Search

To date, plasma cell (PC)–targeted therapies have been limited by suboptimal PC depletion and antibody rebound. We hypothesized this is partly because of PC residence in protective bone marrow (BM) microenvironments. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to examine the effects of the CXCR4 antagonist, plerixafor, on PC BM residence; its safety profile (alone and in combination with a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib); and the transcriptional effect on BMPCs in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Participants were enrolled into 3 groups: group A (n = 4), plerixafor monotherapy; and groups B (n = 4) and C (n = 4), plerixafor and bortezomib combinations. CD34(+) stem cell and PC levels increased in the blood after plerixafor treatment. PC recovery from BM aspirates varied depending on the dose of plerixafor and bortezomib. Single-cell RNA sequencing on BMPCs from 3 group C participants pretreatment and posttreatment revealed multiple populations of PCs, with a post-treatment enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation, proteasome assembly, cytoplasmic translation, and autophagy-related genes. Murine studies demonstrated dually inhibiting the proteasome and autophagy resulted in greater BMPC death than did monotherapies. In conclusion, this pilot study revealed anticipated effects of combined plerixafor and bortezomib on BMPCs, an acceptable safety profile, and suggests the potential for autophagy inhibitors in desensitization regimens.

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage organ disease. Over the past 70 years, tremendous progress has been made in solid organ transplantation, particularly in T-cell-targeted immunosuppression and organ allocation systems. However, humoral alloimmune responses remain a major challenge to progress. Patients with preexisting antibodies to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are at significant disadvantages in regard to receiving a well-matched organ, moreover, those who develop anti-HLA antibodies after transplantation face a significant foreshortening of renal allograft survival. Historical therapies to desensitize patients prior to transplantation or to treat posttransplant AMR have had limited effectiveness, likely because they do not significantly reduce antibody levels, as plasma cells, the source of antibody production, remain largely unaffected. Herein, we will discuss the significance of plasma cells in transplantation, aspects of their biology as potential therapeutic targets, clinical challenges in developing strategies to target plasma cells in transplantation, and lastly, novel approaches that have potential to advance the field.

Plasma cells (PCs) are the major source of pathogenic allo- and autoantibodies and have historically demonstrated resistance to therapeutic targeting. However, significant recent clinical progress has been made with the use of second-generation proteasome inhibitors (PIs). PIs provide efficient elimination of plasmablast-mediated humoral responses; however, long-lived bone marrow (BM) resident PCs (LLPCs) demonstrate therapeutic resistance, particularly to first-generation PIs. In addition, durability of antibody (Ab) reduction still requires improvement. More recent clinical trials have focused on conditions mediated by LLPCs and have included mechanistic studies of LLPCs from PI-treated patients. A recent clinical trial of carfilzomib (a second-generation irreversible PI) demonstrated improved efficacy in eliminating BM PCs and reducing anti-HLA Abs in chronically HLA-sensitized patients; however, Ab rebound was observed over several weeks to months following PI therapy. Importantly, recent murine studies have provided substantial insights into PC biology, thereby further enhancing our understanding of PC populations. It is now clear that BMPC populations, where LLPCs are thought to primarily reside, are heterogeneous and have distinct gene expression, metabolic, and survival signatures that enable identification and characterization of PC subsets. This review highlights recent advances in PC biology and clinical trials in transplant populations.

BACKGROUND: Renal allograft rejection is more frequent under belatacept-based, compared to tacrolimus-based, immunosuppression. We studied kidney transplant recipients experiencing rejection under belatacept-based early corticosteroid withdrawal following T cell depleting induction in a recent randomized trial (BEST Trial, clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01729494) to determine mechanisms of rejection and treatment. METHODS: Peripheral mononuclear cells, serum creatinine levels, and renal biopsies were collected from 8 patients undergoing belatacept-refractory rejection. We used flow cytometry, histology and immunofluorescence to characterize CD8(+) effector memory T cell (T(EM)) populations in the periphery and graft before and after mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition. RESULTS: Here, we found that patients with belatacept-refractory rejection (BRR) did not respond to standard antirejection therapy and had a substantial increase in alloreactive CD8(+) T cells with a CD28(low)/DR(hi)/CD38(hi)/CD45RO(+) T(EM). These cells had increased activation of the mTOR pathway, as assessed by phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 (p-RPS6) expression. Notably, everolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) treatment of patients with BRR halted the in vivo proliferation of T(EM) cells, their ex vivo alloreactivity, and resulted in their significant reduction in the peripheral blood. The frequency of circulating FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells was not altered. Importantly, everolimus led to rapid resolution of rejection as confirmed by histology. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, while prior work has shown that concomitant belatacept + mTOR inhibitor therapy is effective for maintenance immunosuppression, our preliminary data suggest that everolimus may provide an available means for effecting “rescue” therapy for rejections occurring under belatacept that are refractory to traditional antirejection therapy with corticosteroids and polyclonal antilymphocyte globulin.

This report describes the results of 2 international randomized trials (total of 508 kidney transplant recipients). The primary objective was to assess the noninferiority of rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin (rATG, Thymoglobulin®) versus interleukin‐2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) for the quadruple endpoint (treatment failure defined as biopsy‐proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow‐up) to serve as the pivotal data for United States (US) regulatory approval of rATG. The pooled analysis provided an incidence of treatment failure of 25.1% in the rATG and 36.0% in the IL2RA treatment groups, an absolute difference of −10.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] −18.8% to −2.9%) supporting noninferiority (noninferiority margin was 10%) and superiority of rATG to IL2RA. In a meta‐analysis of 7 trials comparing rATG with an IL2RA, the difference in the proportion of patients with BPAR at 12 months was −4.8% (95% CI −8.6% to −0.9%) in favor of rATG. In conclusion, a rigorous reanalysis of patient‐level data from 2 prior randomized, controlled trials comparing rATG versus IL‐2R monoclonal antibodies provided support for regulatory approval for rATG for induction therapy in renal transplant, making it the first T cell–depleting therapy approved for the prophylaxis of acute rejection in patients receiving a kidney transplant in the United States., A rigorous reanalysis of patient‐level data from two prior randomized, controlled trials comparing rATG versus IL‐2R monoclonal antibodies provides support for regulatory approval of rATG for induction therapy in renal transplantation, making it the first T cell–depleting therapy approved for the prophylaxis of acute rejection in patients receiving a kidney transplant in the US.

