somatic Robertsonian translocation between the maternal and paternal homologues, as has been found for all balanced homologous Robertsonian translocations so far investigated. Thus, it is also incorrect to assume in de novo translocation cases that the two involved chromosomes are even from the same parent. Despite a maternal origin of the trisomy, we cannot therefore infer anything about the parental origin of the chromosomes 13 and 14 involved in the translocation in the de novo t(13q14q) case nor for the two t(13;13) chromosomes showing a meiotic origin of the trisomy.

A patient with Angelman syndrome and a 46,XY/47,XY,+inv dup(15)(pter-->q11: q11-->pter) karyotype and a patient with Prader-Willi syndrome and a 46,XY/47,XY,+inv dup(15)(pter-->q12: q12-->pter) karyotype were investigated with molecular markers along chromosome 15. Paternal uniparental isodisomy was found for all informative markers in the first case which indicates that this, rather than the presence of the extra chromosome, is the cause of the Angelman syndrome phenotype. Similarly, the PWS patient showed maternal uniparental distomy with absence of PWS region material on the inv dup(15) chromosome. If (1) marker chromosomes are an occasional by product of 'rescuing' a trisomic fertilisation, or (2) if duplication of the normal homologue in a zygote which has inherited a marker in place of the normal corresponding chromosome 'rescues' an aneuploid fertilisation, or (3) if the presence or formation of a marker chromosome increases the probability of non-disjunction, then uniparental disomy might be found occasionally in other subjects with de novo marker chromosomes.

The parental origin of an extra chromosome in Edwards syndrome has been investigated in 23 families by the combination of the VNTR probe pERT25, two microsatellite polymorphisms for D18S34 and D18S40, and several two-allele polymorphisms. Of the 23 cases, 22 were informative, with 17 (77%) being maternal and 5 (23%) paternal in origin. These results support the previous investigations, suggesting that trisomy 18 is predominantly of maternal origin, although a higher rate of paternally derived cases was observed than previously reported. A significant increase in maternal age was found to be associated with meiotic nondisjunction. Parental age was increased in both the maternally and paternally derived cases, but the size of the latter class was small and did not reach statistical significance.

Recently, we reported that skewed X chromosome inactivation (XCI) was more common in women who had experienced a trisomic pregnancy as compared to control women. Rather than an overall shift in the distribution of skewing there appears to only be an excess of extreme (= 95%) skewing. Further analysis of our data reveals that the increase in skewed XCI is dependent on which chromosome is involved in the trisomy and how many trisomies the woman has experienced, although sample sizes in each group are small. In this review we discuss limitations of the commonly used assays of XCI, which use measurements of DNA methylation to infer skewing patterns, and review the data based on current knowledge of the causes of XCI skewing. Gonadal mosaicism, premature aging, loss of methylation at some CpGs, and X-linked mutations can all be considered as potential mechanisms explaining both increased risk of trisomy and skewed XCI. While further research is needed to evaluate the role of each of these, the association of trisomy with apparent skewed XCI in the mother offers new opportunities to clarify the risk factors for and causes of the high incidence of aneuploidy in human females. Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While gonadal mosaicism can lead to recurrence of trisomy 21 (T21) for a single couple, the recurrence of free T21 in multiple members of a single pedigree has rarely been reported. We present an unusual pedigree with four cases of Down syndrome (DS) with free T21 were born to four separate women related through three generations of one family. The mothers were aged 18, 21, 29, and approximately 30 years at the time of the births. Using microsatellite markers, we excluded most of chromosome 21, excepting two small regions within 21q11.1 and 21q22.3, as being shared among the mothers of the DS children. However, two members of the pedigree, including one DS mother with a normal G-banded karyotype, carried supernumerary alleles at markers 2503J9TG, D21S369, and D21S215, which span the region from 21pter to 21q11.1. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using a centromeric probe hybridizing to chromosomes 13 and 21 did not reveal a novel location, ruling out a cryptic centromeric translocation between chromosome 21 and any chromosome other than chromosome 13. The level of meiotic recombination on chromosome 21 was unusually high in this family as well. We hypothesize that a cryptic rearrangement within the highly repetitive region of 21q11.1 is present in this family, disrupting pairing and leading to an increased risk of non-disjunction of chromosome 21 in this family. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]