Search

Simple Summary: As of today, salvage surgery regarding head and neck cancer remains a challenge for patients, surgeons, and oncologists. Indeed, even though several advances have been made in the last few years, the results in terms of both survival and complications are disappointing. Therefore, it remains important to be aware of the latest emerging techniques and understand their limits to make progress in this field. In addition, the patient's conditions play a major role in the outcome of salvage surgery, so identifying the various factors influencing the results can help improve these approaches. This review will walk us through the latest literature on salvage surgery, and it will help us understand the several difficulties touching this last treatment resort. Salvage surgeries of head and neck cancer are often complicated and do not always show decent results. This type of procedure is tough on the patient, as many crucial organs can be affected. A long period of reeducation usually follows the surgery because of the need to rehabilitate functions such as speech or swallowing. In order to lighten the journey of the patients, it is important to develop new technologies and techniques to ease the surgery and limit its damages. This seems even more crucial since progress has been made in the past years, allowing more salvage therapy to take place. This article aims at showing the available tools and procedures for salvage surgeries, such as transoral robotic surgery, free-flap surgery, sentinel node mapping, and many others, that help the work of the medical team to operate or obtain a better understanding of the status of the cancer when taken in charge. Yet, the surgical procedure is not the only thing determining the outcome of the operation. The patient themself and their cancer history also play an important part in the care and must be acknowledged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The treatment of advanced NSCLC patients unfit for a platinum combination is challenging and no clear evidence is available. We retrospectively collected data on advanced NSCLC not receiving a first-line platinum combination, focusing on clinical selection criteria. Up to 30% of newly diagnosed advanced EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 < 50% NSCLC patients do not receive a first-line platinum doublet. Main clinical selection criteria were older age (>70 years), comorbidities and poor performance status. A single agent chemotherapy was offered with the prevalence of oral metronomic vinorelbine. In the whole population, progression-free survival and overall survival ranged from 4.5 to 5 months and from 9 to 10.5 months, respectively. Limited evidence is available concerning the selection criteria and the outcomes of platinum unfit newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy. We retrospectively collected data on consecutive, stage IIIB-IV, EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 < 50% NSCLC patients treated with first-line single agent chemotherapy. Baseline characteristics, outcome measures and toxicities were recorded, as well as criteria according to which treatment selection was made and what percentage of patients did not receive a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Two-hundred and twenty-one patients were included. Median age was 79 (range 56–92) years, M/F 165(74.6%)/56(25.4%), ECOG performance status (PS) 0/1/ ≥ 2 23(10.9%)/94(42.5%)/103(46.6%), with a median of two serious comorbidities. A median of 25% (range 10%-30%) of newly diagnosed NSCLC did not receive a first-line platinum combination. Clinical criteria according to which decision was made were older age (76.5%), comorbidities (72%), poor PS (55.2%) and familiar or social issues (10%). Single-agent treatment consisted of oral metronomic vinorelbine (MetV 78.6%), gemcitabine (Gem 10%), oral standard vinorelbine (Vin 8.2%) and other (O 3.2%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of single agent treatments ranged from 4.5 to 5 months and from 9 to 10.5 months, respectively. All grade toxicities did not differ among single agents, while grade 3–4 toxicities were less frequent with MetV. Up to 30% of newly diagnosed advanced EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 < 50% NSCLC patients do not receive a first-line platinum doublet. Main clinical selection criteria were older age (>70 years), comorbidities and poor PS. An oral treatment was frequently proposed with MetV being the most frequent choice according to its safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brain metastases (BrMs) are associated with significant morbidity and are found in up to 50% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most of the literature focuses on symptomatic BrMs, with a lack of baseline brain imaging in asymptomatic patients. Unfortunately, much of the data on local treatments with or without systemic treatment is retrospective. Clinical trials of systemic treatments largely exclude patients with BrMs. Chemotherapy is an active treatment for BrM with response rates in the brain similar to other sites of disease. Targeted systemic treatments in patients with driver mutations (EGFR and ALK-MET to date) have impressive central nervous system (CNS) penetrance and response rates. Unfortunately, no prospective data can currently guide the timings or modality of local therapies with systemic treatments in these patients who have a high incidence of CNS disease, but retrospective data suggest that early local therapies may give better intracranial progression-free survival (ICPFS). Recent immunotherapy trials have included patients with BrMs. These patients have largely been pre-treated with local therapies and are asymptomatic. Thus, the current standard is becoming, early local therapies before or in conjunction with immunotherapy agents. The approach seems to be safe. Prospective studies are needed in NSCLC BrMs patients to make sure any benefit from local therapies on the ICPFS and quality of life is not overlooked. Here we report what we think are reasonable conclusions from the available data and make suggestions for future clinical trials in the management of NSCLC BrMs. • Brain metastases occur in 30% of patients with advanced NSC lung cancer. This percentage can be higher in those with driver mutations. • Whether asymptomatic disease progresses to symptomatic disease is not known. • We do not know if asymptomatic disease should be treated early. • There are many reported series of patients, but most are retrospective with mixed patient populations. • Prospective CTs are needed to ensure we are not missing benefit from addition of local therapy to systemic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]