Rising expenditures threaten healthcare sustainability. While transplant programs are typically considered profitable, transplant medications are expensive and frequently targeted for cost savings. This review aims to summarize available literature supporting cost-containment strategies used in solid organ transplant. Despite widespread use of these tactics, we found the available evidence to be fairly low quality. Strategies mainly focus on induction, particularly rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG), given its significant cost and the lack of consensus surrounding dosing. While there is higher-quality evidence for high single-dose rATG, and dose-rounding protocols to reduce waste are likely low risk, more aggressive strategies, such as dosing rATG by CD3+ target-attainment or on ideal-body-weight, have less robust support and did not always attain similar efficacy outcomes. Extrapolation of induction dosing strategies to rejection treatment is not supported by any currently available literature. Cost-saving strategies for supportive therapies, such as IVIG and rituximab also have minimal literature support. Deferral of high-cost agents to the outpatient arena is associated with minimal risk and increases reimbursement, although may increase complexity and cost-burden for patients and infusion centers. The available evidence highlights the need for evaluation of unique patient-specific clinical scenarios and optimization of therapies, rather than simple blanket application of cost-saving initiatives in the transplant population.

Background Single-center trials and retrospective case series have reported promising outcomes using kidneys from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, multicenter trials are needed to determine if those findings are generalizable. Methods We conducted a prospective trial at seven centers to transplant 30 kidneys from deceased donors with HCV viremia into HCV-uninfected recipients, followed by 8 weeks of once-daily coformulated glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, targeted to start 3 days posttransplant. Key outcomes included sustained virologic response (undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after completing treatment with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir), adverse events, and allograft function. Results We screened 76 patients and enrolled 63 patients, of whom 30 underwent kidney transplantation from an HCV-viremic deceased donor (median kidney donor profile index, 53%) in May 2019 through October 2019. The median time between consent and transplantation of a kidney from an HCV-viremic donor was 6.3 weeks. All 30 recipients achieved a sustained virologic response. One recipient died of complications of sepsis 4 months after achieving a sustained virologic response. No severe adverse events in any patient were deemed likely related to HCV infection or treatment with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir. Three recipients developed acute cellular rejection, which was borderline in one case. Three recipients developed polyomavirus (BK) viremia near or >10,000 copies/ml that resolved after reduction of immunosuppression. All recipients had good allograft function, with a median creatinine of 1.2 mg/dl and median eGFR of 57 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at 6 months. Conclusions Our multicenter trial demonstrated safety and efficacy of transplantation of 30 HCV-viremic kidneys into HCV-negative recipients, followed by early initiation of an 8-week regimen of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir.

Introduction The cellular events that contribute to generation of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) post-kidney transplantation (KTx) are not well understood. Characterization of such mechanisms could allow tailoring of immunosuppression to benefit sensitized patients. Methods We prospectively monitored circulating T follicular helper (cTFH) cells in KTx recipients who received T-cell depleting (thymoglobulin, n = 54) or T-cell nondepleting (basiliximab, n = 20) induction therapy from pre-KTx to 1 year post-KTx and assessed their phenotypic changes due to induction and DSA occurrence, in addition to healthy controls (n = 13), for a total of 307 blood samples. Results Before KTx, patients displayed comparable levels of resting, central memory cTFH cells with similar polarization to those of healthy controls. Unlike basiliximab induction, thymoglobulin induction significantly depleted cTFH cells, triggered lymphopenia-induced proliferation that skewed cTFH cells toward increased Th1 polarization, effector memory, and elevated programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)int/hi expression, resembling activated phenotypes. Regardless of induction, patients who developed DSA post-KTx, harbored pre-KTx donor-reactive memory interleukin (IL)-21+ cTFH cells and showed higher % cTFH and lower % of T regulatory (TREG) cells post-KTx resulting in elevated cTFH:TREG ratio at DSA occurrence. Conclusion Induction therapy distinctly shapes cTFH cell phenotype post-KTx. Monitoring cTFH cells before and after KTx may help detect those patients prone to DSA generation post-KTx., Graphical abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held a public meeting and scientific workshop in September 2016 to obtain perspectives from solid organ transplant recipients, family caregivers, and other patient representatives. The morning sessions focused on the impact of organ transplantation on patients' daily lives and the spectrum of activities undertaken to maintain grafts. Participants described the physical, emotional, and social impacts of their transplant on daily life. They also discussed their posttransplant treatment regimens, including the most burdensome side effects and their hopes for future treatment. The afternoon scientific session consisted of presentations on prevalence and risk factors for medication nonadherence after transplantation in adults and children, and interventions to manage it. As new modalities of Immunosuppressive Drug Therapy are being developed, the patient perceptions and input must play larger roles if organ transplantation is to be truly successful.

Currently trials of immunosuppression in transplantation are in decline because their objectives remain focused on improving acute rejection rates and graft survival in the first 12 months. With 1 year renal graft survival rates of greater than 90% the best that can be hoped for is noninferiority trial outcomes compared with current standard of care. Current trial design is not leading to novel therapies improving long-term outcomes and safety, and hence important unmet clinical needs in transplantation remain unanswered. Issues that need to be addressed include but are not limited to: prevention of subclinical rejection in the first year, better 5- and 10-year graft outcomes, more effective treatment for high immunological risk and sensitized (including donor-specific antibody) patients, immunosuppressive combinations that are better tolerated by patients with fewer side effects and less morbidity and mortality. In September 2015, the Transplantation Society convened a group of transplant clinical trial experts to address these problems. The aims were to substantially realign the priorities of clinical trials for renal transplant immunosuppression with the current unmet needs and to propose new designs for clinical trials for transplant immunosuppression. Moving forward, the transplant community needs to provide trial data that will identify superior treatment options for patient subgroups and allow new agents to be evaluated for efficacy and safety and achieve timely regulatory approval. Trial designs for new transplant immunosuppression must be intelligently restructured to ensure that short- and long-term clinical outcomes continue to improve.

