Search

Introduction: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) aiming at pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) became a standardized atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure. Life‐threatening complications like cardiac tamponade exist. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) usage is associated with superior safety in radiofrequency ablation. It is unclear if ICE has an impact on safety of CBA. Methods: The FREEZE Cohort (NCT01360008) subanalysis included patients undergoing "PVI only" CBA. Patients with intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography were excluded. Group A comprises conventional, group B ICE‐guided CBA. Periprocedural results were compared. Results: From 2011 to 2016, a total of 4189 patients were enrolled, and 1906 (45.5%) were included in this subanalysis, split up in two groups (A: 1066 [55.9%], B: 840 [44.1%]). Group A was younger (60.6 ± 10.8 vs. 62.4 ± 10.5 years, p <.001), with smaller left atria (41 vs. 43 mm, p <.001), and less persistent AF (23.1 vs. 38.1%, p <.001). Procedure, left atrial, and fluoroscopy times were shorter in group A as compared to group B. Dose area product was significantly higher in group A (2911 vs. 2072 cGyxcm2, p <.001). In‐hospital major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac event rates including two deaths in group A were not different between groups (0.5% vs. 0.1%, p =.18). The rate of total procedural (10.4% vs. 5.1%, p <.001) and major complications (3.2% vs. 1.3%, p <.001) was significantly higher in group A. Cardiac tamponade occurred significantly more frequently in group A (8 [0.8%] vs. 1 [0.1%], p =.046). Independent predictors for major complications were female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, p =.03) and non‐ICE usage (OR 2.38, p =.02). No differences were observed for persistent phrenic nerve palsy, nor for groin complications. Conclusion: CBA was significantly safer and required less radiation if ICE was used, although the procedures were more complex. The risk of groin complications was not increased with ICE usage. Non‐ICE usage was the only modifiable independent predictor of major complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a commonly encountered chronic and progressive heart rhythm disorder, characterized by exacerbations and remissions. Contemporary clinical practice guidelines recommend a trial of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) as the initial therapy for sinus rhythm maintenance; however, these medications have modest efficacy and are associated with significant adverse effects. Recently, several trials have demonstrated that an initial treatment strategy of cryoballoon catheter ablation significantly improves arrhythmia outcomes (e.g. freedom atrial tachyarrhythmia and reduction in arrhythmia burden), produces clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes (e.g. symptoms and quality of life), and significantly reduces subsequent healthcare resource utilization (e.g. hospitalization), without increasing the risk of serious or any adverse events. These findings are relevant to patients, providers, and healthcare systems, helping inform the decision regarding the initial choice of rhythm-control therapy in patients with treatment-naïve AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Treatment guidelines for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) suggest that patients should be managed with an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) before undergoing catheter ablation (CA). This study evaluated whether pulmonary vein isolation employing cryoballoon CA is superior to AAD therapy for the prevention of atrial arrhythmia (AA) recurrence in rhythm control naive patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF).Methods and Results: A total of 218 treatment naive patients with symptomatic PAF were randomized (1 : 1) to cryoballoon CA (Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic) or AAD (Class I or III) and followed for 12 months. The primary endpoint was ≥1 episode of recurrent AA (AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia) >30 s after a prespecified 90-day blanking period. Secondary endpoints included the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) and recurrence of symptomatic palpitations (evaluated via patient diaries). Freedom from AA was achieved in 82.2% of subjects in the cryoballoon arm and 67.6% of subjects in the AAD arm (HR = 0.48, P = 0.01). There were no group differences in the time-to-first (HR = 0.76, P = 0.28) or overall incidence [incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.79, P = 0.28] of SAEs. The incidence rate of symptomatic palpitations was lower in the cryoballoon (7.61 days/year) compared with the AAD arm (18.96 days/year; IRR = 0.40, P < 0.001).Conclusions: Cryoballoon CA was superior to AAD therapy, significantly reducing AA recurrence in treatment naive patients with PAF. Additionally, cryoballoon CA was associated with lower symptom recurrence and a similar rate of SAEs compared with AAD therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for symptomatic paroxysmal or drug-refractory persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods and Results: Prospective cluster cohort study in experienced CBA and RFA centres. Primary endpoint was 'atrial arrhythmia recurrence', secondary endpoints were as follows: procedural results, safety, and clinical course. A total of 4189 patients were included: CBA 2329 (55.6%) and RFA 1860 (44.4%). Cryoballoon ablation population was younger, with fewer comorbidities. Procedure time was longer in the RFA group (P = 0.01). Radiation exposure was 2487 (CBA) and 1792 cGycm2 (RFA) (P < 0.001). Follow-up duration was 441 (CBA) and 511 days (RFA) (P < 0.0001). Primary endpoint occurred in 30.7% (CBA) and 39.4% patients (RFA) [adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.04; P = 0.12). In paroxysmal AF, CBA resulted in a lower risk of recurrence (adjHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99; P = 0.047). In persistent AF, the primary outcome was not different between groups. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rates were 1.0% (CBA) and 2.8% (RFA) (adjHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.26-1.10; P = 0.088). Re-ablations (adjHR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34-0.61; P < 0.0001) and adverse events during follow-up (adjHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.88; P = 0.005) were less common after CBA. Higher rehospitalization rates with RFA were caused by re-ablations.Conclusions: The primary endpoint did not differ between CBA and RFA. Cryoballoon ablation was completed rapidly; the radiation exposure was greater. Rehospitalization due to re-ablations and adverse events during follow-up were observed significantly less frequently after CBA than after RFA. Subgroup analysis suggested a lower risk of recurrence after CBA in paroxysmal AF.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01360008), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01360008. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Stroke is one of the most feared complications during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). While symptomatic thromboembolic events are rare, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may identify asymptomatic (ie, silent) cerebral lesions (SCLs) following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures. Methods and Results: The REDUCE‐TE Pilot was a prospective multicenter, single‐arm observational study investigating the incidence of SCL in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI with a novel gold‐tip, externally irrigated ablation catheter. After ablation, cerebral diffusion‐weighted MRI and a postablation follow‐up were performed at 1 to 3 days after the ablation procedure. A neurocognitive test was done before and after ablation. The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of one or more new SCLs. Secondary study endpoints included neurocognitive status, procedural success rate, and periprocedural complications including symptomatic thromboembolic events. A total of 104 patients were enrolled (69% male, mean age: 61.5 ± 9.7 years, mean CHA2DS 2‐VASc score: 1.7 ± 1.2). Postprocedural MRI examination was performed in 97 patients, and in nine of them (9.3%; 95% CI: 4.3‐16.9%) a total of 11 SCLs were detected. Univariate analyses did not reveal any significant predictor for new SCLs. Nonsignificant trends were observed for low activated clotting time during ablation and for international normalized ratio value outside the range of 2 to 3 at ablation. There was no evidence of significant deterioration of neurocognitive function after PVI. In four patients, a pericardial tamponade was noted but all patients fully recovered during follow‐up. Conclusions: Ablation of AF using a novel gold‐tip, externally irrigated ablation catheter, resulted in SCLs in approximately one out of 10 patients without a measurable effect on neurocognitive function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We analyzed the procedural experience and clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) gained over 5 years using the second‐generation cryoballoon (CB‐Adv). Methods and Results: For this retrospective study, we enrolled 281 patients undergoing PVI at our institution between 2012 and 2016. The analyzed period was divided into 5 calendar years. Follow‐up data, including Holter electrocardiography recordings, were collected during outpatient clinic visits. The impact of several variables on outcome was evaluated by means of univariate and multivariate analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The median procedure and fluoroscopy times over the years were 90 (72 of 114) and 15 (11 of 21) minutes, respectively. A continuous decline in complication rates and fluoroscopy and procedure times was observed in each subsequent year. During mid‐term follow‐up (33 [25 of 48] months), 178 (63.3%) patients were AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia free. Multivariate analysis revealed left atrial area (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05; P < 0.001), female sex (HR = 2.53; P < 0.001), and common ostium (HR = 1.93; P < 0.001) as significant predictors of outcome. The overall 1‐year success rate was 76.2%. A gradual decrease in the 1‐year success rate (from 90.5% in 2012 to 67.9% in 2016) was mainly related to a steady increase of left atrial area in the entire cohort with successive years of the study. Conclusions: PVI using CB‐Adv in patients with persistent AF is accompanied by a learning curve and facilitates a satisfactory outcome, followed by the proper selection of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Introduction: We aimed to compare arrhythmia recurrence rates after second‐generation cryoballoon (CB‐Adv) ablation and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and left atrial (LA) enlargement. Methods and results: Persistent AF patients with LA enlargement were compared using a propensity‐score‐matching algorithm, and 111 patients treated with CB‐Adv ablation and 111 patients treated with RF ablation were selected. The primary endpoint was the first documented >30‐second arrhythmia recurrence after a 3‐month blanking period. Median LA area was comparable between the RF and CB‐Adv groups (24.2 vs. 24.0 cm2, P = 0.49). In addition to pulmonary vein isolation, roof lines (RLs) with bidirectional conduction block were created in 48 patients in the CB‐Adv group and 49 