Search

Maladaptive cortical plasticity has been described in individuals with heroin and methamphetamine addiction and may mediate other substance abuse disorders. It is unknown whether cannabis dependence in humans alters the capacity for induction of cortical plasticity. The aim of this study was to non-invasively investigate cortical plasticity with transcranial magnetic stimulation in young adults who meet DSM-5 criteria for cannabis use disorder (CUD). Thirty men (ages 20- 30) who used cannabis daily over the previous 6 months (15 diagnosed of CUD) and 15 demographically matched non-users were enrolled in this study. All participants underwent two sessions of theta burst stimulation (TBS) in which either continuous TBS (cTBS; 600 pulses, 80% active motor threshold) or intermittent TBS (iTBS; 2-s train of cTBS repeated every 10 s for a total of 190 s, 600 pulses) was applied over the primary motor cortex. The effects of these protocols were assessed by analysing the contralateral motor evoked potentials (MEPs). The relationships between cortical plasticity and problematic cannabis use, degree of dependence, and nicotine addiction were also investigated. Significant MEP inhibition after cTBS was observed in both cannabis users without CUD and non-users, while this inhibition was not seen in cannabis users with CUD. Strikingly, less motor cortical plasticity was observed in subjects with severe problematic cannabis use. No significant differences between users and non-users were found in the iTBS-induced cortical plasticity measures. Our study provides the first evidence of maladaptive cortical plasticity associated with cannabis use disorder and problematic cannabis use in humans., (© 2020 Society for the Study of Addiction.)

Background: The ability to manipulate the excitability of the network between the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and primary motor cortex (M1) may have clinical value., Objective: To investigate the possibility of inducing long-lasting changes in M1 excitability by applying quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (QPS) to the IPL, and to ascertain stimulus condition- and site-dependent differences in the effects., Methods: QPS was applied to M1, the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) and angular gyrus (AG) IPL areas, with the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) in the train of pulses set to either 5 ms (QPS-5) or 50 ms (QPS-50). QPS was repeated at 0.2 Hz for 30 min, or not presented (sham condition). Excitability changes in the target site were examined by means of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)., Results: QPS-5 and QPS-50 at M1 increased and decreased M1 excitability, respectively. QPS at S1 induced no obvious change in M1 excitability. However, QPS at the SMG induced mainly suppressive effects in M1 for at least 30 min, regardless of the ISI length. Both QPS ISIs at the AG yielded significantly different MEP compared to those at the SMG. Thus, the direction of the plastic effect of QPS differed depending on the site, even under the same stimulation conditions., Conclusions: QPS at the IPL produced long-lasting changes in M1 excitability, which differed depending on the precise stimulation site within the IPL. These results raise the possibility of noninvasive induction of functional plasticity in M1 via input from the IPL., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Repetitive application of peripheral electrical stimuli paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of M1 cortex at low frequency, known as paired associative stimulation (PAS), is an effective method to induce motor cortex plasticity in humans. Here we investigated the effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) combined with low frequency rTMS ('magnetic-PAS') on intracortical and corticospinal excitability and whether those changes were widespread or circumscribed to the cortical area controlling the stimulated muscle., Methods: Eleven healthy subjects underwent three 10min stimulation sessions: 10HzrPMS alone, applied in trains of 5 stimuli every 10s (60 trains) on the extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle; rTMS alone at an intensity 120% of ECR threshold, applied over motor cortex of ECR and at a frequency of 0.1Hz (60 stimuli) and magnetic PAS, i.e., paired rPMS and rTMS. We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from ECR and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. We measured resting motor threshold, motor evoked potentials (MEP) amplitude at 120% of RMT, short intracortical inhibition (SICI) at interstimulus interval (ISI) of 2ms and intracortical facilitation (ICF) at an ISI of 15ms before and immediately after each intervention., Results: Magnetic-PAS , but not rTMS or rPMS applied separately, increased MEP amplitude and reduced short intracortical inhibition in ECR but not in FDI muscle., Conclusion: Magnetic-PAS can increase corticospinal excitability and reduce intracortical inhibition. The effects may be specific for the area of cortical representation of the stimulated muscle., Significance: Application of magnetic-PAS might be relevant for motor rehabilitation., (Copyright © 2017 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. All rights reserved.)