Reduction in donor-specific antibody (DSA) has been associated with improved renal allograft survival after antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). These observations have not been separately analyzed for early and late AMR and mixed acute rejection (MAR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term responses to proteasome inhibitor-based therapy for 4 rejection phenotypes and to determine factors that predict allograft survival.Retrospective cohort study evaluating renal transplant recipients with first AMR episodes treated with proteasome inhibitor-based therapy from January 2005 to July 2015.A total of 108 patients were included in the analysis. Immunodominant DSA reduction at 14 days differed significantly (early AMR 79.6%, early MAR 54.7%, late AMR 23.4%, late MAR 21.1%, P0.001). Death-censored graft survival (DCGS) differed at 3 years postrejection (early AMR 88.3% versus early MAR 77.8% versus late AMR 56.7% versus late MAR 54.9%, P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that immunodominant DSA reduction50% at 14 days was associated with improved DCGS (odds ratio, 0.12, 95% CI, 0.02-0.52, P = 0.01).In summary, significant differences exist across rejection phenotypes with respect to histological and DSA responses. The data suggest that DSA reduction may be associated with improved DCGS in both early and late AMR.

Simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance (CNIA) and early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW) have not been achieved primarily due to excessive acute rejection. This trial compared 2 belatacept-based CNIA/ESW regimens with a tacrolimus-based ESW regimen. Kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive alemtuzumab/belatacept, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG)/belatacept, or rATG/tacrolimus. The combinatorial primary endpoint consisted of patient death, renal allograft loss, or a Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-calculated eGFR of

Rationale & Objective Less than 4% of patients with kidney failure receive kidney transplants. Although discard rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic kidneys are declining, ~39% of HCV-viremic kidneys donated between 2018 and 2019 were discarded. Highly effective antiviral agents are now available to treat chronic HCV infection. Thus, our objective was to examine the cost-effectiveness of transplanting kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-uninfected recipients. Study Design Markov state transition decision model. Data sources include Medline search results, bibliographies from relevant English language articles, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, and the US Renal Data System. Setting & Population US patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who are on kidney transplant waiting lists. Intervention(s) Transplantation with an HCV-unexposed kidney versus transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney and HCV treatment. Outcomes Effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life-years and costs measured in 2018 US dollars. Model, Perspective, and Timeframe We used a health care system perspective with a lifelong time horizon. Results In the base-case analysis, transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney was more effective and less costly than transplantation with an HCV-unexposed kidney because of the longer waiting times for HCV-unexposed kidneys, the substantial excess mortality risk while receiving dialysis, and the high efficacy of direct-acting antiviral agents for HCV infection. Transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney was also preferred in sensitivity analyses of multiple model parameters. The strategy remained cost-effective unless waiting list time for an HCV-viremic kidney exceeded 3.1 years compared with the base-case value of 1.56 year. Limitations Estimates of waiting times for patients willing to accept an HCV-viremic kidney were based on data for patients who received HCV-viremic kidney transplants. Conclusions Transplanting kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-uninfected recipients increased quality-adjusted life expectancy and reduced costs compared with a strategy of transplanting kidneys from HCV-unexposed donors.

Proteasome inhibitor-based strategies hold promise in transplant but have yielded varying results. Carfilzomib, a second-generation proteasome inhibitor, may possess advantages over bortezomib, the first-generation proteasome inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, toxicity, and preliminary efficacy of carfilzomib in highly HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Renal transplant candidates received escalating doses of carfilzomib followed by plasmapheresis (group A) or an identical regimen with additional plasmapheresis once weekly before carfilzomib dosing. Thirteen participants received carfilzomib, which was well tolerated with most adverse events classified as low grade. The safety profile was similar to bortezomib desensitization; however, neurotoxicity was not observed with carfilzomib. Toxicity resulted in permanent dose reduction in 1 participant but caused no withdrawals or deaths. HLA antibodies were substantially reduced with carfilzomib alone, and median maximal immunodominant antibody reduction was 72.8% (69.8% for group A, P = .031, 80.1% for group B, P = .938). After depletion, rebound occurred rapidly and antibody levels returned to baseline between days 81 and 141. Bone marrow studies revealed that approximately 69.2% of plasma cells were depleted after carfilzomib monotherapy. Carfilzomib monotherapy-based desensitization provides an acceptable safety and toxicity profile while leading to significant bone marrow plasma cell depletion and anti-HLA antibody reduction.

Cannabidiol (CBD), a major purified nonpsychoactive component of cannabis with anticonvulsant properties, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2018 as an adjuvant treatment for refractory epilepsy (Epidiolex; GW Pharmaceuticals). CBD is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and CYP2C19 with a growing body of evidence suggesting it is also a potent inhibitor of these pathways. We report for the first time a significant drug-drug interaction between the purified CBD product and tacrolimus. A participant in a CBD clinical trial for epilepsy who was also receiving tacrolimus showed an approximately 3-fold increase in dose-normalized tacrolimus concentrations while receiving 2000-2900 mg/day of CBD. Our report delineates an important concern for the transplant community with the increasing legalization of cannabis and advent of an FDA-approved CBD product. Larger studies are needed to better understand the impact of this drug-drug interaction in solid organ transplant recipients.

Introduction. While use of (hepatitis C virus) HCV-viremic kidneys may result in net benefit for the average end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient awaiting transplantation, patients may have different values for ESKD-related health states. Thus, the best decision for any individual may be different depending on the balance of these factors. Our objective was to explore the feasibility of sampling health utilities from hemodialysis patients in order to perform patient-specific decision analyses considering various transplantation strategies. Study Design. We assessed utilities on a convenience sample of hemodialysis patients for health states including hemodialysis, and transplantation with either an HCV-uninfected kidney or an HCV-viremic kidney. We performed patient-specific decision analyses using each patient’s age, race, gender, dialysis vintage, and utilities. We used a Markov state transition model considering strategies of continuing hemodialysis, transplantation with an HCV-unexposed kidney, and transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney and HCV treatment. We interviewed 63 ESKD patients from four dialysis centers (Dialysis Clinic Inc., DCI) in the Cincinnati metropolitan area. Results. Utilities for ESKD-related health states varied widely from patient to patient. Mean values were highest for -transplantation with an HCV-uninfected kidney (0.89, SD: 0.18), and were 0.825 (SD: 0.231) and 0.755 (SD: 0.282), respectively, for hemodialysis and transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney. Patient-specific decision analyses indicated 37 (59%) of the 63 ESKD patients in the cohort would have a net gain in quality-adjusted life years from transplantation of an HCV-viremic kidney, while 26 would have a net loss. Conclusions. It is feasible to gather dialysis patients’ health state utilities and perform personalized decision analyses. This approach could be used in the future to guide shared decision-making discussions about transplantation strategies for ESKD patients.

