Search

Background: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is increasing especially in new groups of patients. Despite advances in management, morbidity and mortality related to IA remain high. Thus, Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) dedicated to IA are needed to promote the optimal antifungal for each group of patients., Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study involving intensive care units and medical units. Adult patients who received caspofungin, isavuconazole, itraconazole, liposomal amphotericin B, posaconazole, or voriconazole, for the treatment of IA were eligible for enrollment. The primary objective was the concordance between the clinician's prescription and the prescription recommended by the CDSS. The secondary objective was the concordance according to different hospitals, departments, and indications., Results: Eighty-eight patients (n=88) from three medical hospitals were included. The overall concordance was 97% (85/88) including 100% (41/41) for center A, 92% (23/25) for center B, and 95% (21/22) for center C. There was no significant difference in concordance among the hospitals (P=0.973), the departments (P=1.000), and the indications (P=0.799). The concordance was 70% (7/10) for isavuconazole due to its use as an empirical treatment and 100% (78/78) for the other antifungals., Discussion: The concordance rate was high whatever the hospital, the department, and the indication. The only discrepancy was attributed to the use of isavuconazole as an empirical treatment which is a therapeutic option not included in the CDSS., Conclusions: This new CDSS dedicated to IA is meeting the clinical practice. Its implementation in routine will help to support antifungal stewardship., (Copyright © 2023 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We examined, retrospectively, the efficacy of voriconazole in Fusarium eye infections., Methods: Voriconazole-treated patients with proven or probable keratitis or endophthalmitis from the voriconazole database (9 patients) and six French ophthalmology departments (15 patients) were included. Sociodemographic features, predisposing factors, history of corneal trauma, associated ocular conditions, other diseases and prior therapies were analysed. Investigator-determined success was defined as infection resolution with medical treatment. Failure was no response or persistent infection and required surgery., Results: Most patients were Caucasian (83 %) and male (71 %). The infection was keratitis (63 %) or endophthalmitis (37 %) and proven in 23 (96 %). Prior therapy included topical and/or systemic amphotericin (46 %), fluconazole (17 %) or others (33 %), often in combination. Causative fungi were Fusarium solani (14, 58 %), Fusarium moniliforme (1), Fusarium oxysporum (1) and Fusarium spp. (8). Voriconazole was administered systemically, topically and/or by intraocular injection, and 16 patients (67 %) received salvage and eight primary therapy. The overall response was 67 % (73 % keratitis and 56 % endophthalmitis) but seven patients required adjunctive surgery. However, response was 63 % for eight primary therapy patients and 69 % for 16 salvage therapy patients. Response by species was Fusarium solani 64 % (9/14) and all others 80 % (8/10). In 13 patients (77 %), voriconazole was used in combination (response 69 vs. 64 % alone) with topical [amphotericin B 10/24 (42 %), caspofungin 5 (21 %), natamycin 1 (4 %)] and systemic agents [caspofungin 3 (13 %), amphotericin 2 (8 %)]., Conclusions: Topical and systemic voriconazole appears to be effective alone or in combination with other agents for treating severe Fusarium keratitis or endophthalmitis.

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. To investigate the immediate and mid-term benefits of posaconazole prophylaxis in AML patients undergoing first induction chemotherapy and to study the infection risk factors, we prospectively studied the IA incidence in these patients at our hospital between years 2007 and 2008; then we compared them to a matched control group without prophylaxis. There were 55 and 66 patients in each group respectively. At day 32 post-induction, two probable cases (3.6%) were scored in the prophylaxis group compared to 8 cases (12.1%) in the control group (4 possible and 4 probable). At day 100, it reached 7.27% and 15.5% respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis at day 100 showed lower mortality rate in the prophylaxis group compared to the control group [3.64% (n = 2, none due to IA) and 10.61% (n = 7, four due to IA) respectively, P = 0.002]. Multivariate analysis showed age and lack of response to induction as independent infection risk factors. Posaconazole prophylaxis resulted in lower incidence of IA and significantly improved survival. Patient's age and response to induction treatment are two independent infection risk factors, and need more attention during future clinical trials linked to antifungal prophylaxis.

The outcomes for 73 invasive fusariosis patients treated with voriconazole were investigated. Patients with proven (n = 67) or probable (n = 6) infections were identified from the voriconazole clinical database (n = 39) and the French National Reference Center for Mycoses and Antifungals database (n = 34). Investigator-determined success was a complete or partial response. Survival was determined from day 1 of voriconazole therapy to the last day known alive. Patients were 2 to 79 years old (median, 43 years), and 66% were male. Identified Fusarium species (62%) were F. solani, F. moniliforme, F. proliferatum, and F. oxysporum. Underlying conditions analyzed included hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT; 18%), hematologic malignancy (HM; 60%), chronic immunosuppression (CI; 12%), or other condition (OC; 10%). Infection sites were brain (5%), disseminated excluding brain (67%), lungs/sinus (15%), and other (12%). Most patients (64%) were or had recently been neutropenic (<500 cells/mm(3)). Therapy duration was 1 to 480 days (median, 57 days), with a 47% success rate. Baseline neutropenia impacted success adversely (P ≤ 0.03). Success varied by underlying condition (HSCT, 38%; HM, 45%; CI, 44%; OC, 71%) and infection site (brain, 0%; disseminated, 45%; other, 56%; lung/sinus, 64%) (P > 0.05). Combination therapy (13 patients) was no better than treatment with voriconazole alone. Overall, 59% of the patients died (49% died of fusariosis), and 90-day survival was 42%. Site of infection influenced survival (P = 0.02). Median survival (in days) by species was as follows: F. solani, 213; F. oxysporum, 112; Fusarium spp., 101; F. proliferatum, 84; F. moniliforme, 76. We conclude that voriconazole is a therapeutic option for invasive fusariosis.

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is an important cause of mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies. The reported incidence of IPA in the context of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) seems to increase. Approximately 1%-2% of overall fatal cases of IPA occur in COPD patients. The combination of factors such as lung immune imbalance, long-term corticosteroid use, increasing rate of bacterial exacerbations over time, and malnutrition are responsible for the emergence of IPA in these patients. The diagnosis of IPA is difficult to establish, which explains the delay in implementing accurate antifungal therapy and the high mortality rate. Persistent pneumonia nonresponsive to appropriate antibiotic treatment raises the concern of an invasive fungal infection. Definite diagnosis is obtained from tissue biopsy evidencing Aspergillus spp. on microscopic examination or in culture. Culture and microscopy of respiratory tract samples have a sensitivity and specificity of around 50%. Other diagnostic tools can be useful in documenting IPA: computed tomography (CT) scan, nonculture-based tests in serum and/or in bronchoalveolar lavage such as antibody/antigen tests for Aspergillus spp. More recent tools such as polymerase chain reaction or [1-->3]-beta-D-glucan have predictive values that need to be further investigated in COPD patients. Antifungal monotherapy using azole voriconazole is recommended as a first-line treatment of IPA. This review assesses the use of voriconazole in COPD patients.