patients in the RF group. Midterm outcome after single procedure is characterized by arrhythmia recurrences in 47 patients in the RF group and 32 patients in the CB‐Adv group (P = 0.20). There were no differences in the number of AF recurrences in the two groups (38 vs. 32, P = 0.66), but there were more instances of LA tachycardia (LAT) in the RF group than in the CB‐Adv group (11 vs. 0, P < 0.01). LAT recurrence in RF patients was associated with RL creation (9 with vs. 2 without, P < 0.01). Among patients in whom a RL was created, arrhythmia‐free survival was lower in the RF group than in the CB‐Adv group (44.9% vs. 79.2%, P < 0.01). Conclusions: Arrhythmia recurrence rates in the two groups during midterm follow‐up were comparable. RL creation during CB‐Adv ablation resulted in acceptable outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: First-line ablation prior to antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy is an option for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); however, the optimal ablation technique, radiofrequency (RF), or cryoballoon (CB) has to be determined.Methods and Results: The FREEZE Cohort Study compares RF and CB ablation. Treatment-naïve patients were documented in the FREEZEplus Registry. Periprocedural data and outcome were analysed. From 2011 to 2014, a total of 373/4184 (8.9%) patients with PAF naïve to AAD were identified. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed with RF (n = 180) or CB (n = 193). In the RF group, patients were older (65 vs. 61 years, P < 0.01) compared with the CB group. The procedure time was significantly shorter and radiation exposure higher in the CB group. Major adverse events occurred in 1.6% (CB) and 3.7% (RF) of patients (P = 0.22). AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence until discharge was 4.5% (RF) and 8.5% (CB, P = 0.2). Follow-up (FU) ≥12 months was available in 99 (RF) and 107 (CB) patients. After 1.4 years of FU, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) was 61% (RF) and 71% (CB, P = 0.11). In the RF group, more patients underwent cardioversion, and a trend for more repeat ablations was observed. Persistent phrenic nerve palsy was observed in one patient treated by CB.Conclusion: First-line ablation for PAF is safe and effective with either RF or CB. The procedure was faster with the CB, but the radiation exposure was higher. Although there was a trend for more recurrences and complications in the RF group, a more favourable risk profile in patients undergoing CB ablation might have biased the results.Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT01360008. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rapid Mapping and Ablation Using a Novel Platform Introduction A noninvasive 3D mapping technique (ECVUE™, CardioInsight Inc., Cleveland) maps the origin and mechanisms of various arrhythmias without catheterizing the heart. Methods Thirty-three patients (3 centers, mean 45.0 ± 14.6 years,) with symptomatic premature ventricular complexes (24 PVCs), focal atrial tachycardias (2 ATs), and manifest accessory pathways (7 WPW syndromes) were prospectively explored using 3D, noninvasive bedside electrocardiomapping. The location of origin of the focal arrhythmia was first determined using noninvasive mapping. Subsequently, a stimulus artifact was delivered at this site to confirm and evaluate the precise location of the mapped focal origin. The procedural parameters and clinical efficacy were studied. Results Ablation was successful in 32/33 (97%) patients (PVCs: 13 right, 10 left, 1 septal; WPW: 3 left, 3 right; ATs: 2 left) without complications. The time from catheterization to permanent arrhythmia elimination/termination, RF duration, skin-to-skin procedural duration, and fluoroscopic exposure were median 16, 3.98, 71, and 11.9 minutes (for n = 29), respectively. At mean 24.7 ± 3.7 months of follow-up, 31 patients remain arrhythmia-free after a single procedure. One patient (right WPW syndrome) required repeat ablation 1 month later. One patient had recurrence of PVCs and is now deceased. The cumulative radiation (CT scan and fluoroscopy) exposure was median 7.57 mSv. Conclusion ECVUETM is a noninvasive tool allowing rapid preprocedural localization of focal arrhythmia and enables the electrophysiologist with highly specific information to direct RF delivery at the source of the arrhythmia with minimal intracardiac mapping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims In this observational study, we examine the significance of the left atrial (LA) surface area and compare the clinical usage of the Arctic Front Advance (CBA) versus Arctic Front (CB) cryoballoon with the intent to investigate the impact of each in terms of long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) for patients with nonvalvular AF. Methods Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed while using a cryoballoon ablation catheter in conjunction with an intraluminal circular diagnostic mapping catheter, Achieve. The consecutive patients ablated with CBA were matched with patients previously ablated with CB, using propensity score matching. The primary endpoint of this observational single-center retrospective study was the first observation of electrocardiogram-documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmias lasting >30 seconds. Results The patient demographic data were similar in the CBA- and CB-group (N = 188 patients each group). In all patients in the CBA-group and in 95% of the patients in the CB group, acute procedural PVI of all veins was achieved with the single usage of a 28-mm cryoballoon. The one-year freedom from atrial arrhythmias was significantly better in the CBA- versus the CB-group of patients, 90% versus 64%, respectively. During 15-month clinical follow-up in