Importance The complications of corticosteroids make the inclusion of these drugs in immunosuppressive protocols for kidney transplant patients undesirable. However, cessation of corticosteroids is associated with a higher risk of short-term rejection, and the long-term outcomes of patients withdrawn from corticosteroids remain uncertain. Objective To compare long-term kidney transplant outcomes of patients randomized to continue or withdraw corticosteroids. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted between November 1999 and December 2002 with linkage to a mandatory national registry with validated outcome ascertainment until June 8, 2018. The study included 28 kidney transplant centers in the United States, including 386 low– to moderate–immune risk adult recipients of a living or deceased donor kidney transplant without delayed graft function or short-term rejection in the first week after transplant. Analyses were intention to treat. Analysis began September 2018 and ended June 2019. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with or without corticosteroids 7 days after transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures Kidney allograft failure from any cause including death and allograft failure censored for patient death defined by the requirement for long-term dialysis or repeat transplant. Results Of 385 patients, 191 were assigned to withdraw from corticosteroids (mean [SD] age, 46.5 [12.1] years), and 194 patients were assigned to continued corticosteroids (mean [SD] age, 46.3 [12.6] years). The median (interquartile range) follow-up time was 15.8 (12.0-16.3) years after transplant. The adjusted hazard ratios of allograft failure from any cause including death was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.62-1.10;P = .19) and for allograft failure censored for patient death was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.52-1.19;P = .25) and did not differ between the patients assigned to withdraw from corticosteroids vs assigned to continued corticosteroids. Results were consistent in a per-protocol analysis among 223 patients who continued the trial-assigned treatment of corticosteroid withdrawal (n = 114) or corticosteroids (n = 109) through at least 5 years after transplant. The outcomes of trial participants in either treatment group did not differ from similarly treated contemporary registry patients who met trial eligibility criteria and were treated with the same immunosuppressive drugs. Conclusions and Relevance Long-term corticosteroids may not be necessary as part of a calcineurin-based multiple drug immunosuppressive regimen in low– to moderate–immune risk kidney transplant recipients.

Background Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and occurs due to genetic or acquired abnormalities that result in the dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. Case Report We report a case of post-living kidney transplantation de novo aHUS in a setting of heterozygous deletion in the complement factor H-related protein (CFHR)3-CFHR1 gene. The aHUS episode was possibly triggered by antibody-mediated rejection or tacrolimus. The patient responded well to eculizumab and substituting belatacept for tacrolimus. Her serum creatinine level was stable at 1.5 mg/dL after 2.5 years of follow-up. Conclusion This case highlights the success of using a strategy that combines eculizumab and belatacept, as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors, in treating aHUS in a patient with heterozygous deletion in the CFHR3-CFHR1 gene.

Context: Obesity has been reported as risk factor for reduced posttransplant graft and patient survival and increased delayed graft function (DGF). Objective: The purpose of this work is to analyze the effect of body mass index (BMI) on defined transplant outcomes in patients transplanted under defined guidelines in a kidney transplant program. Design: Review of a prospectively collected database in renal transplant recipients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and early corticosteroid withdrawal between 2001 and 2011. Setting: This review was conducted in a single abdominal transplant program in the United States. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was death-censored graft survival categorized by posttransplant body mass groups. Secondary outcomes included DGF as well as patient survival. Results: Four hundred sixty seven patients were identified. No difference was observed in graft survival or DGF between BMI groups. One-year, death-censored graft survival and patient survival rates ranged from 97.5% to 100% and 96.6% to 100%, respectively. Delayed graft function was uncommon across all BMI groups, ranging from 5.3% to 9.1%, with the lowest incidence in patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates at 1 year were similar across all groups (10.1%-14%) as were estimated glomerular filtration rates were at 1, 3, and 5 years. Conclusion: Our results do not show an effect of BMI on posttransplant outcomes, suggesting that relaxation of BMI criteria may be warranted for recipient selection.

The development of new immunosuppressive drugs has slowed markedly over the past several years, and the outlook that improved therapy will be available to the next generation of transplant recipients is bleak. In this viewpoint, the authors outline some of important barriers to new drug development and suggest specific steps that the transplant community can take to overcome them.

Administration of targeted immunosuppression, in the form of genetically engineered antibodies, is commonplace in solid organ transplantation. Polyclonal antibodies, such as rabbit antithymocyte globulin, offer global immunosuppression by targeting several cell surface antigens on B and T lymphocytes. However, secondary to their broad therapeutic targets, they are associated with infection, infusion-related reactions, inter-batch variability, and posttransplant malignancies. Nevertheless, polyclonal antibodies are still commonly administered for induction and treatment of allograft rejection and offer an important role in current solid organ transplantation, which is beyond the scope of this chapter.

Hepatitis C (HCV) disease transmission from the use of HCV antibody-positive and HCV nucleic acid test-negative (HCV Ab+/NAT-) kidneys have been anecdotally reported to be absent. We prospectively analyzed kidney transplant (KT) outcomes from HCV Ab+/NAT- donors to HCV naive recipients under T-cell depleting early steroid withdrawal immunosuppression. Allografts from 40 HCV Ab+/NAT- donors were transplanted to 52 HCV Ab- recipients between July 2016 and February 2018. Thirty-three (82.5%) of donors met Public Health Service (PHS) increased risk criteria. De novo HCV infection was detected at 3 months post-KT in one recipient (1.9%). This was a case of transmission from a HCV Ab+ NAT+ donor with an initial false-negative NAT completed using sample collected on donor hospital admission (day 2). At the time of HCV diagnosis, a stored donor sample collected during procurement (day 4) was tested and resulted NAT-positive. Subsequently, sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved with 12 weeks of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. One death with functioning graft at 261 days post-KT was determined not related to HCV or donor factors. This experience provides evidence of a low transmission rate of HCV from HCV Ab+/ NAT- kidney donors, thereby arguing for increasing utilization.

