Search

How the dorsal-ventral axis of the vertebrate jaw, particularly the position of tooth initiation site, is established remains a critical and unresolved question. Tooth development starts with the formation of the dental lamina, a localized thickened strip within the maxillary and mandibular epithelium. To identify transcriptional regulatory networks (TRN) controlling the specification of dental lamina from the naïve mandibular epithelium, we utilized Laser Microdissection coupled low-input RNA-seq (LMD-RNA-seq) to profile gene expression of different domains of the mandibular epithelium along the dorsal-ventral axis. We comprehensively identified transcription factors (TFs) and signaling pathways that are differentially expressed along mandibular epithelial domains (including the dental lamina). Specifically, we found that the TFs Sox2 and Tfap2 (Tfap2a/Tfap2b) formed complimentary expression domains along the dorsal-ventral axis of the mandibular epithelium. Interestingly, both classic and novel dental lamina specific TFs-such as Pitx2, Ascl5 and Zfp536-were found to localize near the Sox2:Tfap2a/Tfap2b interface. To explore the functional significance of these domain specific TFs, we next examined loss-of-function mouse models of these domain specific TFs, including the dental lamina specific TF, Pitx2, and the ventral surface ectoderm specific TFs Tfap2a and Tfap2b. We found that disruption of domain specific TFs leads to an upregulation and expansion of the alternative domain's TRN. The importance of this cross-repression is evident by the ectopic expansion of Pitx2 and Sox2 positive dental lamina structure in Tfap2a/Tfap2b ectodermal double knockouts and the emergence of an ectopic tooth in the ventral surface ectoderm. Finally, we uncovered an unappreciated interface of mesenchymal SHH and WNT signaling pathways, at the site of tooth initiation, that were established by the epithelial domain specific TFs including Pitx2 and Tfap2a/Tfap2b. These results uncover a previously unknown molecular mechanism involving cross-repression of domain specific TFs including Pitx2 and Tfap2a/Tfap2b in patterning the dorsal-ventral axis of the mouse mandible, specifically the regulation of tooth initiation site., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Shao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Epithelial signaling centers control epithelial invagination and organ development, but how these centers are specified remains unclear. We report that Pitx2 (the first transcriptional marker for tooth development) controls the embryonic formation and patterning of epithelial signaling centers during incisor development. We demonstrate using Krt14 Cre / Pitx2 flox/flox ( Pitx2 cKO ) and Rosa26 CreERT /Pitx2 flox/flox mice that loss of Pitx2 delays epithelial invagination, and decreases progenitor cell proliferation and dental epithelium cell differentiation. Developmentally, Pitx2 regulates formation of the Sox2 + labial cervical loop (LaCL) stem cell niche in concert with two signaling centers: the initiation knot and enamel knot. The loss of Pitx2 disrupted the patterning of these two signaling centers, resulting in tooth arrest at E14.5. Mechanistically, Pitx2 transcriptional activity and DNA binding is inhibited by Sox2, and this interaction controls gene expression in specific Sox2 and Pitx2 co-expression progenitor cell domains. We demonstrate new transcriptional mechanisms regulating signaling centers by Pitx2 , Sox2 , Lef1 and Irx1 ., Competing Interests: Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing or financial interests., (© 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.)

