Search

Background: Montana is a rural state with limited access to higher-level trauma care; it also has higher injury fatality rates compared with the rest of the country., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to utilize Geographic Information System methodology to assess proximity to trauma care and identify the demographic characteristics of regions without trauma access., Methods: Maptitude® Geographic Information System software (Caliper Corporation, Newton, MA) was used to identify regions in Montana within 60 min of trauma care; this included access to a Level II or Level III trauma center with general surgery capabilities and access to any level of trauma care. Demographic characteristics are reported to identify population groups lacking access to trauma care., Results: Of the 1.1 million residents of Montana, 63% of residents live within 60 driving min of a higher-level trauma center, and 83% of residents live within 60 driving min of any level of trauma center. Elderly residents over age 65 years of age and American Indians had reduced access to both higher-level trauma care and any level trauma care., Conclusions: Prompt access to trauma care is significantly lower in Montana than in other parts of the country, with dramatic disparities for American Indians. In a rural state, it is important to ensure that all hospitals are equipped to provide some level of trauma care to reduce these disparities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Antiplatelet medication use continues to rise in an aging population, and these agents can have a deleterious effect for patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH). The purpose of the current investigation is to assess the safety and efficacy of using platelet reactivity testing (PRT) to direct platelet transfusion for tICH patients., Patients and Methods: A Level I trauma center adopted a targeted platelet transfusion guideline using PRT to determine whether platelets were inhibited by an antiplatelet medication (aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors). Non-inhibited patients were monitored without platelet transfusion, regardless of severity of the head injury. The guideline was analyzed retrospectively to evaluate patient outcomes during the study period (June 2014-December 2016). All patients sustained blunt tICH and received a PRT for known or suspected antiplatelet medication use. Differences were assessed with Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's Exact tests., Results: 166 patients met study inclusion criteria. PRT results indicated that 48 patients (29%) were not inhibited by an antiplatelet medication, and 92% of those patients (n = 44) were spared platelet transfusion. Seven percent (n = 11) of all patients had a clinically significant progression of the head bleed, but this did not differ by inhibition or transfusion status. Implementation of this guideline reduced platelet transfusions by an estimated 30-50% and associated healthcare costs by 42%., Conclusions: A targeted platelet transfusion guideline using PRT reduced platelet usage for patients with tICH. If appropriately tested, results suggest that not all tICH patients taking or suspected of taking antiplatelet drugs need platelet transfusion. Platelet reactivity testing can significantly reduce healthcare costs and resource usage., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Rural trauma education emphasizes that radiologic imaging should be discouraged if it delays transfer to definitive care. With increased capacity for image sharing, however, radiography obtained at referring hospitals (RH) could help providers at trauma centers (TC) prepare for patients with traumatic brain injury. We evaluated whether a head CT prior to transfer accelerated time to neurosurgical intervention at the TC. The study was conducted at a combined adult Level I and pediatric Level II TC with a catchment area that includes rural hospitals within a 150 mile radius. The trauma registry was used to identify patients with traumatic brain injury who went to surgery for a neurosurgical procedure immediately after arrival at the TC. All patients were transferred in from a RH. Differences between groups were assessed using analysis of variance and chi-square. Fifty-six patients met study criteria during the study period (2010-2015). The majority (86%) of patients received head CT imaging at the RH, including a significant percentage of patients (18%) who presented with GCS ≤8. There was no statistically significant decrease in time to surgery when patients received imaging at the RH. CT imaging was associated with a delay in transfer that exceeded 90 minutes. Findings demonstrate that imaging at the RH delayed transfer to definitive care and did not improve time to neurosurgical intervention at the TC. Transfer to the TC should not be obstructed by imaging, especially for patients with severe TBI.

Background: Injured older adults often receive delayed care in the emergency department (ED) because they do not meet criteria for trauma team activation (TTA). This is particularly dangerous for the increasing number of patients taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet (AC/AP) medication at the time of injury., Objectives: The present study examined improvements in processes of care and triage accuracy when TTA criteria include an escalated response for older anticoagulated patients., Methods: A retrospective study was performed at a Level I trauma center. The study population (referred to as A55) included patients aged 55 years or older who were taking an AC/AP medication at the time of injury. Study periods included 11 months prior to the criteria change (Phase 1: July 2013-May 2014; n = 107) and 11 months after the change (Phase 2: July 2014-May 2015; n = 211). Differences were assessed with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-squared tests., Results: More A55 patients received a full or limited TTA after criteria were revised (70% vs. 26%, p < 0.001). Undertriage was reduced from 13% to 2% (p < 0.001). The trauma center significantly decreased time to first laboratory result, time to first computed tomography scan, and total time in ED prior to admission for A55 patients arriving from the scene of injury or by private vehicle., Conclusion: Criteria that escalated the trauma response for A55 patients led to reductions in undertriage for anticoagulated older adults, as well as more timely mobilization of important clinical resources., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prior research has documented the inadequacy of pain management for trauma patients in the emergency department (ED), with rates of pain assessment and opioid administration averaging about 50%. Such rates, however, may be misleading and do not adequately capture the complexity of pain management practices in a trauma population. The goal of the study was to determine if pain was undertreated at the study hospital or if patient acuity explained the timing and occurrence of pain treatment in the prehospital setting and the ED., Methods: A retrospective study was performed at a Level 1 adult trauma centre in the Midwest. The trauma registry was used to identify patients who received a trauma activation during the study period (June-November 2012; N=313). Using the first set of patient vitals and ISS, patients were grouped into three categories: physiologically stable with low injury severity (n=132); physiologically stable with moderate to severe injury (n=122); and physiologically unstable with severe injury (n=56). Differences were assessed with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests., Results: Patients who were physiologically unstable were the least likely to receive a standardised pain assessment and the least likely to receive an opioid in the ED. Patients who were physiologically stable at entry to the ED but sustained a severe injury were the most likely to receive an opioid. Time to first pain assessment and time to first opioid did not differ by patient acuity., Conclusions: Results confirm that patient acuity greatly affects the ability to effectively and appropriately manage pain in the initial hours after injury. This study contributes to the literature by noting areas for improvement but also in explaining why delaying pain treatment may be appropriate in certain patient populations., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)