The purpose of this study was to determine the intrapatient (within the same patient) variability of tacrolimus in adherent patients. Daily tacrolimus trough levels were obtained at home using dried blood spot technology in kidney and liver transplant recipients. Patients were randomized to receive 3 formulations of tacrolimus, each for two 1-week periods. Adherence was monitored by patient diary, pill counts, and use of the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS). Variability was quantified as the coefficient of variation (CV). Comparison of CV between groups was by independent t test or one-way ANOVA as appropriate. The population was found to be adherent with a rate of 99.9% with a mean interval between the evening and morning dose of tacrolimus of 11.86 hours. The median CV for the entire population was 15.2% (range 4.8%-110%). There were no differences in CV by allograft type or tacrolimus formulation. The multivariate analysis did not identify any demographic characteristics associated with a CV > 30%. In a highly adherent population, tacrolimus did not display high intrapatient variability. Given the association between IPV and poor allograft outcomes, future studies are needed to quantitate the influence of adherence and establish target IPV goals.

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) have a deleterious effect on allografts and remain a major immunologic barrier in transplantation. Current therapies to eliminate DSAs are ineffective in highly HLA-sensitized patients. Proteasome inhibitors have been employed as a strategy to target bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs), the source of long-term antibody production; however, their efficacy has been limited by poorly defined drug-resistance mechanisms. Here, we performed transcriptomic profiling of CD138+ BMPCs that survived in vivo desensitization therapy with the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib to identify mechanisms of drug resistance. The results revealed a genomic signature that included increased expression of the immunoproteasome, a highly specialized proteasomal variant. Western blotting and functional studies demonstrated that catalytically active immunoproteasomes and the immunoproteasome activator PA28 were upregulated in carfilzomib-resistant BMPCs. Carfilzomib-resistant BMPCs displayed reduced sensitivity to the proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib, bortezomib, and ixazomib, but enhanced sensitivity to an immunoproteasome-specific inhibitor ONX-0914. Finally, in vitro carfilzomib treatment of BMPCs from HLA-sensitized patients increased levels of the immunoproteasome β5i (PSMB8) catalytic subunit suggesting that carfilzomib therapy directly induces an adaptive immunoproteasome response. Taken together, our results indicate that carfilzomib induces structural changes in proteasomes and immunoproteasome formation.

Background Classification of acute rejection (AR) based on etiology and timing may provide a means for enhancing therapeutic results and allograft survival. This study evaluated graft and patient survival after the first AR episodes among kidney transplant recipients with an early or late antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), acute cellular rejection (ACR) or mixed AR (MAR). Methods A prospective institutional review board-approved database was queried to identify biopsy-proven first AR episodes occurring from January 2005 to October 2012. The ACR was defined by Banff criteria; borderline AR was excluded. The AMR was defined as 3 of 4 criteria: renal dysfunction, donor specific antibody, C4d positivity on biopsy, and histological changes. The MAR met criteria for both ACR and AMR. Early AR occurred within six months post-transplant. AR episodes were then assigned to 1 of the 6 categories--early AMR, early ACR, early MAR, late AMR, late ACR, and late MAR. Results One hundred eighty-two kidney transplant recipients identified with a first AR episode. Mean follow-up was 773 days (± 715 days). No difference was observed in patient survival. Death-censored graft survival was 84%. Death-censored graft loss was higher with late versus early AMR (P = 0.01) and late versus early ACR (P = 0.03), but not late versus early MAR (P = 0.3). Conclusions The AR type demonstrated a hierarchy for graft survival with ACR better than MAR better than AMR, which persisted for both early and late AR. Improvement in long-term results of AR may require development of specific treatment for individual AR types.

Background Highly sensitized patients, who produce antibodies against multiple anti-human leukocyte antigens, have significantly reduced chances for renal transplantation. Traditionally, desensitization protocols to reduce the levels of antibodies have relied on the use of intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis. Results Here we report the case of a patient with a calculated panel-reactive antibody level of 100% who was desensitized using multiple courses of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, in an intravenous immunoglobulin-free regimen. The patient underwent a successful transplantation with an allograft from a living donor and has continued to do well post-transplantation. Conclusions The expression of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies decreases the likelihood of transplantation for patients by restricting the available donor pool. New protocols that reduce antibody expression in these patients and allow for renal transplantation are needed. Bortezomib, as used in the patient reported here, represents a promising new medication for successful desensitization and transplantation.

Background Post-transplantation recurrence of primary focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is estimated to occur in 30%–50% of cases and doubles the risk of allograft failure. Treatment of recurrent FSGS is challenging because specific pathogenic targets are unknown and available therapeutic options have limited efficacy. Case Report We report a case of recurrent FSGS with nephrotic-range proteinuria (urine protein creatinine ratio [UPCR], >50) and debilitating edema that was resistant to rituximab and plasmapheresis. The patient had a remarkable response to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) gel and achieved complete remission (UPCR, 0.5; serum albumin, 4.1 g/dL; serum creatinine, 1.0 mg/dL) which was maintained over 10 months on this treatment. Conclusions We conclude that ACTH gel is a potential therapeutic option for post-transplantation recurrence of FSGS and warrants further evaluation.

A prospective iterative trial of proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based therapy for reducing HLA antibody (Ab) levels was conducted in five phases differing in bortezomib dosing density and plasmapheresis timing. Phases included 1 or 2 bortezomib cycles (1.3 mg/m(2) × 6-8 doses), one rituximab dose and plasmapheresis. HLA Abs were measured by solid phase and flow cytometry (FCM) assays. Immunodominant Ab (iAb) was defined as highest HLA Ab level. Forty-four patients received 52 desensitization courses (7 patients enrolled in multiple phases): Phase 1 (n = 20), Phase 2 (n = 12), Phase 3 (n = 10), Phase 4 (n = 5), Phase 5 (n = 5). iAb reductions were observed in 38 of 44 (86%) patients and persisted up to 10 months. In Phase 1, a 51.5% iAb reduction was observed at 28 days with bortezomib alone. iAb reductions increased with higher bortezomib dosing densities and included class I, II, and public antigens (HLA DRβ3, HLA DRβ4 and HLA DRβ5). FCM median channel shifts decreased in 11/11 (100%) patients by a mean of 103 ± 54 mean channel shifts (log scale). Nineteen out of 44 patients (43.2%) were transplanted with low acute rejection rates (18.8%) and de novo DSA formation (12.5%). In conclusion, PI-based desensitization consistently and durably reduces HLA Ab levels providing an alternative to intravenous immune globulin-based desensitization.

