Search

Gammopathies, multiple myeloma, and amyloidosis are plasma dyscrasias characterized by clonal proliferation and immunoglobulin overproduction. Renal impairment is the most common and serious complication with an incidence of 20–30% patients at the diagnosis. Kidney transplant has not been considered feasible in the presence of plasma dyscrasias because the immunosuppressive therapy may increase the risk of neoplasia progression, and paraproteins may affect the graft. However, recent advances in clinical management of multiple myeloma and other gammopathies allow considering kidney transplant as a possible alternative to dialysis. Numerous evidence indicates the direct relationship between hematological remission and renal function restoring. The combination of kidney and hematopoietic cell transplant has been reported as a promising approach to reestablish end-organ function and effectively treat the underlying disease. This review describes current protocols used to perform kidney transplantation in patients with plasma dyscrasias.

Introduction It is widely accepted that the risk of malignancies is significantly increased among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and after kidney transplantation compared with the general population. Only a few data are available on kidney transplantation waiting list patients. The aim of this study was to investigate solid organ cancer incidence among subjects on the waiting list at a single center. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients enrolled on our kidney transplantation waiting list between August 1, 2008 and July 31, 2010, seeking to evaluate the causes of withdrawal from the list, incidence of cancer, type of neoplasm, and its correlation with clinical features. We estimated the ratio of observed to expected numbers of cancers, the standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Results Among 1184 patients, we excluded 569 patients from the waiting list including 26 (4.56%) who displayed malignancies. The overall incidence of cancer was 0.11 events/person-months and the overall prevalence of cancer was 2.2%. In 97% of patients, the malignant disease was confined to the primitive organ of origin without secondary dissemination. We observed a prevalence of cancers related to ESKD (17; 65.38%). The SIR for all cancer types in our population compared with the general population was 2.22. The SIR for native kidney and thyroid cancers among our population compared with the general population was >10. Conclusion The incidence of cancer was significantly increased among kidney transplantation waiting list patients compared with the general population. Our study highlighted the importance of a careful, targeted neoplastic screening. It could be particularly important for ESKD-related malignancies like native kidney tumors or thyroid cancers.

Background: Short-term results of renal transplantation have shown a drastic improvement over time mainly due to changes in immunosuppressive therapy. Non-compliance to therapy is one of the causes of graft loss. Tacrolimus is a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy: recently became available Tacrolimus once a day formulation (Advagraf) that could improve the compliance of patients to immunosuppressive therapy. Few are published data about its use in clinical practice. We therefore compared the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of once-daily formulation compared to the classic twice-daily dosing tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant patients. Methods: Retrospectively evaluation of 30 de novo transplant recipients treated with Advagraf in 2009-2012 (on dose daily of 0.2-0.3 mg/kg) and 30 treated with Prograf (2 doses daily of 0.2 mg /kg). Comparison between the two groups regarding drugs dose, blood level and clinical variables. Result: Both Advagraf and Prograf patients reached the drug target level, even if initially with a higher drug dose for Advagraf. Creatinine levels were initially higher in Advagraf group, no differences are detectable two weeks after transplant. There were no differences between groups for rejection episodes, graft loss and adverse events. Lipid metabolism was significantly better in Advagraf patients. Discussion: Advagraf confirm to offer a similar short-term efficacy compared with the twice a day administration in de novo kidney transplant, with a higher drug dose compared to tacrolimus. The safety profile is comparable with twice-daily administration. Interestingly a better lipid metabolism is present in Advagraf group.

BACKGROUND The progressive deterioration of kidney allograft function leads in most cases to transplant failure. Polymorphisms in genes encoding for inflammatory and apoptosis molecules may be one possible explanation for interindividual differences in kidney transplant outcomes. The objective of our work was to identify the possible effect of interleukin 6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1), and Fas on graft function. MATERIAL AND METHODS A case-control study was carried out to assess potential associations between polymorphisms in inflammation- and apoptosis-related genes and the risk for chronic impairment of kidney graft function. The study included 376 cadaveric kidney recipients, 256 of them with stable graft function and 120 who experienced renal deterioration during the follow-up period of 2.6 ± 1.4 years. Genotyping of IL-6/G-174C, TGFB1/L10P, TGFB1/R25P, and Fas/G-670A polymorphisms was performed by PCR-RFLP and direct sequencing. RESULTS Considering the single IL-6, TGFB1, and Fas polymorphisms, we found similar allelic and genotype frequencies between the 2 groups. To test the hypothesis of mutual effects of polymorphisms, multiple logistic regression was performed incorporating data for all the possible dual genotypic associations. The association of IL-6 high producer and Fas low producer genotype resulted in a protective effect against graft dysfunction (OR=0.79; 95% C.I.=0.72-0.86). CONCLUSIONS This study did not find significant associations of apoptosis and inflammation gene polymorphisms with transplanted kidney function in Italian renal transplant recipients. However, our data seem to indicate that the carriage of IL-6 high producer/Fas low producer genotype has a protective effect against graft function loss.