Search

The association of a sigma factor (sigma) with RNA polymerase in bacteria determines its specificity of promoter utilization. To identify amino acid residues in sigma E from Bacillus subtilis that determine the specificity of its interaction with the nucleotides at the -10 region of its cognate promoters, we tested whether base pair substitutions in the -10 region of a sigma B-dependent promoter could signal its utilization by sigma E-RNA polymerase. We found that a combination of base pair substitutions at positions -15 and -14 of the sigma B-dependent ctc promoter resulted in its utilization by sigma E-RNA polymerase in vivo. We also found that the combination of two amino acid substitutions at positions 119 and 120 in sigma E changed its specificity for promoter utilization, resulting in a sigma factor that directed transcription from the sigma B-dependent ctc promoter, but not from sigma E-dependent promoters. These results suggest that amino acid residues at positions 119 and 120 determine, at least in part, the specificity of interactions between sigma E and the nucleotides in the -10 region of its cognate promoters.

In order to determine which amino acyl residues in a secondary sigma factor govern its specificity of recognition at the -35 region of promoters, we examined the effects of amino acid substitutions in sigma E in Bacillus subtilis that made the sequence of its putative -35 recognition region more similar to another sigma factor in B. subtilis, sigma K. We found that a single amino acid substitution at position 217 of sigma E resulted in a sigma factor that could direct transcription from sigma K-dependent promoters. Furthermore, we tested whether this amino acid substitution in sigma E had changed the specificity of interactions of the sigma with -35 region sequences by examining the activity of the mutant sigma E on derivatives of sigma E-dependent promoters that contained single base-pair substitutions. We found that this substitution in sigma E specifically suppressed the effect of a single base-pair substitution at position -31 in a sigma E-dependent promoter spoIIID. The amino acyl residue at another position (219) on sigma E affected the specificity of interaction with position -33 in spoIIID promoter. The amino acyl residues at the two positions in sigma E, 217 and 219, that determine the specificity of interactions between the sigma and base-pairs in the -35 region of its cognate promoters (positions -33 and -31, respectively, in the spoIIID promoter) probably closely contact these base-pairs.

We have examined the role of the most highly conserved region of bacterial RNA polymerase sigma factors by analyzing the effect of amino acid substitutions and small deletions in sigma E from Bacillus subtilis. sigma E is required for the production of endospores in B. subtilis but not for vegetative growth. Strains expressing each of several mutant forms of sigE were found to be deficient in their ability to form endospores. Single amino acid substitutions at positions 68 and 94 resulted in sigma factors that bind with less affinity to the core subunits of RNA polymerase. The substitution at position 68 did not affect the stability of the protein in B. subtilis; therefore, this substitution probably did not have large effects on the overall structure of the sigma factor. The substitution at position 68 probably defines a position in sigma E that closely contacts a subunit of RNA polymerase, while the substitution at position 94 may define a position that is important for protein stability or for binding to core RNA polymerase.

The sigma subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase is required for specific binding to promoters. One region in most sigma factors makes sequence-specific contacts at the -10 region of its cognate promoters. To test the role of the amino acids in this -10 binding region, we examined the effects of 49 single-amino-acid substitutions in sigma E from Bacillus subtilis. We assayed the effect of each amino acid substitution on spore formation because sigma E is essential for endospore formation in B. subtilis. Our results showed that substitutions at several positions, including the highly conserved aromatic amino acid at position 102, had little or no detectable effect. Substitutions at another position, position 117, produced dominant negative mutations; we suggest that these mutations allow RNA polymerase containing the mutant sigma factor to bind specifically to promoters but prevent transcription initiation. Of the recessive defective alleles, those that produced substitutions at positions 113, 115, and 120 produced the most defective sigma factors. These results suggest that the residues at or near these positions in wild-type sigma E play important roles in sigma E function.

During sporulation in Bacillus subtilis, new RNA polymerase sigma factors are produced. These sigma factors direct the transcription of genes that are required for this cellular differentiation. In order to determine the role of each sigma factor in this process, it is necessary to know which promoters are recognized by each sigma factor. The spoIIID gene product plays an important role in the establishment of mother cell-specific gene expression during sporulation. We found that substitution of an alanine at position 124 of the sporulation-specific sigma factor sigma E suppressed the effect of a single-base-pair transition at position -13 of the spoIIID promoter. This alanine substitution in sigma E did not suppress the effect of a transversion at position -12 of the spoIIID promoter. The allele specificity of the interaction between sigma E and the spoIIID promoter is strong evidence that sigma E directs transcription from the spoIIID promoter during sporulation. Position 124 in sigma E is located within a region that is highly conserved among the regions in other sigma factors that probably interact with the -10 regions of their cognate promoters.

The spoIIA operon encodes three genes, including the structural gene for a sporulation-induced sigma factor sigma F. We used deletion analysis of spoIIA-lacZ fusions to define the location of the spoIIA promoter. We found that sigma H-RNA polymerase transcribes spoIIA accurately in vitro and propose that sigma H directs transcription of spoIIA during sporulation.

Bacillus subtilis possesses at least five different forms of RNA polymerase holoenzyme which are distinguished by their sigma subunit and their promoter recognition specificity. Sigma-37 RNA polymerase, a minor form of RNA polymerase, recognizes a class of promoters, which includes promoters for genes transcribed early during endospore formation. We have used site-directed bisulfite mutagenesis to construct a series of single and multiple base substitutions in a promoter recognized by sigma-37 RNA polymerase. In vitro transcription analysis of this series of mutant promoters demonstrated that single base substitutions at positions -36, -16, -15 and -14 most dramatically reduced the efficiency of promoter utilization by sigma-37 RNA polymerase. These results support a model in which sigma-37 RNA polymerase recognizes its cognate promoters by interacting with a sequence of nucleotides near the -10 region and the -35 region of the promoter--a sequence not recognized by B. subtilis sigma-55 RNA polymerase or Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

The RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma H is essential for the onset of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis. sigma H also is required for several additional stationary-phase-specific responses, including the normal expression of several genes that are required for the development of competence for DNA uptake. It is necessary to identify the genes that are transcribed by sigma H RNA polymerase (E sigma H) in order to understand the role of this sigma factor during the transition from exponential growth to stationary phase. Feavers et al. (Mol. Gen. Genet. 211:465-471, 1988) proposed that citG, the structural gene for fumarase, is transcribed from two promoters, one of which (citGp2 [P2]) may be used by E sigma H. It is likely that the citGp2 promoter is used by E sigma H because we found that this promoter was used accurately in vitro by E sigma H and directed expression of xylE in vivo. This xylE expression was dependent on spo0H, the structural gene for sigma H, and was independent of the citGp1 promoter. Comparison of the nucleotide sequences of several sigma H-dependent promoters showed that these sequences were similar at two regions approximately 10 and 35 base pairs upstream from the start points of transcription. These sequences may signal recognition of these promoters by E sigma H. Primer extension analyses were used to examine transcription from three sigma H-dependent promoters during growth and sporulation. The citGp2 promoter appeared to be active during the middle and late stages of exponential growth, whereas activation of the spoIIA promoter was delayed until after the end of exponential growth. Evidently, promoters used by E sigma H can display different temporal patterns of expression.