Background Although the generic drug approval process has a long-term successful track record, concerns remain for approval of narrow therapeutic index generic immunosuppressants, such as tacrolimus, in transplant recipients. Several professional transplant societies and publications have generated skepticism of the generic approval process. Three major areas of concern are that the pharmacokinetic properties of generic products and the innovator (that is, “brand”) product in healthy volunteers may not reflect those in transplant recipients, bioequivalence between generic and innovator may not ensure bioequivalence between generics, and high-risk patients may have specific bioequivalence concerns. Such concerns have been fueled by anecdotal observations and retrospective and uncontrolled published studies, while well-designed, controlled prospective studies testing the validity of the regulatory bioequivalence testing approach for narrow therapeutic index immunosuppressants in transplant recipients have been lacking. Thus, the present study prospectively assesses bioequivalence between innovator tacrolimus and 2 generics in individuals with a kidney or liver transplant. Methods and findings From December 2013 through October 2014, a prospective, replicate dosing, partially blinded, randomized, 3-treatment, 6-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted at the University of Cincinnati in individuals with a kidney (n = 35) or liver transplant (n = 36). Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDA) data that included manufacturing and healthy individual pharmacokinetic data for all generics were evaluated to select the 2 most disparate generics from innovator, and these were named Generic Hi and Generic Lo. During the 8-week study period, pharmacokinetic studies assessed the bioequivalence of Generic Hi and Generic Lo with the Innovator tacrolimus and with each other. Bioequivalence of the major tacrolimus metabolite was also assessed. All products fell within the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) average bioequivalence (ABE) acceptance criteria of a 90% confidence interval contained within the confidence limits of 80.00% and 125.00%. Within-subject variability was similar for the area under the curve (AUC) (range 12.11–15.81) and the concentration maximum (Cmax) (range 17.96–24.72) for all products. The within-subject variability was utilized to calculate the scaled average bioequivalence (SCABE) 90% confidence interval. The calculated SCABE 90% confidence interval was 84.65%–118.13% and 80.00%–125.00% for AUC and Cmax, respectively. The more stringent SCABE acceptance criteria were met for all product comparisons for AUC and Cmax in both individuals with a kidney transplant and those with a liver transplant. European Medicines Agency (EMA) acceptance criteria for narrow therapeutic index drugs were also met, with the only exception being in the case of Brand versus Generic Lo, in which the upper limits of the 90% confidence intervals were 111.30% (kidney) and 112.12% (liver). These were only slightly above the upper EMA acceptance criteria limit for an AUC of 111.11%. SCABE criteria were also met for the major tacrolimus metabolite 13-O-desmethyl tacrolimus for AUC, but it failed the EMA criterion. No acute rejections, no differences in renal function in all individuals, and no differences in liver function were observed in individuals with a liver transplant using the Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) test for multiple comparisons. Fifty-two percent and 65% of all individuals with a kidney or liver transplant, respectively, reported an adverse event. The Exact McNemar test for paired categorical data with adjustments for multiple comparisons was used to compare adverse event rates among the products. No statistically significant differences among any pairs of products were found for any adverse event code or for adverse events overall. Limitations of this study include that the observations were made under strictly controlled conditions that did not allow for the impact of nonadherence or feeding on the possible pharmacokinetic differences. Generic Hi and Lo were selected based upon bioequivalence data in healthy volunteers because no pharmacokinetic data in recipients were available for all products. The safety data should be interpreted in light of the small number of participants and the short observation periods. Lastly, only the 1 mg tacrolimus strength was utilized in this study. Conclusions Using an innovative, controlled bioequivalence study design, we observed equivalence between tacrolimus innovator and 2 generic products as well as between 2 generic products in individuals after kidney or liver transplantation following current FDA bioequivalence metrics. These results support the position that bioequivalence for the narrow therapeutic index drug tacrolimus translates from healthy volunteers to individuals receiving a kidney or liver transplant and provides evidence that generic products that are bioequivalent with the innovator product are also bioequivalent to each other. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01889758., In a randomized 3-treatment crossover clinical trial, Rita Alloway of the University of Cincinnati and colleagues establish bioequivalence between 3 versions of the drug tracolimus (a brand name and 2 disparate generics) in kidney and liver transplant recipients., Author summary Why was this study done? Consensus documents developed by professional transplantation societies worldwide have cautioned the use of generic immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus in individuals with a solid organ transplant. Reasons have included repeated switching between innovator (that is, “brand” products) and generics and among different generics, especially when not controlled by physicians. There was uncertainty in the transplant community as to whether tacrolimus generics that are bioequivalent to the innovator are also bioequivalent to each other. For market approval, generic drug products of the narrow therapeutic index drug tacrolimus had to be studied only in healthy individuals and not in the much more complex organ transplant population. What did the researchers do and find? We performed a randomized, prospective, 3-treatment, 6-period, crossover, replicate dose study in individuals with a kidney or liver transplant. Thirty-five individuals with a kidney transplant and 36 individuals with a liver transplant receiving tacrolimus were studied to compare the tacrolimus time concentration profiles of 3 different products in their blood: namely, Innovator (Prograf), Generic Hi (Sandoz), and Generic Lo (Dr. Reddy) 1.0 mg tacrolimus capsules. Generic products were selected based upon pharmacokinetic data from healthy volunteer studies since bioequivalence data were not available in individuals with an organ transplant. We observed bioequivalence based on average bioequivalence and scaled average bioequivalence criteria in individuals after kidney or liver transplant between tacrolimus innovator and the 2 generics on the US market as well as between the 2 generics. What do these findings mean? Similar tacrolimus exposure is expected in individuals with a kidney or liver transplant when receiving Prograf, Sandoz generic, or Dr. Reddy’s generic tacrolimus.

