Search

Aims: The aim of this study is to explore the relationships of tricuspid annulus area (TAA) with right atrial maximal volume (RAVmax) and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) in healthy subjects and patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) of different aetiologies and severities., Methods and Results: We enrolled 280 patients (median age 66 years, 59% women) with FTR due to left heart disease (LHD), pulmonary hypertension (PH), corrected tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), and 210 healthy volunteers (45 years, 53% women). We measured TAA at mid-systole and end-diastole, tenting volume of tricuspid leaflets, RAVmax, and RVEDV by 3D echocardiography. Irrespective of TA measurement timing, TAA correlated more closely with RAVmax than with RVEDV in both controls and FTR patients. On multivariable analysis, RAVmax was the most important determinant of TAA, accounting for 41% (normals) and 56% (FTR) of TAA variance. In FTR patients, age, RVEDV, and left ventricular ejection fraction were also independently correlated with TAA. RAVmax (AUC = 0.81) and TAA (AUC = 0.78) had a greater ability than RVEDV (AUC = 0.72) to predict severe FTR (P < 0.05). Among FTR patients, those with AF had the largest RAVmax and smallest RVEDV. RAVmax and TA were significantly dilated in all FTR groups, except in TOF. PH and TOF had largest RVEDV, yet tenting volume was increased only in PH and LHD., Conclusion: RA volume is a major determinant of TAA, and RA enlargement is an important mechanism of TA dilation in FTR irrespective of cardiac rhythm and RV loading conditions., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Quantitative echocardiography parameters are seldom used to grade tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity due to relative paucity of validation studies and lack of prognostic data. To assess the relationship between TR severity and the composite endpoint of death and hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF); and to identify the threshold values of vena contracta width (VCavg), effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), regurgitant volume (RegVol), and regurgitant fraction (RegFr) to define low, intermediate, and high-risk TR based on patients' outcome data., Methods and Results: A cohort of 296 patients with at least mild TR underwent 2D, 3D, and Doppler echocardiography. We built statistical models (adjusted for age, NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure) for VCavg, EROA, RegVol, and RegFr to study their relationships with the hazard of outcome. The tertiles of the derived hazard values defined the threshold values of the quantitative parameters for TR severity grading. During 47-month follow-up, 32 deaths and 72 CHF occurred. Event-free rate was 14%, 48%, and 93% in patients with severe, moderate, and mild TR, respectively. Severe TR was graded as VCavg > 6 mm, EROA > 0.30 cm2, RegVol > 30 mL, and RegF > 45%., Conclusion: This outcome study demonstrates the prognostic value of quantitative parameters of TR severity and provides prognostically meaningful threshold values to grade TR severity in low, intermediate, and high risk., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

In patients with structurally normal atrioventricular valvular apparatus, functional regurgitation of the mitral or tricuspid valves has been attributed mainly to ventricular dilation and/or dysfunction, through a combination of annulus dilation and tethering of the valve leaflets. The occurrence of functional regurgitation of atrioventricular valves in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and atrial dilation but normal ventricular size and function has received much less attention, and its peculiar mechanisms still remain to be understood. This distinct form of functional regurgitation (i.e., "atrial functional regurgitation") may require different treatment and interventional repair approaches than the classical functional regurgitation due to ventricular dilatation and dysfunction ("ventricular functional regurgitation"), and current guideline recommendations do not yet address this distinction. Clarifying the differences in the pathophysiology of atrial functional regurgitation and its management implications is of paramount importance. This review describes briefly the comparative anatomy of mitral and tricuspid apparatus and the pathophysiology and typical echocardiographic features of atrial functional regurgitation compared with ventricular functional regurgitation, as well as the added value of three-dimensional echocardiography as an essential imaging tool to clarify the mechanisms involved in its development., (Copyright © 2019 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Current guidelines recommend transthoracic echocardiography to assess patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) because it provides information regarding the presence of structural abnormalities of the tricuspid valve (TV), allows measurement of tricuspid annulus diameter, and evaluates severity of FTR by integrating data obtained from 2D and Doppler echocardiography. Critical components of the noninvasive evaluation include information regarding TV anatomy, tricuspid regurgitation severity, right ventricular size and systolic function, and associated findings such as estimated pulmonary artery pressure. However, most of the parameters included in the current recommendations to assess FTR are derived from the experience and knowledge developed about the mitral valve and have been transferred from the left to the right side of the heart without accounting for differences in anatomy of the tricuspid and mitral apparatus or for differences in hemodynamic environment in which the TV operates compared to its left counterpart., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)