Search

Purpose: To compare clinical and radiological outcomes, implant survivorship at a minimum of 1-year follow-up using metaphyseal trabecular cones with or without impaction grafting in a complex revision TKA. Methods: A retrospective comparative matched analysis was performed and 15 patients who underwent revision surgery using the combination of porous trabecular metaphyseal cone and diaphyseal impaction grafting (MC–IBG) were matched with a group of 13 patients who also underwent revision surgery using metaphyseal cone (MC) without impaction grafting. All included patients presented severe bone defect (AORI 2,3) and a rotating-hinge prosthesis were implanted. Results: Both groups were comparable regarding the baseline demographic and clinical data. Patients had previously undergone a mean of 4 (range, 2–12) and 3 (range, 2–5) previous procedures in the MC-IBG and MC groups, respectively. The indications for revision were aseptic loosening in 11 (73.3%) and 11 (84.6%) patients; prosthetic joint infection in 4 (26.7%) and 2 (15.4%) in the MC–IBG and MC groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean postoperative Knee Society Score between the study groups (p = 0.806). Overall, 4 patients had further revision. Two patients were revised in the MC–IBG group, one patient for aseptic loosening and the second one after 2 episodes of instability. Two patients in the MC group presented prosthetic joint infection and underwent a two-stage reimplantation. No significant difference was observed between the study groups at comparison (p = 0.92). Conclusion: Trabecular metal cones with diaphyseal impaction grafting provide an alternative technique in a complex revision TKA surgery with early clinical and radiographic success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The role of arthroscopic Latarjet as a revision surgery after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair has yet to be established. Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes, recurrences, and complication rates of arthroscopic Latarjet as a revision procedure after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Latarjet as a primary procedure. Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients who were diagnosed with anterior shoulder instability and underwent arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization between 2009 and 2018. Patients were separated into 2 groups depending on whether Latarjet was performed after a previous instability surgery (revision) or as a primary surgery (primary). Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome (CMSO) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) were assessed pre- and postoperatively with a minimum 24 months of follow-up. In addition, pre- and postoperative levels of sports activity, dislocations, subluxations, and complications were assessed. Results: A total of 97 patients (n = 62 revision; n = 35 primary), with a mean age of 31.0 ± 8.8 and 29.4 ± 7.6 years old in the revision and primary Latajet group, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up in the revision group was 32 months (24-53) and 35.5 months (27.7-42.2) in the primary Latarjet group. No significant differences between groups were observed in Rowe score (revision = 91.4, primary = 94.1; P =.223), CMSO score (revision = 90.7, primary = 94; P =.105), and SANE (revision = 85.8, primary = 87.3; P =.683) postoperatively. However, the postoperative difference in the WOSI score between the revision and primary Latarjet groups was nearly significant (510 ± 334 vs 403 ± 343, respectively; P =.05). Four (6.4%) postoperative dislocations were reported in the revision and 1 (2.8%) in the primary Latarjet group (P =.14). Patients in the revision group had a lower return to the previous level of sports participation (P =.008) and decreased external rotation with the arm by the side compared with the primary Latarjet group (P =.000). Conclusion: Arthroscopic Latarjet as a revision surgery is a reasonable surgical option in failed Bankart repair cases. The decision to perform arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization as a revision surgery should not be influenced by the potential risk of future complications as it provides comparable clinical outcomes to the primary Latarjet procedure with a low postoperative recurrence rate. However, a decreased level of postoperative sports participation and external rotation with the arm by the side can be expected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trochanteric bursitis or greater trochanteric pain syndrome is a common disorder and frequent cause of lateral hip pain. It can lead to severe functional impairment with increase morbidity and poor quality of life. The purpose of the current study was to identify and evaluate relationship between health-related factors, as prognostic indicators, and clinical outcomes. Methods: A single-centre, prospective study was conducted and 60 patients (62 hips) were included with a minimum 12 months of follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Hip Outcome Scale, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and Visual Analogue Scale. Radiological assessments and health-related factors were documented in an attempt to understand their validity as predictors of clinical outcomes. Complications and recurrence rates were also analyzed. Results: Univariate model revealed that an increased BMI (p = 0.001; OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07); number of previous corticosteroid infiltrations (p = 0.001; OR = 1.28, 95% CI, 1.11-1.48); longer time from symptom onset to surgery (p = 0.001; OR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.28); smoker status (p = 0.001; OR 11.2; 95% CI, 3.30-44.2); and the presence of prior lumbosacral fusion (LSF) (p = 0.001; OR 13.8; 95% CI, 2.96--101); were prognostic factors predisposing for poor clinical outcomes. Among prognostic health-related factors were medical comorbidities such as emotional distress (p < 0.001; OR 26.1; 95% CI, 5.71-192); fibromyalgia (p = 0.026; OR 3.56; 95% CI, 1.16-11.7); and hyporthyroidism (p = 0.005, OR = 6.55, 95% CI, 1.73-28.7). Conclusions: Better overall physical function was predicted by lower number of corticosteroid infiltrations, shorter time span from symptom onset to surgery, non-smoker status and the absence of prior lumbosacral fusion. Obesity, smoking, the presence of emotional distress, fibromyalgia and hypothyroidism seem to increase the risk of poor clinical outcomes. A proper selection and/or correction of modifiable prognostic factors could reduce the incidence of endoscopic treatment failure and, as a consequence, improve patient outcomes and quality of life. However, future efforts should focus on experimental and randomised studies to fully determine these associations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Unacceptably high rates of redislocation, reoperation, osteoarthritis, and coracoid nonunion have been reported in patients with a seizure disorder after surgery for shoulder instabilitiy. Purpose: To evaluate the objective and subjective functional and radiologic results of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability in patients with epilepsy and compare them with the results of patients without epilepsy. Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective and comparative case-control analysis of patients operated for shoulder instability with arthroscopic Latarjet was conducted. Nineteen patients (21 unstable shoulders) with a seizure disorder (epilepsy group) were matched with 21 patients without a history of seizure (control group). Demographics, surgical indications, and imaging data were collected. Clinical outcomes at a minimum 2 years of follow-up (range, 2-9 years) postoperatively included Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome (CMSO) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). The incidence of complications, recurrent instability, redislocation, revision surgery, repeated seizure(s), and presence of osteoarthritis, coracoid nonunion, and osteolysis were also examined. Results: After a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, no significant differences in functional results were found between patients with and without epilepsy on the average Rowe (P =.917), WOSI (P =.621), CMSO (P =.600), and SANE (P =.859) scores. A total of 5 patients (7 shoulders) continued to have seizures postoperatively, but no seizure-related glenohumeral instability was documented. One dislocation and 1 subluxation were documented while participating in sports in each study group, comprising a recurrence rate of 9.5%, but no significant differences were found at comparison (P =.605). A bone defect did not influence the results, as no significant difference was found between the 2 groups. Osteoarthritic changes of the glenohumeral joint were observed in 5 shoulders (23.8%) in the epilepsy group and in 3 (14.3%) in the control group (P =.451). No case of coracoid nonunion or osteolysis was recorded. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative athletic activity (P =.660). However, patients with epilepsy had significantly lower pre- and postoperative sports participation (P <.001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization can lead to improved functional and subjective outcomes and should be considered in patients with epilepsy with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. These results can be achieved regardless of the presence of bone defect and the postoperative control of seizures and are similar to those in patients without epilepsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]