The Iroquois genes (Irx) appear to regulate fundamental processes that lead to cell proliferation, differentiation, and maturation during development. In this report, the Iroquois homeobox 1 (Irx1) transcription factor was functionally disrupted using a LacZ insert and LacZ expression demonstrated stage-specific expression during embryogenesis. Irx1 is highly expressed in the brain, lung, digits, kidney, testis and developing teeth. Irx1 null mice are neonatal lethal and this lethality it due to pulmonary immaturity. Irx1 -/- mice show delayed lung maturation characterized by defective surfactant protein secretion and Irx1 marks a population of SP-C expressing alveolar type II cells. Irx1 is specifically expressed in the outer enamel epithelium (OEE), stellate reticulum (SR) and stratum intermedium (SI) layers of the developing tooth. Irx1 mediates dental epithelial cell differentiation in the lower incisors resulting in delayed growth of the lower incisors. Irx1 is specifically and temporally expressed during developmental stages and we have focused on lung and dental development in this report. Irx1+ cells are unique to the development of the incisor outer enamel epithelium, patterning of Lef-1+ and Sox2+ cells as well as a new marker for lung alveolar type II cells. Mechanistically, Irx1 regulates Foxj1 and Sox9 to control cell differentiation during development., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Sox2 marks dental epithelial stem cells (DESCs) in both mammals and reptiles, and in this article we demonstrate several Sox2 transcriptional mechanisms that regulate dental stem cell fate and incisor growth. Conditional Sox2 deletion in the oral and dental epithelium results in severe craniofacial defects, including impaired dental stem cell proliferation, arrested incisor development and abnormal molar development. The murine incisor develops initially but is absorbed independently of apoptosis owing to a lack of progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. Tamoxifen-induced inactivation of Sox2 demonstrates the requirement of Sox2 for maintenance of the DESCs in adult mice. Conditional overexpression of Lef-1 in mice increases DESC proliferation and creates a new labial cervical loop stem cell compartment, which produces rapidly growing long tusk-like incisors, and Lef-1 epithelial overexpression partially rescues the tooth arrest in Sox2 conditional knockout mice. Mechanistically, Pitx2 and Sox2 interact physically and regulate Lef-1, Pitx2 and Sox2 expression during development. Thus, we have uncovered a Pitx2-Sox2-Lef-1 transcriptional mechanism that regulates DESC homeostasis and dental development., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing or financial interests., (© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.)

Protein inhibitors of activated STAT (Pias) proteins can act independent of sumoylation to modulate the activity of transcription factors and Pias proteins interacting with transcription factors can either activate or repress their activity. Pias proteins are expressed in many tissues and cells during development and we asked if Pias proteins regulated the pituitary homeobox 2 (PITX2) homeodomain protein, which modulates developmental gene expression. Piasy and Pias1 proteins are expressed during craniofacial/tooth development and directly interact and differentially regulate PITX2 transcriptional activity. Piasy and Pias1 are co-expressed in craniofacial tissues with PITX2. Yeast two-hybrid, co-immunoprecipitation and pulldown experiments demonstrate Piasy and Pias1 interactions with the PITX2 protein. Piasy interacts with the PITX2 C-terminal tail to attenuate its transcriptional activity. In contrast, Pias1 interacts with the PITX2 C-terminal tail to increase PITX2 transcriptional activity. The E3 ligase activity associated with the RING domain in Piasy is not required for the attenuation of PITX2 activity, however, the RING domain of Pias1 is required for enhanced PITX2 transcriptional activity. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays reveal PITX2 interactions with Piasy and Pias1 in the nucleus. Piasy represses the synergistic activation of PITX2 with interacting co-factors and Piasy represses Pias1 activation of PITX2 transcriptional activity. In contrast, Pias1 did not affect the synergistic interaction of PITX2 with transcriptional co-factors. Last, we demonstrate that Pias proteins form a complex with PITX2 and Lef-1, and PITX2 and β-catenin. Lef-1, β-catenin, and Pias interactions with PITX2 provide new molecular mechanisms for the regulation of PITX2 transcriptional activity and the activity of Pias proteins.