Morbid obesity is a barrier to kidney transplantation due to inferior outcomes, including higher rates of new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), delayed graft function (DGF), and graft failure. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) increases transplant eligibility by reducing BMI in kidney transplant candidates, but the effect of surgical weight loss on posttransplantation outcomes is unknown. Reviewing single-center medical records, we identified all patients who underwent LSG before kidney transplantation from 2011-2016 (n = 20). Post-LSG kidney recipients were compared with similar-BMI recipients who did not undergo LSG, using 2:1 direct matching for patient factors. McNemar's test and signed-rank test were used to compare groups. Among post-LSG patients, mean BMI ± standard deviation (SD) was 41.5 ± 4.4 kg/m2 at initial encounter, which decreased to 32.3 ± 2.9 kg/m2 prior to transplantation (P

LCP-Tacro is an extended-release formulation of tacrolimus designed for once-daily dosing. Studies in renal transplantation demonstrate greater bioavailability with similar safety and efficacy vs. twice-daily tacrolimus capsules. In this phase 2 study, adult stable liver transplant patients on tacrolimus capsules (Prograf) twice-daily were converted to tacrolimus tablets (LCP-Tacro) once-daily; patients continued on LCP-Tacro once-daily for days 8-21; target trough levels were 5-15 ng/mL; 24-hour pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments were done on days 7 (baseline pre-switch), 14, and 21. A 6 month extension study phase evaluated PK and safety following a total of 52 weeks of LCP-Tacro. Fifty-seven patients completed LCP-Tacro dosing in the core study; 43 completed the extension phase. The mean conversion ratio was 0.71 (Prograf:LCP-Tacro). PK data demonstrated consistent exposure (AUC) at the lower conversion dose. Cmax , Cmax /Cmin ratio, percent fluctuation and swing were significantly (P

More than half of the kidney transplant candidates awaiting transplantation are sensitized to human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). Desensitization to HLAs involves treatment with immunomodulating therapies designed to reduce levels of anti-HLA antibodies in order to make kidney transplantation possible. Over the last two decades, desensitization therapies have been limited to plasmapheresis (PP), immunoadsorption (IA), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), and rituximab. Review of reported experiences with desensitization in kidney transplant candidates revealed that PP or IA alone is inadequate to achieve durable reductions in HLA antibodies. Increasing evidence has accumulated indicating that high-dose IVIg has limited ability to reduce HLA antibodies, but a few centers have reported success with high-dose IVIg+rituximab in non-randomized trials. Overall experience in multiple centers, however, has shown high antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) rates, particularly in patients with the highest degrees of HLA sensitization. Low-dose IVIg combined with alternate day PP in living donor transplant candidates has been shown to provide enhanced survival over dialysis. However, low-dose IVIg/PP regimens also continue to be associated with unacceptable AMR rates. Recent experiences with plasma cell-targeted therapies based on the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib are relatively small but may represent an important alternative to non-deletional strategies with IVIg.

This report characterizes acute rejection and rejection outcomes in subjects randomized to continuous corticosteroid therapy (CCS) or early corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD; 7 days after transplantation) in the Astellas Blinded CSWD Trial.The Astellas Blinded CSWD Trial was a 5-year, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of early CCS withdrawal in 386 kidney transplant recipients (195 CCS and 191 CSWD). Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were required as well as either rabbit antithymocyte globulin or interleukin-2 receptor antibody induction. Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) was grade 1A or higher by Banff criteria. This report also provides borderline changes (BL) that did not meet Banff grade 1A included with BCAR (BCAR+BL).BCAR+BL was 25 (12.8%) in CCS group and 42 (22.0%) in CSWD group (P=0.022). Early BCAR+BL (first 90 days after transplantation) was less frequent in CCS (n=5 [2.6%]) than in CSWD (n=22 [11.5%]; P0.001). Among non-African-American subjects, early BCAR+BL occurred more often in CSWD (n=20 [12.7%]) versus CCS (n=2 [1.3%]; P0.001). Late acute rejection (2 years) occurred more often in African-American subjects in CCS (n=5 [13.9%]) than in CSWD (n=0; P=0.056). Risk factors were CSWD (hazard ratio [HR], 4.72; P0.002) and human leukocyte antigen mismatch (HR, 1.48; P0.005) for early BCAR+BL and CSWD (HR, 1.9; P0.02), human leukocyte antigen mismatch (HR, 1.2; P0.01), and age (HR, 0.97; P0.002) for 5-year rejection. The HR for graft loss associated with BCAR+BL was 8.8.BCAR+BL may occur more frequently during the early period after transplantation under an early CSWD regimen with tacrolimus plus induction compared with CCS, particularly among non-African-Americans.

This two‐sequence, three‐period crossover study is the first pharmacokinetic (PK) study to compare all three innovator formulations of tacrolimus (twice‐daily immediate‐release tacrolimus capsules [IR‐Tac]; once‐daily extended‐release tacrolimus capsules [ER‐Tac]; novel once‐daily tacrolimus tablets [LCPT]). Stable renal transplant patients were dosed with each drug for 7 days, and blood samples were obtained over 24 h. Thirty subjects were included in the PK analysis set. A conversion factor of 1:1:0.80 for IR‐Tac:ER‐Tac:LCPT was used; no dose adjustments were permitted during the study. The median (interquartile range) total daily dose was 6.0 (4.0–8.0) mg for IR‐Tac and ER‐Tac and 4.8 (3.3–6.3) for LCPT. Significantly higher exposure on a per milligram basis, lower intraday fluctuation and prolonged time (Tmax) to peak concentration (Cmax) were found for LCPT versus IR‐Tac or ER‐Tac. ER‐Tac showed no differences versus IR‐Tac in exposure, Cmax, Tmax or fluctuation. The observed exposure of IR‐Tac was used to normalize exposure for LCPT and ER‐Tac, resulting in the following recommended total daily dose conversion rates: IR‐Tac:ER‐Tac, +8%; IR‐Tac:LCPT, −30%; ER‐Tac:LCPT, −36%. After exposure normalization, Cmax was ~17% lower for LCPT than for IR‐Tac or ER‐Tac; Cmin was ~6% lower for LCPT compared with IR‐Tac and 3% higher compared with ER‐Tac., This study evaluates the pharmacokinetic profile of three tacrolimus formulations and shows significant differences, highlighting the higher per mg exposure and a lower peak and delayed peak of extended‐release tacrolimus tablets when compared to the two other capsule formulations.

Pharmacokinetic analyses comparing generic tacrolimus preparations versus the reference drug in kidney transplant patients are lacking. A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-period (14 days per period), two-sequence, crossover and steady-state pharmacokinetic study was undertaken to compare twice-daily generic tacrolimus (Sandoz) versus reference tacrolimus (Prograf®) in stable renal transplant patients. AUC(0-12h) and peak concentration (C(max) ) were calculated from 12 h pharmacokinetic profiles at the end of each period (days 14 and 28). Of 71 patients enrolled, 68 provided evaluable pharmacokinetic data. The ratios of geometric means were 1.02 (90% CI 97-108%, p = 0.486) for AUC(0-12h) and 1.09 (90% CI 101-118%, p = 0.057) for C(max) . Mean (SD) C(0) was 7.3(1.8) ng/mL for generic tacrolimus versus 7.0(2.1) ng/mL for reference tacrolimus based on data from days 14 and 28. Correlations between 12 h trough levels and AUC were r = 0.917 for generic tacrolimus and r = 0.887 for reference drug at day 28. These data indicate that generic tacrolimus (Sandoz) has a similar pharmacokinetic profile to the reference drug and is bioequivalent in kidney transplant recipients according to US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines.

