Search

Abstract: Since 1991, more than 50% of pediatric transplant recipients have received a living donor (LD) kidney, and ≈ 85% of these allografts were one‐haploidentical parental kidneys. Short‐term (1 yr) and long‐term (5 yr) graft survival of LD kidneys are 10% and 15% better, respectively, than that of cadaver donor (CD) kidneys. Because of these results, children are frequently not placed on a cadaver waiting list until the possibility of a LD is excluded – a process that may take up to 1 yr. The hypothesis for this study was that the graft outcome of a six‐antigen‐matched CD kidney is superior to that of a one‐haploidentical LD kidney, and that children are at a disadvantage by not being placed on a CD list whilst waiting for a LD. The database of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) for 11 yrs (1987–98), was reviewed to identify children who were recipients of a six‐antigen‐matched CD kidney (primary and repeat transplants), and those who were recipients of a one‐haploidentical LD kidney (primary and repeat transplants). Using standard statistical methods, the morbidity, rejection episodes, post‐transplant hospitalizations, renal function, long‐ and short‐term graft survival, and half‐life of primary recipients were compared in the two groups. Unlike adult patients, only 2.7% (87/3313) of CD recipients in the pediatric age range received a six‐antigen‐matched kidney, and the annual accrual rate over 11 yrs was never higher than 4%. Comparison of 57 primary six‐antigen‐CD kidneys (PCD) with 2472 primary LD (PLD) kidneys revealed that morbidity, rejection rates, and ratios were identical in the two groups. Renal function and subsequent hospitalizations were also identical in the two groups. Five‐year graft survival of the PCD group was 90% compared with 80% for the PLD group, and the half‐life of the PCD group was 25 ± 12.9 yrs compared with 19.6 ± 1.3 yrs. Our data suggest that the six‐antigen‐matched CD kidney may have less graft loss as a result of chronic rejection and would therefore confer a better long‐term outcome. Based on these findings we recommend that all children, whilst waiting for a LD work‐up, be listed with the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry for a CD kidney. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We define delayed graft function (DGF) as the need for dialysis during the first post‐transplant week. We analyzed 5272 transplants, of which 2486 were of living donor (LD) and 2786 were of cadaver donor (CD) origin. Twelve per cent (620/5272) of all patients developed DGF. Donor specific rates were 5.6% for LD and 19.1% for CD patients. Factors predictive of DGF in CD patients were: African‐American race (25%), prolonged cold ischemia (24%), absence of T‐cell induction antibody therapy and absence of HLA‐DR matching. The relative risk (RR) for graft failure due to DGF was 6.02 (p < 0.001) in LD patients and 2.58 (p < 0.001) for CD recipients. Two‐year graft survival (GS) in LD patients without DGF was 89.6%, compared to 41.6% for those with DGF (p < 0.001); in CD patients it was 80.2% and 49.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Censoring for primary non‐function, GS for LD patients with a functioning graft at 30 d post‐transplant and no DGF was 91.5%, compared to 70.1% for those with DGF (p < 0.001); GS for CD patients was 83.8% and 68.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). However, when patients whose grafts had failed during the first year were censored no differences in GS were noted between patients with and without DGF for either LD or CD recipients. To determine whether DGF acts as an independent risk factor for graft failure, patients were segregated into four groups: rejection with DGF; rejection without DGF; DGF without rejection; and no DGF, no rejection. When these groups were compared DGF emerged as an independent risk factor for graft failure. This large study reviewing pediatric renal transplantation over 10 yr clearly delineates the role of DGF as a major risk factor for graft failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) data registry has now compiled data for 11 years, and includes data on 6038 renal transplants in 5516 patients. With the availability of new data and immunosuppressive medications, trends in their usage continue to change. NAPRTCS data have previously demonstrated that increased doses of cyclosporin A (CsA) are associated with improved allograft outcomes, and there has been a steady increase in the dose of CsA given post‐transplantation. Transplants that occurred in 1987, 1989, 1991, and 1993 received a mean one‐year post‐transplant dose of 6.5, 7.0, 7.7, and 8.2 mg/kg/d, respectively. In the 1995 cohort, the dose decreased to 7.4 mg/kg/d. Since the introduction of Neoral®, its use has steadily increased. Of the 1997 cohort, 81% report Neoral® as the formulation of CsA used. The dose of CsA given, however, has not changed. At day 30 post‐transplant, the dose was 7.0 mg/kg/d for Sandimmune and 7.4 mg/kg/d for Neoral®. Finally, the outcome in black transplant patients is inferior to that of nonblack. Evaluation of CsA blood levels revealed that at 1 year post‐transplant, black patients consistently have CsA levels higher than nonblacks, and a lower percentage of black patients have a CsA level < 100 ng/mL. The percentage of patients using triple therapy (prednisone, azathioprine, and CsA) remained stable from 1987 to 1993 at 80–85%. However, in 1996 only 30% of patients were receiving triple therapy. This is probably due to the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Comparing the 1996–97 cohorts, there has been no significant change in the percentage of patients receiving prednisone (96.2% vs. 95.4%) or CsA (83.1% vs. 79.6%). However, during this time, the use of azathioprine has decreased from 50.0% to 35.8%, the use of tacrolimus has increased from 2.5% to 10.8%, and the use of... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 1995 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study summarizes data voluntarily collected from 123 centers on 5,197 children and adolescents grouped into three cohorts: (1) patients who received renal transplants on or after 1 January 1987 (n = 3,066), (2) patients who were maintained on peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD) on or after 1 January 1992 (n = 1,488), and (3) patients treated for chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) on or after 1 January 1994 (n = 643). The transplant and dialysis information update previous registry data whereas the CRI information reflects l st-year registry data. Three-year graft survival rates were 83% and 66% for living donor grafts and cadaver donor (CD) grafts, respectively. Triple drug maintenance therapy with prednisone, cyclosporine, and azathioprine was used by >70% of all transplant recipients through 5 years of follow-up. The 2-year CD survival has steadily improved from 65% in 1987 to 82% in 1992. Fifty malignancies have been reported, the majority of which are lymphoproliferative disorders. The 2-year patient survival posttransplantation is 95%. Mortality rates for the youngest patients have drastically improved over the past 2 years. Approximately two-thirds of patients in the dialysis cohort are maintained on PD; automated PD remains the preferred modality. Overall, the peritonitis rate is one infection every 13.3 patient months, the frequency of infection being greatest in the youngest patients. Whereas the primary reason for dialysis modality termination is transplantation, approximately 40% of the entire dialysis cohort (PD and HD) were not considered active transplant candidates. Baseline CRI data revealed the most common primary diagnoses to be obstructive uropathy (24%) and aplastic/hypoplastic/dysplastic kidneys (19%). The standardized height deficit in the CRI cohort was greatest in the youngest patients and those with the most impaired renal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Editorial. Comments on an article on chronic rejection in pediatric renal transplantation in the May 2000 issue of 'Pediatric Transplantation.' Identification of the risk factors for chronic rejection; Review of cyclosporin A-treated children; Graft survival rate from living donor and cadaver donor source transplants.