Background: Desynchronization of sensorimotor rhythmic activity increases instantaneous corticospinal excitability, as indexed by amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The accumulative effect of cortical stimulation in conjunction with sensorimotor desynchronization is, however, unclear., Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of repetitive pairing event-related desynchronization (ERD) with TMS of the precentral gyrus on corticospinal excitability., Methods: Closed-loop single-pulse TMS was controlled by beta-band (16-22 Hz) ERD during motor-imagery of finger extension and applied within a brain-computer interface environment in eleven healthy subjects. The same number and pattern of stimuli were applied in a control group of eleven subjects during rest, i.e. independent of ERD. To probe for plasticity resistant to depotentiation, stimulation protocols were followed by a depotentiation task., Results: Brain state-dependent application of approximately 300 TMS pulses during beta-ERD resulted in a significant increase of corticospinal excitability. By contrast, the identical stimulation pattern applied independent of beta-ERD in the control experiment resulted in a decrease of corticospinal excitability. These effects persisted beyond the period of stimulation and the depotentiation task., Conclusion: These results could be instrumental in developing new therapeutic approaches such as the application of closed-loop stimulation in the context of neurorehabilitation., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aberrant motor cortex plasticity is hypothesized to contribute to chronic musculoskeletal pain, but evidence is limited. Critically, studies have not considered individual differences in motor plasticity or how this relates to pain susceptibility. Here we examined the relationship between corticomotor excitability and an individual's susceptibility to pain as pain developed, was sustained and resolved over 21 days. Nerve growth factor was injected into the right extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle of 20 healthy individuals on day 0, 2, and 4. Corticomotor excitability, pressure pain thresholds and performance on a cognitive conflict task were examined longitudinally (day 0, 2, 4, 6, and 14). Pain and disability were assessed on each alternate day (1,3…21). Two patterns of motor plasticity were observed in response to pain--corticomotor depression or corticomotor facilitation (P = .009). Individuals who displayed corticomotor depression experienced greater pain (P = .027), and had worse cognitive task performance (P = .038), than those who displayed facilitation. Pressure pain thresholds were reduced to a similar magnitude in both groups. Corticomotor depression in the early stage of pain could indicate a higher susceptibility to pain. Further work is required to determine whether corticomotor depression is a marker of pain susceptibility in musculoskeletal conditions. PERSPECTIVE: This article explores individual differences in motor plasticity in the transition to sustained pain. Individuals who developed corticomotor depression experienced higher pain and worse cognitive task performance than those who developed corticomotor facilitation. Corticomotor depression in the early stage of pain could indicate a higher susceptibility to pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Musculoskeletal pain is associated with altered motor control that, despite short-term benefit, is hypothesised to have long-term consequences, contributing to the development of chronic pain. However, data on how motor control is altered when pain is sustained beyond a transient event are scarce. Here, we investigated motor adaptation, and its relationship with corticomotor excitability, in the transition to sustained muscle pain. Twenty-eight healthy individuals were injected with nerve growth factor into the right extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle on days 0 and 2. Motor adaptation and corticomotor excitability were assessed on day -2, before injection on days 0 and 2, and again on days 4 and 14. Motor adaptation was quantified during a radial-ulnar movement as kinematic variability of wrist flexion-extension and pronation-supination, and as electromyographic (EMG) variability of extensor carpi radialis brevis activity. Pain, muscle soreness, and functional limitation were assessed from days 0 to 14. Pain, muscle soreness, and functional limitation were evident at days 2 and 4 (P < 0.001). Electromyographic variability reduced at days 4 and 14 (P < 0.04), with no change in kinematic variability (P = 0.9). However, data revealed variation in EMG and kinematic variability between individuals: some displayed increased motor variability, whereas others a decrease. Individuals who displayed an increase in EMG variability after 4 days of pain also displayed an increase in corticomotor excitability (r = 0.43, P = 0.034). These findings suggest individual adaptation of the motor system in the transition to sustained pain that could have implications for clinical musculoskeletal pain disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate whether an acute bout of resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) stimulated changes in corticomotor excitability (motor evoked potential; MEP) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and compared the responses to two traditional resistance exercise methods.Ten males completed four unilateral elbow flexion exercise trials in a balanced, randomized crossover design: 1) heavy-load (HL: 80% one-repetition maximum [1-RM]); 2) light-load (LL; 20% 1-RM); and two other light-load trials with BFR applied 3) continuously at 80% resting systolic blood pressure (BFR-C) or 4) intermittently at 130% resting systolic blood pressure (BFR-I). MEP amplitude and SICI were measured using TMS at baseline, and at four time-points over a 60 min post-exercise period.MEP amplitude increased rapidly (within 5 minutes post-exercise) for BFR-C and remained elevated for 60 minutes post-exercise compared with all other trials. MEP amplitudes increased for up to 20 and 40 min for LL and BFR-I, respectively.These findings provide evidence that BFR resistance exercise can modulate corticomotor excitability, possibly due to altered sensory feedback via group III and IV afferents. This response may be an acute indication of neuromuscular adaptations that underpin changes in muscle strength following a BFR resistance training programme.

