Search

Background: The majority of potentially preventable deaths in trauma are due to uncontrolled hemorrhage and occur early after injury. How major bleeding is defined is integral to early identification and treatment of this group of high-risk patients. However, there is no consensus on a definition of major bleeding in trauma. The aim of this Delphi study was to develop a consensus definition for research, with transfusion used as a surrogate marker of bleeding.Study Design and Methods: Trauma experts from three international groups were invited to take part in an online Delphi survey. Over the course of four rounds, the group developed a number of definitions of major bleeding and reached consensus on a new definition.Results: Forty-four trauma experts agreed to become members of the Delphi panel, and 30 of 44 (68%) completed all four rounds. The panel agreed to exclude the historical massive transfusion definition (≥10 units of red blood cells within 24 hours). Consensus was reached on a new definition for use in clinical research: 4 or more units of any blood component within 2 hours of injury.Conclusion: This Delphi process has yielded a pragmatic transfusion-based definition of major bleeding. The consensus definition differs from historical definitions: a shorter time frame to reflect the acuity of bleeding, and multiple blood components in keeping with a balanced approach to resuscitation. The definition developed may be best suited to mature trauma systems (reflecting the demographics of the expert panel), and could be used to guide registry data recording and to characterize patients at risk of major bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Trauma is a leading cause of death worldwide in persons under 44 years of age, and uncontrolled haemorrhage is the most common preventable cause of death in this patient group. The transfusion management of trauma haemorrhage is unrecognisable from 20 years ago. Changes in clinical practice have been driven primarily by an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of trauma‐induced coagulopathy (TIC), which is associated with poor clinical outcomes, including a 3‐ to 4‐fold increased risk of death. Targeting this coagulopathy alongside changes to surgical and anaesthetic practices (an overarching strategy known as damage control surgery/damage control resuscitation) has led to a significant reduction in mortality rates over the last two decades. This narrative review will discuss the transfusion practices that are currently used for trauma haemorrhage and the evidence that supports these practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Uncontrolled bleeding is the most common preventable cause of death for patients with severe injury. Coagulopathy inevitably accompanies severe bleeding, exacerbated by the ongoing blood loss and the treatments administered. There is debate about the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of early traumatic coagulopathy and uncertainty about whether injury induces a unique coagulopathy when compared to other forms of major haemorrhage. This review describes current understanding of the coagulopathy of major blood loss and focuses on the early coagulation changes that occur following severe injury. It then reports on the contemporary management of coagulopathic bleeding using new transfusion strategies. Finally this review presents some practical points to the delivery of transfusion for major blood loss in the modern hospital setting. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]