The presence of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) in patients experiencing acute cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is associated with poor renal allograft survival in kidney transplant recipients. Traditional therapies for AMR provide variable results, and do not deplete the cellular source of antibody production, that is, the plasma cell.Physiologic effects of proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are reviewed in the context of recent clinical reports of PI therapy in solid organ transplantation for AMR and desensitization.PI-based therapy is a novel approach for treating AMR that is being employed with increasing frequency in transplantation. Initial reports of PI-based regimens for treating AMR have demonstrated the ability of bortezomib to significantly reduce DSA levels and improve histology and allograft function. Use of PI agents have recently been evaluated in a large multicenter collaborative consisting of over 100 solid organ transplant recipients treated with a common PI-based regimen. Increasing experience with PI-based regimens for AMR have indicated that PI therapy (similar to other AMR therapies) provides excellent results in early AMR, with late AMR demonstrating a greater degree of therapeutic resistance. A substantial number of strategies exist for enhancement of therapeutic results with PI therapy for AMR.

AMR is being recognized with increasing efficiency, but continues to present a significant threat to renal allograft survival. Traditional therapies for AMR (IVIG, plasmapheresis, rituximab, and antilymphocyte preparations) in general have provided inconsistent results and do not deplete the source of antibody production, viz., the mature plasma cell. Recently, the first plasma cell-targeted therapy in humans has been developed using bortezomib (a first in class PI) for AMR treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Initial experience with bortezomib involved treatment of refractory AMR. Subsequently, the efficacy of bortezomib in primary therapy for AMR was demonstrated. In a multicenter collaborative effort, the initial results with bortezomib in AMR have been confirmed and expanded to pediatric and adult heart transplant recipients. More recently, results from a prospective, staged desensitization trial has shown that bortezomib alone can substantially reduce anti-HLA antibody levels. These results demonstrate the significant potential of proteasome inhibition in addressing humoral barriers. However, the major advantage of proteasome inhibition lies in the numerous potential strategies for achieving synergy.

Purpose of review Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor that was originally Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. In the past few years, off-label use in solid organ transplant recipients has demonstrated its ability to provide plasma cell-targeted therapy in humans. The purpose of this review is to provide an update of recent basic science and clinical results with bortezomib in treating antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) that occurs in solid organ transplant recipients. Recent findings Proteasome inhibitor therapy for AMR in kidney transplant recipients is effective both as primary and as rescue therapy. Optimal responses with proteasome inhibitor therapy are obtained when AMR is diagnosed promptly and early in the posttransplant period. However, proteasome inhibitor therapy for late AMR (i.e., occurring 6 months or later posttransplant) provides less predictable results, likely due to the existence of a substantial bone marrow niche-resident long-lived plasma cell population. Proteasome inhibitor therapy has also recently been shown to provide effective therapy for AMR in heart, and also, transplant recipients. Summary Proteasome inhibitor therapy with bortezomib provides effective treatment for AMR in solid organ transplant recipients. As the first plasma cell-targeted therapy, proteasome inhibitor therapy provides the additional advantage of opening new possibilities for biologically defined plasma cell-targeted therapies.

Background. The efficacy of plasma cell targeted therapies for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has not been defined in detail. The purpose of this study was to compare early and late acute AMR in terms of immunologic characteristics and responses with proteasome inhibitor (PI) therapy. Methods. Renal transplant recipients with acute AMR were treated with PI-based regimens. Early acute AMR was defined as occurring within 6 months posttransplant. Immunodominant donor-specific antibody (iDSA) was defined as the DSA with the highest level. Results. Results are expressed as early or late acute AMR. Thirty AMR episodes (13 early, 17 late) were treated in 12 and 16 patients. Early but not late AMR was associated with presensitization. Late AMR iDSA levels were higher, and specificities were primarily class II (DQ being most frequent). Early AMR patients demonstrated greater reduction in iDSA at 7, 14, and 30 days and at the posttreatment nadir (81.5%+21.2% vs. 51.4%+27.6%; P

This study assessed the long-term effects of prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf(®) [Tacrolimus QD]), which has been developed to provide similar efficacy and safety to twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf(®) [Tacrolimus BID]) with the added benefit of once-daily dosing.

Gaber AO, Mulgaonkar S, Kahan BD, Woodle ES, Alloway R, Bajjoka I, Jensik S, Klintmalm GB, Patton PR, Wiseman A, Lipshutz G, Kupiec-Weglinski J, Gaber LW, Katz E, Irish W, Squiers EC, Hemmerich S. YSPSL (rPSGL-Ig) for improvement of early renal allograft function: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center Phase IIa study. Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 523–533. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Introduction: Recombinant P-selectin glycoprotein ligand IgG fusion protein, rPSGL-Ig (YSPSL), a fusion protein of human P-selectin ligand and IgG1-Fc, blocks leukocyte adhesion and protects against ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) in animal models. Patients and Methods: This randomized 15-center, double-blind, 59-patient Ph2a study assessed YSPSL’s safety in recipients of deceased-donor kidney allografts and its potential efficacy in improving early graft function. Two doses and two dosing modalities were evaluated. Results: No drug-specific toxicities or increased adverse event rates were noted. Two YSPSL-treated patients died of causes determined as unrelated to study drug. YSPSL did not reduce the incidence of dialysis within the first week post-transplant (41% in treated vs. 20% in placebo patients). Renal function endpoints scored at post-operative days 1 & 2 were also not impacted by YSPSL. However, at day 5, the fraction of patients with serum creatinine above 6 mg/dL was lower in the YSPSL vs. placebo group (26% vs. 55%, p = 0.043). Large variations in the dialysis-delayed graft function (DGF) rates were observed between centers, independently of treatment assignment, indicating subjectivity of this endpoint. Conclusion: In this first Ph2a study in kidney transplantation, YSPSL was safe but did not impact the dialysis-DGF rate. Further studies with more objective efficacy endpoints are required to define the impact of YSPSL on early renal allograft function.