Search

Background: As physicians, Mobile smartphones, laptops and tablets are now an integral part of our day to day activities including personal communications as well as our routine clinical practice. Methods: A digital survey was designed to explore the usage of mobile smartphones and the associated apps among surgeons in Trauma and Emergency departments. It was sent to 850 members of the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Results: A total of 91 responses were received with 60.4% aged between 35 and 54 years. Only 24.1%of respondents found the available apps extremely useful in their practice, however 75.9% of participants agreed on not being able to identify a certain good application to rely on., Conclusion: Despite the widespread use of smartphones among doctors of different grades and specialties, there is a preference shown towards the use of instant messenger apps and the use of the camera for clinical photos. The usefulness of current available apps appears to be limited due to the absence of a regulating body to check the validity of data and peer review the contents of apps leaving a huge responsibility on the individual doctor using the app to rely on its results., (Celsius.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the transition to acute care surgery (ACS) on trauma volumes and outcomes., Methods: All admissions from 2 1-year periods from June 2008 to May 2010 (1 year before ACS and 1 year after ACS) to the LAC+USC Medical Center were prospectively collected. In anticipation of this change, trauma patient demographics, clinical data, and outcomes (trauma volume and preventable and potentially preventable deaths and complications) were prospectively collected., Results: Before ACS, there were 5,378 trauma admissions. After ACS, there were 5,726 (66.5%) trauma and 2,886 (33.5%) nontrauma admissions. There were no demographic or clinical differences between trauma patients in the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in overall mortality (3.8% before ACS vs 3.3% after ACS, P = .292). Similarly, there were no differences in the rates of preventable and potentially preventable deaths or complications observed (1.2% vs 1.0%, P = .374) during the study period., Conclusions: Despite a 60% increase in total patient volume and a 233% increase in operative volume over the study period, the addition of emergency surgery to a trauma service did not compromise trauma patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The incidence of post-traumatic acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is decreasing. We hypothesized that disparities exist in the overall incidence and incidence of ARDS over time across different types of trauma centers., Methods: The National Trauma Databank version 7.0 was queried for patients admitted to designated trauma centers (I-III) and ventilated at least 48 hours. Level I university admissions (group 1) were compared with level I community and level II/III center admissions (group 2)., Results: There were 43,664 patients with an incidence of ARDS of 5.2% (2,260) overall, 4.1% (1,062/25,937) in group 1, and 6.8% (1,198/17,727) in group 2 (P < .001). The incidence decreased significantly in group 1 in contrast to group 2 yearly. The incidence in level I community centers was marked (608/5,180 [11.7%]) and increased significantly over time. On logistic regression, admission to a level I university center (.646 [.590-.707],<.001) was independently associated with ARDS., Conclusions: Admission to a level I center may not necessarily confer similar results reflecting potential variation in management between centers that presumably provide similar service. These investigations may have significance to quality improvement., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Scant literature investigates potential outcome differences between Level I trauma centers. We compared overall survival and survival after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients admitted to American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified versus state-verified Level I trauma centers. Using the National Trauma Data Bank Version 7.0, incident codes associated with admission to an ACS-verified facility were extracted and compared with the group admitted to state-verified centers. Overall, there were 382,801 (73.7%) patients admitted to ACS and 136,601 (26.3%) admitted to state centers. There was no adjusted survival advantage after admission to either type (4.9% for ACS vs 4.8% for state centers; 1.014 [95% CI, 0.987 to 1.042], P = 0.311). However, in the 3,088 cases of ARDS, mortality for admission to the ACS centers was 20.3 per cent (451 of 2,220) versus 27.1 per cent (235 of 868) for state centers. Adjusting for injury severity and facility size, admission to an ACS center was associated with a significantly greater survival after ARDS (0.75 [0.654 to 0.860]; P < 0.001). Level I verification does not necessarily imply similar outcomes in all subgroups. Federal oversight may become necessary to ensure uniformity of care, maximizing outcomes across all United States trauma systems. Further study is needed.

