Search

Objectives: To assess the safety profile of antegrade mitomycin gel instillation through a percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PCNT) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with the aim of decreasing morbidity associated with therapy. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing antegrade administration of mitomycin gel via PCNT were retrospectively included for analysis from four tertiary referral centres between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was safety profile, as graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). Post‐therapy disease burden was assessed by primary disease evaluation (PDE) via ureteroscopy. Results: Thirty‐two patients received at least one dose of mitomycin gel via PCNT for UTUC, 29 of whom completed induction and underwent PDE. Thirteen patients (41%) had residual tumour present prior to induction therapy. At a median of 15.0 months following first dose of induction therapy, ureteric stenosis occurred in three patients (9%), all of whom were treated without later recurrence or chronic stenosis. Other adverse events included fatigue (27%), flank pain (19%), urinary tract infection (12%), sepsis (8%) and haematuria (8%). No patients had impaired renal function during follow‐up and there were no treatment‐related deaths. Seventeen patients (59%) had no evidence of disease at PDE and have not experienced recurrence at a median follow‐up of 13.0 months post induction. Conclusions: Administration of mitomycin gel via a PCNT offers a low rate of ureteric stenosis, demonstrates a favourable safety profile, and is administered without general anaesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: UGN-101 (mitomycin for pyelocalyceal solution) is a recently approved chemoablative treatment for low-grade (LG) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). While approved for retrograde or antegrade administration, previous reports discuss only patients treated by retrograde approach. We report our techniques for antegrade administration along with early outcomes from our cohort of patients who have undergone UGN-101 administration via nephrostomy. Materials and Methods: UGN-101 is administered as 6 weekly instillations in patients who have undergone endoscopic ablation of LG UTUC. We outline our approach in patients thought to have LG UTUC from initial ureteroscopy to nephrostomy placement, UGN-101 administration and eventual nephrostomy removal. We discuss early durability of response along with adverse events with special attention to ureteral strictures. Results: Eight patients underwent antegrade UGN-101 administration during the study period, all of whom underwent followup ureteroscopy with complete response in 4 patients. Three patients reported 5 adverse eventsd3 grade 1, 1 grade 2 requiring 1 week delay of treatment and 1 asymptomatic ureteral stricture. Median followup was 7 months. Conclusions: We outline our approach for antegrade administration of UGN-101 and discuss early results along with adverse events. Future studies should evaluate our method's potential to increase patient comfort, improve logistics and decrease risk of adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Surgical management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma requires kidney and ureter removal, compromising renal function. Nonsurgical alternatives have potentially prohibitive safety concerns. We examined the feasibility and safety of ablation of the ureter and renal pelvis using endoluminal vascular targeted photodynamic therapy in a porcine model. We also report the efficacy of WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy in a murine model. Materials and Methods After receiving approval we performed a total of 28 endoluminal ablations in the ureters and renal pelvis of 18 swine. Intravenous infusion of WST11 (4 mg/kg) followed by 10-minute laser illumination was done via percutaneous access or a retrograde ureteroscopic approach. Animals were followed clinically with laboratory testing, imaging and histology, which were evaluated at several postablation time points. A murine xenograft was created with the 5637 human urothelial cell carcinoma line to determine sensitivity to this therapy. Results At 24 hours 50 mW/cm laser fluence produced superficial necrosis of the ureter. Deeper necrosis penetrating the muscularis propria or adventitia was produced by treatment with 200 mW/cm in the ureter and the renal pelvis. At 4 weeks superficial urothelium had regenerated over the treatment site. No symptomatic obstruction, clinically relevant hydronephrosis or abnormality of laboratory testing was noted up to 4 weeks. Of the mice 80% had no evidence of tumor 19 days after WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy. Conclusions Urothelial cell carcinoma appears to be sensitive to WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy. The depth of WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy treatment effects can be modulated in a dose dependent manner by titrating light intensity. Moreover, when applied to the porcine upper urinary tract, this treatment modality is feasible via antegrade and retrograde access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: UGN-101 is a novel delivery system for intracavitary treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). UGN-101 was approved based on a pivotal trial for small volume residual low-grade UTUC. Our aim was to report our experience with UGN-101 in a more heterogenous and real-world setting.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all UGN-101 cases from 15 institutions with a focus on practice patterns, efficacy, and adverse effects. We include UGN-101 utilization in both the chemoablative and adjuvant setting.Results: There were a total 136 renal units treated from 132 patients. The majority of cases were biopsy proven low-grade UTUC. Practice patterns varied considerably - the most common administration technique was antegrade instillation via a percutaneous nephrostomy. When utilized in the adjuvant setting, 69% of patients were disease free at the time of their first endoscopic evaluation, while in the chemoablative setting, 37% were endoscopically clear on the first evaluation (P < 0.001). Complete response was higher in patients with smaller tumor size prior to UGN-101 induction; low volume (<1 cm) residual disease was associated with a 70% complete response, similar to disease free rate at first endoscopic evaluation when UGN-101 was used in the adjuvant setting. The use of maintenance doses of UGN-101 was reported in 27% of cases. The overall incidence of new onset, clinically significant ureteral stenosis was 23%.Conclusions: This study represents the largest review of patients treated with UGN-101 and can serve as a basis of ongoing hypotheses regarding treatment with UGN-101 for UTUC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• UGN-101 has been approved for the use based on data showing efficacy in the chemo-ablation of small upper tract tumors of pyelocaliceal system – but there is no data on potential efficacy in the setting of ureteral tumors. • This study aims to explore this for the first time and review outcomes in 47 ureteral tumors treated with UGN-101. • The complete response rate in patients treated with chemo-ablative intent (n = 23) was 47.8%. UGN-101 has been approved for the chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) involving the renal pelvis and calyces. Herein is the first reported cohort of patients with ureteral tumors treated with UGN-101. We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with UGN-101 for UTUC at 15 high-volume academic and community centers focusing on outcomes of patients treated for ureteral disease. Patients received UGN-101 with either adjuvant or chemo-ablative intent. Response rates are reported for patients receiving chemo-ablative intent. Adverse outcomes were characterized with a focus on the rate of ureteral stenosis. In a cohort of 132 patients and 136 renal units, 47 cases had tumor involvement of the ureter, with 12 cases of ureteral tumor only (8.8%) and 35 cases of ureteral plus renal pelvic tumors (25.7%). Of the 23 patients with ureteral involvement who received UGN-101 induction with chemo-ablative intent, the complete response was 47.8%, which did not differ significantly from outcomes in patients without ureteral involvement. Fourteen patients (37.8%) with ureteral tumors had significant ureteral stenosis at first post-treatment evaluation, however, when excluding those with pre-existing hydronephrosis or ureteral stenosis, only 5.4% of patients developed new clinically significant stenosis. UGN-101 appears to be safe and may have similar efficacy in treating low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the ureter as compared to renal pelvic tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]