CBA group, patients with LA area above 23 cm2 were more likely to experience recurrence of AF (23%) than patients with LA area below 23 cm2 (7%). Conclusions Comparing one-year outcomes, the CBA is superior to the CB with regards to maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. When using the CBA catheter, an enlarged LA is associated with a higher recurrence of arrhythmia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is now established therapeutic option. Multiple procedures (MPs) are often needed to achieve the satisfactory outcome. The aim of the study was to assess the outcome after MPs in AF patients categorized to risk-score groups. Methods We followed a cohort of consecutive 911 (69% male; median 59 years) patients with AF (58% paroxysmal) who had CAAF performed. ALARMEC (Atrial fibrillation type, Left Atrium size, Renal insufficiency, MEtabolic syndrome, cardiomyopathy) risk score was calculated for each patient. The end point was maintenance of sinus rhythm at the follow-up of 60 months. Results We performed 1,199 CAAF procedures. One, two, and three procedures were performed in 663 (73%), 208 (23%), and 40 (4%) patients, respectively. Outcome after the first procedure (56%) was improved with MPs (76%). MPs > 2 were performed in 1%, 3%, 5%, 6%, and 10% patients with ALARMEC score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. MPs were successful in 89%, 86%, 81%, 65%, and 43% of patients with ALARMEC score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Outcome in 174 (19%) patients on antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) was 85%, 68%, 75%, 44%, and 39% in ALARMEC score: 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Outcome in 737 (81%) patients without AAD was 90%, 85%, 80%, 77%, and 69% in ALARMEC score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Conclusion The moderate success rate after index procedure of CAAF can be further improved with multiple ones and AAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

German Ablation Registry-Different Energy Sources in AF Ablation Background Catheter ablation is used extensively with curative intention in atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation has long been a standard of care, while cryoballoon technology has emerged as a feasible approach with promising results. Prospective multicenter registry data referring to both ablation technologies in AF ablation therapy are lacking. Methods Between January 2007 and August 2011, a total of 3,775 consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF who underwent PV ablation in their respective centers were enrolled. The cohort was divided into 2 groups according to the ablation energy source used: cryoballoon ablation (group 1, n = 905 [24.0%], median age 63 years, 64.3% men) and RF ablation (group 2, n = 2870 [76.0%], median age 63 years, 62.7% men). Comorbidities and baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. Results Acute success rate was similar in both groups (97.5% in cryo vs 97.6% in RF; P = 0.81). Procedure times were similar, ablation and fluoroscopy times were higher in cryoballoon when compared to RF ablation. Overall complication rate was similar in cryo- (4.6%) and RF-ablation (4.6%; P = 1.0). Phrenic nerve palsy was more often in cryo versus RF ablation (2.1% in cryo vs 0.0% in RF; P < 0.001). Other complications were more common in RF compared to cryoablation (4.6% in RF vs 2.7% in cryo; P < 0.05). Conclusion RF ablation is the most widespread ablation method in Germany, but use of cryoballoon increased significantly. Procedure times were similar, but ablation and fluoroscopy times were longer in cryoballoon ablation. No significant differences were found in terms of acute success and overall complication rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation. The most frequent complication during cryoballoon-based PVI is phrenic nerve injury (PNI). However, data on PNI are scarce.Methods: The YETI registry is a retrospective, multicenter, and multinational registry evaluating the incidence, characteristics, prognostic factors for PNI recovery and follow-up data of patients with PNI during cryoballoon-based PVI. Experienced electrophysiological centers were invited to participate. All patients with PNI during CB2 or third (CB3) and fourth-generation cryoballoon (CB4)-based PVI were eligible.Results: A total of 17 356 patients underwent cryoballoon-based PVI in 33 centers from 10 countries. A total of 731 (4.2%) patients experienced PNI. The mean time to PNI was 127.7±50.4 seconds, and the mean temperature at the time of PNI was -49±8°C. At the end of the procedure, PNI recovered in 394/731 patients (53.9%). Recovery of PNI at 12 months of follow-up was found in 97.0% of patients (682/703, with 28 patients lost to follow-up). A total of 16/703 (2.3%) reported symptomatic PNI. Only 0.06% of the overall population showed symptomatic and permanent PNI. Prognostic factors improving PNI recovery are immediate stop at PNI by double-stop technique and utilization of a bonus-freeze protocol. Age, cryoballoon temperature at PNI, and compound motor action potential amplitude loss >30% were identified as factors decreasing PNI recovery. Based on these parameters, a score was calculated. The YETI score has a numerical value that will directly represent the probability of a specific patient of recovering from PNI within 12 months.Conclusions: The incidence of PNI during cryoballoon-based PVI was 4.2%. Overall 97% of PNI recovered within 12 months. Symptomatic and permanent PNI is exceedingly rare in patients after cryoballoon-based PVI. The YETI score estimates the prognosis after iatrogenic cryoballoon-derived PNI. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03645577. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]