Background: Compartment syndrome is a devastating complication after trauma to the extremities. Prompt fasciotomy is essential for avoiding disability and limb loss. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors for the need for fasciotomy after extremity trauma., Methods: All trauma patients sustaining extremity injuries admitted to the LAC+USC Medical Centre during a 10-year period ending in December 2007 were identified. Demographics, clinical data, blood requirements and outcomes were abstracted. Patients who required an extremity fasciotomy were compared with those who did not. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of the need for fasciotomy., Results: During the study period, 288 (2.8%) of a total of 10,315 patients who sustained extremity trauma required a fasciotomy. Despite a stable ISS and extremity AIS over the study period, fasciotomy rates decreased significantly from 3.2% in 1998 to 2.5% in 2002 to 0.7% in 2007 (p<0.001). The need for fasciotomy varied widely by mechanism of injury (from 0.9% after motor vehicle accident to 8.6% in GSWs, p<0.001) and by type of injury (from 2.2% in closed fracture to 41.8% in combined vascular injury, p<0.001). Patients requiring fasciotomy were predominantly male (90.6% vs. 73.5%, p<0.001) and had higher ISS (14.5±9.7 vs. 12.8±10.6, p=0.006). Patients requiring fasciotomy received significantly more units of PRBCs (8.2±13.9 vs. 1.8±5.1, p<0.001) during their hospital stay. Patients requiring fasciotomy were more likely to sustain open fractures (upper: 8.3% vs. 5.2%, p=0.031 and lower: 28.5% vs. 11.8%, p<0.001); joint dislocations (elbow: 25.0% vs. 8.3%, p=0.005, and knee: 31.2% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001) and brachial (8.0% vs. 1.1%, p<0.001), femoral (20.1% vs. 1.1%, p<0.001) and popliteal vessel injuries (15.3% vs. 0.4%, p<0.001). A stepwise logistic regression identified the presence of vascular injury, need for PRBC transfusion, male gender, open fracture, elbow or knee dislocation, GSW, ISS≥16 and age<55 years as independent predictors for the need for fasciotomy., Conclusion: After extremity trauma, approximately 1% of patients will require a fasciotomy. The need for fasciotomy varied widely by injury mechanism and type reaching 42% in patients who sustained a combined arterial and venous injury. The above risk factors were identified as independent predictors for the need for fasciotomy., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The value of cervical spine immobilization after penetrating trauma to the neck is the subject of lively debate. The purpose of this study was to review the epidemiology of unstable cervical spine injuries (CSI) after penetrating neck trauma in a large cohort of patients., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients admitted with penetrating neck injuries to a Level I trauma center from January 1996 through December 2008. A penetrating neck injury was defined as a gunshot wound (GSW) or stab wound (SW) between the clavicles and the base of the skull. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate associations between injury mechanisms, the presence of CSI instability, and mortality. Risk factors independently associated with the presence of a CSI were identified., Results: A total of 1,069 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 463 patients (43.3%) and 606 patients (56.7%) were sustaining GSW and SW, respectively. Overall, 65 patients (6.1%) were diagnosed with a CSI with a significantly higher incidence after GSWs compared with SWs (12.1% vs. 1.5%; p < 0.001). In four patients (0.4%), the CSI was considered unstable, all of them following GSW. All patients with unstable CSI had obvious neurologic deficits or altered mental status at the time of admission. Risk factors independently associated with the presence of a CSI were GSW to the neck and a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8 on admission (R = 0.16)., Conclusion: The overall incidence of unstable CSI after penetrating trauma to the neck is exceedingly low at 0.4%. Following GSW to the neck, an unstable CSI was noted in <1% of patients. After cervical SW, however, no spinal instability was noted precluding the need for spinal precautions in these instances.

Background: The "July Phenomenon" refers to the propensity for increased errors to occur with new housestaff, as they assume new responsibilities at the beginning of the academic year. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the new residents presenting in July at a high volume Level I Academic Trauma Center., Methods: The trauma registry at the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical center was retrospectively reviewed to identify all injured patients admitted over a 5-year period ending in December 2006. All Morbidity and Mortality reports for the study period were reviewed to extract deaths and any complications classified as preventable or potentially preventable. Patients admitted in the first 2 months (July to August) of the academic year were compared with those treated at the end of the academic year (May to June). Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were compared, and the rates of preventable and potentially preventable deaths and complications were determined for each of these groups., Results: During the 5-year study period, 24,302 injured patients were admitted. Of those, 8,151 were admitted during the period from May to August with 4,030 (49.4%) at the beginning of the academic year (July to August) and 4,121 (50.6%) at the end of the academic year (May to June). Overall, the average age was 35.1 +/- 17.7 years, 77% were men with an Injury Severity Score of 8.4 +/- 9.7 and 24.2% penetrating injury rate. When examining mortality, after adjustment for differences between the two groups, there was no difference between patients admitted at the beginning or at the end of the academic year (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.1 [0.8, 1.5], p = 0.52). However, when compared with the patients treated for their injuries in May to June, those treated at the beginning of the academic year had a significantly higher rate of preventable and potentially preventable complications (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.9 [1.1, 3.2], p = 0.013)., Conclusions: At an academic Level I trauma center, admission at the beginning of the academic year was associated with an increased risk of errors resulting in preventable and potentially preventable complications; however, these errors did not impact mortality. Specific errors associated with this increased rate of preventable complications warrant further investigation.

The rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has increased significantly over the last years, especially from community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) sources. The true prevalence of these multidrug-resistant infections among the trauma patient population, however, is not well defined. A retrospective review of our surgical intensive care unit (SICU) database from April 2003 to April 2007 was performed to identify all trauma patients surviving 48 hours or more that had a positive culture result during their SICU stay. The results of the cultures were examined. A total of 582 SICU patients with 2,860 cultures were assessed for MRSA infection. Among these, 368 cultures (12.9%) in 36 patients were reported as MRSA positive. Thirteen of these patients fulfilled the criteria for a CA-MRSA infection. When outcomes were analyzed, no significant difference in mortality (8.7% vs 15.4%, P = 0.540) or hospital related charges ($364,231 +/- 323,719 vs $242,458 +/- 276,630, P = 0.091) was noted. Patients with a hospital-acquired MRSA infection, however, had longer hospital lengths of stay (42.7 +/- 47.1 vs 25.3 +/- 31.1, P = 0.037) than their community-associated counterparts. MRSA constitutes an important source of infection among critically ill trauma patients. CA-MRSA organisms may play an increasing pathogenic role in this population.

Background: An emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is performed in critically injured patients after a recent or in an imminent cardiac arrest following trauma. Emergent thoracotomy (ET) or operation room thoracotomy is reserved for more stable patients. However, the number of these interventions performed in an European settings is limited. Thus, we initiated the current study to investigate outcomes and risk factors for mortality of patients required EDT or ET at the largest trauma center in Estonia. Methods: All patients admitted after trauma to the North Estonia Medical Centre between 1/1/2017 and 31/12/2021 subjected to EDT or ET were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Results: Overall, 39 patients were included. EDT and ET were performed in 16 and 23 patients, respectively. Median age was 45 (33–53) years and 89.7% were males. The crude 30-day mortality was 56.4% being 87.5% and 34.8% in the EDT and ET group, respectively. None of the patients with pre-hospital CPR requirement, severe head injury (AIS head ≥ 3) or severe abdominal injury (AIS abdomen ≥ 3) survived. All the patients in the survival group had signs of life in the emergency department. The rate of stab wounds was significantly higher in the survival group (p = 0.007). Patients with CGS < 9 had significantly lower possibility for survival (p < 0.001). Conclusions: EDT and ET outcomes in Estonian trauma system are comparable to similar advanced trauma systems in Europe. Patients with GCS > 8, signs of life in the ED and with isolated penetrating chest injury had the most favorable outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of penetrating abdominal injuries (PAI) is a standard of care in numerous established trauma centers. However, available evidence supporting SNOM of PAI in European settings remains scarce. Thus, we performed a multi-center study at selected Northern European trauma centers to investigate the management and outcomes of PAI. We hypothesized that despite a low number of penetrating injuries in included trauma centers, SNOM is successfully utilized with outcomes comparable with trauma centers with a high number of PAI. Methods: All adult patients admitted to participating trauma centers in the Northern European region with PAI between 1/2015 and 12/2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes were mortality and success rate of SNOM. Results: Overall, 119 patients were included. Median age was 38 (28–47) years. SNOM was initiated in 55 patients (46.0%) with 94.5% success rate. Three patients (5.5%) failed SNOM and had a delayed laparotomy with one gastric injury, one small bowel injury and one patient with a bleeding from mesentery. Overall mortality of the cohort was 5.0%. However, all patients in the SNOM group survived. Higher median ISS, median Abbreviated Injury Scale score of the abdomen, rate of combined anterior and posterior wounds, rate of in-hospital complications and longer hospital length of stay were observed in the immediate laparotomy group compared to the SNOM group. Conclusions: SNOM of PAI is a safe practice even in regions with a low prevalence of penetrating injuries. The outcomes in our study are comparable with results from trauma centers treating larger numbers of patients with PAI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the association between positive blood alcohol level (BAL) and functional outcome in patients suffering severe traumatic brain injury. Study design: The brain trauma registry of an academic trauma centre was queried for patients admitted between January 2007 and December 2011. All patients (≥ 18 years) with a neurosurgical intensive care length of stay beyond 2 days were included. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, injury profile, laboratory test and outcomes were abstracted for analysis. Primary outcome was unfavourable functional outcome defined as Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) ≤ 3. Multivariable regression models were used for analysis. Results: Of the 352 patients, 39% were BAL (+) at admission. Patients with (+) BAL were significantly younger with less co-morbidities. The cohorts exhibited no significant difference in the severity of the intra-cranial injury and the use of intra-cranial monitoring or surgical interventions. Further, the groups presented no difference in in-hospital mortality (p= 0.1) or 1-year mortality (p= 0.5). There was a worse long-term functional outcome in (–) BAL patients compared to their BAL (+) counterparts after adjustment for confounders (GOS ≤ 3: AOR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.1–3.5,p= 0.02). Conclusion: Positive BAL on admission is associated with a better long-term functional outcome in patients suffering severe traumatic brain injury. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Background: Transmediastinal gunshot wounds are associated with a high mortality and frequently require operative intervention. The purpose of this study was to identify the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of these injuries in a mature trauma system with decreasing prehospital time intervals. Methods: Patients admitted to a large urban Level 1 trauma centre between 1/2006 and 12/2010 sustaining a firearm injury to the torso were identified. Transmediastinal gunshot wounds were defined as missile tracts traversing the mediastinum identified on CT images, operative notes or autopsy reports. Results: Overall, 133 patients met study criteria. A total of 116 patients (87.2%) were haemodynamically unstable or had no vital signs on arrival to the Emergency Department. Ninety-seven (83.6%) of these patients required a resuscitative thoracotomy resulting in 8 survivors (6.0%). There were 17 haemodynamically stable patients (12.8%) identified, 14 of whom underwent CT scan evaluation. Six patients subsequently required operative intervention. Only 11 patients (8.3%) in the study population were successfully managed nonoperatively. The overall mortality was 78.9%, and for those who reached the hospital with vital signs, the mortality was 24.3%. Conclusions: Transmediastinal gunshot wounds encountered in a mature trauma centre are highly lethal injuries requiring resuscitative thoracotomy in most instances. Changing perspectives in these injuries may reflect the effects of an evolving prehospital care. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of intra-abdominal closed-suction drainage after emergent trauma laparotomy for isolated solid organ injuries (iSOI) and to determine its association with deep surgical site infections (DSSI). All patients subjected to trauma laparotomy between January 2006 and December 2008 for an iSOI at two Level I urban trauma centers were identified. Patients with isolated hepatic, splenic, or renal injuries were included. Study variables extracted included demographics, clinical characteristics, intra-abdominal injuries, drain placement, DSSI, septic events, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Diagnosis of DSSI was based on abdominal computed tomography scan demonstrating an intra-abdominal collection combined with fever and elevated white blood cell count. For the analysis, patients were stratified based on injury severity. To identify an independent association between closed-suction drain placement and DSSI, stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed. Overall, 142 patients met the inclusion criteria with 80 per cent (n = 114) having severe iSOI. In 47 per cent (n = 53) of the patients with a severe injury, an intra-abdominal drain was placed. A drain was placed more often in patients with a blunt trauma with more severe injury defined by Injury Severity Score and abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale Score and those who underwent splenectorny (P < 0.05). There was a three-fold increased risk of DSSI in patients subjected to drain placement (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 8.2; P = 0.046). Subgroup analysis demonstrated those who sustained severe hepatic injury receiving a drain had a significantly increase risk of DSSI (P = 0.02). There was no statistical difference in the rate of DSSI based on the presence or absence of an intra-abdominal drain after severe splenic injury (17 vs 18%, P = 0.88). The use of intra-abdominal closed-suction drains after iSOI is not associated with decreased risk of DSSI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trauma in the elderly (≥55 years) accounts for a significant proportion of admissions to trauma centers. Our understanding of the epidemiology and outcomes associated with penetrating injury in this age segment of the population, however, is severely limited. The aim of the present study therefore was to investigate the incidence and type of injuries sustained by elderly patients from firearms and the impact of age on outcomes. Methods: This was a 5-year National Trauma Databank (NTDB) study. Injury demographics, mortality rates, and lengths of stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the hospital were analyzed. Elderly patients ≥55 years old were assigned to one of three categorical strata: 55-64 years old, 65-74 years old, and ≥75 years old. Results: During the study period, 98,242 patients were admitted for firearm-related injuries, and 3,190 (3.2%) of them were ≥55 years old. Within the elderly age segment of the population, 1,676 patients (52.5%) were 55-64 years of age, 727 (22.8%) were 65-74 years of age, and 787 (24.7%) were ≥75 years old. The incidence of severe trauma [Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16] in the elderly age strata was 43.3, 46.8, and 57.6%, respectively ( p < 0.001). Patients ≥75 years old were significantly more likely than patients 55-74 years old to suffer self-inflicted injuries. The most commonly encountered injury in elderly patients was gunshot wounds to the head, which increased in a stepwise fashion with advancing age (25.8, 31.6, and 39.4% respectively; p < 0.001). The crude mortality rate in all patients sustaining gunshot wounds increased progressively with age. Within the elderly age segment, mortality ranged from 28.5% in the age stratum 55-64 years, to 55.4% in the stratum ≥75 years (adjusted p < 0.001). Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay increased with advancing age but peaked and remained stable among the elderly age groups. An admission Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 8, an ISS ≥ 16, hypotension on admission, age, self-inflicted injury, and injury sustained by assault were factors independently associated with death in patients ≥55 years. Conclusions: Injury from firearms is not uncommon in the elderly patient population and is primarily a result of self-inflicted gunshot wounds to the head. These patients sustain a high burden of injury and a high rate of mortality, which increases with advancing age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The liberal utilization of computed tomography (CT) has significantly contributed to overall improvements in trauma care. However, the role and the current practice of the CT examinations in the management of patients with penetrating liver injuries are scantily documented. Aims: This study was aimed to assess the current practice and the role of the admission and follow-up CT in patients with penetrating liver injuries. Setting and Design: This is a retrospective study at a Level I trauma center. Study period is from 01/2005 to 12/2007. Methods: All patients with penetrating liver injuries were analyzed. Results: Overall, 178 patients with penetrating liver injuries were assessed. A total of 123 (69.1%) patients underwent emergent laparotomy without preoperative CT due to signs of peritonitis (47.8%), hypotension (16.3%), or a GCS of ⩽8 (5.1%). In this group of patients, no nontherapeutic laparotomy occurred. The remaining 55 (30.9%) patients underwent CT scan evaluation on admission. Of these, 54.5% were selected for nonoperative management (NOM). Sensitivity and specificity of the admission CT to predict a positive laparotomy was 95.7% and 90.6%, respectively. Overall, 80.6% of isolated liver injuries were successfully managed nonoperatively. Thirty-three (18.5%) patients died within 72 h. In the remaining 145 patients, 33 liver-related complications occurred in 17.2% (25 of 145) of patients. Conclusion: Two-thirds of patients with penetrating liver injuries require emergent laparotomy, mainly due to associated injuries. The remaining one-third of patients, however, is amenable for an admission CT, which reliably predicts successful NOM. Moderate or severe injuries require follow-up CT because of the high incidence of asymptomatic liver-related complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the method of transport after injury and survival among trauma patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma facility in Los Angeles, California. The trauma registry of LAC+USC Medical Center was reviewed to identify all injured patients evacuated by emergency medical service (EMS) from the injury scene from 1998 to 2007. The study population was divided into those who were airlifted (HEMS) and those who were transported by ground emergency medical service (GEMS) with transportation time that exceeded 30 minutes (GEMS > 30 minutes). During the 10-year study period, 1,836 patients were airlifted (helicopters for emergency medical service (HEMS)) and 1,537 patients were ground transported (GEMS > 30 minutes). HEMS patients suffered more frequently a penetrating injury (19% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), presented more often hypotensive to the emergency department (4% vs. 1%, p < 0.001), had more frequently a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8 (9% vs. 3%, p < 0.001) and required more often an intubation at the injury scene (1.6% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001). However, the transportation time and the total prehospital time were significantly shorter for airlifted patients. After multivariable analysis, the difference in mortality between the two transport modalities was not significant (adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval, 0.72 (0.22, 2.35); p = 0.596). In a metropolitan Los Angeles trauma system, EMS helicopter transportation of injured patients does not appear to improve overall adjusted survival after injury. There is however a potential benefit for severely injured subgroups of patients due to the shorter prehospital times. