Search

The outcome of proficiency tests (PTs) is influenced, among others, by the evaluation procedure chosen by the PT provider. In particular for PTs on GMO testing a log-data transformation is often applied to fit skewed data distributions into a normal distribution. The study presented here has challenged this commonly applied approach. The 56 data populations from proficiency testing rounds organised since 2010 by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Genetically Modified Food and Feed (EURL GMFF) were used to investigate the assumption of a normal distribution of reported results within a PT. Statistical evaluation of the data distributions, composed of 3178 reported results, revealed that 41 of the 56 datasets showed indeed a normal distribution. For 10 datasets, the deviation from normality was not statistically significant at the raw or log scale, indicating that the normality assumption cannot be rejected. The normality of the five remaining datasets was statistically significant after log-data transformation. These datasets, however, appeared to be multimodal as a result of technical/experimental issues with the applied methods. On the basis of the real datasets analysed herein, it is concluded that the log transformation of reported data in proficiency testing rounds is often not necessary and should be cautiously applied. It is further shown that the log-data transformation, when applied to PT results, favours the positive performance scoring for overestimated results and strongly penalises underestimated results. The evaluation of the participants' performance without prior transformation of their results may highlight rather than hide relevant underlying analytical problems and is recommended as an outcome of this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dear Editor, The European Union Reference Laboratory for Genetically Modified Food and Feed (EURL GMFF) is organizing regularly, in line with its mandate under Regulation (EU) 2017/625, Proficiency Testing rounds (PTs) primarily for EU National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) appointed in the frame of official controls for the determination of GMOs in different food and feed commodities. Furthermore, the PCR amplification step itself is only part of the analytical procedure, which starts with sub-sampling, DNA extraction, total DNA quantification, and testing for the absence of PCR inhibitors in the extracted DNA. [Extracted from the article]

National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) in the Member States of the European Union (EU) monitor the implementation of the EU legislation on the presence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food and feed. The EU Reference Laboratory for GM Food and Feed (EURL GMFF) supports the harmonisation of measurement procedures and the improvement of the analytical performance of these laboratories, among others through the organisation of a proficiency testing (PT) scheme. The PT results reported over 10 years have been analysed using common criteria applied to the reported data. The outcome revealed a gradual decrease of the relative standard deviation within the sets of the reported data with time. The extent of the deviation of the results from the assigned value also diminished between 2010 and 2019. The average deviation from the assigned value was independent of the GM content in the later PT rounds but it was affected by the complexity of the test item matrix. Performance scores were calculated for all results reported by the 62 NRLs. The number of unsatisfactory performance scores obtained decreased with time. The trends observed indicate an improvement in the analytical performance and an increased harmonisation of GMO testing within the EU enforcement laboratories. • The reported results during 10 years of a proficiency testing scheme were evaluated. • Common performance parameters were applied to visualise performance trends. • The variability of the results around the assigned value decreased with time. • The performance of 62 National Reference Laboratories improved with time. • An increased harmonisation and accuracy of GMO testing was observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]