Summary: Ethylene induces anthocyanin biosynthesis in most fruits, including apple (Malus domestica), strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa), and plum (Prunus spp.). However, ethylene inhibits anthocyanin biosynthesis in pear (Pyrus spp.), but the underlying molecular mechanism has not been characterized. In this study, ethylene induced the expression of PpERF105, which encodes a transcription factor. PpERF105 functioned as a transcriptional activator, but it inhibited anthocyanin biosynthesis in pear. A transcriptome analysis revealed that PpERF105 activated the expression of PpMYB140, which encodes an R2R3‐MYB transcriptional repressor. Moreover, PpMYB140 directly inhibited the expression of anthocyanin‐related structural genes. It also competed with PpMYB114 for the binding to bHLH3, ultimately resulting in the formation of the MYB140‐bHLH‐WDR complex rather than the conventional MBW complex, thereby further inhibiting anthocyanin biosynthesis. Furthermore, PpMYB140 prevented the overaccumulation of anthocyanins in the absence of ethylene. Collectively, our study data indicate that ethylene‐induced PpERF105 inhibits anthocyanin biosynthesis by upregulating PpMYB140 expression. Our findings may be useful for elucidating the molecular basis of the ethylene‐mediated inhibition of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruit. Significance Statement: Ethylene induces anthocyanin biosynthesis in most fruits, including apple (Malus domestica), strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa), and plum (Prunus spp.), while it inhibits coloration in red pear (Pyrus spp.) fruit. In the present study, ethylene induced the expression of the transcription factor PpERF105, which activated the expression of PpMYB140, which further inhibited anthocyanin biosynthesis. These findings provide new insights into the molecular basis of the inhibitory effects of ethylene on anthocyanin biosynthesis in red pear fruit and enriches our knowledge about hormone‐regulated anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ethylene induces anthocyanin biosynthesis in most fruits, including apple (Malus domestica) and plum (Prunus spp.). By contrast, ethylene inhibits anthocyanin biosynthesis in pear (Pyrus spp.), but the underlying molecular mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we identified and characterized an ethylene-induced ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR (ERF) transcription factor, PpETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR9 (PpERF9), which functions as a transcriptional repressor. Our analyses indicated PpERF9 can directly inhibit expression of the MYB transcription factor gene PpMYB114 by binding to its promoter. Additionally, PpERF9 inhibits the expression of the transcription factor gene PpRELATED TO APETALA2.4 (PpRAP2.4), which activates PpMYB114 expression, by binding to its promoter, thus forming a PpERF9-PpRAP2.4-PpMYB114 regulatory circuit. Furthermore, PpERF9 interacts with the co-repressor PpTOPLESS1 (PpTPL1) via EAR motifs to form a complex that removes the acetyl group on histone H3 and maintains low levels of acetylated H3 in the PpMYB114 and PpRAP2.4 promoter regions. The resulting suppressed expression of these 2 genes leads to decreased anthocyanin biosynthesis in pear. Collectively, these results indicate that ethylene inhibits anthocyanin biosynthesis by a mechanism that involves PpERF9-PpTPL1 complex-mediated histone deacetylation of PpMYB114 and PpRAP2.4. The data presented herein will be useful for clarifying the relationship between chromatin status and hormone signaling, with implications for plant biology research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doxorubicin (DOX) is a widely used and effective antineoplastic drug; however, its clinical application is limited by cardiotoxicity. A safe and effective strategy to prevent from doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity (DIC) is still beyond reach. Elabela (ELA), a new APJ ligand, has exerted cardioprotective effect against multiple cardiovascular diseases. Here, we asked whether ELA alleviates DIC. Mice were injected with DOX to established acute DIC. In vivo studies were assessed with echocardiography, serum cTnT and CK-MB, HW/BW ratio and WGA staining. Cell death and atrophy were measured by AM/PI staining and phalloidin staining respectively in vitro. Autophagic flux was monitored with Transmission electron microscopy in vivo , as well as LysoSensor and mRFP‐GFP‐LC3 puncta in vitro. Our results showed that ELA improved cardiac dysfunction in DIC mice. ELA administration also attenuated cell death and atrophy in DOX-challenged neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCs). Additionally, we found that ELA restored DOX-induced autophagic flux blockage, which was evidenced by the reverse of p62 and LC3II, improvement of lysosome function and accelerated degradation of accumulated autolysosomes. Chloroquine, a classical autophagic flux inhibitor, blunted the improvement of ELA on cardiac dysfunction. At last, we revealed that ELA reversed DOX-induced downregulation of transcription factor EB (TFEB), and silencing TFEB by siRNA abrogated the effects of ELA on autophagic flux as well as cell death and atrophy in NRCs. In conclusion, this study indicated that ELA ameliorated DIC through enhancing autophagic flux via activating TFEB. ELA may become a potential target against DIC. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alternative splicing (AS) plays a crucial role in plant growth, development and response to various environmental changes. However, whether alternative splicing of MADS-box transcription factors contributes to the flower bud dormancy process in fruit trees still remains unknown. In this work, the AS profile of genes in the dormant flower buds of 'Dangshansu' pear tree were examined. A total number of 3661 alternatively spliced genes were identified, and three mRNA isoforms of the dormancy associated MADS box (DAM) gene, PpDAM1 , derived by alternative splicing, designated as PpDAM1.1 , PpDAM1.2 and PpDAM1.3 , were characterized. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis indicated that AS of PpDAM1 didn't affect the nucleus localization and homo-/heterodimerization of PpDAM1.1, PpDAM1.2 and PpDAM1.3 proteins, but disturbed the translocation of PpDAM1.1/PpDAM1.1, PpDAM1.3/PpDAM1.3, PpDAM1.1/PpDAM1.3, and PpDAM1.2/PpDAM1.3 dimers to the nucleus. Constitutive expression of PpDAM1.2 , but not PpDAM1.1 and PpDAM1.3 , in Arabidopsis retarded the growth and development of transgenic plants. Further comparative expression analyses of PpDAM1.1 , PpDAM1.2 and PpDAM1.3 in the flower buds of 'Dangshansu' and a less dormant pear cultivar, 'Cuiguan', exhibited that the expression of all the three isoforms in 'Dangshansu' were significantly higher than in 'Cuiguan', especially PpDAM1.2 , which showed a predominantly higher expression than PpDAM1.1 and PpDAM1.3 in both cultivars. Our results suggest that alternative splicing of PpDAM1 could play a crucial role in pear flower bud dormancy process. • Three alternative spliced mRNA isoforms of PpDAM1 were detected in pear buds. • Constitutive expression of PpDAM1.2 retarded the growth and flowering in Arabidopsis. • PpDAM1.2 showed higher expression than PpDAM1.1/1.3 in different pear cultivars. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Pp-SNACs, PpNAC88/92/130, were highly expressed during cold, salt and ABA treatment. • Stress-responsive genes, PpCORs/PpRDs/PpKINs, also show abiotic stress responses. • Pp-SNACs have in-vivo and in-vitro transcriptional regulations on PpCOR47/15A/RD29A promoters. • The combination of PpNAC88 and PpNAC130 synergistically regulates the PpCOR15A promoter. • PpNAC88 and PpNAC130 make protein complex during abiotic stress signaling. NAC proteins contribute to regulate diverse plant developmental processes and tolerances to biotic and abiotic stresses. In pear, limited reports are available about the transcriptional regulations of PpNACs during abiotic stress signaling. The transcriptome of Pyrus ussuriensis in response to cold stress (4 °C) for 5 h and 12 h revealed some differentially expressed NAC genes. We found three putative NAC genes, PpNAC88, PpNAC92 , and PpNAC130 , from subgroup-3D (stress responsive NAC subgroup in pear) that were differentially expressed during cold stress in pear. At the same time, RNA-seq of Pyrus betulaefolia under salt stress also revealed high RPKM values of these Pp-NACs. Further, these PpNACs, PpNAC88/92/130, were named Pp-SNACs due to their phylogenetic group with well-known SNACs (stress-responsive NACs) in other crops. qRT-PCR revealed that all Pp-SNACs were significantly and differentially expressed in response to cold and salt stresses, similar to stress-responsive genes, PpCOR47/15A/RD29A/KIN. High transcript abundances of all PpSNACs along with the PpABF2/ABF3/RD29A/COR15A (ABA and stress-responsive genes) were also observed during ABA treatment to both pear calli and explants. Furthermore, luciferase and Y1H assays revealed the transcriptional regulations of Pp-SNACs on PpCOR47/15A/RD29A promoters, while PpNAC88 and PpNAC130 both, in-vivo and in-vitro, can regulate the promoter of PpCOR15A. Conversely, we also found that PpNAC88 and PpNAC130 also make protein complex, and the combination of PpNAC88 and PpNAC130 synergistically regulates the PpCOR15A promoter, which may highlight multidirectional regulations of these Pp-SNACs during abiotic stress in the pear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]