Background: Pairing peripheral electrical stimulation (ES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) increases corticospinal excitability when applied with a specific temporal pattern. When the two stimulation techniques are applied separately, motor imagery (MI)-related oscillatory modulation amplifies both ES-related cortical effects--sensorimotor event-related desynchronization (ERD), and TMS-induced peripheral responses--motor-evoked potentials (MEP). However, the influence of brain self-regulation on the associative pairing of these stimulation techniques is still unclear. Objective: The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of MI-related ERD during associative ES and TMS on subsequent corticospinal excitability. Method: The paired application of functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscle and subsequent single-pulse TMS (110% resting motor threshold (RMT)) of the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) was controlled by beta-band (16-22 Hz) ERD during MI of finger extension and applied within a brainmachine interface environment in six healthy subjects. Neural correlates were probed by acquiring the stimulus-response curve (SRC) of both MEP peak-to-peak amplitude and area under the curve (AUC) before and after the intervention. Result: The application of approximately 150 pairs of associative FES and TMS resulted in a significant increase of MEP amplitudes and AUC, indicating that the induced increase of corticospinal excitability was mediated by the recruitment of additional neuronal pools. MEP increases were brain state-dependent and correlated with beta-band ERD, but not with the background EDC muscle activity; this finding was independent of the FES intensity applied. Conclusion: These results could be relevant for developing closed-loop therapeutic approaches such as the application of brain state-dependent, paired associative stimulation (PAS) in the context of neurorehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate whether an acute bout of resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) stimulated changes in corticomotor excitability (motor evoked potential, MEP) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and compared the responses to two traditional resistance exercise methods. Ten males completed four unilateral elbow flexion exercise trials in a balanced, randomized crossover design: (1) heavy-load (HL: 80% one-repetition maximum [1-RM]); (2) light-load (LL; 20% 1-RM) and two other light-load trials with BFR applied; (3) continuously at 80% resting systolic blood pressure (BFR-C); or (4) intermittently at 130% resting systolic blood pressure (BFR-I). MEP amplitude and SICI were measured using TMS at baseline, and at four time-points over a 60 min post-exercise period. MEP amplitude increased rapidly (within 5 min post-exercise) for BFR-C and remained elevated for 60 min post-exercise compared with all other trials. MEP amplitudes increased for up to 20 and 40 min for LL and BFR-I, respectively. These findings provide evidence that BFR resistance exercise can modulate corticomotor excitability, possibly due to altered sensory feedback via group III and IV afferents. This response may be an acute indication of neuromuscular adaptations that underpin changes in muscle strength following a BFR resistance training programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Motor cortex excitability was found to be changed after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the temporal cortex highlighting the occurrence of cross-modal plasticity in non-invasive brain stimulation. Here, we investigated the effects of temporal low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex plasticity in a large sample of tinnitus patients. In 116 patients with chronic tinnitus different parameters of cortical excitability were assessed before and after ten rTMS treatment sessions. Patients received one of three different protocols all including 1 Hz rTMS over the left temporal cortex. Treatment response was defined as improvement by at least five points in the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ). Variables of interest were resting motor threshold (RMT), short-interval intra-cortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and cortical silent period (CSP). Results After rTMS treatment RMT was decreased by about 1% of stimulator output nearsignificantly in the whole group of patients. SICI was associated with significant changes with respect to treatment response. The group of treatment responders showed a decrease of SICI over the course of treatment, the group of non-responders the reverse pattern. Conclusions Minor RMT changes during rTMS treatment do not necessarily suggest the need for systematic re-examination of the RMT for safety and efficacy issues. Treatment response to rTMS was shown to be related to changes in SICI that might reflect modulation of GABAergic mechanisms directly or indirectly related to rTMS treatment effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique that modulates the excitability of neurons within the primary motor cortex (M1). Research shows that anodal-tDCS applied over the non-dominant M1 (i.e. unilateral