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Low-velocity gunshot wounds cause most civilian duodenal injuries. The objective of this study was to describe a simplified surgical algorithm currently in use in a South African civilian trauma center and to verify its validity by measuring morbidity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with duodenal gunshot injuries during the study period January 1999 to December 2003 was performed. Data points accrued included patient demographics, admission hemodynamic status and resuscitative measures, laparotomy damage control procedures, methods of surgical repair of the duodenal injury, associated injuries, length of intensive care and hospital stays, complications, and mortality. Results: A total of 75 consecutive patients with gunshot injuries to the duodenum were reviewed. Primary repair was performed in 54 patients (87%), resection and reanastomosis in 7 (11%), and pancreatoduodenectomy in 1 (2%) during the initial phases. The overall morbidity and mortality were 58% and 28%, respectively. Duodenum-related complications were recorded in nine (15%) patients: two duodenal fistulas, one duodenal obstruction, and six cases of suture-line dehiscence. Overall and duodenum-related morbidity rates in patients with combined pancreatoduodenal injuries were 83% and 17%, respectively. Duodenum-related mortality occurred in three (4.8%) patients. Conclusions: Most civilian low-velocity duodenal gunshot injuries treated with simple primary repair result in overall morbidity, mortality, and duodenum-related complication rates comparable to those in reports where more complex surgical procedures were employed. Primary repair is also applicable for most combined pancreatic and duodenal gunshot injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Introduction: Trauma in pregnancy is the leading cause of non-obstetrical maternal death and remains a major cause of fetal demise. The objective of this study was to examine the outcomes of pregnant patients sustaining abdominal injury. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all pregnant trauma patients admitted to two level 1 trauma centers from February 1, 1996 to December 31, 2008. Patient data abstracted included mechanism of injury, physiologic parameters on admission, Injury Severity Score (ISS), abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), gestational age, diagnostic and surgical procedures performed, complications, and maternal and fetal mortality. Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were used. Results: During the 155-month study period, 321 pregnant patients were included, of which 291 (91%) sustained a blunt injury, while 30 (9%) were victims of penetrating trauma. Of the penetrating injuries, 22 (73%) were gunshot wounds, 7 (23%) stab wounds, and 1 (4%) shotgun injury. The overall maternal and fetal mortality was 3% (n =9) and 16% (n =45), respectively. Mean age was 22±6 year-old, and the mean ISS was 12±16. The overall mean abdominal AIS was 2±1.2. When adjusted for age, abdominal AIS, ISS, and diastolic blood pressure, the penetrating trauma group experienced higher maternal mortality [7% vs. 2% (adjusted OR: 7; 95% CI: 0.65–79), p =0.090], significantly higher fetal mortality [73% vs. 10% (adjusted OR: 34; 95% CI: 11–124), p <0.0001] and maternal morbidity [66% vs. 10% (adjusted OR: 25; 95% CI: 9–79) p <0.0001]. Conclusions: Fetal mortality and overall maternal morbidity remains exceedingly high, at 73% and 66%, respectively, following penetrating abdominal injury. Penetrating injury mechanism, severity of abdominal injury and maternal hypotension on admission were independently associated with an increased risk for fetal demise following traumatic insult during pregnancy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The study purpose was to determine the incidence of mechanical complications (MC) associated with central venous catheterization (CVC) and to evaluate their impact on outcomes. This was a retrospective review of trauma morbidity and mortality records at a Level I trauma center (1999 to 2009). Demographics and outcomes were extracted for all trauma patients with CVC. Patients developing MC were compared with those who did not. Four thousand eight hundred eighteen lines were placed in 2935 patients. Of these, 1.5 per cent (n = 73) had MC. A total of 64.4 per cent (n = 47) were pneumothoraces followed by arterial cannulation at 8.2 per cent (n = 6) and thrombosis at 6.8 per cent (n = 5). The rate of MC by access site was: subclavian 1.8 per cent (n 5 52), internal jugular 1.2 per cent (n = 10), and femoral 0.3 per cent (n = 3) (P value for trend = 0.001). Change in management was required in 31.5 per cent (n = 23). Number of lines (P≤0.001), Injury Severity Score (P< 0.001), body mass index less than 20 kg/m² (P = 0.036), and chest Abbreviated Injury Score greater than 3 (P=0.034)were significant predictors of MC. Patients with MC had a longer intensive care unit length of stay (18.8 ± 25.7 vs 11.4 6 13.3; adjusted odds ratio, 5.75; 95% confidence interval, 2.24-9.25; P 5 0.001). Incidence of MC was 1.5 per cent. Complications were clinically significant in 31.5 per cent and resulted in longer intensive care unit stays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]