Search

Background: Safer cars, decreased violence, and nonoperative management have changed the trauma patient's nature. We evaluated changes in a Level I trauma center over 15 years and considered their effect on trauma surgeons., Methods: From January 1985 through August 1999, 16,799 trauma registry patients were analyzed for mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, and procedures., Results: Mean Injury Severity Score decreased from 15.9 to 10.7 and length of stay fell from 8.0 days to 5.9 days. There were significant decreases in penetrating trauma admissions and percentage of patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale score > 3 for head, chest, and abdomen. Frequency of craniotomy, thoracotomy, and laparotomy dropped dramatically., Conclusion: Significant decreases in injury severity, penetrating violence, and operations have occurred over 15 years. These changes will have profound effects on the practice of trauma surgeons and on surgical education.

We studied 1164 injured Hispanic and 2560 injured non-Hispanic White children newborn through 14 years triaged to the San Diego County Regionalized Trauma System from 1985 through 1990. Incidence rates did not differ by ethnic group. Hispanic children were more likely to be struck as pedestrians (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5) and less likely to be injured in falls (OR = 0.7) than non-Hispanic White children. For motor vehicle and pedal cycle injuries, Hispanic children were more likely not to have been restrained by seatbelts (OR = 4.0) or car seats (OR = 3.7).

Complications in trauma care occur because of provider-related or patient disease-related events. Strictly defined standardized definitions of both types of complications are needed to develop strategies for problem resolution. The frequency and characteristics of 135 disease-related and provider-related complications were examined for a 3-year period in a level I university trauma service in all patients meeting Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) criteria. Provider-related complications were analyzed for recurrent process errors to be targeted for corrective action. Complication events occurred in 2764 of 3327 patients, with provider-related complications in 759. Twenty-three percent (175) of complications were judged unjustified and 16 patterns of recurrent process-of-care errors were identified. Delay in trauma team activation was caused by insensitivity of field triage protocols and inadequate recognition of injury patterns. Delays in diagnosis or surgery were caused by inadequate performance of standard work-up, inadequate recognition of injury severity by providers, diagnostic procedure interpretation errors, and errors in prioritizing the order of diagnostic procedures. Errors in technique were attributed to inexperience, haste, unfamiliarity with devices, lack of developed institutional techniques, and failure of providers to use recognized endpoints. Errors in judgment were attributed to failure to access available patient information, proceeding despite available information, and failure to utilize available care guidelines. Further reduction in provider-related morbidity in an organized trauma system requires this type of analysis, which identifies the need to change the process of care through education or adjustment of protocols for standardization care delivery in addition to the traditional focus on outcomes.

As the number of preventable trauma-related deaths plateaus as a result of trauma system development, new directions for quality improvement in trauma care must come from analyzing morbidity with standardized methods to establish thresholds for provider-related and disease-specific complications. To establish such thresholds and determine priorities for improvements in quality all trauma patients who died, who were admitted to the ICU or OR, who were hospitalized for more than 3 days, or who were interfacility transfers to an academic trauma service, were concurrently evaluated for 1 year. All complication events were defined, reviewed, tabulated, and classified using 135 categories of complications. These categories were subdivided into provider-specific and disease-specific complications. Provider-related complications were classified as justified or unjustified to allow identification of events with a potential for improvement. A total of 1108 patients were admitted (mean ISS, 17); there were 97 deaths. Three potentially preventable deaths were identified, 857 complication events were identified, and 285 provider-related complications were responsible for errors with potential for improvement in 59 events (21%). Disease-specific morbidity was primarily related to infection; pneumonia accounted for 36% of all infectious complications and systemic infection for only 8.6% of infectious complications. Organ failure and other major systemic complications occurred in 2%-8% of patients. This type of analysis forms the basis on which to determine thresholds of provider-specific and disease-specific morbidity in a trauma hospital and serves as a guide to direct efforts toward continuous quality improvement.