stimulation) improves motor function of the non-dominant hand. Similarly, previous studies also show that applying cathodal tDCS over the dominant M1 improves motor function of the non-dominant hand, presumably by reducing interhemispheric inhibition. In the present study, one condition involved anodal-tDCS over the non-dominant M1 (unilateral stimulation) whilst a second condition involved applying cathodal-tDCS over the dominant M1 and anodal-tDCS over non-dominant M1 (bilateral stimulation) to determine if unilateral or bilateral stimulation differentially modulates motor function of the non-dominant hand. Using a randomized, cross-over design, 11 right-handed participants underwent three stimulation conditions: 1) unilateral stimulation, that involved anodal-tDCS applied over the non-dominant M1, 2) bilateral stimulation, whereby anodal-tDCS was applied over the non-dominant M1, and cathodal-tDCS over the dominant M1, and 3) sham stimulation. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was performed before, immediately after, 30 and 60 minutes after stimulation to elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying any potential after-effects on motor performance. Motor function was evaluated by the Purdue pegboard test. Results: There were significant improvements in motor function following unilateral and bilateral stimulation when compared to sham stimulation at all-time points (all P < 0.05); however there was no difference across time points between unilateral and bilateral stimulation. There was also a similar significant increase in corticomotor excitability with both unilateral and bilateral stimulation immediately post, 30 minutes and 60 minutes compared to sham stimulation (all P < 0.05). Unilateral and bilateral stimulation reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) immediately post and at 30 minutes (all P < 0.05), but returned to baseline in both conditions at 60 minutes. There was no difference between unilateral and bilateral stimulation for SICI (P > 0.05). Furthermore, changes in corticomotor plasticity were not related to changes in motor performance. Conclusion: These results indicate that tDCS induced behavioural changes in the non-dominant hand as a consequence of mechanisms associated with use-dependant cortical plasticity that is independent of the electrode arrangement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Primary motor cortex (M1) is relatively spared in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Objective: Aim of the present study was to investigate whether abnormal M1 synaptic plasticity is present at an early stage of AD. We employed an electrophysiological protocol, named rapid paired associative stimulation (rPAS), involving repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) paired with electrical stimulation of the contralateral median nerve, that modifies corticospinal excitability and short latency afferent inhibition (SAI). Methods: We studied 10 patients with a diagnosis of probable mild AD according to the Mini Mental State Examination score (minimum 21) and 14 age-matched control subjects. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) amplitudes and short-afferent inhibition (SAI) were measured at baseline before and for up to 60 min after 5Hz-rPAS in abductor pollicis brevis (APB). rPAS consisted of 600 pairs of transcranial magnetic stimuli, at a rate of 5 Hz for 2 min, coupled with electrical median nerve stimulation preceding TMS over the contralateral M1 at an inter-stimulus interval of 25 ms. Results: Baseline SAI was significantly reduced in AD patients. In the control subjects rPAS induced a significant increase in MEP amplitudes and a decrease of SAI in the APB muscle persistently for up to 1 h. Conversely 5Hz-rPAS did not induce any significant changes in MEP amplitudes and SAI in mild AD patients. Conclusions: Sensory-motor plasticity is impaired in the motor cortex of AD at an early stage of the disease. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

It is generally accepted that functional properties of the motor cortex in adult humans can be altered through behavioral or pharmacological manipulations, as well as in some pathological conditions. The ability and capacity of adult human cortex to undergo any adaptive or reorganizational changes is referred to as plasticity. Much of the evidence concerning motor cortical plasticity have been derived from studies using the non-invasive technique of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS has proven to be a suitable tool to explore representational plasticity and to interact with neuronal activity in settings of induction protocols either alone or coupled with altered sensory inputs. Furthermore, plastic changes induced by motor learning protocols have attracted particular interest because of their relevance in functional recovery. Recent studies support the view that learning in human motor cortex occurs through long-term potentiation (LTP)-like mechanisms. Purposeful modulation of motor cortical plastic changes by manipulative TMS protocols may offer useful rehabilitative strategies in patients with chronic motor deficits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]