The purpose of auditing trauma care is to maintain quality assurance and to guide quality improvement. This study was conducted to identify the incidence, type, and setting of errors leading to morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Determinations of the Medical Audit Committee of San Diego County were reviewed and classified by the authors for identification of preventable errors leading to morbidity or mortality. Errors were classified by type and categorized by phase of care. Errors were identified in the cases of 4% of all patients admitted for trauma care over a 4-year period. Of all trauma patient deaths, 5.9% were considered preventable or potentially preventable. The most common single error across all phases of care was failure to appropriately evaluate the abdomen. Although errors in the resuscitative and operative phases were more common, critical care errors had the greatest impact on preventable death. The detected error rate of 4% may represent the baseline error rate in a trauma system. While regionalized trauma care has dramatically reduced the incidence of preventable death after injury, efforts to further reduce preventable morbidity and mortality may be guided by an identification of common errors in a trauma system and their relationship to outcome.

The regionalization of trauma care has led to a decrease in preventable death after injury. This decrease has been attributed to earlier resuscitation and surgical intervention. Little emphasis, however, has focused on the critical care phase of trauma patient management. This study was undertaken to determine the significance of critical care errors (CCEs) on preventable mortality and morbidity in a regionalized system of trauma care. The records of 12,910 trauma patients admitted to six trauma centers over a three-year period were reviewed. The cause and preventability of death was determined by a panel of trauma experts. Critical care errors occurred in 151 (23%) of all patients with errors occurring during any phase of care. The CCEs were identified in 38 of 125 (30%) deaths of patients with errors in some phase of care. The CCEs were implicated as the cause of death in 30 (48%) of the 62 preventable deaths. The proportion of preventable deaths attributable to CCEs was higher than the proportion of preventable death attributable to errors in the resuscitative and operative phases of care (p less than 0.001, chi-square). These data indicate that CCEs significantly contribute to preventable mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. It is imperative that physicians caring for trauma patients possess expertise in the critical care management of injured patients.

We examined the impact of a trauma system on the survival of patients with a Trauma Score of 8 or less. We compared the observed survival with that predicted using a method that calculates the probability of survival (Ps) based on age, physiologic score, and anatomic severity of injury. Of 3394 patients triaged to trauma centers in a 12-month period, 283 (8.3%) had a Trauma Score of 8 or less. Sufficient data were available in 189 patients with blunt trauma to make the survival comparison. The Ps was 18%; the observed survival was 29%. Of 60 patients with penetrating trauma and complete data, the Ps was 8%; the observed survival was 20%. We attribute the improved survival to the integration of prehospital and hospital care and expeditious surgery.

We reviewed the hospital records and autopsy data of all deaths occurring at a Level I Trauma Center during a 1-year interval to determine the epidemiology of traumatic death in a regionalized system of care: 1,581 patients were admitted and 106 died (6.6%). Nonsurvivors (NS) differed significantly from survivors (S) in age, Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, and probability of survival, but there was no difference between NS and S in scene time or transport time. Of the NS 91.4% died within 7 days; only 8.6% died after 7 days. Central nervous system (CNS) injury was responsible for 48.1% of deaths, followed by hemorrhage (36.8%) and cardiovascular disease (5.7%). Sepsis was responsible for 5.5% of deaths. Secondary brain injury was found at autopsy in 66% of patients dying of CNS injury. The relatively small number of septic deaths may be due, in part, to improvements in treatment associated with regionalization of trauma care. The frequency of secondary brain injury, despite rapid transport and evacuation of mass lesions, suggests that it may play a major role in the pathophysiology of CNS death occurring in a trauma system.

BackgroundIdentifying risk factors for the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is important for understanding and ultimately preventing the disorder. This study assessed pain shortly after traumatic injury (i.e. peritraumatic pain) as a risk factor for PTSD.MethodParticipants (n=115) were patients admitted to a Level 1 Surgical Trauma Center. Admission to this service reflected a severe physical injury requiring specialized, emergent trauma care. Participants completed a pain questionnaire within 48?h of traumatic injury and a PTSD diagnostic module 4 and 8 months later.ResultsPeritraumatic pain was associated with an increased risk of PTSD, even after controlling for a number of other significant risk factors other than acute stress disorder symptoms. An increase of 0.5 s.d. from the mean in a 0?10 pain rating scale 24?48?h after injury was associated with an increased odds of PTSD at 4 months by more than fivefold, and at 8 months by almost sevenfold. A single item regarding amount of pain at the time of hospital admission correctly classified 65% of participants.ConclusionsIf these findings are replicated in other samples, high levels of peritraumatic pain could be used to identify individuals at elevated risk for PTSD following traumatic injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]